Benutzerbeiträge von „Collect“
Für Collect Diskussion Sperr-Logbuch Hochgeladene Dateien Logbücher globales Konto Bearbeitungsfilter-Logbuch
Der Benutzer hat 0 Bearbeitungen. Das Konto wurde am 16. Juni 2009 erstellt.
20. März 2016
- 15:5115:51, 20. Mär. 2016 Unterschied Versionen −37 Stephen Crabb →Links with homophobic Christian group: source gives that quote as being from unspecified "events" and not as being the official position of the fundamentalist Christian group
19. März 2016
- 16:3516:35, 19. Mär. 2016 Unterschied Versionen −294 Stephen Crabb rm blog as not RS
- 16:3416:34, 19. Mär. 2016 Unterschied Versionen −767 Stephen Crabb rm non-RS "petition" site
4. Februar 2016
- 20:5820:58, 4. Feb. 2016 Unterschied Versionen +1 K Mogador (Insel) typo
1. Januar 2016
- 18:0218:02, 1. Jan. 2016 Unterschied Versionen +25 Arthur W. Hummel senior →Career in Library of Congress and Sinology: USGPO per many sources
19. Februar 2015
- 23:0623:06, 19. Feb. 2015 Unterschied Versionen +25 Breitbart News Network →"Friends of Hamas" story: noting that it was traced to its source
2. Februar 2015
- 23:4123:41, 2. Feb. 2015 Unterschied Versionen +333 Breitbart News Network →ACORN undercover videos: I think you deleted a reliable source there by accident /
- 23:3623:36, 2. Feb. 2015 Unterschied Versionen +484 Breitbart News Network →Reporting satire from The Daily Currant as news: adding Globe editor comment from WaPo, WaPo says it was labelled as from Prudent Investor, and not labelled as Daily Currant
- 23:2423:24, 2. Feb. 2015 Unterschied Versionen −457 Breitbart News Network restore Nomoskedacity version as being properly sourced
- 15:1015:10, 2. Feb. 2015 Unterschied Versionen −612 Breitbart News Network see [http://www.imediaethics.org/News/3812/Paul_krugman_bankruptcy_tale_lost_in_translation_daily_currants_satire_story_duped_breitbartcom.php]
27. Januar 2015
- 14:4914:49, 27. Jan. 2015 Unterschied Versionen +256 Catalina Vasquez Villalpando →Post-Treasurer years: 2008 is a tad out of date at best in a BLP
3. Januar 2015
- 23:4723:47, 3. Jan. 2015 Unterschied Versionen −656 Breitbart News Network um - adding scads of POV to what was a stable section is not exactly going to fly at this point - sorry
30. Dezember 2014
- 15:3715:37, 30. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −1.265 Breitbart News Network that boston.com "automatically reposted" something in fact is more of a problem of boston.com's "fact checking" and is not related to Breitbart per talk page
28. Dezember 2014
- 15:4415:44, 28. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +227 Breitbart News Network →Paul Krugman "bankruptcy" hoax from Boston.com: adding page view for Boston.com article
- 04:1804:18, 28. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −32 Breitbart News Network →Misidentification of Loretta Lynch: seems we had agreed to remove the BLP issue from this -- senseless to re-insert it sans any strong rationale
27. Dezember 2014
- 23:0423:04, 27. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −263 Breitbart News Network Undid revision 639851929 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk)assertion that Huston deliberately wrote an untruth is subject to WP:BLP find a source making that specific assertio
- 23:0023:00, 27. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −263 Breitbart News Network Undid revision 639830376 by Megajeffzilla (talk)see UNDUE and note that editorializing in Wikipedia's voice is improper
24. Dezember 2014
- 02:4402:44, 24. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −22 Breitbart News Network →Misidentification of Loretta Lynch: "eventually" is editorial voice, and we use neutral language - we do then state this was a mistake, but we can not imply that Huston did so deliberately without strong reliable sourcing
- 02:4002:40, 24. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −7 Breitbart News Network →ACORN undercover videos: Hoyt was PE when he wrote the column - the other wording implies he wrote after his tenure as PE
23. Dezember 2014
- 16:2816:28, 23. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +465 Breitbart News Network →ACORN undercover videos: really should include what the NYT public editor wrote here - else we leave the impression that there was no substance at all to the allegations
- 15:2115:21, 23. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −1.477 Breitbart News Network →Misidentification of Loretta Lynch: 1. Colbert No. 2. "claimed at length" - no 3. corrections are always "at the bottom" pet NYT MOS, 3. SYNTH is against policy 4. WP:BLP applies since Huston is living
- 15:1115:11, 23. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −77 Breitbart News Network →Shirley Sherrod: unsourced per se - the prior sentence covers the issue
- 15:1015:10, 23. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +49 Breitbart News Network →"Friends of Hamas" hoax: name source of hoax - who is named in section
- 15:0815:08, 23. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −1.516 Breitbart News Network →Misidentification of Loretta Lynch: removed SYNTH - there may still be WP:BLP issues, Colbert's comedy schtick is possibly one of them as the author is specifically named here
