Our Exagmination Round His Factification for Incamination of Work in Progress: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Undid revision 513471583 by 98.177.248.112 (talk) The punctuation was correct - read the inline comment |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The book's contributors were as follows: |
The book's contributors were as follows: |
||
* [[Samuel Beckett]] ("Dante |
* [[Samuel Beckett]] ("Dante... Bruno. Vico.. Joyce"<!-- sic! those periods are correct! See page 3 -->) |
||
* [[Marcel Brion]] ("The Idea of Time in the Work of James Joyce") |
* [[Marcel Brion]] ("The Idea of Time in the Work of James Joyce") |
||
* [[Frank Budgen]] ("James Joyce's ''Work in Progress'' and Old Norse Poetry") |
* [[Frank Budgen]] ("James Joyce's ''Work in Progress'' and Old Norse Poetry") |
||
Revision as of 07:03, 20 September 2012
Our Exagmination Round His Factification for Incamination of Work in Progress is a 1929 collection of critical essays, and two letters, on the subject of James Joyce's book Finnegans Wake, then being published in discrete sections under the title Work in Progress. All the essays are by writers who knew Joyce personally and who followed the book through its development.
The book's contributors were as follows:
- Samuel Beckett ("Dante... Bruno. Vico.. Joyce")
- Marcel Brion ("The Idea of Time in the Work of James Joyce")
- Frank Budgen ("James Joyce's Work in Progress and Old Norse Poetry")
- Stuart Gilbert ("Prolegomena to Work in Progress")
- Eugene Jolas ("The Revolution of Language and James Joyce")
- Victor Llona ("I Dont Know What to Call It but Its Mighty Unlikely Prose")
- Robert McAlmon ("Mr. Joyce Directs and Irish Word Ballet")
- Thomas MacGreevy ("The Catholic Element in Work in Progress")
- Elliot Paul ("Mr. Joyce's Treatment of Plot")
- John Rodker ("Joyce and His Dynamic")
- Robert Sage ("Before Ulysses - and After")
- William Carlos Williams ("A Point for American Criticism")
Two "letters of protest" are also included in the Exagmination, from G.V.L. Slingsby ("Writes a Common Reader") and Vladimir Dixon ("A Litter to James Joyce"). "G.V.L. Slingsby" was the pseudonym of a woman journalist who complained about the difficulty of Work in Progress to Sylvia Beach. Since Joyce wanted the essay collection to contain negative criticism as well as positive, Beach invited the woman to write a pseudonymous article in dispraise of Joyce's new work. The journalist complied, choosing her pseudonym from Edward Lear's poem The Jumblies.[1]
Stuart Gilbert and Sylvia Beach believed that Joyce wrote the second letter of protest himself, as it is addressed to "Mr. Germs Choice" and "Shame's Voice" alternately (two puns on Joyce's name), and the letter itself is written in a pastiche of the punning style that Joyce was then using in his published work.[2] Their assumption, however, was challenged and proven false by the discovery in the late 1970s of a number of books and letters authored by the historical Vladimir Dixon, a minor poet of Russian verse living in America during the 1920s.[3]
See also
References
- ^ Fargnoli, A. Nicholas (1996). James Joyce A to Z: The Essential Reference to His Life and Writings. Ireland: Oxford University Press. p. 206. ISBN 0-19-511029-3.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - ^ Beach, Sylvia (1962). Our Exagminations, etc. New York: New Directions. vii.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|nopp=ignored (|no-pp=suggested) (help) - ^ Goldwasser, Thomas A. (Spring, 1979). "Who Was Vladimir Dixon? Was He Vladimir Dixon?". James Joyce Quarterly. 16 (3): 219–222.
{{cite journal}}:|access-date=requires|url=(help); Check date values in:|date=(help)
 | This article about a non-fiction book is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |