Dumpling line

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Representation of a dumpling line according to PlanzV

In Germany, the graphic demarcation between different uses within development plans is called the dumpling line or pearl string line. The representation is defined in the Planzeichenverordnung (PlanzV). Different uses can be different types of construction areas or dimensions of structural use within the meaning of the Building Use Ordinance (BauNVO).

The terms themselves are not used in the ordinances mentioned , the plan sign ordinance only shows a graphic representation. In the absence of a definition in the range of public law, however, the terms have established themselves.

The term does not exist in Austria because a parcel in the land register or cadastre always has exactly one type of structural use (there are only solid lines, any parcels of different use belonging to a land register are marked with a «~» at the border).

Individual evidence

  1. Section 1, Paragraph 4 and Section 16, Paragraph 5 of the Building Use Ordinance
  2. PlanzV 90, Annex to the ordinance on the preparation of the master plan and the presentation of the plan content from December 18, 1990, No. 15.14 ( Memento of the original from October 9, 2014 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was automatically inserted and not yet checked . Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / www.bergischgladbach.de
  3. City of Leuna, Official Gazette No. 27/2008, p. 3 (PDF; 214 kB) ( Memento of the original from October 8, 2014 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / www.leuna-stadt.de
  4. City of Wiesloch, development plan for Äußere Helde, legend (PDF; 166 kB)
  5. Federal Administrative Court, Az. 4 BN 19.05, decision of June 2, 2005 (PDF; 25 kB)
  6. Administrative Court of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Az. 3 S 261/10, judgment of 13 December 2012