The Deligne cohomology is used in mathematics, especially in algebraic geometry , for the construction of secondary characteristic classes. It was introduced by Pierre Deligne around 1972 (unpublished).
definition
Let be a smooth manifold and the sheaf of complex-valued differential forms . For one , the Deligne complex is defined by
M.
{\ displaystyle M}
Ω
C.
{\ displaystyle \ Omega _ {\ mathbb {C}}}
n
∈
N
{\ displaystyle n \ in \ mathbb {N}}
D.
(
n
)
: =
Cone
(
Z
⊕
σ
≥
n
Ω
C.
→
Ω
C.
)
[
-
1
]
{\ displaystyle {\ mathcal {D}} (n): = \ operatorname {Cone} (\ mathbb {Z} \ oplus \ sigma ^ {\ geq n} \ Omega _ {\ mathbb {C}} \ rightarrow \ Omega _ {\ mathbb {C}}) \ left [-1 \ right]}
.
Here the coquette complex is with for and for , the cone is the image cone of the chain image given by the inclusions of sheaves and and denotes the chain complex with .
σ
≥
n
Ω
C.
{\ displaystyle \ sigma ^ {\ geq n} \ Omega _ {\ mathbb {C}}}
(
σ
≥
n
Ω
C.
)
k
=
0
{\ displaystyle (\ sigma ^ {\ geq n} \ Omega _ {\ mathbb {C}}) ^ {k} = 0}
k
<
n
{\ displaystyle k <n}
(
σ
≥
n
Ω
C.
)
k
=
Ω
C.
{\ displaystyle (\ sigma ^ {\ geq n} \ Omega _ {\ mathbb {C}}) ^ {k} = \ Omega _ {\ mathbb {C}}}
k
≥
n
{\ displaystyle k \ geq n}
Cone
(
Z
⊕
σ
≥
n
Ω
C.
→
Ω
C.
)
{\ displaystyle \ operatorname {Cone} (\ mathbb {Z} \ oplus \ sigma ^ {\ geq n} \ Omega _ {\ mathbb {C}} \ rightarrow \ Omega _ {\ mathbb {C}})}
Z
→
C.
{\ displaystyle \ mathbb {Z} \ rightarrow \ mathbb {C}}
σ
≥
n
Ω
C.
→
Ω
C.
{\ displaystyle \ sigma ^ {\ geq n} \ Omega _ {\ mathbb {C}} \ rightarrow \ Omega _ {\ mathbb {C}}}
A.
[
-
1
]
{\ displaystyle A \ left [-1 \ right]}
A.
[
-
1
]
n
=
A.
n
-
1
{\ displaystyle A \ left [-1 \ right] ^ {n} = A ^ {n-1}}
The -th Deligne cohomology is
n
{\ displaystyle n}
H
^
D.
e
l
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
: =
H
n
(
M.
;
D.
(
n
)
)
{\ displaystyle {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {Z}): = H ^ {n} (M; {\ mathcal {D}} (n))}
.
Note that different complexes are used for different ones.
n
{\ displaystyle n}
properties
Long exact sequence
H
^
D.
e
l
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
{\ displaystyle {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {Z})}
fits into an exact sequence
→
H
n
-
1
(
M.
;
Z
)
→
H
d
R.
n
-
1
(
M.
;
C.
)
→
H
^
D.
e
l
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
→
H
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
⊕
Ω
c
l
n
(
M.
;
C.
)
→
H
d
R.
n
(
M.
;
C.
)
→
{\ displaystyle \ rightarrow H ^ {n-1} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ rightarrow H_ {dR} ^ {n-1} (M; \ mathbb {C}) \ rightarrow {\ hat {H} } _ {Del} ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ rightarrow H ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ oplus \ Omega _ {cl} ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {C}) \ rightarrow H_ {dR} ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {C}) \ rightarrow}
.
Denotes the closed differential forms and the De-Rham cohomology .
Ω
c
l
∗
{\ displaystyle \ Omega _ {cl} ^ {*}}
H
d
R.
∗
{\ displaystyle H_ {dR} ^ {*}}
Next is
H
n
-
1
(
M.
;
C.
/
Z
)
≃
ker
(
H
^
D.
e
l
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
→
Ω
c
l
n
(
M.
