Monarchia Sicula: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lopakhin (talk | contribs)
m →‎Notes: tidy up
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{One source|date=October 2023}}
The '''Monarchia Sicula''' was a right exercised from the beginning of the sixteenth century by the secular rulers of [[Sicily]], according to which they had final jurisdiction in purely religious matters, independent of the [[Holy See]].
The '''monarchia Sicula''' (Sicilian monarchy) was a historical but unduly inflated '''right''' exercised from the beginning of the sixteenth century by the secular authorities of [[Sicily]] (presently in [[Italy]]), according to which they claimed final jurisdiction in Catholic matters, independent of the [[Holy See]].


This right they claimed on the ground of a [[Pope|papal]] privilege. The oldest document advanced in support of their claim is a [[Papal Bull]] of [[5 July]], [[1098]], addressed by [[Urban II]] to Count [[Roger I of Sicily]]<ref>Jaffé, ''Regista Rom. Pont.'', I, 2nd ed., n. 5706; edition of the text in ''Quellen und Forschungen aus italien. Archiven und Bibliotheken'', VII, 1904, pp. 214-9</ref>. The pope agreed not to appoint a [[papal legate]] for Sicily against the count's will, and declared his intention of getting executed by the count the ecclesiastical acts, usually performed by a legate (''quinimmo quæ per legatum acturi sumus, per vestram industriam legati vice exhiberi volumus''). [[Pope Paschal II]] in a Bull of [[1 October]], [[1117]], addressed to Count [[Roger II of Sicily]]<ref>Jaffé, loc. cit., 6562</ref>, confirmed this privilege and defined it more clearly. He bestowed upon Roger II the same power, "in the sense that if a papal legate be sent thither, that is a representative of the pope, you in your zeal shall secure the execution of what the legate is to perform" (''ea videlicet ratione, ut si quando illuc ex latere nostro legatus dirigitur, quem profecto vicarium intelligimus, quæ ab eo gerenda sunt, per tuam industriam effectui mancipentur'').
They premised this right on an old [[Pope|Papal]] privilege. The oldest document advanced in support of their claim was a [[Papal Bull]] of 5 July 1098 by [[Pope Urban II]] to Count [[Roger I of Sicily]].<ref>Jaffé, ''Regista Rom. Pont.'', I, 2nd ed., n. 5706; edition of the text in ''Quellen und Forschungen aus italien. Archiven und Bibliotheken'', 7, 1904, pp. 214-9.</ref> The Pope agreed not to appoint a [[Papal legate]] to [[Sicily]] against the will of the Count and declared his intention of permitting the Count to execute ecclesiastical acts in [[Sicily]] that were ordinarily executed by a legate (''quinimmo quae per legatum acturi sumus, per vestram industriam legati vice exhiberi volumus''). [[Pope Paschal II]], in a Bull of 1 October 1117 addressed to Count [[Roger II of Sicily]],<ref>Jaffé, loc. cit., 6562.</ref> confirmed and clarified this privilege. He gave Roger II the same power "in the sense that if a Papal legate be sent thither, that is a representative of the Pope, you in your zeal shall secure the execution of what the legate is to perform" (''ea videlicet ratione, ut si quando illuc ex latere nostro legatus dirigitur, quem profecto vicarium intelligimus, quae ab eo gerenda sunt, per tuam industriam effectui mancipentur'').


Urban II had thus granted Apostolic legatine power to the secular rulers; according to the Bull of Paschal II this meant that, when a papal legate was sent to Sicily to exercise jurisdiction in certain ecclesiastical matters as the pope's representative, he must communicate the nature of his commission to the secular ruler, who would then execute in person the pope's order in place of the legate (''legati vice''). In both instances it was a question not of a jurisdiction of the princes of Sicily independent of the Holy See, but only of the privilege of the secular rulers to execute the precepts of the supreme Church authorities; in other words, the sovereign of Sicily was privileged, but also bound, to carry out papal regulations in his land.
[[Pope Urban II]] thus had granted Apostolic legatine authority to the secular authority of [[Sicily]]; according to the Bull of [[Pope Paschal II]] this meant that, when a Papal legate was appointed to [[Sicily]] to exercise jurisdiction in certain ecclesiastical matters as the Papal representative, he was required to communicate the nature of his commission to the secular authority, which then would execute the Papal acts so commissioned in place of the legate (''legati vice''). In both instances it was a question not of a jurisdiction of the Prince of [[Sicily]] independent of the [[Holy See]], but only of the privilege of the secular authority to execute ecclesiastical acts as a deputy of the Catholic Church; in other words, the sovereign of Sicily was privileged, but also obligated, to execute Papal regulations in his jurisdiction (of [[Sicily]]).


