User talk:King of the North East

Archives

Automated message dump
Automated message dump 2
Automated message dump 3
Automated message dump 4
Automated message dump 5
Automated message dump 6
Automated message dump 7

RFA update

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

Template:Fb end

Addressing Concerns

Hi English Peasant, I'd like to address some perceived concerns. The reason I spoke out regarding Mario1987's ban is due to the fact that while he has not always observed policies nor always been accurate in his endeavors, he has shown a will to better the project and has sworn never again to abuse sock puppets, which is the actual reason he was banned. While my personal inclination was to deny this as being motivated by saying whatever is necessary to avoid a ban, I thought it necessary to assume good faith, as per Wikipedia policy. I assure you that I shall be watching him intently, and I've chatted with the unbanning admin regarding him, so if he slips up he'll be done forever.

When I say "return to productive editing." I was trying to be encouraging, and was only supporting the edits that comply with Wikipedia policy. While the user has behaved in a questionable manner in the past, I'd encourage you to give him the benefit of the doubt, at least until he messes up again, as it'll be his last time. Anyway, I hope this clears up some issues. Cheers! --Liempt (talk) 08:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paraguayan football statistics

Hi, first of all thanks for working hard on south american footballers stubs, you're doing a great job (as usual!). As far as the Paraguayan statistics I'm afraid that RSSSF will be your best bet for finding caps and goals at the national team level. As far as club level you just won't find anything, believe me, I've tried so hard to find statistics for Paraguayan players with no luck. The only info I can come up with when creating articles are DOBs and career clubs (usually by Googling or from Diario ABC Color). Regards. Bruno18 (talk) 17:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mario

Hi EP, I just thought I'd give you this little back-and-forth from my talk page so you don't get blind-sided or anything like that:

Sorry to bother but could you please tell me where can i report an user who keeps harassing me about football player articles i've created because he keeps telling me that the articles are misleading, innacurate and other things like that. He sent me many messages and i left a message back to him to erase them all if he is not satisfied, he added PROD tags to many articles and other users didn't agree with him but he dosen't give up. Recently i found this message on a talk page.

I know that my past actions were regretable but this user is just incredible. I hope you can help me. Regards Mario1987 18:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want i can provide many more links to talk pages where the user keeps attacking me. Mario1987 18:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mario. While you have a couple options at your disposal for dealing with repeated abuse, I'd like to suggest a few things first. While a personal attack is a very serious matter, I think it's important to note that English peasant has the best interest of the project at heart, and is simply trying to stay within the guidelines for notability and factual accuracy. While it could be argued that he does so with too much fervor, I believe there are alternatives to reporting him at this stage. One of his major issues was factual accuracy; What I would do in this circumstance is, instead of treating it as an attack against me, treat it as constructive criticism. If I were sure that my articles were factual, in spite of his claim to the contrary, the logical thing to do is reference them! I think in this manner you two could possibly play off each other to build up a strong stream of well referenced articles.

Another major complaint of his is notability. I personally see people who make complaints about the notability of articles as people dedicated to maintaining the quality of the encyclopaedia. When an article of yours goes up for deletion, I'd simply wait for the community decision. If your articles are truly notable, odds are that they shall remain in Wikipedia, as several of them already have. As for these percieved negative comments towards you, I'd suggest honestly to rise above it and ignore them. Try to avoid becoming personally affected and hostile yourself, and keep in mind that many people, including yourself, do questionable things with the quality of the project in mind.

If, after all this, you still feel it necessary to take further action, you have several options at your disposal, most of them within the dispute resolution process. Consider informal mediation or contacting a third party to give a hand. If an attack is extremely disruptive (such as a physical threat or whatever) you have the option of reporting the abuser to the administrator's noticeboard, but I would strongly advise against this as immediate fighting after the release of a ban is not going to look good for you, further, I don't think he really deserves to be reported in any way shape or form. If you're still interested, consider reading the no personal attacks policy, don't call the kettle black and assume good faith

Good luck! I hope you two can resolve your dispute peacefully and work together to build strong football articles, something you both obviously want to do!--Liempt (talk) 20:36, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope he takes my suggestions to heart. Good luck!--Liempt (talk) 20:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ángel Marcos

Hi! I've created this article about former FC Nantes player and coach Ángel Marcos, who was quite successful in France. But I'm not sure of his Argentine clubs/years played/apperances and goals. Could you have a look at the article and correct it if needed, as you seems to love Argentine football.(I understand, many great Argentine players came to France...)Thanks!--Latouffedisco (talk) 18:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!Thanks for improving the article about Angel Marcos! I noticed that it was very hard to find datas about Argentine players, that's a shame, however you can ask me datas for any Argentine player stats in France. No problem, I will ask you to help me when needed, I have some players in my sight...Keep up the good work!--Latouffedisco (talk) 17:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE

Thanks, I'll follow your advice from now on. Do you happen to be an admin? Because I need help in removing the second names in Ezequiel Carlos Maggiolo and Gonzalo Rubén Bergessio articles. Greets. --Fache (talk) 21:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

about La Plata Derby

well, there was a good link in the spanish version of the article, http://www.rsssf.com/tablese/estgim.html

I'll try to find some others good links with statistics.