21. Dezember 2014
- 22:2122:21, 21. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −875 Breitbart News Network we cannot make claims NOT SUPOPORTED by the sources - the sources support that there was confusion about two people with the same name, not that Breitbart deliberately made false accusations about anyone
- 18:5718:57, 21. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −12 Breitbart News Network Undid revision 639061053 by Ultragandalf (talk)non-utile edit reverted
- 15:4415:44, 21. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −498 Breitbart News Network nope -- it was confusion -- a "false statement" would require the second person not even have that name - note that secondary reliable fact sources do not accuse Breitbart of deliberately lying as this change would seem to infer
14. Dezember 2014
- 21:0921:09, 14. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −94 Breitbart News Network →Confusion of two persons named "Loretta Lynch": clarifying what happened
- 21:0821:08, 14. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +10 Breitbart News Network →False identification of Loretta Lynch: more accurate title here
- 21:0721:07, 14. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −53 Breitbart News Network →Photoshopped image of Nancy Pelosi: trimming
- 21:0421:04, 14. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +657 Breitbart News Network →Controversies: Daily Caller 11/03/2014
- 17:3117:31, 14. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +14 Breitbart News Network →Paul Krugman "bankruptcy" hoax: the error appears to have been with Boston.com, not originating with Breitbart
- 17:3017:30, 14. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +1 Breitbart News Network →False statements about Loretta Lynch: issue was identification
- 17:2917:29, 14. Dez. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −275 Breitbart News Network →False statements about Loretta Lynch: TPM is not WP:RS where there is an editorial POV presented
6. August 2014
- 20:0020:00, 6. Aug. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +9 K Benutzer:Karsten11/Gerry Hutch noun
- 20:0020:00, 6. Aug. 2014 Unterschied Versionen −205 Benutzer:Karsten11/Gerry Hutch rm categories which do not appear to conform to the actual body of the BLP
8. April 2014
- 14:0414:04, 8. Apr. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +18.897 Phil Robertson →Disputes with A&E: YouTube videos are weak sourcing for contentious claims in a BLP right from the start
24. Februar 2014
- 19:1719:17, 24. Feb. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +20.782 Phil Robertson →top: double redirect
22. Februar 2014
- 17:0517:05, 22. Feb. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +40.010 Pamela Geller →Views: "conservative" is not in the source given so can not be in the claim made
- 14:5214:52, 22. Feb. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +40.002 Pamela Geller edited out extra "described" which can be avoided easily
18. Februar 2014
- 23:1423:14, 18. Feb. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +41.995 Pamela Geller Undid revision 596077272 by StAnselm (talk)the lead should accurately reflect the content of the article - this is all clearly in the article
- 18:3718:37, 18. Feb. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +41.995 Pamela Geller →top: adding to views paragraph with info already in article
6. Februar 2014
- 14:5914:59, 6. Feb. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +20.756 Phil Robertson →Beliefs: does not appear to be a member of any "movement" per se
5. Februar 2014
- 21:3421:34, 5. Feb. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +20.704 Phil Robertson Undid revision 594086785 by Resaltador (talk)do we really need the "anti-abortion" term here when it does not occur in the body of the article cited?
18. Januar 2014
- 15:4315:43, 18. Jan. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +46.234 Pamela Geller Undid revision 591229973 by 68.102.109.113 (talk)iow if she endorsed a Democrat as well you would add her there? Insufficient for labeling as a party member
6. Januar 2014
- 23:5723:57, 6. Jan. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +21.243 Phil Robertson see the WP:BLP/N discussions thereon
3. Januar 2014
- 18:4918:49, 3. Jan. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +38.886 Pamela Geller →Career: filling out claim made in cited source
- 17:2917:29, 3. Jan. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +38.497 Pamela Geller placing "right wing: as a descriotion ascribed as opinion and not in Wikipedoa's voice -- you have "right wing" in the lead as you insisted
- 15:4815:48, 3. Jan. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +21.246 Phil Robertson →GQ comments: rm source which said absolutely nothing about the claim it was used for, (facebook likes at 1 million+)
- 15:4215:42, 3. Jan. 2014 Unterschied Versionen +21.553 Phil Robertson →GQ comments: word choice - the episodes are not wisdom teeth