Talk:University of Belgrano: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
¿que mierda les pasa? ¿no quieren reconocer que la UB VENDE títulos? |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WPArgentina}}, {{WikiProject Universities}}. Tag: |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader}} |
{{talkheader}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub| |
|||
{{WikiProject Argentina|importance=mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Higher education}} |
|||
}} |
|||
The poor quality of the institution is an issue that should be in the article.--[[User:PortoPuto|PortoPuto]] 22:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC) |
The poor quality of the institution is an issue that should be in the article.--[[User:PortoPuto|PortoPuto]] 22:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Regardless of the alleged university quality, Wikipedia is '''NOT''' the best place to include that kind of statements. Also your username can be considered offensive, so please change it or you'll blocked. --< |
:Regardless of the alleged university quality, Wikipedia is '''NOT''' the best place to include that kind of statements. Also your username can be considered offensive, so please change it or you'll blocked. --<span style="font-family:Lucida Blackletter;"><span style="font-size:large;">[[User:COA|<span style="color:black;">COA</span>]]</span></span> 22:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
::I think that it should be written in the article. |
::I think that it should be written in the article. |
||
::By the way, I've changed my username as you requested. --[[User:PortoPuto|PortoPuto]] 22:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC) |
::By the way, I've changed my username as you requested. --[[User:PortoPuto|PortoPuto]] 22:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
:::Are you kidding? Your username looks exactly the same. This is your last warning. Please stop vandalizing or you'll be blocked. --< |
:::Are you kidding? Your username looks exactly the same. This is your last warning. Please stop vandalizing or you'll be blocked. --<span style="font-family:Lucida Blackletter;"><span style="font-size:large;">[[User:COA|<span style="color:black;">COA</span>]]</span></span> 22:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
::::What's your problem. Did you '''buy''' a degree in this university? --[[User:PortoPuto|PortoPuto]] 22:55, 6 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Quality discussion== |
|||
:::::[[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|30px]] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] a page, you ''will'' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- {{test4}} (Fourth level warning) --> --<font face="Lucida Blackletter"><font size="+1"><font color="black">[[User:COA|COA]]</font></font></font> 23:14, 6 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Just saying the quality is bad, or "some people say that" is a opinion, and uncited and unverifable opinions are discouraged. However, if you can find a source that describes the universtiy in this way, then that's fine. The difference is between |
|||
* "Some people say X is bad" - claim has no source, can't be verified - and see [[Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words]] |
|||
* "Paper X[link] described X as bad" - verifible, source is cited and named. |
|||
Hope that helps. [[User:MartinRe|MartinRe]] 00:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Please read this before editing the article== |
|||
Recent vandalism in this article has been unstoppable, please discuss changes here before editing the article. All edits with no consensus will be considered vandalism and removed without any advise. Thanks. --[[User:OneEuropeanHeart|OneEuropeanHeart]] 22:16, 21 February 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:23, 10 February 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the University of Belgrano article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
The poor quality of the institution is an issue that should be in the article.--PortoPuto 22:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- Regardless of the alleged university quality, Wikipedia is NOT the best place to include that kind of statements. Also your username can be considered offensive, so please change it or you'll blocked. --COA 22:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- I think that it should be written in the article.
- By the way, I've changed my username as you requested. --PortoPuto 22:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- Are you kidding? Your username looks exactly the same. This is your last warning. Please stop vandalizing or you'll be blocked. --COA 22:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Quality discussion[edit]
Just saying the quality is bad, or "some people say that" is a opinion, and uncited and unverifable opinions are discouraged. However, if you can find a source that describes the universtiy in this way, then that's fine. The difference is between
- "Some people say X is bad" - claim has no source, can't be verified - and see Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words
- "Paper X[link] described X as bad" - verifible, source is cited and named.
Hope that helps. MartinRe 00:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Please read this before editing the article[edit]
Recent vandalism in this article has been unstoppable, please discuss changes here before editing the article. All edits with no consensus will be considered vandalism and removed without any advise. Thanks. --OneEuropeanHeart 22:16, 21 February 2006 (UTC)