Bye --Tincho gelp (talk) 22:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guardian stats centre

Hello again. I just found this site a day ago, so I was hoping it would give a reliable source for appearances and goals in a few leagues that are difficult to find (e.g., Argentina, Greece and Portugal). It appears that the site only has tracked the past few seasons and some of the data is slightly different than other sources (e.g., ESPNsoccernet). That said, I think most of the data is accurate and it gives me a chance to find data on some players which I could not otherwise. Thank you for the note and best regards. Jogurney (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you know...

If you know something about colombian football, you must know that the names Atlético Junior and Independiente Santa Fe are absolutely false and wrong, because it was the old names of current Corporación Deportiva Popular Junior and Santa Fe Corporación Deportiva.

You can see it at http://www.dimayor.com.co/club_junior.htm and http://www.dimayor.com.co/club_santafe.htm

Thanks.

--Kok13 (talk) 03:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hypocricy

If you examine your articles on Argentine football players you see words like 'impressive' , 'legend' and 'extraordinary' so to remove any words about Asprilla, clearly an outstanding player is ridiculous. As for the comment on Redondo it was linked to an article (i.e - sourced) so clearly its not only my point of view that he was exceptional. In fact he is one of the best Argentine players of the past 20 years in my view. So basically its pathetic, if you are going to be accusing of no NPOV then first look at your own articles. --JB 16.14pm 13/04/08

Accusing people of Hypocricy isn't going to help if you can't point me to a particular edit of mine stating anything like "greatest ever", "excellent", "brilliant skills" etc. Even though many of the players I write about are in my opinion legendary and excellent, I try to write about them in terms of facts and achievements, not my own point of view. I am not responsible for how other people edit the articles I create afterwards, If I see anyone adding superlatives or speculation I always remove it. This project is meant to be an encyclopaedia, not a sports magazine. English peasant 12:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In order to

Instead, in order to meet Wikipedia:NC#Sports_teams, the articles can be named Santa Fe C.D. or Santa Fe CD and the other as Junior de Barranquilla, not Independiente Santa Fe or Atlético Junior because it was the former names of the clubs. ¿Or you name New York Red Bulls as Metrostars or Torino F.C. as Torino Calcio? It's the same mistake. --Kok13 (talk) 03:50, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make perssonal argues in this discussion, I understand the Wikipedia Politics and also I know that the names Atlético Junior and Independiente Santa Fe are false and wrong, no matters what google says. Wikipedia coud have a sue about this... --Kok13 (talk) 17:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Fe

It appears that the club has a new website at www.santafecd.net, but I agree that the English media (and www.conmebol.com) have not changed their identification of the club. Perhaps we should go with the name Club Santa Fe that is used by www.dimayor.com.co ([1]). I think that may be a common enough name that it can cover Independiente and the current iteration of the club. In any case, a RM is probably the best way to move forward. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 18:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Thank you for the helpful note. I usually try to populate the categories I start, but often get distracted and move on to something else (a bad habit, I know). As you say, populating the categories is a good way to find articles that need help, and I'll try to do a better job of populating any new ones before I forget about them (like I did with San Luis footballers). I've never used the ____ international footballers categories before, but I see they are useful and will add them to the relevant articles. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 16:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Spence

Thanks for the heads up. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 21:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Venezuelan football

Hi. I don';t know if your interest spans other countries in south america, but some of the biggest football stars in Venezuela are still red linked. Would you be interested in adding a few stubs, Venezuela national football team for instance doesn't have any players covered hardly at all ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 17:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah where are you working? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 08:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NN footballers

No, its fine - hitting the delete button on various crap can be very therapeutic :) Plus, from what I've seen, I think you'd make a great admin. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 19:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alberto Fouilloux

Great work on taking the initiative. Selecciones de la Vida (talk) 18:17, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro Carrusca

