User talk:O: Difference between revisions
Signpost delivery using AWB |
|||
Line 175: | Line 175: | ||
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist|''Signpost'' spamlist]]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. [[User:Ralbot|Ralbot]] ([[User talk:Ralbot|talk]]) 13:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)</small> |
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist|''Signpost'' spamlist]]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. [[User:Ralbot|Ralbot]] ([[User talk:Ralbot|talk]]) 13:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)</small> |
||
== A&W Root Beer == |
|||
Okay, there are a few things you didn't touch on. I'm thinking specificly of when you said it was a poorly written article. |
|||
Please elaborate. - [[User:VenomousNinja|~VNinja]][[User talk:VenomousNinja|~]] 01:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:17, 28 December 2007
No urgent messages right now. edit this message
User:O | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Main page watch Main userpage |
Talk page post | watch | archives Discussions pertaining to this user |
User contributions Block log | Logs |
Wikimedia user matrix Display all accounts on all Wikimedia wikis |
Miscellany Other user subpages |
This is O's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
edit |
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
User:Vishwin60/Tabs/Other User:Vishwin60/Tabs/Other User:Vishwin60/Tabs/Other User:Vishwin60/Tabs/Other User:Vishwin60/Tabs/Other |
Gaming the systemHi, O - I'm concerned about some recent edits of yours that look to me a lot like attempts to game the system. I'm addressing these directly to you here, since I think they constitute a pattern of behaviour that is tending towards disruptive. Specific instances of this include:
All of the above seem to me to be examples of the sort of behaviour illustrated under GAME:2 and GAME:7. In each example, the misapplication of policy remains consistent: you over-reach what the policy actually says, and try to force an interpretation on other editors that is more limited, more narrow, and more prescriptive than those policies. This consistency makes me believe that you are doing this knowingly and deliberately. There may be other examples; I haven't delved into your edit history and at this stage have no desire to do so. I do, however, note the remark on your current review that suggests that WP:AIR isn't the only WikiProject where you've been at the focus of some friction. There's no problem in having a difference of opinion; but if you want to change policy (as it seems to me that you do), then go about building consensus to change it. Please don't simply misrepresent what exists at present. If, on the other hand, these incidents are all simply co-incidental, I strongly urge you to make yourself thoroughly familiar with what policies actually say before attempting to advise others of "breaches" that you perceive. --Rlandmann (talk) 00:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Fair enough - and thanks for the thoughtful reply. I'm still willing to assume good faith. Nevertheless, I stand by my advice that if you're going to attempt to counsel others on rules, you need to present them as they actually exist. To return to specifics:
Once again, thanks for addressing my concerns so promptly and so thoroughly. Cheers --Rlandmann (talk) 02:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC) helloHello. Others and I have tried to make changes to address your comments (747 article). The issue of the last 3 sections seems to be an issue that the WikiProject community should consider. This could solve the issue and have the results applied to all of the articles. I don't resist your suggestion, just think that guidance from the community for this systemwide issue is better. Archtransit (talk) 19:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC) AdopterHi O, I've started to clean up the Adopters' list. You appear to have changed username since you added yourself to the list but not updated your info there. In case you're still interested, can you kindly update your information? Or, if you're not interested any more, would you mind removing yourself? Thank you and happy editing, Snowolf How can I help? 22:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)~~ RfA Thanks172.189.127.93 vandalismI noticed you were vandalized by this IP as well. I also noticed he said something about the Wikimedia Commons. I don't recall seeing this user anywhere at all, let alone the commons. Do you think this user could be a puppet of someone you know? I'm kinda confused. ♣ Klptyzm Chat wit' me § Contributions ♣ 04:47, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC) A&W Root BeerOkay, there are a few things you didn't touch on. I'm thinking specificly of when you said it was a poorly written article. Please elaborate. - ~VNinja~ 01:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |