User talk:Master of Puppets

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gonzo fan2007 (talk | contribs) at 05:20, 10 October 2008 (→‎RFP: thanks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Master of Puppets/StatusDiv

User:Master of Puppets/Header




BryanSweet Page

sorry about the whole issue with the wiki page i dont plan on making it again. but i do plan on making a new web page on free webs im sure u have heard of it. is there any way u can give me back the code or atleast give it back on wiki so i can save it onto my comp i worked a really long time on it and i didnt save any of the work i did

please help thanks BryanSweet —Preceding unsigned comment added by BryanSweet (talk • contribs) 18:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU

thanks alot for re posting the wiki for me a got all the info i needed and am i allowed to keep this page now BryanSweet/Freewebs? —Preceding unsigned comment added by BryanSweet (talk • contribs) 01:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, Master of Puppets. You have new messages at Narutolovehinata5's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Master of Puppets. You have new messages at Sultec's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sarahchapman

Hello? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahchapman (talk • contribs) 01:41, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Hey why did you delete my page ??????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisv3193 (talk • contribs) 04:48, 2 October 2008


I guess it's cool for other web based internet radio stations to have a wiki and you say it's spam.. How are we going to explain what we are about if we don't add content and NEWS ARTICLES we've been in... I know I followed your rules and I didn't break them... I been trying for a year now to add it and I chenged it each time to make you people happy.. I bet if I threw a 100 dollar bill at wiki they would not have a problem... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisv3193 (talk • contribs) 04:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Chrisv3193 (talk) 05:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

so what am I to add to my page if i wanted I read the rules and I'm not spamming. I don't know any other way to talk about the station I added news articles and proof to what we are I don't see the problem..

this is a local show in Cleveland Ohio

I followed there template and I get deleted

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rover%27s_Morning_Glory

--Chrisv3193 (talk) 05:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I did add sources did you read it.. Rolling stones and other news articles we got in, how much more do I have to add.. I tell ya what you show me a outline to what you want and I will follow it once I have it done I will show you and you can decide if it will go on wiki.. --Chrisv3193 (talk) 05:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have it back up in my profile http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chrisv3193 --Chrisv3193 (talk) 05:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blake Lewis was on one of the show that runs on our network and that show got a mention on Fox news rolling stones and other news outlets.. The show is apart of our network...

look at the article it's from Fox News..

--Chrisv3193 (talk) 05:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the Internet radio show Maximum Threshold. this show is apart of our network... --Chrisv3193 (talk) 05:29, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok even if the show is on MSC RADIO NETWORK I can't put the shows we have or some of the guest that appeared on the shows.. Ok well can we add a wiki for each show on the network.. I was trying to make it easy and talk about the history of MSC RADIO NETWORK and the shows we have and the guest. We had guest that came on the shows which dropped bombshells.

Look I been trying for a year and I read and read all the rules I don't understand what you Wiki wants. I figure they wanted the history and what we are about and I think I nailed it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisv3193 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Ok well I want to make a page for one of the shows on the network Uncensored Net Noise and trust me I'll have so much info on that page can we set that up????

--Chrisv3193 (talk) 05:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make it a point to put the page back up and send a e-mail to Wiki and show them what we have... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisv3193 (talk • contribs) 06:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


DUDE DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT... I'll keep it on my profile... --Chrisv3193 (talk) 17:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 2, 2008

Could you fully protect Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 2, 2008? It's transcluded to the main page and I shudder to think what vandals would do when they find out it isn't protected. Normally, it's protected by User:Raul654, but this time he forgot to. I saw in the recent changes as being one of the few admins on. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for protecting it! Cunard (talk) 05:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pioneer Courthouse Square

Hi, thanks for protecting the page, but the template at the top is overkill. I'm not sure what the procedure normally is for such things. There really isn't a content dispute, there is a pack of sock puppets who have for two years trolled the page by putting in a few poorly-worded and unsourced sentences. You can read about it on the talk page and the thread at ANI. If there isn't some way to leave the page fully protected without the needless content dispute tag--as what is really going on is simple vandalism--then let me know and I'll put in an unprotect request. The "content dispute" tag is giving the trolls more gravitas than is necessary. Thanks! Katr67 (talk) 08:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I looked into this yesterday, after seeing the ANI thread, and I concur; it isn't an edit war, it's everyone else reverting someone with a dozen or so sockpuppets from including their silly prefered version, which appears to have been rejected by consensus on the talk page over two years ago. I think moving back to semiprotection is reasonable if were are more vigilant in blocking obvious sockpuppets after their first edit (I have it on my watchlist now, and everyone should feel free to report to AIV after 1 edit, rather than giving four new warnings to each sock). No real rush, so I won't be a unilateralist and unprotect, but that's my 2 cents. --barneca (talk) 13:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to the above link to the ANI case, see also Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pioneercourthouse, which was a result of the multiple Beenturns## accounts that had been created in an effort to deal with further potential sleeper accounts and potentially the source IP. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

my page

Hello, I was just wondering why my page was deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cregister (talk • contribs) 09:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VeryKool Wiki Deleted???

You deleted my entry of VeryKool today. I have followed every guideline set out by Wikipedia, so I am not sure why you deleted it. We are not advertising a specific product, we just created an entry so people could learn about our brand. If you allow Samsung, Nokia, etc. to have factual pages, why are we not allowed?

I expect an immediate response. --Noah82 (talk) 20:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Noah82 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Lost Tribes

Please see my remarks on your nixing page protection for Ten Lost Tribes and Talk:Ten Lost Tribes. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Kanik

I'm damn tired of trying to keep these cleanup tags on the Chris Kanik article. I'm trying to engage her/him in a discussion about good sources, but it isn't going anywhere.

In fact, I give up. Block him, or deal with him. I'm done. cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 21:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for handling this person. I'm so close to losing my cool (its been like a year since I've lost my wikipedia cool, so wow, thanks random IP for making today less fun). I really think they need a nice cooling off period [ie, a block] but I'll leave it up to you or others to decide. Thank you, again, for attempting to deal with them. cOrneLlrOckEy (talk) 21:17, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Kanik

Hello,

I don't know much about the wikipedia world or the "rules" of the wikipedia world. So i apologize if I have come off as threatening. I am just irritated by going back and forth on this.

Early this week, someone vandalized the Chris Kanik page, posting "Chris Kanik is an ass clown" and "Chris Kanik is the man who was pregnant". After this Cornellrockey began to tag it for deletion and quetioning Chris Kanik's notability.

Granted, MySpace may not be "credible" - however, you can not dispute the actual footage. Watch it. It's credible. What about it is not? It's film of a tour he did that was completely done on the internet through websites like Youtube and MySpace. The only proof of this is on the sites. before you question the validity, take the time to actually look through the links. Cornell rockey posted that he visited the MTv site and that it didn't mention Chris. Then after a message I sent him, he said all it did was mention his last name and nothing else - it is irritating because he needs to actually look through this stuff. The South Africa show has an independent website as well as a wikipedia page. As for bamboozle - i own a t-shirt which has Chris' name on it along with the other performers.

I have messages Chris, who just doesn't want people vandalizing his site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.222.140.4 (talk) 21:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mtv

There's no article for the MTv thing. The website is all that exists - and the footage from the actual episode Chris was on - which, again, is on his Youtube, but not considered reliable because it's on youtube. In terms of notability, Real World is the first reality tv show it has been on for nearly 20 years. Chris' profile is located under the heading "Finalist." This was also the first time MTV used an online casting to get housemates. That's what makes this notable.

Outside of that - Carmen Sandiego was one of the most popular PBS shows. Chris was on that. there are no "articles" just footage to prove it. Additionally, for a comic to be asked to perform at Giants Stadium is pretty notable. It's not everyday that a young comic is asked to perform in front of thousands and thousands of people.

I think in the circumstance of Chris - there is no way to get outside references. The footage is the proof. he is a young comic who has made a name for himself on myspace and youtube. he has a fanbase of over 30K. is that not notable enough? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.222.140.4 (talk) 21:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked User 128.138.64.155

Greetings Master of Puppets. You recently blocked a vandal - User talk:128.138.64.155 - but I have just deleted a posterior edit by the same person on that same talk page. Can your initial block be extended? --Technopat (talk) 22:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for prompt reply. Yes, it dawned on me the moment I'd hit the save page... And thank you for being out there and helping to make Wikipedia so great! Regards, --Technopat (talk) 22:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers! (Thumbs up smiley)--Technopat (talk) 22:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brooklyn?