)
)
{\ displaystyle H ^ {n-1} (M; \ mathbb {C} / \ mathbb {Z}) \ simeq \ ker ({\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ rightarrow \ Omega _ {cl} ^ {n} (M))}
and the composition
H
n
-
1
(
M.
;
C.
/
Z
)
→
H
^
D.
e
l
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
→
H
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
{\ displaystyle H ^ {n-1} (M; \ mathbb {C} / Z) \ rightarrow {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ rightarrow H ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {Z})}
is the negative of the Bockstein homomorphism of the short exact sequence .
0
→
Z
→
C.
→
C.
/
Z
→
0
{\ displaystyle 0 \ rightarrow \ mathbb {Z} \ rightarrow \ mathbb {C} \ rightarrow \ mathbb {C} / \ mathbb {Z} \ rightarrow 0}
In particular, for -dimensional, closed, orientable manifolds:
(
n
-
1
)
{\ displaystyle (n-1)}
H
^
D.
e
l
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
≃
H
d
R.
n
-
1
(
M.
;
C.
)
/
in the
(
H
n
-
1
(
M.
;
Z
)
→
H
n
-
1
(
M.
;
C.
)
)
≃
C.
/
Z
{\ displaystyle {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ simeq H_ {dR} ^ {n-1} (M; \ mathbb {C}) / \ operatorname {im} (H ^ {n-1} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ rightarrow H ^ {n-1} (M; \ mathbb {C})) \ simeq \ mathbb {C} / \ mathbb {Z}}
.
Product structure
There is a clearly defined product , so that it becomes a graded commutative ring with the following properties:
∪
{\ displaystyle \ cup}
H
^
D.
e
l
∗
(
M.
;
Z
)
{\ displaystyle {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {*} (M; \ mathbb {Z})}
for every smooth map there is a ring homomorphism
f
:
M.
′
→
M.
{\ displaystyle f \ colon M ^ {\ prime} \ rightarrow M}
f
∗
:
H
^
D.
e
l
∗
(
M.
;
Z
)
→
H
^
D.
e
l
∗
(
M.
′
;
Z
)
{\ displaystyle f ^ {*} \ colon {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {*} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ rightarrow {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {* } (M ^ {\ prime}; \ mathbb {Z})}
for all is a ring homomorphism
M.
{\ displaystyle M}
R.
:
H
^
D.
e
l
∗
(
M.
;
Z
)
→
Ω
c
l
∗
(
M.
;
C.
)
{\ displaystyle R \ colon {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {*} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ rightarrow \ Omega _ {cl} ^ {*} (M; \ mathbb {C} )}
for all is a ring homomorphism
M.
{\ displaystyle M}
I.
:
H
^
D.
e
l
∗
(
M.
;
Z
)
→
H
∗
(
M.
;
Z
)
{\ displaystyle I \ colon {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {*} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ rightarrow H ^ {*} (M; \ mathbb {Z})}
for and for all true
a
:
H
d
R.
∗
-
1
(
M.
;
C.
)
→
H
^
D.
e
l
∗
(
M.
;
Z
)
{\ displaystyle a \ colon H_ {dR} ^ {* - 1} (M; \ mathbb {C}) \ rightarrow {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {*} (M; \ mathbb {Z} )}
x
∈
H
^
D.
e
l
∗
(
M.
;
Z
)
,
α
∈
H
d
R.
∗
(
M.
;
C.
)
{\ displaystyle x \ in {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {*} (M; \ mathbb {Z}), \ alpha \ in H_ {dR} ^ {*} (M; \ mathbb {C })}
a
(
α
)
∪
x
=
a
(
α
∧
R.
(
x
)
)
{\ displaystyle a (\ alpha) \ cup x = a (\ alpha \ wedge R (x))}
.
Here are the homomorphisms from the above long exact sequence.
R.
,
I.
,
a
{\ displaystyle R, I, a}
Application: Secondary characteristic classes
Complex vector bundles
To every complex vector bundle with a connected form over a manifold one can
assign classes (in a natural way for bundle mapping )
, so that the homomorphism (from the above exact sequence)
V
{\ displaystyle V}
∇
{\ displaystyle \ nabla}
M.
{\ displaystyle M}
c
^
i
(
∇
)
∈
H
^
D.
e
l
2
i
(
M.
;
Z
)
{\ displaystyle {\ hat {c}} _ {i} (\ nabla) \ in {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {2i} (M; \ mathbb {Z})}
H
^
D.
e
l
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
→
H
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
⊕
Ω
c
l
n
(
M.