The guy never played for Treviso, he does not play in Italy any longer. And I really failed to find out more about him, it seems like there's no track of him since he left Treviso this summer. Personally I think the subject fails WP:N per lack of reliable and significant third-party sources, and I didn't even find some evidence he actually played a professional game. --Angelo (talk) 09:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then let's have a try with WP:PROD (that's what I did just now). --Angelo (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anibal Taravini

Hi, sorry to importunate you, but do you have any informations about Aníbal Tarabini who played at 1966 FIFA world cup, in order to create a stub. He played for AS Monaco from 1973 to 75 (13 matches, 5 goals), but all French sources say that he was born on 30 March 1946 whereas all others sources say 4 August 1941. He also played for Union Santa Fé before coming in France. That is very few to create an article, so if you have any informations, you're welcome!Best regards--Latouffedisco (talk) 18:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating a perfect start for this article. Sorry, I didn't mean to force you to create it. I have added some stuffs to the article by the way. Again, best regards--Latouffedisco (talk) 07:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for providing a third party opinion on the Juan Peron article. Appreciated. Bakersville (talk) 00:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi! I have to thank you for this comment you posted in the Mick´s page [2]. I know I have entered the english wikipedia with the "left foot", but belive me, I´m not a bad user. I only try to finish with lies invented by several supporters that are no neutral. If you see the spirit of my contributions, thay are all against the subjetive point of view of many users... I´am neutral, and I was trated badly by many users on their comments. Thank you again for being tolerant. I´m not an english professor, but I can defend myself with this language. At least, I think so...

Your regards, --Ultracanalla (talk) 01:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on my page. But I would note, unless 'neutral', 'lies' and 'invented' have different meanings in Spanish as they do in English, I don't see much hope here. MickMacNee (talk) 02:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, Mick, we must stop with this useless discussion. I prommise i will treat with more respect everybody and I want you to do the same with me, please. I sincerely apologize if I offended you. I´m not a bad user and I only try to help in the football articles. We start again at 0? We all have to give the other cheek!

See you --Ultracanalla (talk) 02:12, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "famous" cheek

I´m not a praticant Christian and I´m not atheist... I only try to express a sensation, but with a touch of sense of hummor. I tried to say that the discussion we had with Mick was not so tremendous to attack each other as we were doing... We should start at 0, and write a new page in this encyclopedia. --Ultracanalla (talk) 03:12, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PC Update

Of course I will update that information in each player, I'm sorry I didn't knew about that, thanks for the information! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bupasival (talk • contribs) 16:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks again for the information, I think I've made the signature in the preferences. Thanks for the help, is difficult to learn everything about wikipedia, but people like you make it much easier! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bupasival (talk • contribs) 21:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Football players stats

Hello again, when I edit the stats of a football player, you told me I had to edit pc update too, but do I have to edit ntupdate too? Thanks again for your help! bupasival (talk) 12:39, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Le Chic

Please, I created this article today http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Chic and they want to delete it, and I don't know why... bupasival (talk) 14:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cookie

Mario1987 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Nicolas Mazzina

Admittedly, I have little knowledge on how youth team football works in South America, but The PFA Premier and Football League Players Records 1946-2005 states "ArYth/Aru21" for his international info. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:21, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE

The best source for Romanian players statistics is by far http://romaniasoccer.uv.ro/ under the Players section. And yes, i do search for more sources when i create football player articles, because i know what i've done with these articles is not a good thing. I will also try to add more sources and update the player profiles i created, because i realised some time ago that you were only trying to help me. Sorry for all the work i made you spend on these articles and i promise i will try to update and check all of them. Cheers!! Mario1987 16:21, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Current squad and Navbox

Hi, and sorry for the late response. In my opinion, your proposal has both pros and cons. The main advantage, as you already noted, is the simplification of the roster editing process. On the other hand, every single football club article should have a corresponding squad template, which is a thing I do not support at all (especially for minor league teams). Virtue is in the middle, as we say in Italy, so a possible solution is to add this support only for major clubs. This is my opinion. --Angelo (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ismael Sosa's image

Isn't no image better than the one in the Ismael Sosa's article? (as a photographer I cringed when I saw it) -- Alexf⁴² 11:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Argentine League titles