As a result of the [[Feudalism|feudal]] relationship between the princes of Sicily and the pope, ecclesiastical matters here took on a more pronouncedly political character than elsewhere, and the Church in Sicily was reduced to the greatest dependence upon the secular power. However, up to the beginning of the sixteenth century, the privilege bestowed by Urban II was never invoked or even mentioned. When [[Ferdinand II of Aragon]] became King of Sicily, his secretary, [[Giovanni Luca Barberi]] of [[Noto]] in Sicily, undertook to collect the official documents by which the rights of the kings of Sicily, both in ecclesiastical and in secular matters, were clearly determined. To this collection (''Capibrevio'') was joined a collection of documents under the title ''Liber Monarchiæ'', meant to prove that the secular rulers of Sicily had always exercised the spiritual power. In this ''Liber Monarchiæ'' the privilege conferred by Urban II in regard to the legatine power was first published.
As a result of the [[Feudalism|feudal]] relation between the Princes of Sicily and the Pope, ecclesiastical matters there were more political in character than elsewhere, and the Catholic Church in [[Sicily]] was reduced to the greatest dependence upon secular authority. However, up to the beginning of the sixteenth century, the privilege bestowed by [[Pope Urban II]] was never invoked or even mentioned. When [[Ferdinand II of Aragon]] became King of [[Sicily]], his secretary, [[Giovanni Luca Barberi]] of [[Noto]], [[Sicily]], undertook to collect the documents by which the rights of the Kings of [[Sicily]], both in ecclesiastical and secular matters, were determined. To this collection, denominated the ''Capibrevio'', was joined a collection of documents titled the ''Liber Monarchiae'' (''Book of the Monarchy''), meant to prove that the Sicilian monarchs always had exercised spiritual authority. The ''Liber Monarchiae'' first published the legatine privilege conferred by [[Pope Urban II]].


The kings urged it to give a legal basis to the authority they had long exercised over the local Church. They also used it to extend their pretensions that, by virtue of an old papal privilege, they possessed ecclesiastical authority in spiritual matters to be exercised independently of the pope. Despite doubts expressed concerning the genuineness of the Urban document, Ferdinand declared on 22 January, 1515: "As for the Kingdom of Sicily, where we exercise the supervision of spiritual as well as of secular affairs, we have made sure that we do so legitimately". In consequence of such exorbitant demands, disputes arose between the popes and the rulers of the island. [[Clement VII]] negotiated with [[Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor]] concerning the Monarchia Sicula, but without success. In 1578 [[Philip II of Spain]] tried vainly to obtain a formal confirmation of the right from [[Pius V]]. In 1597 the king appointed a special permanent judge (''Judex Monarchiœ Siculœ''), who was to give final decisions in the highest ecclesiastical causes, an appeal from his judgment to the pope's being forbidden. The ''Judex Monarchiœ Siculœ'' claimed the general right to visit the convents, supreme jurisdiction over the bishops and the clergy, and the exercise of a number of ecclesiastical rights belonging to the bishops, so that papal jurisdiction was almost wholly excluded.
The Kings promoted it as a legal basis of the purported authority that they had long exercised over the local Catholic Church. They also used it to extend their pretensions that, by virtue of an old Papal privilege, they possessed ecclesiastical authority in spiritual matters independent of the [[Pope]]. Despite doubts expressed concerning the authenticity of the document, Ferdinand declared on 22 January 1515: "As for the Kingdom of Sicily, where we exercise the supervision of spiritual as well as of secular affairs, we have made sure that we do so legitimately". In consequence of such an exorbitant claim, disputes arose between the Popes and the Sicilian monarchs. [[Pope Clement VII]] negotiated with [[Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor]] concerning the "''monarchia Sicula''" ("Sicilian monarchy"), but without success. In 1578 [[Philip II of Spain]] tried vainly to obtain a formal confirmation of the right from [[Pope Pius V]]. In 1597 the King appointed a special permanent judge ("''Judex Monarchiae Siculae''") to give final decisions in the highest ecclesiastical causes, an appeal from his judgment to that of the Pope being forbidden. The ''Judex Monarchiae Siculae'' claimed the general right to visit convents, supreme jurisdiction over the Sicilian Bishops and the Clergy, and the exercise of a number of episcopal rights, such that Papal authority was almost wholly excluded.


