Talk:Jessica Alba

; Archives
	17 April 2005 - 23 December 2007;

Mexico Unassessed

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skip to table of contents

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Comics B‑class Mid‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jessica Alba article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

How the heck is there nothing in this article about the scientific study that proved the perfection of her hip movement? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.216.61 (talk) 00:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this keep getting removed? This was an actual research result froma team of mathematicians at Cambridge. [1]

Americans of French Canadian descent

Given that she's already been put down in the French Americans list through her mother and her mother's from Canada, is it reasonable to also add her to the Americans of French Canadian descent list [2] as Angelina Jolie is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.110.92 (talk) 06:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warren

{{editprotected}} re-link Cash Warren - User:Nightscream keeps unlinking him because he "does not have his own article", which is not a valid reason according to WP:RED unless he never will — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.216.61 (talk • contribs)

Done. east.718 at 23:24, January 15, 2008

Nothing I see at Wikipedia:Red link provides a rationale for wikilinking Cash Warren. The Intro of that policy page states: "Red links should not be created for topics that will never have articles, such as a celebrity's romantic interest (who is not a celebrity in his or her own right).. Conversely, I don't see anything listed further below in that page that would justify redlinking him. Alba may be noteworthy, but her fiancee and father of her child is not. One day, if that changes, then he may merit his own article. Until then, there no reason to wikilink him, and east718 has indicated on my Talk Page that I disagree with redlinking him, then I should revert it. I am doing so, and unless and until someone creates an article for him with info other than just his relationship to Alba, please do not revert it again. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 06:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

are you sure he does not qualify? he has been on oprah and has a famous parent as well. but more to the point, I primarily objected to your rationale, not to the unlinking itself. I will leave whether he should be linked or not up for debate, but your edit was made on the basis of an invalid argument, that was why I requested it be undone, even though I don't really know anything about Warren himself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.216.61 (talk) 19:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your position. But being on Oprah or having a famous parent does not qualify one for an article, let alone redlinking the person's name without one. Btw, please sign your posts. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in the first line

Jessica Alba is a American actress - should be "an American" ... could not edit or would have fixed. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.50.124.162 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for the report, I have fixed it. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 04:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Switching photo

I would like to switch the Spike TV award photo with the Good Luck Chuck photo. We would keep both but just switch the position.

The reason is the Spike TV award photo looks like she is carrying a weapon. Her eyes look sleepy, too. The best photo should be at the top. The Playboy photo is fair use so I can see why you don't want to put that at the top. Spevw (talk) 00:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Her eyes look fine to me, and the caption explains that she's at the "Spike" awards show, and I don't see how what she's carrying matters anyway, or why Fair Use would preclude use of photo on top. Her image is bigger in the Spike photos than in the Good Luck Chuck photo, so I think it makes a better accompanying image to the article. Nightscream (talk) 01:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a doctor, but it looks like she has Ptosis (eyelid) in the photo but not the other photo. I think it must have been late at night so she is sleepy. I favor the switch. Is it ok with you? Spevw (talk) 22:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. The other not only features her more prominently in the photo, but does so in her capacity as an actress at a public event, whereas the other one is smaller and features her in a specific character from one of her films. It does not depict ptosis, it merely shows that her eyes were slightly lowered when the pic was taken.Nightscream (talk) 04:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to hear that she does not have ptosis of the eyelid but the other photo is of better quality as the Spike one shows her eyes lowered. The comment below also doesn't like the Spike photo. However, the Playboy photo is a fair use photo which I don't like for the main photo. Spevw (talk) 00:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should switch it with the playboy photo. it does look like she is carrying a weapon. 16 February 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.171.129.70 (talk) 20:29, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any sisters/brothers?

This article doesn't mention whether Jessica Alba has any sisters or brothers (besides Joshua)? --72.230.46.168 (talk) 15:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing...

Should Cash Warren redirect to Jessica Alba#Personal life temporarily, until a full article can be written? --72.230.46.168 (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC) SHE GAVE ME A BJ!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.50.52.151 (talk) 01:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]