I agree with you that the Centenario Cup is a different competition, however the title of the section doesn't say "League Titles", it mentions official competitions by AFA in the Professional Era. Either we change the title, or we recognize whatever the AFA considers official. I see no reason to be more "papist than the Pope." Let me know what you think.Nordisk varg (talk) 18:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I just checked how this page appears in the Spanish Wikipedia. Official championships in the Professional Era are properly categorized; the Centennial Cup appears in its own category, together with two other official AFA cups. All these three are listed in the AFA website among the list of "Argentine Champions of the Professional Era." I suggest we could do the same here in the English Wikipedia.Nordisk varg (talk) 19:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I must say I disagree. We are talking of here of "Argentine First Division champions", so things like Copa Lipton etc are irrelevant because these were international competitions between countries. I think the criterion is simple: the AFA has a section entitled "Argentine First Division Champions." In it, in addition to the League titles, it quotes only three other cups of equal importance, one of them being the Centennial Cup. There's no different section or other cups like the ones you mention. All I'm saying is: 1) either to reproduce the official AFA criterion for what constitutes an "Argentine First Division Champion", or 2) Include a brief link to the proper section for these very unique three Argentine cups, as it is done in the Spanish Wikipedia site. It's not too much to ask.Nordisk varg (talk) 03:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Misquoting and arguing the point that is not being disputed is just distracting, not a replacement for good argument. Your sweeping comment regarding the Copas Lipton etc in your "response" to me is out of place, and clearly is not what I said. Let me try again: the point is very simple. The section we are arguing about is called "Argentine First Division Champions", not "Argentine First Division League Champions." If you add "league", then there's no argument since Gimnasia LP has not won one. However, since the concept of "league" is used in Europe, not in Argentina, the AFA accordingly labels the category as "First Division Champions" plainly. Gimnasia LP is one of those, and that's why it appears in the official list. I just want this article to agree with the AFA information, as it is the case of the one in the Spanish Wikipedia. Otherwise, state that the list in the English version refers to "league titles only." It's that simple.Nordisk varg (talk)04:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We finally agree on something: we are wasting each other's time. Someone made the change I requested to the proper heading of Primera Division Argentina, so this aspect is addressed for the moment to my satisfaction. Still, though the article gives accurate information, it remains incomplete (thus inexact), as anyone checking the AFA site can tell. Hopefully, this will also be corrected soon. Do not assign a "misleading" intention to my corrections; they were an honest entry that was appropriate (to my view) with the heading of the table at the time. After all, none of us should claim to know more about Argentine football statistics than the fellows at AFA, shouldn't we?Nordisk varg (talk) 04:32, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Víctor Trossero

I've created an article about Víctor Trossero. I was wondering if he was related to Enzo Trossero, because they played together at FC Nantes. I have no idea about that, so your help is welcome. Regards.--Latouffedisco (talk) 11:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would be surprising if they were brothers: they were born the same year (1953) with only 5 months between their dates of birth. Maybe they were cousins? Again, regards, and thanks for your investigations.--Latouffedisco (talk) 08:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Pablo Sorin

Hi, I was just wondering why the succession box I created for Argentine captains was removed?

Thanks, Sparrowgoose 16:31, 30 May 2008 (HKT)

Cropped/Altered public domain images

The basics of your question are dealt with in Derivative work - follow some of the inline links for pretty thorough details on the basics offered in the article. SkierRMH (talk) 17:37, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Copa Libertadores

Thanks for your advice, and I've included the relevant information in the article. Maybe you can take a look and see anything wrong or could be improved. Anyway, thanks for your kind help in creating and developing this article. Salt (talk) 04:16, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: adding and removing blank links

Oops! Sorry about missing that. I'll make sure to not do that in the future. Captain panda 02:49, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Navboxes

Hello. There will be a problem here if only a few people will participate. Anyone then can object to the accepted guidelines. Just look how many people voted on recent TFD and how many vote now. I propose some colour bar added to the top of the project talk page and/or the main page there announcing there is a vote about it to attract people to come a help reach a clear consensus. - Darwinek (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even better idea. Feel free to create such a section on the main project page. - Darwinek (talk) 13:45, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, looks great. Hope it will attract more users. - Darwinek (talk) 14:23, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Damián Manso

You're right and thanks for noticing it. Fortunately the histories have been merged since [3], so my mistake is behind us. Also when I did this redirect, I merged the two articles together and I kept the datas from the "old artcle". Best regards.--Latouffedisco (talk) 09:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome and fortunately I'm OK with people pointing my own mistakes. Thanks again, regards.--Latouffedisco (talk) 08:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Football template naming convention

