Affirming a Disjunct
As affirming a disjunct ( English for "affirmation of a disjunct"; also: asserting an alternative ["affirmation of an alternative"]) is a logical fallacy that consists in the fact that a disjunctive syllogism is constructed with respect to two sets that are not disjoint are:
(1) A is true or B is true. | |
(2) B is true. | |
So: | (3) A is wrong. |
Often it is a false dilemma .
Examples
“To have a girlfriend like Tom's, you have to be either rich or famous. Tom is rich, so he can't be famous. "
“I can't stop eating this chocolate. Either I really love chocolate, or I seriously lack willpower. I know I really love chocolate; I cannot lack willpower. "
"Either Thomas Jefferson or John Adams died on July 4, 1826. Thomas Jefferson died on July 4, 1826. So John Adams did not die on July 4, 1826."
Wrong dilemma: "With Obama you have two options: Either you believe that he is a man of God, or you think that he is a liar." ( Penn Jilette )
literature
- Jason Iuliano: Affirming a Disjunct . In: Robert Arp, Steven Barbone, Michael Bruce (Eds.): 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy . Wiley, Hoboken 2018, ISBN 978-1-119-16790-7 , pp. 39-41 , doi : 10.1002 / 9781119165811.ch1 .
Web links
- Brian Kirby: A Plea For Affirming a Disjunct. 1986, accessed July 17, 2020 .
Individual evidence
- ↑ a b c Affirming a disjunct. Retrieved July 17, 2020 .
- ^ Affirming a disjunct. Retrieved July 17, 2020 .
- ^ Affirming a Disjunct. Retrieved July 17, 2020 .
- ↑ Jason Iuliano: Affirming a Disjunct . In: Robert Arp, Steven Barbone, Michael Bruce (Eds.): 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy . Wiley, Hoboken 2018, ISBN 978-1-119-16790-7 , pp. 39–41, here: p. 39 , doi : 10.1002 / 9781119165811.ch1 .