Dynamic judgment formation

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Dynamic judgment (DU) is a model of the organizational consulting . It is a method that lends itself to structuring and supporting decision-making processes in groups, teams, but also as an individual.

History and background

The model was developed by the Dutch sociologist and business consultant Lex Bos. In 1974 he dealt with decision-making processes in groups in his dissertation. His observations in various field tests led him to formulate the model. The aim was to propose a process to arrive at sustainable and transparent judgments and decisions . Dynamic plays an important role in this, as does the open, respectful and factual interaction between those involved. Lex Bos was connected to anthroposophy and based his model on the basic values ​​of this philosophy . This is particularly evident in the dynamic naming .

Representation of the model

Graphic implementation

Lemniscates

To represent the model graphically, Lex Bos used the lemniscate . The lying eight symbolizes the supposedly never-ending process in the formation of judgments. The lemniscate goes through different fields ( perception / concepts / goals / paths) based on the question and thus leads to a balanced judgment.

Field model

definition

“The model of dynamic judgment formation shows how thinking and decision-making processes can be recorded and accompanied in an individual or a group of people. This process proceeds in a dialogical way in different directions and in a dynamic way. It begins in the center of the model (at the intersection of the lemniscates) as the starting point of the movement, which contains energy and feeling in the form of a question that keeps the process going. The goal is to be able to judge a situation and develop an adequate response to it. The dialogue takes place between the different sides, on the so-called paths (path of knowledge and choice) and within the paths in the fields (perception and terms, goals and paths). The result is a consensus-based assessment of the situation with lasting effects and an action-oriented orientation. Dynamic judgment formation can serve both as a model for reflective self-management or for client-centered advice on the individual level, as well as a general model of action on the system and organizational level. "( Susanne Bächtold )

Areas of application

The dynamic formation of judgments as a process model is mainly used in organizational consulting, supervision and mediation . Through the simple structuring of the model in the clearly delimited fields, the perceptions can be collected and weighted as facts, the terms as interpretations for the analysis on the path of knowledge, and the goals can be declared for the level of action and the paths to them, i.e. H. the means to be discussed. It also offers the possibility to process and resolve conflicts.

The attitude that a supervisor adopts according to the model reminds the social pedagogue and supervisor Carla van Kaldenkerken of the dialogue method and non-violent communication . The method is very complex and can only be used in supervision with experience.

literature

  • Jessica Andermahr, Boris Jermer: Question way about dynamic judgment formation according to Lex Bos. In: Volker Heyse et al. (Ed.): Mittelstand 4.0 - a digital challenge. Leadership and competence development in the field of tension of digital change. Waxmann Verlag, Münster 2018, ISBN 978-3-8309-3738-8 , pp. 202–203.
  • Rolf Kuhn: Model for the personal decision-making process . In: Marika Hammerer, Erika Kanelutti, Ingeborg Melter (eds.): Future field of educational and career advice. New developments from science and practice , Bertelsmann Verlag, Bielefeld 2010, ISBN 978-3-7639-4704-1 , pp. 125–130
  • Silvia Schibli, Katja Supersaxo: The dynamic formation of judgments as a process model. In: dies .: Introduction to supervision. Haupt UTB, Bern / Stuttgart / Vienna 2009, ISBN 978-3-8252-3249-8 , pp. 56–70.
  • Susanne Bächtold, Katja Supersaxo (ed.): Dynamic judgment formation. Judging and Acting with the Lemniscate, A Practical Guide. Haupt Verlag, Bern 2005, ISBN 3-258-06874-7 .
  • Lex Bos: Ordeelsvorming in groups. Dissertation at Wageningen University (Netherlands) 1974.
    • German translation: Formation of judgment in groups, polarity and rhythm as the key to the development of social organizations. Urachhaus publishing house, Stuttgart 2001. ( online ).

Individual evidence

  1. ↑ a b c d Susanne Bächtold, Katja Supersaxo (ed.): Dynamic judgment formation. Judging and Acting with the Lemniscate, A Practical Guide. Haupt Verlag, Bern 2005, ISBN 3-258-06874-7 .
  2. ↑ Lex Bos: Ordeelsvorming in groepen. Dissertation at the Landbowhogschool Wageningen (Netherlands) 1974. German translation: Formation of judgments in groups, polarity and rhythm as the key to the development of social organizations. Urachhaus publishing house, Stuttgart 2001.
  3. ↑ Susanne Bächtold: The model of dynamic judgment formation. In: Bächtold / Supersaxo (Ed.): Dynamic judgment formation. Judging and acting with the lemniscate. A guide for the practice. Haupt Verlag, Bern 2005, ISBN 3-258-06874-7 , p. 38.
  4. ↑ Carla van Kaldenkerken. Review of December 23, 2010 to: Silvia Schibli, Katja Supersaxo: Introduction to Supervision . Haupt Verlag (Bern Stuttgart Vienna) 2009. In: socialnet reviews