I saw you removed CONEMBOL from the Brazil template for Copa America, and I saw your edit explanation. So I thought I would give my resoning here. All national football templates currently have been using the conferderation in the template title. It is the FIFA World Cup and the UEFA Euro 2008. Adding CONEMBOL is simply following the naming convention. Why is this a bad thing and in need of removal this especially helps when these appear on US or Mexican pages who may also appear in CONCACAF tournaments, not everyone is aware of which tournamnet belongs to which confederation. Please reply here I am monitoring this page Paul Bradbury 21:53, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just find it very distracting, its quite hard to dig out what the template is actually about on the when Copa América is buried between Brazil squad - CONEMBOL and 2007 Winners (8th Title). I thought the reason European Cup was preceded by UEFA is that there are a number of other European Cups and there are also loads of World Cups and Gold Cups. There is only one Copa América of any note, and I guess not many other competitions called African Cup of Nations either, so I would see the inclusion of the confederation name as unnecessary. As for your point about reducing confusion, I disagree, especially since CONMEBOL is not wikilinked and CONMEBOL would surely mean nothing to anyone unfamiliar with what Copa América actually is. E P 22:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I still think I prefer consistency but given there is no consistency in naming convention at the moment anyway and that I buy your second argument, I am willing to bow to your way of doing it. May be worth raising at WP:FOOTY at some point. Paul Bradbury 22:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keeping tabs

Just thought I'd check in on you, see how you were doing. I note that you've abdicated!

Also, you may find this flattering. DS (talk) 00:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2007 Copa América players

Ok, but what about the coaches? I€₣ ^(talk) 23:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Day of Summer!

Category:Croatian-Australian_Socceroos

Hi,

Category:Croatian-Australian_Socceroos has come up for deletion at CfD. As this category was created as a result of this AfD, which you participated in, I thought you might have an opinion on this debate as well. This is a blanket notice that is being sent out to everyone who participated in that AfD. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:23, 13 July 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rec.sport.soccer

Since the nom was amended by an editor other than myself, I have removed the RSSF nom. If you would, please revisit the revised nomination. DarkAudit (talk) 22:44, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Junior Barranquilla?

WTF? how did you come up with that name Junior Barranquilla? should we call REAL MADRID... ROYAL MADRID?????????????? pleasse push for a revert!!! don't come up with that made up bullshit name!

Atlético Junior is the common name!!! no one calls it Junior Barranquilla... maybe Junior de Barranquilla, but never something such name OMG.. that was just product of pure ignorance.. Cheers --76.19.149.244 (talk) 01:36, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THAT WEBSITE HAS A TYPOOOOOOOO!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.149.244 (talk) 01:42, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I was quite happy with the article being called Atlético Junior, but one user (Kok13) kept moving it to Corporación Deportiva Popular Junior which I have never seen or heard anywhere outside Wikipedia. If you don't like the way it is now Ask for it to be moved to another name. E P 08:08, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Junior Barranquilla Oficial website E P 08:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

La Guerra Gaucha

Hi I';ve begun work on La Guerra Gaucha which is a featured article on spanish wiki. Could you help me translate the article? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 20:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I not exactly what you'd call advanced either. I have no trouble translating some articles like Culture of El Salvador which I did earlier but this ones a bit harder to comprehend. I thought an FA article on an argentine film on spanish wiki was quite expectional so if we can even get a GA eventually for one on here this would be something. Enjoy the summer! ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 20:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't it be nice to see this in English!! ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 20:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:9dJMorteros.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:9dJMorteros.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: This

Please WP:AGF in the future. There was no need to be that aggressive with editors who are trying to build articles that you've created. Rather than pointing out mistakes in the future, why not help editors work to avoid them in the future? I'm sure we can all create a more harmonious environment here on Wikipedia if we all work together to help each other :-) Thanks for taking the time to read this, friend. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 13:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how pointing out mistakes is assuming bad faith, I did not accuse Enigmaman of bad faith, merely pointed out the minor mistakes they had made. I also reject your assertion that I was aggressive, terse perhaps, but I assumed from the length of their talkpage and the barnstar about 2 posts above my own that I was speaking to an established editor, who should be able to handle another editor pointing out their (minor) mistakes as I certainly would. Perhaps I should have told them how much I appreciate their effort to improve Wikipedia coverage of Argentine football before pointing out their mistakes, I shall apologise forthwith. E P 21:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks. That would've been simply sweet. Cheers mate :-) Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 21:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Wow

Don't be fooled by the number! Most are Rollbacks and minimum editions. That really doesn't take much time. I decided I could spend 1 or 2 hours a day again after almost 2 years pause; at least while I don't have that much extra work. See you 'round! Mariano(t/c) 09:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notable former players discussion

User:Fasach_Nua has opened up this discussion Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Notable_former_players_list which you should voice your opinion on. I'm ambivalent at this point. -- Alexf⁴² 22:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see you had commented already. -- Alexf⁴² 22:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you have gathered, I find the sections useful and informative, I believe it is important to establish a methodology and consensus to improve these sections, in order to stop the edit warring and bickering on the subject. Many such attempts to establish consensus have failed on much more tedious and trivial issues, such as whether to include F.C. in the infobox header, so there is little realistic prospect of success. I still want to try though. Keep in touch mate. E P 22:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 19:21, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

Roll call and Coordinator nominations

It's that time of year again – we're wiping everyone's name off of the active members list and doing a project roll call. Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. You can also add your name to any of our many task forces!