It wasn't Real World Brooklyn. It was Real World - Hollywood, which aired this past spring. he was not on the show - he was a finalist on the show - However, last summer - MTV featured him on a Special. He then made it as a finalist. His popularity grew from being aired repeatedly on the special.

he is a notable comic and it would be a shame to have the account deleted. You don;t get to play Giants Stadium, do a nation wide tour of all the improvs, get featured on MTV and tour south africa if you are not a notable comic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.222.140.4 (talk) 23:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MISR (firearm)

Hi Master of Puppets, Thank you for your response. I am sending you the same response I sent to Dave 1185. Here are the facts: The Page already existed, I did not create it, I added some references. They decided out of no where to cancel it, then started accusing me be being a zealout and moking my ethinic ancestery. There are several other pages of copies and variants of the AKM and they are all there. I searched as best as what is available on the net to get references. The Egyptian Military Companies do not have that much of exposure as others do. due to their strange understanding of secrecy. Before coming to the USA, I served in the Egyptian Army so that I can immigrate in a legal manner. I had both Asssault Rifles in front of me. There are substantial differences on the outside, I am not sure how much on the inside. The Egyptian Military Production is considerably advanced and they made many improvements in other weapons such as Sakr Eye MANPADS. I was involved in severaltraining manouvres with other Military personnel, one of them was the Bright Star and due to the fact that I am tri-lingual, I was assigned as assistant to several Generals, as an interpreter with foreign Military Officials and I have seen and heard many of them at different occasions showing their admiration of the weapon in question and how different it is from the original one in many aspects, while they were trying it out in the field. Now, that was 18-19 years ago, I was younger and my grasp of technical information was not that developped and my interest in weaponery was more in statistics and capabilities of weapons in a comparitive way (distance, range, weight, speed and so on). I am saying this because I know that this weapon, however small and insignifigant it might be is deserving a page, which as I said was already created some time ago,before these two wikipedian decided to go on a mission to eradicate which does not conform with certain guidlines of Wikipedia. I am not interested in having a war with others, but in as much as there are many pages that are either copies or variants of other weapons and these pages are allowed to exsist just because the variation is well established in different references from the net or a commonly known information for many is not just or fair. Orthopraxia (talk) 17:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes im around

Uh-huWikidude57SBC 17:50, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How does it feel?

How do you feel when you deal with vandalism?. Mythdon (talk) 04:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Master! MAS-TER!

XD Yes I know I should get an account but truth is besides my several edits just lately, I'm not here enough to merit getting one. That said, the OTHER IP, we were discussing on Glen Benton's page, has just violated 3RR with here silly MySpace-esque additions which I've warned her numerous times to keep to herself and stop littering Wikipedia with. She probably has a crush on the guy's son or something (I'm not psychic but the first time she edited, it just gave it away). So thanks for responding to me, and thanks in advance for keep that page clean! 72.219.148.226 (talk) 18:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hai!

Kunt = cunt = not the best name for someone who says they're here to edit constructively. If you really want to unblock them, more power to you, but I fail to see how anyone who registers with a name like that is here to be a useful contributor. Mind you, I've had some bad experiences with names like that... Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kunta1988

Yes, I think that would be acceptable given his explanation. I'll say so. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Timmy edit summary

Hi MoP. Your edit to the Timmy article was a bit on the pointy side. I believe you didn't change anything and only taunted another user in the edit summary. As I know you know, there's policies about that... I understand the frustration there, but still... Hobit (talk) 13:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Understood. I hadn't realized you were an admin when I wrote that. That said, the edit summaries might not be the best place for things like that. Best of luck! Hobit (talk) 18:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection

The article Power Rangers which you protected has been protected long enough [1]. Mythdon (talk) 09:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for Rejecting unblock request for IP 79.74.34.863