When [[Caesar Baronius]], in an excursus on the year 1097 in the eleventh volume of his ''[[Annales ecclesiastici]]'' (Rome, 1605), produced solid reasons against the genuineness of Urban II's Bull and especially against the legality of the Monarchia Sicula, a violent feud arose, and the Court of [[Madrid]] prohibited the eleventh volume from all countries of the Spanish Empire. Baronius omitted the excursus in the second edition of the "Annales" (Antwerp, 1608), but published instead a special ''Tractatus de Monarchia Sicula''. During the [[War of the Spanish Succession]] another serious conflict arose between the [[Papal Curia]] and the Spanish court in regard to this alleged legatine power. The occasion of the dispute was a question of ecclesiastical immunity, and the differences continued after Count [[Victor Amadeus II of Sardinia]] had been made King of Sicily by the [[Treaty of Utrecht]] and had been crowned in [[Palermo]] (1713).
When [[Caesar Baronius]], in an excursus on the year 1097 in the eleventh volume of his ''[[Annales Ecclesiastici]]'' (Rome, 1605), produced good reasons against the genuineness of the bull of [[Pope Urban II]] and especially against the legality of the ''monarchia Sicula'', a violent feud arose, and the Court of [[Madrid]], [[Spain]] forbid the eleventh volume from the whole of the Spanish Empire. Baronius omitted the excursus in the second edition of the "Annales" (Antwerp, 1608), but published instead a special ''Tractatus de Monarchia Sicula''. During the [[War of the Spanish Succession]] another serious conflict arose between the [[Papal Curia]] and the Spanish court in regard to this alleged legatine authority. The occasion of the dispute was a question of ecclesiastical immunity, and the differences continued after Count [[Victor Amadeus II of Sardinia]] had been made King of [[Sicily]] by the [[Treaty of Utrecht]] and had been crowned in [[Palermo]] in 1713.


On 20 February, 1715, [[Clement XI]] declared the ''Monarchia Sicula'' null and void, and revoked the privileges attached to it. This edict was not recognized by the monarchs of Sicily, and, when a few years later the island came under the rule of [[Charles VI, Holy Roman Emperor]], [[Benedict XIII]] entered into negotiations with him with the result that the Decree of Clement XI was withdrawn, and the ''Monarchia Sicula'' restored, but in an altered form. The king, through the concession of the pope could now appoint the ''Judex Monarchiœ Siculœ'', who was at the same time to be the delegate of the Holy See and empowered to decide in the last instance upon religious matters. On the basis of this concession the kings of Sicily demanded more and more far reaching rights in ecclesiastical affairs, so that fresh struggles with the Holy See constantly arose. The situation grew ever more unbearable.
On 20 February 1715, [[Pope Clement XI]] declared the ''monarchia Sicula'' null and void, and revoked the privileges attached to it. The monarchs of Sicily rejected the declaration, and, when a few years later the island came under the rule of [[Charles VI, Holy Roman Emperor]], [[Pope Benedict XIII]] negotiated with him, with the result that the Decree of [[Pope Clement XI]] was withdrawn and the ''monarchia Sicula'' restored, but in an altered form. The King, through the concession of the Pope, could now appoint the ''Judex Monarchiae Siculae'', who was at the same time to be the delegate of the [[Holy See]] and empowered with final jurisdiction of religious matters. On the basis of this concession the Kings of Sicily demanded more and more far reaching rights in ecclesiastical matters, so that fresh struggles with the [[Holy See]] constantly arose. The situation grew more unbearable.