;
C.
)
{\ displaystyle {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ rightarrow H ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ oplus \ Omega _ {cl } ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {C})}
c
^
i
(
∇
)
{\ displaystyle {\ hat {c}} _ {i} (\ nabla)}
on maps, where the -th Chernform and the -th Chern class - whose image is precisely the De Rham cohomology class of - denotes.
(
c
i
(
V
)
,
c
i
(
∇
)
)
{\ displaystyle (c_ {i} (V), c_ {i} (\ nabla))}
c
i
(
∇
)
{\ displaystyle c_ {i} (\ nabla)}
i
{\ displaystyle i}
c
i
(
V
)
{\ displaystyle c_ {i} (V)}
i
{\ displaystyle i}
H
2
i
(
M.
;
C.
)
{\ displaystyle H ^ {2i} (M; \ mathbb {C})}
c
i
(
∇
)
{\ displaystyle c_ {i} (\ nabla)}
If there is a flat connection on a trivializable vector bundle , one obtains
∇
{\ displaystyle \ nabla}
c
^
i
(
∇
)
∈
ker
(
H
^
D.
e
l
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
→
H
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
⊕
Ω
c
l
n
(
M.
;
C.
)
≃
H
d
R.
n
-
1
(
M.
;
C.
)
/
in the
(
H
n
-
1
(
M.
;
Z
)
→
H
n
-
1
(
M.
;
C.
)
)
{\ displaystyle {\ hat {c}} _ {i} (\ nabla) \ in \ ker ({\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ rightarrow H ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ oplus \ Omega _ {cl} ^ {n} (M; \ mathbb {C}) \ simeq H_ {dR} ^ {n-1} (M; \ mathbb {C}) / \ operatorname {im} (H ^ {n-1} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ rightarrow H ^ {n-1} (M; \ mathbb {C}))}
.
If is additionally defined
dim
(
M.
)
=
n
-
1
{\ displaystyle \ dim (M) = n-1}
c
^
i
(
∇
)
∈
H
d
R.
n
-
1
(
M.
;
C.
)
/
in the
(
H
n
-
1
(
M.
;
Z
)
→
H
n
-
1
(
M.
;
C.
)
)
≃
C.
/
Z
{\ displaystyle {\ hat {c}} _ {i} (\ nabla) \ in H_ {dR} ^ {n-1} (M; \ mathbb {C}) / \ operatorname {im} (H ^ {n -1} (M; \ mathbb {Z}) \ rightarrow H ^ {n-1} (M; \ mathbb {C})) \ simeq \ mathbb {C} / \ mathbb {Z}}
the Chern-Simons invariant of .
∇
{\ displaystyle \ nabla}
Real vector bundles
Define
for a real vector bundle with connection
∇
{\ displaystyle \ nabla}
p
^
i
(
∇
)
: =
(
-
1
)
i
c
^
2
i
(
∇
⊗
C.
)
∈
H
^
D.
e
l
4th
i
(
M.
;
Z
)
{\ displaystyle {\ hat {p}} _ {i} (\ nabla): = (- 1) ^ {i} {\ hat {c}} _ {2i} (\ nabla \ otimes \ mathbb {C}) \ in {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {4i} (M; \ mathbb {Z})}
.
For a -dimensional Riemannian manifold consider the Levi-Civita connection and define the (Riemannian) Chern-Simons invariant through it
(
4th
n
-
1
)
{\ displaystyle (4n-1)}
(
M.
,
G
)
{\ displaystyle (M, g)}
∇
{\ displaystyle \ nabla}
C.
S.
(
M.
,
G
)
: =
p
^
n
(
∇
)
∈
H
^
D.
e
l
4th
n
(
M.
;
Z
)
≃
C.
/
Z
{\ displaystyle CS (M, g): = {\ hat {p}} _ {n} (\ nabla) \ in {\ hat {H}} _ {Del} ^ {4n} (M; \ mathbb {Z }) \ simeq \ mathbb {C} / \ mathbb {Z}}
.
C.
S.
(
M.
,
G
)
{\ displaystyle CS (M, g)}
is a conforming invariant .
literature
Web links
<img src="https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAutoLogin/start?type=1x1" alt="" title="" width="1" height="1" style="border: none; position: absolute;">