User talk:Carbon-16
/Archive 1 |
1. Be as insulting as you like. I love it. - However, I allow this primarily in the interest of humor (see "Faggot" in ye olde archive one). Unfunny, obviously non-GF (personal attacks, etc) will be removed.
2. If your article was tagged for speedy deletion, read the edit summary or the speedy deletion tag. - Please, before asking here, look there. It'll save you time and headache, and it'll have links to rules that take me a while to find.
3. I will reply on my user talk page for the most part. - I don't like having to go to one talk page to write and another to respond. While this is somewhat easier with tabs in Firefox, it's a hassle to have to switch back and forth.
MSN
Hey dude, I saw you have MSN (on your userpage). My details are on my talk page, if you wanna add me. Cheers, Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you. If they vandalise I'll be sure to report them soon enough! Auroranorth (sign) 11:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Afds
Dude I really read all the articles and thought they were good. That's why they should be kept, hey. Dude Wikipedia needs good articles ergo I must vote Keep in Afds when they are like gonna be deleted. Love to ya and all, it were not spam dude sup. 203.220.107.23 11:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- The thing is, AfD is a discussion, not a vote. You have to specify why you think an article is "good" because just saying it is provides no context or information for the person who makes the final decision (the closing admin). If I say "this article is good because it is well-sourced, is notable, and is free of bias" that is much more helpful than "this article is good" and it's much more likely to be given appropriate weight by the closing admin! -Wooty [Woot?] [Spam! Spam! Wonderful spam!] 11:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)