It's also time to start the WikiProject Films coordinator selection process! We are aiming to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 07:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:35, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Template to be deleted

Done. Mariano(t/c) 07:26, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agustín Pelletieri

Please help monitor the article Agustín Pelletieri. There have been tons of edits lately (probably by the same person), who keeps changing his birthday from 1982 to 1983 (not true according to the sources), says that he's played in major international tournaments for Argentina (definitely not true), and links him to various clubs (not even appear to be legit "rumours"). I've also removed the part about him being capped at the under-20 level; while I cannot prove that's incorrect, no sources are given either. You can add it back if that turns out to be true. Chanheigeorge (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE

Thanks, and congratulations for your work in all Argentine-related football articles. I'm sorry I'm having less time to edit these days but I'll try to keep helping with the easiest stuff (updating squads). Greets. Fache (talk) 20:29, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dab Page

The reason I removed the link is that I'm currently working to make that disambiguation page redundant. It is a high priority on the list to remove unnecessary disambiguation pages. "European Cup" is a term which should not link to anywhere as it is too unspecific. if people with to use the term "European Cup" then it should be by directing it to the specific tournament they are referring to...or if they mean just generic European Cups then it shouldn't be wiki-linked at all. I'll leave it to you to remove the link for now, but if it's still there when I'm finished working my way through the list then I'll remove it again. Thanks djdannyp 08:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!

Roll call and Coordinator nominations

The September 2008 WikiProject Films coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of candidates. Additionally, we are keeping nominations open during the voting period, in case any additional editors wish to nominate themselves. Please vote here by September 28!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bicycle kick

Is there any way that you can review the article, I have a concern with the overall length and validity of the Peruvian claim section, and neutral editors are needed for assistance. Selecciones de la Vida (talk) 16:36, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lima Cricket & Football Club

Let me permit the writing of this message involve quoting what you stated and me giving a reply to each of your statements:

"The institution may have been founded in 1845 but reference 4 gives a date of 1893 which post dates many south american teams."

The source that states "the club" was originally founded in 1845 clearly defines the name of the organization at that point as "Salon de Comercio." The same source also states it acted as a sports organization, but it did not mention any specific sports or if they had an official sort of team. Similarly, neither did I state they did when I wrote it in the article.

The date of reference 4 that claims 1893 might as well be considered incorrect. According to the official Lima Cricket website, they were founded in 1859. The "Salon de Comercio" of 1845 was pretty much, in other words, what served as the base for the future creation of Lima Cricket (therefore still important to mention of its prior existance). Now, that does not mean reference 4 is completely incorrect. Since Lima Cricket's official website is a superior source, it simply means that the date in "reference 4" is not correct.

"Please do not re-add the information without providing a reliable source that football was played here before 1867."

According to the official Lima Cricket website, they have a sports foundation of football, rugby, and cricket starting from the year 1859. That is the most reliable source that you'll ever find on the matter.

"Simply taking the foundation date of the institution is not acceptable, doing this would make the institution the oldest football club in the world predating the officially recognised oldest club Sheffield F.C. by 12 years."

You're incorrect. Sheffield was founded in 1857. Lima Cricket was "founded" in 1859.

If you wish to continue the discussion, feel free to do so using my talk page. On the other hand, if you find what I'm stating an understandable response, then please re-include the information you deleted from the article.--MarshalN20 (talk) 23:07, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This reliable source states that the first recorded game of football in Peru occurred in 1892. The Lima Cricket and Football Club‎ website is non-nuetral,therefore less reliable that the neutral source. if you wish to use the Lima Cricket and Football Club article to boast about football in Peru predating football elsewhere on the continent plaese find a relaible source that gives an account of a football match played in Peru before 1867. E P 23:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"The Lima Cricket and Football Club‎ website is non-nuetral,therefore less reliable that the neutral source."

The Lima Cricket and Football Club is an organization of much prestige in Peru. In their website they state that they have documentation that certifies their claim that in 1859 they were a club that practiced football, rugby, and cricket. If such a thing were false, then the Peruvian government would have already fined them for lying.

