Personal Care Products Council: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rescuing 2 sources, flagging 0 as dead, and archiving 0 sources. #IABot
Line 30: Line 30:


===California Safe Cosmetics Act===
===California Safe Cosmetics Act===
CTFA reportedly spent over $600,000 on lobbyists in [[Sacramento]] in the months before the vote on Senate Bill 484 ([[California Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005]]) to attempt to prevent the bill from passing.<ref name="sfgate1">{{cite web|url=http://www.safecosmetics.org/newsroom/press.cfm?pressReleaseID=13|title=Latest Press Releases|publisher=[http://www.safecosmetics.org/ Campaign For Safe Cosmetics]|date=2005-10-08|accessdate=2007-03-01}} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.breastcancerfund.org/site/pp.asp?c=kwKXLdPaE&b=1104835|title=SB484 - The Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005|publisher=[http://health-fit-blog.blogspot.com.ng/2015/11/best-routine-for-personal-skin-care.html/ Breast Cancer Fund]|accessdate=2007-03-01|date=2006-05-17}} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref>
CTFA reportedly spent over $600,000 on lobbyists in [[Sacramento]] in the months before the vote on Senate Bill 484 ([[California Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005]]) to attempt to prevent the bill from passing.<ref name="sfgate1">{{cite web|url=http://www.safecosmetics.org/newsroom/press.cfm?pressReleaseID=13 |title=Latest Press Releases |publisher=[http://www.safecosmetics.org/ Campaign For Safe Cosmetics] |date=2005-10-08 |accessdate=2007-03-01 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/20060930064900/http://www.safecosmetics.org/newsroom/press.cfm?pressreleaseid=13 |archivedate=September 30, 2006 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.breastcancerfund.org/site/pp.asp?c=kwKXLdPaE&b=1104835 |title=SB484 - The Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005 |publisher=[http://health-fit-blog.blogspot.com.ng/2015/11/best-routine-for-personal-skin-care.html/ Breast Cancer Fund] |accessdate=2007-03-01 |date=2006-05-17 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/20060827091630/http://www.breastcancerfund.org:80/site/pp.asp?c=kwKXLdPaE&b=1104835 |archivedate=August 27, 2006 }}</ref>


===Nanotechnology safety concerns===
===Nanotechnology safety concerns===

Revision as of 10:45, 22 February 2016

Personal Care Products Council (United States)
Formation1894
HeadquartersUnited States Washington, D.C
Membership
Approx. 600 companies
President & CEO
Lezlee Westine
Websitepersonalcarecouncil.org

The Personal Care Products Council (PCPC) was founded in 1894 as the Manufacturing Perfumers' Association. In 1922 it was renamed to the American Manufacturers of Toilet Articles (AMTA) in 1922;[1] in 1970 the association adopted the name Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association;[2] in November 2007, the name was changed to the Personal Care Products Council.

Organizational structure

In April 2009, Lezlee Westine was appointed President and CEO of the Personal Care Products Council replacing interim President, Mark Pollak.[3]

The organization has five main departments:[4]

  • Science: handles research and development.
  • Government Affairs: conducts federal and state lobbying.
  • Global Strategies: monitors and takes action on international cosmetic regulation.
  • Legal and Regulatory: takes appropriate action on court decisions and regulatory agencies.
  • Public Affairs and Communications: communicates industry messages to the media and other stakeholders.

The Personal Care Products Council Foundation works with the American Cancer Society, and the Professional Beauty Association to administer the Look Good Feel Better Program. The program aims to help cancer patients learn skin care and beauty techniques. [5]

Challenges

California Safe Cosmetics Act

CTFA reportedly spent over $600,000 on lobbyists in Sacramento in the months before the vote on Senate Bill 484 (California Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005) to attempt to prevent the bill from passing.[6][7]

Nanotechnology safety concerns

In 2006, Friends of the Earth and International Center for Technology Assessment filed a formal petition with the Food and Drug Administration for better monitoring and regulating of products containing harmful nanoparticles and stated they would sue if the FDA does not take adequate action in 180 days.[8] CTFA vice president spoke out against the petition and stated, "I don't think there's anything to worry about ... All of the safety questions have been answered [in previous studies]."[6]

See also

References

  1. ^ "A Centennial History of CTFA". Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association. 2003. Retrieved 2007-01-16. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help) [dead link]
  2. ^ "A Centennial History of CTFA pg. 3". Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association. 2003. Archived from the original on 2006-09-23. Retrieved 2007-01-16. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  3. ^ http://www.personalcarecouncil.org/newsroom/lezlee-westine-appointed-new-president-ceo-personal-care-products-council
  4. ^ "CTFA Services". Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association. 2003. Archived from the original on 2006-11-06. Retrieved 2007-01-16. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  5. ^ http://www.wbtw.com/story/25056577/beauty-volunteers-train-for-look-good-feel-better-program
  6. ^ a b "Latest Press Releases". Campaign For Safe Cosmetics. 2005-10-08. Archived from the original on September 30, 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-01. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  7. ^ "SB484 - The Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005". Breast Cancer Fund. 2006-05-17. Archived from the original on August 27, 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-01. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  8. ^ Keay Davidson (2006-05-17). "FDA urged to limit nanoparticle use in cosmetics and sunscreens". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2007-04-20.

External links