I wish to know why the unblock request was declined? The above IP is not a static IP, instead it is a dynamic IP assigned to users on a ad hoc basis depending on which particular range is free at the time the user logs on. So technically you are considering anyone who uses the IP the vandal despite the fact it could be someone quite different. Also, being that you are only 17, that gives me cause to restrain from using wkipedia. How can someone of such young age have the life experience and knowledge to administor a web site such as this? Yes you can glean information from the Web but, this information is vague at the best of times and quite random. 79.74.43.196 (talk) 18:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know that it isn't static. Regardless, I decided to let the block remain, primarily due to the vandal edits by the IP and subsequent requests for unblock. I realize that the IP could be used for both good and bad, but anyone who wished to contribute positively could simply create an account.
In terms of my age and the consequences it has on my abilities as an administrator, I don't think its an issue. I'm not sure what "life experience" is needed to administrate a site, but so far I think I'm holding my own. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 20:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

Master of Puppets, I'd like to thank you for voting in my RFA. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again, SpencerT♦C 02:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AAU reminder notice

A friendly reminder from the Adopt-a-User project =)
Hey there Master of Puppets! This is a friendly reminder to update your status at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area/Adopters whenever it is appropriate in order to provide new users with the most up-to-date information on available adopters. Also please note that we will be removing adopters who have not edited in 60 days. If you become active again (and we hope you do!) please feel free to re-add yourself. Cheers!
  • Notice delivery by xenobot 14:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD discussion on Saw films' traps

Hey, you may not realise this, but your questioning of the Keep !votes in that AfD for the traps in the Saw films is starting to look a little like badgering. Just let people say their peace -- constantly questioning why people feel the way they do is not strengthening your argument for deletion (it is quite the opposite effect, actually). I hope all is well -- nice to see you online. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have a right to question, of course. But go easy -- by challenging almost everyone who disagrees with the proposed deletion, you're not helping your cause. You made a cogent point in the nomination -- let the other editors discuss this. Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 23:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw your last comment to me on the AfD after I posted the above message and I switched my !vote to Strong Keep based on your most recent remark. While you have every right to feel passionate about killing that article, I really think you overplayed your hand and the result will be the saving of the article. Ecoleetage (talk) 23:52, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think we're in parallel conversations. I enjoy a debate and an exchange of opinions, but I respect when people have views that differ from mine. But I have never begun an AfD discussion where I am constantly badgering everyone who disagrees with me -- in fact, I've given Rescue from Deletion Barnstars to people who confounded my attempts to get an article deleted! Just leave the AfD alone -- I am sure the closing admin can separate the wisdom from the muck and make the proper decision. Thanks and be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, you may want to investigate the latest Keep !vote: User:Jigsaw23, who literally showed up with this discussion as his very first Wiki input. There may be some socking going on, which would help your cause. Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:39, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Final word: The constant badgering of people who disagree with you in a blatant attempt to sway the opinion of an AfD closing admin is actually closer to "obnoxious" rather than "productive." Please don't do this again. Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 10:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
First post-final word message: This is actually a message for any potential TPSs who stumble upon this exchange -- MoP and I have known each other for a while and he "adopted" me when I started to become an active editor. We are able to have a mature exchange of opinions without acrimony, and our disagreements are in the spirit of friendship. I am posting this particular message to prevent a reprise of a previous situation where an earlier disagreement I had on this Talk Page was yanked completely out of context and used for utterly malicious purposes. And now, as a special treat for the impressionable young lads and jaded middle-aged men in the Wiki audience...here's Raquel Welch: [2]. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Second post-final word message: As per your comment "That's why I'm questioning some keep votes (and delete votes too, mind you); to encourage some discussion" -- unless I missed something, you never questioned any of the delete votes in that particular AfD. And speaking of articles -- do you ever write any articles? I don't recall seeing any articles written by you. Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ItsLassieTime