[[Pius IX]] tried in vain by amicable adjustments to enforce the essential rights of the Holy See in Sicily. [[Giuseppe Garibaldi]], as "Dictator" of Sicily, claimed the rights of the papal legate, and, during the service in [[Palermo Cathedral]], caused legatine honours to be shown him. In the Bull "Suprema" of [[28 January]], [[1864]], which was not published with the prescriptions for its execution until [[10 October]], [[1867]], Pius IX revoked the Monarchia Sicula finally and forever. The government of [[Victor Emmanuel II of Italy]] protested, and the ''Judex Monarchiœ Siculœ'', Rinaldi, refused to submit, for which he was excommunicated in 1868. Article 15 of the Italian law of guarantees (13 May 1871) explicitly revoked the ''Monarchia Sicula'', and the question was thus finally disposed of.
[[Pope Pius IX]] tried in vain by amicable adjustments to enforce the essential rights of the [[Holy See]] in [[Sicily]]. [[Giuseppe Garibaldi]], as "Dictator" of Sicily, claimed the rights of the Papal legate, and, during the ceremony in [[Palermo Cathedral]], caused legatine honours to be given him. In the bull ''Suprema'' of 28 January 1864, which was not published with the prescriptions for its execution until 10 October 1867, [[Pope Pius IX]] permanently revoked the ''monarchia Sicula''. The government of [[Victor Emmanuel II of Italy]] protested, and the ''Judex Monarchiae Siculae'', Rinaldi, refused to submit, for which he was excommunicated in 1868. Article 15 of the Italian law of guarantees of 13 May 1871 explicitly revoked the ''monarchia Sicula'' and the question was thus finally disposed of.


==Notes==
==Notes==
Line 19: Line 20:


==References==
==References==
*{{Catholic|wstitle=Monarchia Sicula}} cites:
*SENTIS, ''Die Monarchia Sicula. Eine historisch-canonistische Untersuchung'' (Freiburg, 1869), which contains the older literature (pp. 4-6)
**Franz Jakob Sentis, {{lang|de|Die Monarchia Sicula. Eine historisch-canonistische Untersuchung}} (Freiburg, 1869), which contains the older literature (pp.&nbsp;4–6)
*{{Catholic|Monarchia Sicula}}


[[Category:History of Sicily]]
[[Category:History of Sicily]]

Latest revision as of 17:29, 23 January 2024

The monarchia Sicula (Sicilian monarchy) was a historical but unduly inflated right exercised from the beginning of the sixteenth century by the secular authorities of Sicily (presently in Italy), according to which they claimed final jurisdiction in Catholic matters, independent of the Holy See.

They premised this right on an old Papal privilege. The oldest document advanced in support of their claim was a Papal Bull of 5 July 1098 by Pope Urban II to Count Roger I of Sicily.[1] The Pope agreed not to appoint a Papal legate to Sicily against the will of the Count and declared his intention of permitting the Count to execute ecclesiastical acts in Sicily that were ordinarily executed by a legate (quinimmo quae per legatum acturi sumus, per vestram industriam legati vice exhiberi volumus). Pope Paschal II, in a Bull of 1 October 1117 addressed to Count Roger II of Sicily,[2] confirmed and clarified this privilege. He gave Roger II the same power "in the sense that if a Papal legate be sent thither, that is a representative of the Pope, you in your zeal shall secure the execution of what the legate is to perform" (ea videlicet ratione, ut si quando illuc ex latere nostro legatus dirigitur, quem profecto vicarium intelligimus, quae ab eo gerenda sunt, per tuam industriam effectui mancipentur).

Pope Urban II thus had granted Apostolic legatine authority to the secular authority of Sicily; according to the Bull of Pope Paschal II this meant that, when a Papal legate was appointed to Sicily to exercise jurisdiction in certain ecclesiastical matters as the Papal representative, he was required to communicate the nature of his commission to the secular authority, which then would execute the Papal acts so commissioned in place of the legate (legati vice). In both instances it was a question not of a jurisdiction of the Prince of Sicily independent of the Holy See, but only of the privilege of the secular authority to execute ecclesiastical acts as a deputy of the Catholic Church; in other words, the sovereign of Sicily was privileged, but also obligated, to execute Papal regulations in his jurisdiction (of Sicily).

As a result of the feudal relation between the Princes of Sicily and the Pope, ecclesiastical matters there were more political in character than elsewhere, and the Catholic Church in Sicily was reduced to the greatest dependence upon secular authority. However, up to the beginning of the sixteenth century, the privilege bestowed by Pope Urban II was never invoked or even mentioned. When Ferdinand II of Aragon became King of Sicily, his secretary, Giovanni Luca Barberi of Noto, Sicily, undertook to collect the documents by which the rights of the Kings of Sicily, both in ecclesiastical and secular matters, were determined. To this collection, denominated the Capibrevio, was joined a collection of documents titled the Liber Monarchiae (Book of the Monarchy), meant to prove that the Sicilian monarchs always had exercised spiritual authority. The Liber Monarchiae first published the legatine privilege conferred by Pope Urban II.

