User talk:Sandstein: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 55: Line 55:


Hi, thanks for the notice. I agree with Luna Santin's recommendation for account creation in this case. The range block should expire soon also, I think tomorrow. [[User_talk:Sanchom|Sancho]] 05:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the notice. I agree with Luna Santin's recommendation for account creation in this case. The range block should expire soon also, I think tomorrow. [[User_talk:Sanchom|Sancho]] 05:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

== Reqest to Restore [[LogMeIn]] to user space ==

Hi, Sandstein. I am writing to request restoration of the article [[LogMeIn]] to my userspace so that I can try to redact it to meet Wikipedia's standards.

I had not previously edited or viewed the article, but was trying to find some background/history about the company, and found that the WP article had been deleted due to G11. I have previous experience with redacting and improving articles for restoration, and am interested in doing so with the [[LogMeIn]] article. Thus I am requesting that the deleted version be restored to [[User:TJJFV/LogMeIn]].

Thanks, [[User:TJJFV|TJJFV]] 23:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:13, 18 September 2007

Click here to leave me a new message.. Please add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message; this will create an identifying signature and timestamp.

If you were looking for my talk page's previous contents, they are in the archives. I will respond to messages on this page unless you request otherwise.


Not trying to adverstise

I noticed there was a page up with our company URL so I replaced it with an actual description. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Netrangerrr (talkcontribs) 15:40, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Please have a re-look at this page. Assuming good faith I've reverted your edits and added a translation. RFCU may take a very long time, and may face the same problem of a non-English name. Thanking You, AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 09:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was disruptive. Do not revert administrative actions on WP:UAA. That page is for obvious problems. This is not an obvious problem. Go to WP:RFCN if the name bothers you. Sandstein 09:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

I've unblocked User:BQZip01 since he's nearly served out his time and has promised to reform. I see letting him off a couple hours early as a goodwill gesture that may help him to identify with the project. If he breaks that promise I'll come down on him utterly mercilessly. Please let me know if you have any concerns. Raymond Arritt 15:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with Elias Alucard, Dab is a vandal...

take a look at his edits to Aramaic history —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharru Kinnu III (talkcontribs) 17:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Treatise of the Three Imposters

I am not sure the Treatise of the Three Imposters was written by John Toland. I didn't mean to erase it without talking to you, I just didn't know how to send you a message at first. I don't profess to be an expert on the subject of John Toland, but the copy of The Treatise of the Three Imposters that I've been reading for class was authored by Jean Rousset de Missy, Charles Levier and Jan Vroese. I don't have the full citation, but I can get it if you need it. Anyhow, I don't know what source you have that cites Toland has the author, but you might want to check this out. Let me know, HC —Preceding unsigned comment added by Calhoha (talkcontribs) 19:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. This site suggests it is an anonymous pamphlet which may have been attributed to many people. The article text you are referring to was originally written by User:Clio the Muse, our resident historian. I am sure that if you ask her, she will be able to provide you with her reference. As for me, I have no objection if you want to overwrite the unsourced assertion of Toland's authorship. Sandstein 22:01, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are wise

I saw your decision on the AFD of Lansing Bennett. Quoting WP:BLP1E, which is Wikipedia policy and not an essay or guideline, is wise. Even if it stings a bit since I am the person who wrote most of the Lansing Bennett article, your tactful and wise comments are a useful lesson in the workings of wikipedia!

Soon, you may wish to use your wisdom to decide on the AFD of al-Shehhi, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Marwan_al-Shehhi , whose act is very notable but the person is the subject of few references, usually only in passing.

There is an article about the Hijackers of United Airlines flight 175

Mrs.EasterBunny 22:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The whole pack has been redirected. :) Thanks for letting me know. --Moonriddengirl 12:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review of Supertall closure

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Supertall. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 13:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the notice. I agree with Luna Santin's recommendation for account creation in this case. The range block should expire soon also, I think tomorrow. Sancho 05:00, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reqest to Restore LogMeIn to user space

Hi, Sandstein. I am writing to request restoration of the article LogMeIn to my userspace so that I can try to redact it to meet Wikipedia's standards.

I had not previously edited or viewed the article, but was trying to find some background/history about the company, and found that the WP article had been deleted due to G11. I have previous experience with redacting and improving articles for restoration, and am interested in doing so with the LogMeIn article. Thus I am requesting that the deleted version be restored to User:TJJFV/LogMeIn.

Thanks, TJJFV 23:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]