User:ItsLassieTime is once again edit warring over at Timmy Martin (television character). I made valid changes to bring the article inline with the TV MoS for characters, but she doesn't like it and so keeps reverting it and claiming ownership of the article yet again, and falsely claiming I have made 3 reverts. I made the fix in four back to back edits.[3] She reverted because she doesn't like it[4], and I restored[5] having also left notes on her talk page that she is completely ignoring. She reverted again, as have I, which makes 2 reverts each. Since she ignores anyone who is not an admin attempting to talk to her, can you have a word with her about her continued claims of ownership over articles and refusal to follow existing, consensus backed guidelines. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please LOCK articles Lassie (1954 TV series), Paul Martin (television character), and Ruth Martin (television character). Collectonian recently nominated two of them for deletion and consensus weighed strongly against such deletion. Collectonian has followed me from one Lassie article to the next vexatiously reverting my work time and again. In MHO, she hasn't added anything of significance to any of the articles but is simply positioning herself as "owner" and antagonist. I believe she has a collie and feels some sort of need to "own" and "protect" anything mentioning said dogs at WP. She hasn't touched the Lassie articles in months and as soon as I made a recent attempt to edit, she zipped in with her reverts. I have strongly considered registering a "stalking" and "harassment" complaint with the administration but I don't know the procedure. Her conduct is extremely vexatious and unwarranted. I would appreciate any advice in how to cope with this editor. Thank you! ItsLassieTime (talk) 05:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, I do not "have" (or own) a collie, thanks for the accusation (and considering your user name, such questions about my neutrality are rather humorous...). Anyone looking at the history of the Lassie article can easily see I was there long before you were and its been noted before on my user page as a topic of interest. I visited the Paul and Ruth Martin articles while going through my to do list. If you want to make such a serious accusation as claiming I'm stalking or harassing you, I suggest you back it up very quickly with some actual evidence or strike those remarks. I've been wikistalked, thanks, so trust me, I know your remarks are beyond unfounded and extremely uncivil. I also demand evidence to back up your beyond false claim that I am "following" you around and "vexatiously reverting" your edits. So far in the last week, you have falsely accused me of sockpupptry, of collusion, of lacking neutrality, and now stalking and harassment. Frankly, I'm getting very tired of your slandering remarks. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 06:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't touched the Lassie articles in months. I left months ago rather than deal with the incessant reverts and malicious destruction of sourced and carefully researched information for nothing more than putting your oar forth and saying, "This is my article! Touch it if you dare!" Now I come back to edit (hoping you're not lurking about and hoping you've taken the articles off your watchlist) but nope! there you are again with the incessant reverts and edit conflicts. There is absolutely nothing wrong with good work that warrants the incessant reverts. Your reverts are frivolous and vexatious. I notice on your talk page and archives that you have a knack for antagonizing other editors. I do think an adminstrator should moderate the Lassie articles because your incessant reverts and nominations for deletion are damaging, negative, and counterproductive. ItsLassieTime (talk) 06:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not the one who has reverted MULTIPLE editors attempting to edit the article. Let's see...FIVE reverts on the image removal from the Timmy article. Nor do I run around demanding people leave your articles alone and attempt to "protect" them by throwing UC tags on them then just leaving them there. You won't allow anyone to work "with" you on the articles, but make it clear that you will only be happy if you are left alone to do whatever you like. When others disagree, you make a glut of personal attacks, as is clearly shown on the talk page of the Timmy article. Another editor supported the image removal, and you slandered him and me by calling us socks. A third supported, you called it collusion and ganging up on you. I'm not the one being antagonizing and contentious here. You have extreme ownership issues and refuse to even acknowledge your many inappropriate actions and words here. And sorry, but nominating articles of characters that appear to be unnotable for deletion and attempting to apply standards to articles is neither damaging, negative, nor counterproductive. Your ridiculous and wild accusations and constant personal attacks, however, are. My talk page and archives also show I work with far more editors than I "antagonize". I've been editing a long time and have over 30,000 edits under my belt. Admins have a lot of the same sort of complaints when they deal with issues, so I guess they are also "damaging, negative, and counterproductive." And at least I didn't run around AfDing notable characters out of some weird retribution over two character articles you like being AfDed. And despite your constant nasty attitude, I have not made false accusations against you, as you have repeatedly done with me. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 06:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your incessant reverts and nominations for deletion are frivolous, vexatious, time-consuming, negative, counterproductive, and IMO damgaing to WP and its goals. Rearranging the Timmy article into various sections with a hard-nosed "This is according to guideleines" ignores the spirit of WP while applying its "Letter of the Law".