Furthermore, if according to the other websites of the other football clubs they were founded on the dates they said they were founded, their claims are just as valid as that of Lima Cricket's 1859 date.

"if you wish to use the Lima Cricket and Football Club article to boast about football in Peru predating football elsewhere on the continent plaese find a relaible source that gives an account of a football match played in Peru before 1867."

According to the book you cite, the first recorded football match happened in 1867. In that same book they never state that this was the first football match. They simply state that it was the "first recorded." I'm sure you know enough about the English language to know the difference between both things.--23:46, 25 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MarshalN20 (talk • contribs)

You clearly believe that you own the Peru section of the Bicycle Kick article constantly reverting other peoples edits. The long section you keep reinserting adds nothing to the article, it just fills out the section, there is no equivelent on the origins of football in Italy, the oldest club in Italy the most important seaport in Italy, etc. The the Italian claim is clearer and more consise for the ommission of such needless information.
You left this on my talkpage, it is misleading According to the book you cite, the first recorded football match happened in 1867. In that same book they never state that this was the first football match. They simply state that it was the "first recorded." I'm sure you know enough about the English language to know the difference between both things. The book I cited actually stated "soccer arrived in Peru in the 1880s aboard an english ship", "the first recorded football match took place in 1892" and "In 1893 two exclusive soccer clubs were formed, Lima Cricket and Football Club.... and Unión Cricket". This contradicts your wishful interpretation of what the book says.
Whenever someone makes changes you dont like, you revert without discussion, make false accusations of vandalism and/or rant on their talkpages instead of trying to engage anyone in discussion you tell them that they are wrong, misquoting or misinterpreting things in the process see point 2. Your manner is confrontational and patronising. Please read up on Wikipedia policies such as WP:CON, WP:CIVIL, WP:3RR, WP:SOCK and WP:SELFPUB.

-E P 23:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look, you little insignificant worm. My contributions to Wikipedia are simply aimed at improving the quality of this website and at providing factual information in order to uncover the truth out of controversial topics. Nonetheless, after all the hard work I do to improve articles, gather sources, gather pictures, and all other sort of information; I end up getting back-handed by a bunch of imbeciles that, like you, think you're some sort of "bad boys" of Wikipedia and that with your self-given title of "respected editors" you can and have a right to act as if you were professionals of this website. I do not have to bow down to any of your stupid comments that try to make me seem as if I was some biased freak. Also, I have every single God-given right to state the information I provide to Wikipedia is information that I gathered. I am the one that has taken the time to search throughout the internet for sources, for information, and for other things important and relevant to the section. Still, if I dare mention that I am the provider of such sources I get blamed of being selfish and, yet again, a biased freak. Yet, to further contribute to the irony of things, in the Bicycle Kick article I get attacked by a biased group of people led by a guy from Chile that firmly believes that the bicycle kick was invented in Chile and that the Peruvian claim holds no foundation and is a piece of crap. If you take some time to read the article you'll see the user "Selecciones de la Vida" is the biased person that has been constantly attacking the Peruvian section. Still, you take sides with him to work against the Peruvian section under the claim that it is "too long" and "unecessary." Without trying to make a direct comparisson, it would be like saying some sections in the Bible are longer than others and therefore should be truncated in order to fit the size of the other sections! But you know what, I really do have better things to do than to argue with you or any other of the "respected editors" of Wikipedia (the free encyclopedia). I already did as much as a "biased freak" like me can apparently do in the article before the "respected editors" gang up on me. I really do hope you someday understand the mistake you're making. Until then, happy editings "respected editor."--MarshalN20 (talk) 16:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly didn't read WP:CIVIL did you? E P 22:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