The Kings promoted it as a legal basis of the purported authority that they had long exercised over the local Catholic Church. They also used it to extend their pretensions that, by virtue of an old Papal privilege, they possessed ecclesiastical authority in spiritual matters independent of the Pope. Despite doubts expressed concerning the authenticity of the document, Ferdinand declared on 22 January 1515: "As for the Kingdom of Sicily, where we exercise the supervision of spiritual as well as of secular affairs, we have made sure that we do so legitimately". In consequence of such an exorbitant claim, disputes arose between the Popes and the Sicilian monarchs. Pope Clement VII negotiated with Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor concerning the "monarchia Sicula" ("Sicilian monarchy"), but without success. In 1578 Philip II of Spain tried vainly to obtain a formal confirmation of the right from Pope Pius V. In 1597 the King appointed a special permanent judge ("Judex Monarchiae Siculae") to give final decisions in the highest ecclesiastical causes, an appeal from his judgment to that of the Pope being forbidden. The Judex Monarchiae Siculae claimed the general right to visit convents, supreme jurisdiction over the Sicilian Bishops and the Clergy, and the exercise of a number of episcopal rights, such that Papal authority was almost wholly excluded.

When Caesar Baronius, in an excursus on the year 1097 in the eleventh volume of his Annales Ecclesiastici (Rome, 1605), produced good reasons against the genuineness of the bull of Pope Urban II and especially against the legality of the monarchia Sicula, a violent feud arose, and the Court of Madrid, Spain forbid the eleventh volume from the whole of the Spanish Empire. Baronius omitted the excursus in the second edition of the "Annales" (Antwerp, 1608), but published instead a special Tractatus de Monarchia Sicula. During the War of the Spanish Succession another serious conflict arose between the Papal Curia and the Spanish court in regard to this alleged legatine authority. The occasion of the dispute was a question of ecclesiastical immunity, and the differences continued after Count Victor Amadeus II of Sardinia had been made King of Sicily by the Treaty of Utrecht and had been crowned in Palermo in 1713.

On 20 February 1715, Pope Clement XI declared the monarchia Sicula null and void, and revoked the privileges attached to it. The monarchs of Sicily rejected the declaration, and, when a few years later the island came under the rule of Charles VI, Holy Roman Emperor, Pope Benedict XIII negotiated with him, with the result that the Decree of Pope Clement XI was withdrawn and the monarchia Sicula restored, but in an altered form. The King, through the concession of the Pope, could now appoint the Judex Monarchiae Siculae, who was at the same time to be the delegate of the Holy See and empowered with final jurisdiction of religious matters. On the basis of this concession the Kings of Sicily demanded more and more far reaching rights in ecclesiastical matters, so that fresh struggles with the Holy See constantly arose. The situation grew more unbearable.

Pope Pius IX tried in vain by amicable adjustments to enforce the essential rights of the Holy See in Sicily. Giuseppe Garibaldi, as "Dictator" of Sicily, claimed the rights of the Papal legate, and, during the ceremony in Palermo Cathedral, caused legatine honours to be given him. In the bull Suprema of 28 January 1864, which was not published with the prescriptions for its execution until 10 October 1867, Pope Pius IX permanently revoked the monarchia Sicula. The government of Victor Emmanuel II of Italy protested, and the Judex Monarchiae Siculae, Rinaldi, refused to submit, for which he was excommunicated in 1868. Article 15 of the Italian law of guarantees of 13 May 1871 explicitly revoked the monarchia Sicula and the question was thus finally disposed of.

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Jaffé, Regista Rom. Pont., I, 2nd ed., n. 5706; edition of the text in Quellen und Forschungen aus italien. Archiven und Bibliotheken, 7, 1904, pp. 214-9.
  2. ^ Jaffé, loc. cit., 6562.

References[edit]

  •  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainHerbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Monarchia Sicula". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. cites:
    • Franz Jakob Sentis, Die Monarchia Sicula. Eine historisch-canonistische Untersuchung (Freiburg, 1869), which contains the older literature (pp. 4–6)