User talk:David Shankbone: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 15: Line 15:
:: Viridae would appear to be correct. [http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb311/Kato90125/somey.jpg Here's] what a "proper" one seems to look like (tks, Kato ;) ) - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 06:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
:: Viridae would appear to be correct. [http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb311/Kato90125/somey.jpg Here's] what a "proper" one seems to look like (tks, Kato ;) ) - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;cursor:help">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 06:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
:::Jorge isn't a moderator there, so he wouldn't see a moderator screen. --<font color="#0000C0">David</font> '''[[User:David Shankbone|<font color="#0000C0">Shankbone</font>]]''' 06:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
:::Jorge isn't a moderator there, so he wouldn't see a moderator screen. --<font color="#0000C0">David</font> '''[[User:David Shankbone|<font color="#0000C0">Shankbone</font>]]''' 06:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
::::Are you actually using ED as the source for an assertion of fact? I don't even think that makes any sense whatsoever, and I'm one of those arguing strenuously against the link ban for that site. The things you're citing have been asserted to be forged, and given ED's love of photoshopping images, that's a more credible assertion than yours. [[User:Dtobias|*Dan T.*]] ([[User talk:Dtobias|talk]]) 11:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC):What a fantastic example of your journalistic integrity David. <small>'''[[User:Naerii|<font face="verdana" color="#CC0099">naerii</font>]] - [[User talk:Naerii|<font face="verdana" color="#CC0099">talk</font>]]'''</small> 11:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
::::Are you actually using ED as the source for an assertion of fact? I don't even think that makes any sense whatsoever, and I'm one of those arguing strenuously against the link ban for that site. The things you're citing have been asserted to be forged, and given ED's love of photoshopping images, that's a more credible assertion than yours. [[User:Dtobias|*Dan T.*]] ([[User talk:Dtobias|talk]]) 11:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
:What a fantastic example of your journalistic integrity David. <small>'''[[User:Naerii|<font face="verdana" color="#CC0099">naerii</font>]] - [[User talk:Naerii|<font face="verdana" color="#CC0099">talk</font>]]'''</small> 11:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:57, 17 May 2008

Encyclopedia Dramatica, Somey, the Wikipedia Review, Daniel Brandt and Newyorkbrad

File:Newyorkbad.jpg
The main screenshot. To see the others, go to Encyclopedia Dramatica.

The screenshots uploaded on Encyclopedia Dramatica's Wikipedia Review article that show Somey and Daniel Brandt tracking Newyorkbrad's IP address at his Manhattan law firm, as well as the IP addresses of other users there, were supplied to me separately by Jorge at the Wikipedia Review, who is a member in good standing. Additionally, Jorge passed along a threat from Somey to me:

I'm going to politely ask, just this once, that you not tempt me to take this any further than necessary. Also, why don't you tell your little friend Dave that I know where he's doing his internship, and I doubt the folks there would appreciate what he's been doing via their servers. Got it? I am FUCKING TIRED of this."

If they are forgeries, they were not done by me. What they show is that Somey has been tracking people's IP addresses and sharing the information, and is willing to use it. I hope that makes the people who post there feel good. Additionally, I forwarded all e-mails to members of the press, including Cade Metz at The Register and Seth Finkelstein at The Guardian, along with the screenshots, as well as to the Wikipedia Cyberstalking group that includes the Trustees of the Foundation and trusted users. --David Shankbone 05:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David thats fake - there are certain things in the interface that mods see that noone else can - they don't appear on that page. ViridaeTalk 06:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and the image is deleted - cant claim fair use for an image not used in the mainspace. ViridaeTalk 06:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Viridae would appear to be correct. Here's what a "proper" one seems to look like (tks, Kato ;) ) - Alison 06:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jorge isn't a moderator there, so he wouldn't see a moderator screen. --David Shankbone 06:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are you actually using ED as the source for an assertion of fact? I don't even think that makes any sense whatsoever, and I'm one of those arguing strenuously against the link ban for that site. The things you're citing have been asserted to be forged, and given ED's love of photoshopping images, that's a more credible assertion than yours. *Dan T.* (talk) 11:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What a fantastic example of your journalistic integrity David. naerii - talk 11:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]