Personal Care Products Council

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Geraldshields11 (talk | contribs) at 00:22, 10 February 2014 (→‎Organizational structure: Copyedit (minor)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Personal Care Products Council (United States)
Formation1894
HeadquartersUnited States Washington, D.C
Membership
Approx. 600 companies
President & CEO
Mark Pollak
Key people
John Bailey, VP
Websitepersonalcarecouncil.org

The Personal Care Products Council (PCPC) was founded in 1894 as the Manufacturing Perfumers' Association. In 1922 it was renamed to the American Manufacturers of Toilet Articles (AMTA) in 1922;[1] in 1970 the association adopted the name Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association;[2] in November 2007, the name was changed to the Personal Care Products Council.

Organizational structure

In December 2008, Mark Pollak was named interim President after the resignation of President Pam Bailey.[3]

The organization has five main departments:[4]

  • Science Department: research and development.
  • Legislative Departments: state and federal lobbying.
  • International Department: communication, changes in cosmetic regulation and anti-counterfeiting.
  • Legal Department: takes appropriate against court decisions and regulatory agencies.
  • Public Affairs Department: monitors media and distributes information to the media.

PCPC is a not-for-profit 501(c)(6) with 2011 revenue loss of $742,260. It paid it's top 15 executives a total of $5,294,564.00 in 2012. [5]

Challenges

California Safe Cosmetics Act

CTFA reportedly spent over $600,000 on lobbyists in Sacramento in the months before the vote on Senate Bill 484 (California Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005) to attempt to prevent the bill from passing.[6][7]

Nanotechnology safety concerns

In 2006, Friends of the Earth and International Center for Technology Assessment filed a formal petition with the Food and Drug Administration for better monitoring and regulating of products containing harmful nanoparticles and stated they would sue if the FDA does not take adequate action in 180 days.[8] CTFA vice president spoke out against the petition and stated, "I don't think there's anything to worry about ... All of the safety questions have been answered [in previous studies]."[6]

See also

References

  1. ^ "A Centennial History of CTFA". Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association. 2003. Retrieved 2007-01-16. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help) [dead link]
  2. ^ "A Centennial History of CTFA pg. 3". Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association. 2003. Archived from the original on 2006-09-23. Retrieved 2007-01-16. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  3. ^ Newman, Karen A. "What Next for Oral Care?" GCI February 2009. p. 4.
  4. ^ "CTFA Services". Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association. 2003. Archived from the original on 2006-11-06. Retrieved 2007-01-16. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  5. ^ http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2012/131/390/2012-131390920-0965f921-9O.pdf
  6. ^ a b "Latest Press Releases". Campaign For Safe Cosmetics. 2005-10-08. Retrieved 2007-03-01. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help) [dead link]
  7. ^ "SB484 - The Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005". Breast Cancer Fund. 2006-05-17. Retrieved 2007-03-01. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help) [dead link]
  8. ^ Keay Davidson. "FDA urged to limit nanoparticle use in cosmetics and sunscreens". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2007-04-20.

External links