lol. "Respected Editor," if you think I've insulted you in the past post, then you certainly have never been truly insulted by anyone. That probably must have come as your all-might status as a "Respected Editor" and how people supposedly tremble before you. I'm not apologizing for what I wrote, because I don't have to show any sort of respect to people who don't show any respect to me either. FYI, I've also done a series of contributions to Wikipedia, and yet I don't go into other people's talk pages with the "airs of the high and mighty" and disrespect them for the sake of proving my point. Of course, with you thinking of yourself as a "Respected Editor," it must be very hard for you to understand the concept of respect to others below your "rank in British society." lol.--MarshalN20 (talk) 12:46, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you re-read what I said, Mariano, Nanonic and Selecciones are the respected editors, please ensure that you actually understand what people are saying before you start ranting on. If you have nothing but barely comprehensible drivel and weak insults to offer in defence of your position, I recomend that you keep quiet. Now could you please desist from drivelling on my talkpage. Thank you. E P 13:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(As written by English peasant): "If you re-read what I said, Mariano, Nanonic and Selecciones are the respected editors, please ensure that you actually understand what people are saying before you start ranting on." lol. (My Reply): Okay, go ahead with your little Mafia, "Respected Editors."--MarshalN20 (talk) 15:11, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and just so you know, the respected editor "Selecciones de la Vida" at several points decided to use his IP address (instead of his username) to act as a different person. This went on to the point that his IP address was temporarily banned due to vandalism in the article. Now, if that's what you consider a "Respectable Editor," then that just simply shows how much you know about this. Here's the IP Address that he uses to act as a secondary person: 96.242.82.74. Look for it in the Bicycle Kick discussion and you'll even find that he had the indecency to use it directly against me. So much for "respectable." lol.--MarshalN20 (talk) 16:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop hurling around unsubstantiated allegations. If you suspect misconduct you should provide diffs as evidence and if you suspect sock-puppetry you should Request checkuser. Making unsubstantiated allegations, being rude, aggressive, sarcastic and misrepresenting other peoples intentions do nothing but damage your argument further. Have you nothing better to do here than post on my talkpage? E P 19:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How childish of you. If we're holding a discussion, obviously I must post in your talk page. For a "respected editor" you certainly don't know how to hold a discussion. If you don't want people posting discussions in your talk page then go talk about it with the real Wikipedia administrators, as apparently "respected editors" such as yourself don't hold anymore power than simple old me.--MarshalN20 (talk) 23:36, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nereo Champagne

Hi! His career stats in the infobox starts when he was 22 years old, do you have access to any info before 2007? Thanks, Punkmorten (talk) 17:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:Current squad / navbox

Hm, looks like a good idea, though not that simple to implement. I'm currently kinda bussy, but I'll try to do something about ASAIC. Take care, Mariano(t/c) 20:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current squad / navbox template

In response to your request at Wikipedia:Requested templates #Current squad / navbox, I have put put together something similar to what you wanted. It allows the creation of a football squad template that can be displayed as a table (for transclusion in team articles) or as a navigation box (for transclusion in player articles). Here's an example of how it will work:

{{Arsenal de Sarandí squad|format=table}}

User:Zyxw/Arsenal de Sarandí squad

{{Arsenal de Sarandí squad|format=navbox}}

User:Zyxw/Arsenal de Sarandí squad I designed it using a multiple template format similar to the existing table templates ({{fb start}}, {{football squad player}}, etc.) and navbox templates {{{football squad}}, {{football squad2 player}}, etc.). I'm still tinkering with it, but I will let you know when it is live and ready to use. -- Zyxw (talk) 07:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Centenario Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Centenario Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SARCHACO.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:SARCHACO.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GyTSalta.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:GyTSalta.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Comunicaciones.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Comunicaciones.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Deportivo merlo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Deportivo merlo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:33, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CDmoron.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CDmoron.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:33, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Berazategui Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Berazategui Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Gen Lamadrid.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gen Lamadrid.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dep Riestra.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dep Riestra.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ferro Carril Urquiza Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ferro Carril Urquiza Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ferro Carril Midland Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ferro Carril Midland Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Loma Negra Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Loma Negra Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CipollettiLogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CipollettiLogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CANunorco.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CANunorco.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Depespaniol g.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Depespaniol g.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CAdelaJA.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CAdelaJA.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Guarani AF.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Guarani AF.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BocaUnidos.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:BocaUnidos.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Club tiro federal.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Club tiro federal.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Racing cordoba.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Racing cordoba.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dock sud.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dock sud.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CSYDSNBurzaco.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CSYDSNBurzaco.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CD Coreano.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CD Coreano.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Deportivo Guaymallen Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Deportivo Guaymallen Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CD Juventud Unida Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CD Juventud Unida Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:La Emilia Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:La Emilia Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Concepcion FC Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Concepcion FC Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HuracanBs As.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:HuracanBs As.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Independiente LR Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Independiente LR Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cruciero del Norte Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cruciero del Norte Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CA Puerto Nuevo Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CA Puerto Nuevo Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Independiente Neuquen.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Independiente Neuquen.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:34, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bella Vista BB Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bella Vista BB Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Arsenal de Sarandi.GIF)

Thanks for uploading Image:Arsenal de Sarandi.GIF. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Altos Hornos Zapla.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Altos Hornos Zapla.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GrupoUniversitario.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:GrupoUniversitario.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Deportivo Maipu.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Deportivo Maipu.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CentralCordoba(SdE).gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CentralCordoba(SdE).gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CAALOGO.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CAALOGO.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lugano Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lugano Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Defensores Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Defensores Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DepMadryn.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:DepMadryn.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]