"When creating an article on a single character of a television show, note that the section headers below are not >>>>>> mandatory, and several featured articles on fictional characters have different section headers (and placement) than one another.<<<<<<< Find the structure that works best for the article in question; regardless of whether you use these headers, the information that they discuss is important to establishing an article with real world context."

You should discuss your intentions of radically altering sections and headers on the Talk Page before frivolously and vexatiously reverting, creating edit conflicts, and destroying forever carefully researched and valuable material and information. ItsLassieTime (talk) 07:12, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on a sec, guys. Don't focus on who reverted who or what you think the other guy is trying to do by reverting you. Let's leave the past where it belongs and just focus on the now; why, with plenty of explanation and citing of policy, should your way come through, Lassie? And you, Collectonian? Remember, don't comment on each others' editing style - I'll handle that if anyone steps out of line. Focus on the issue at hand. Thanks! Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 00:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry...after all the personal attacks, false accusations, slandering of my editing ethics, and rather over the top reactions to what are normally considered fairly basic and standard edits, its hard to continue retaining civility with this editor. I also left a note on my user page in response to your last remarks there. Didn't know if you caught those or not. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:45, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, in case you weren't aware, here is the discussion I started at the TV project regarding which version is best, but alas, it has gotten derailed. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Lassie headaches, and despite your request here, ItsLassieTime has posted new personal attacks there. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFP

Haha, yeah we do! But I am going to have to leave it in your hands for a little while, so keep up the good work =D « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 05:42, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar!! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 05:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luna Santin

Thanks for the quick page protection. - NeutralHomer • Talk • Work • October 10, 2008 @ 00:36 00:36, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AribaWeb deletion

I am not sure why this article has been flagged for speedy deletion. AribaWeb is a open source java web development framework (not a website, blog, ...), much like the hundreds of such frameworks documented on Wikipedia (and listed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_application_frameworks).

As I've attempted to highlight in the article text, AribaWeb is more notable than many of the other frameworks already covered on Wikipedia because it 1) is one of the first frameworks of its kind, 2) has been proven in real world deployment (millions of user desktops, hundred of thousands of companies, hundreds of billions of dollars of commerce), and 3) has a number of technically novel capabilities. In that sense it seems at least as worth of coverage as these other frameworks already listed on wikipedia:

SmartClient Click Framework Reasonable Server Faces Aranea framework RIFE

I am not a member of the company that originally developed this product (Ariba) nor am I a member of the open source AribaWeb development team. However, I have been an observer of the recent developments in the Java web application development space and I believe that AribaWeb merits coverage in Wikipedia. If there is something procedurally that I have done incorrectly please let me know. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.200.223.179 (talk) 01:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

B.P.R.D.: Hollow Earth deletion

Hi, I'm new to the editing process and I happened to save my page, B.P.R.D.: Hollow Earth before entering the synopsis. Is there any way you could restore it? I was working on the summary when you deleted it.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckmoak (talk • contribs) 01:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AribaWeb deletion

Sorry I wasn't logged in when I entered my previous message. Can you please advise on how to restore the AribaWeb page? Charlesclloyd (talk) 01:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note to say hello

I have been bust travelling for work and have not been around much at all lately. Hope you have been well! Cheers and take care! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 01:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am back and forth to the UK a lot. Several treks into Europe. South Asia, Australia, NZ. Back and forth from Detroit to the west coast. It's really been quite a blur. For all the guitars I own I am on a quest to find the "perfect" Tele. I thought I had a good candidate in Northern California. It was a mid 60s burst. But it had a couple of issues and the seller wanted way too much money. So my quest rolls on. No rush on the userpage. I will be around, off and on, as long as Wiki is still here to be around for. Maybe next year, haha! Maybe 2011. I will probably still be lurking somewhere. Cheers! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 01:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Immediate Attention

Why did you delete my page immediatley? I was in the process of updating more information to show notability. Please reinstate the old page so that I may add that information. I need the code that I spent so much time on! Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afranklin2 (talk • contribs) 03:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Master_of_Puppets&oldid=244308398"