Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:23, 23 March 2007

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Şebinkarahisar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Turkey Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Armenia Start‑class

	Şebinkarahisar is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Comments

Şebinkarahisar

Şebinkarahisar is a district of Giresun Province, Turkey. tr.wikipedia.org Şebinkarahisar —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.224.206.214 (talk) 15:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

True. Khoikhoi 02:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concur.--Doktor Gonzo 16:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be sensible

If you feel the sudden urge to advertise Armenian heroism at least do it in a sub section of the article, not in the bloody intro. And keep it NPOV and less dramatic if you can so it doesn't induce vomit.--Doktor Gonzo 16:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See, this "happy?" comment is not nice and I don't think Wikipedia ever prevents you from creating sub sections. Anyway, looks a little more tidy now. And no I don't know crap about Şebinkarahisar.--Doktor Gonzo 16:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The vomit and advertisement of Armenian heroism is not nice either. No one meant to put that in the intro if you wanna call that one-liner an intro anyway. You could've, w/out vomiting, asked it to be moved to a section and less POV. You didn't need to remove the entire paragraph either. - Fedayee 17:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just pointed out what should be edited, wasn't interested in doing it myself. And I was just being honest with my previous comment, but at least I kept it on the discussion page. Anyway, see you around Fedayee.--Doktor Gonzo 17:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is still in its infancy. If you want to read a vomit-inducing article, read this one. Happy editing, Hakob 00:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is our second encounter and the second time you are making a comparison to an irrelevant article that you think concerns me because of my nationality.--Doktor Gonzo 11:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There will probably be more in the future since decorum seems to be an alien idea to you. Hakob 01:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA and WP:POINT. I was actually warning you.--Doktor Gonzo 10:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Take it easy guys.. Baristarim 02:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Armenian Genocide sub-section

I took the time to write the History section of the article [1]. I mentioned the Armenian thing too and gave inter-link but it is not enough apperantly. An Armenian Genocide sub-section is being created again[2].

This is what I wrote to Fedayee:

"It is a part of the history of the city so I mentioned it and gave a direct inter-link to the article. Are you demanding an Armenian Genocide sub-section in every Eastern Turkish city article?"

I will not get into any edit wars. I invite everyone to be reasonable.--Doktor Gonzo 14:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, first you tell me to create a sub-section and now you are against the sub-section...right. What's so bad about the sub-section anyway? And I will be removing the NPOV tag because it is just a bad faith tag there just because it talks about the Armenian Genocide. I have changed the wording to be as NPOV as possible...cmon be reasonable here. - Fedayee 21:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you to create an appropriate section, don't you think in the context of this article, an article about a city, History is more suited than Armenian Genocide? And I still have problems with your writing, it depicts the event as if Şebin Karahisar was a sovereign Armenian city resisting against an Ottoman invasion. And you don't move the NPOV tag until the discussions have been resolved, that's the whole idea of it.--Doktor Gonzo 09:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plus I think one sentence about the event is more than enough, it already has an article of its own, the internal-link directs. I summarized its 2500 year old history in just one paragpraph and you are sparing another paragraph just for one event that already has its own article, would you call that balanced?--Doktor Gonzo 10:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 10:20, 23 March 2007 edit Doktor Gonzo (talk \| contribs) 655 edits →‎Armenian Genocide sub-section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:23, 23 March 2007 edit undo Doktor Gonzo (talk \| contribs) 655 edits m →‎Armenian Genocide sub-section Next edit →
Line 40:		Line 40:

	::I asked you to create an appropriate section, don't you think in the context of this article, an article about a city, '''History''' is more suited than '''Armenian Genocide'''? And I still have problems with your writing, it depicts the event as if Şebin Karahisar was a sovereign Armenian city resisting against an Ottoman invasion. And you don't move the NPOV tag until the discussions have been resolved, that's the whole idea of it.--<tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Doktor_Gonzo\|Doktor]] [[User talk:Doktor_Gonzo\|Gonzo]]</tt> 09:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)		::I asked you to create an appropriate section, don't you think in the context of this article, an article about a city, '''History''' is more suited than '''Armenian Genocide'''? And I still have problems with your writing, it depicts the event as if Şebin Karahisar was a sovereign Armenian city resisting against an Ottoman invasion. And you don't move the NPOV tag until the discussions have been resolved, that's the whole idea of it.--<tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Doktor_Gonzo\|Doktor]] [[User talk:Doktor_Gonzo\|Gonzo]]</tt> 09:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
	::'''Plus'''I think one sentence about the event is more than enough, it already has an article of its own, the internal-link directs. I summarized its 2500 year old history in just one paragpraph and you are sparing another paragraph just for one event that already has its own article, would you call that balanced?--<tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Doktor_Gonzo\|Doktor]] [[User talk:Doktor_Gonzo\|Gonzo]]</tt> 10:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)		::'''Plus''' I think one sentence about the event is more than enough, it already has an article of its own, the internal-link directs. I summarized its 2500 year old history in just one paragpraph and you are sparing another paragraph just for one event that already has its own article, would you call that balanced?--<tt class="plainlinks">[[User:Doktor_Gonzo\|Doktor]] [[User talk:Doktor_Gonzo\|Gonzo]]</tt> 10:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)