Talk:Kasivisvesvara Temple, Lakkundi: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tag: |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{dyktalk|24 August|2008|entry=... that [[shrine]]s dedicated to the [[Hinduism|Hindu]] sun god [[Surya]] usually face east, but the one at the '''[[Kasivisvesvara temple, Lakkundi|Kasivisvesvara Temple]]''' in [[Lakkundi]], [[Karnataka]] faces west?|views=933}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|||
{{WikiProject India|importance=low |
|||
|karnataka=yes |
|||
|karnataka-importance=low |
|||
}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Sentence wording== |
==Sentence wording== |
||
Re: The article sentence ''Above the cornice, seemingly detacted from the cornice is a procession of men and animals.'' I'm not sure what ''detacted'' is supposed to mean. ''Detached''? Still hard to understand if so. In addition, the sentence is awkward with the repeated ''cornice'' and possibly a missing comma. |
Re: The article sentence ''Above the cornice, seemingly detacted from the cornice is a procession of men and animals.'' I'm not sure what ''detacted'' is supposed to mean. ''Detached''? Still hard to understand if so. In addition, the sentence is awkward with the repeated ''cornice'' and possibly a missing comma. |
||
Latest revision as of 21:46, 24 January 2024
 | A fact from Kasivisvesvara Temple, Lakkundi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 933 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Sentence wording[edit]
Re: The article sentence Above the cornice, seemingly detacted from the cornice is a procession of men and animals. I'm not sure what detacted is supposed to mean. Detached? Still hard to understand if so. In addition, the sentence is awkward with the repeated cornice and possibly a missing comma.
- yes, its detached. Spelling error. What the author meant was that the sculptures described are actually sculptured out of the same piece of material as the cornice, but are so finely done that they seem to be independent and just placed or glued on the cornice.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 19:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)