Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Changed language and removed NPOV tag |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{POV|date=March 2008}} |
|||
The '''Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975''' was passed by the [[District of Columbia]] city [[Council of the District of Columbia|council]] on [[June 26]], [[1976]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://tomdavis.house.gov/cgi-data/news/files/191.shtml |title=Government Reform to Review D.C. s Handgun Ban |publisher=Congressman [[Tom Davis]]}}</ref> The law banned residents from owning [[handgun]]s, [[automatic firearm]]s, and high-capacity [[semi-automatic firearm]]s, as well as prohibited possession of unregistered [[firearm]]s. Exceptions to the ban were allowed for [[police officer]]s and guns registered before 1976. The law also required firearms kept in the home to be "unloaded, disassembled, or bound by a [[trigger lock]] or similar device"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactSheets/Read.aspx?ID=72 |title=The Case For Reforming The District of Columbia's Gun Laws |publisher=National Rifle Association}}</ref>, thus amounting to a prohibition on the use of firearms for self-defense in the home.<ref name=dc-circuit-opinion> |
The '''Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975''' was passed by the [[District of Columbia]] city [[Council of the District of Columbia|council]] on [[June 26]], [[1976]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://tomdavis.house.gov/cgi-data/news/files/191.shtml |title=Government Reform to Review D.C. s Handgun Ban |publisher=Congressman [[Tom Davis]]}}</ref> The law banned residents from owning [[handgun]]s, [[automatic firearm]]s, and high-capacity [[semi-automatic firearm]]s, as well as prohibited possession of unregistered [[firearm]]s. Exceptions to the ban were allowed for [[police officer]]s and guns registered before 1976. The law also required firearms kept in the home to be "unloaded, disassembled, or bound by a [[trigger lock]] or similar device"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactSheets/Read.aspx?ID=72 |title=The Case For Reforming The District of Columbia's Gun Laws |publisher=National Rifle Association}}</ref>, thus amounting to a prohibition on the use of firearms for self-defense in the home.<ref name=dc-circuit-opinion> |
||
{{cite web |
{{cite web |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|quote= Section 7-2507.02, like the bar on carrying a pistol within the home, amounts to a complete prohibition on the lawful use of handguns for self-defense.}}</ref> |
|quote= Section 7-2507.02, like the bar on carrying a pistol within the home, amounts to a complete prohibition on the lawful use of handguns for self-defense.}}</ref> |
||
Portions of this law were struck down by [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]] in the case ''[[ |
Portions of this law were struck down by [[United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit]] in the case ''[[District of Columbia v. Heller]]''. This ruling has been stayed pending appeal with the United States Supreme Court. |
||
==Constitutionality== |
== Constitutionality == |
||
[[Washington, D.C.]]'s gun laws are considered by many to be the strictest in the [[United States]], and have been challenged |
[[Washington, D.C.]]'s gun laws are considered by many to be the strictest in the [[United States]], and have been challenged as infringing on [[constitutionality|constitutional]] rights protected by the [[United States Constitution]]'s [[Second Amendment to the United States Constitution|Second Amendment]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=Kates, Jr. Don B. |title=Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment |journal=Michigan Law Review |volume=204 |year=1983}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Reynolds, Glenn Harlan |title=A Critical Guide to the Second Amendment |journal=Tennessee Law Review |volume=461 |year=1995}}</ref> <ref>{{cite book |author=Hirschman, Albert O. |title=The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy |year=1991}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |author=Polsby, Daniel P. |title=The False Promise of Gun Control |publisher=Atlantic Monthly |date=March 1994}}</ref> On [[March 9]], [[2007]], portions of the law were declared unconstitutional by a three-judge panel of the [[United States Court of Appeals]], in a 2-1 ruling in the case [[District of Columbia v. Heller]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030901090.html |title=Appeals Court Guts D.C. Gun Ban |author=Miller, Bill and Robert Barnes |date=March 9, 2007 |publisher=The Washington Post}}</ref> The District subsequently applied for a rehearing [[en banc]], which was denied, and appealed the decision to the [[Supreme Court of the United States]]. The case is now pending before the Supreme Court. |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Revision as of 03:07, 9 April 2008
The Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 was passed by the District of Columbia city council on June 26, 1976.[1] The law banned residents from owning handguns, automatic firearms, and high-capacity semi-automatic firearms, as well as prohibited possession of unregistered firearms. Exceptions to the ban were allowed for police officers and guns registered before 1976. The law also required firearms kept in the home to be "unloaded, disassembled, or bound by a trigger lock or similar device"[2], thus amounting to a prohibition on the use of firearms for self-defense in the home.[3]
Portions of this law were struck down by United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the case District of Columbia v. Heller. This ruling has been stayed pending appeal with the United States Supreme Court.
Constitutionality
Washington, D.C.'s gun laws are considered by many to be the strictest in the United States, and have been challenged as infringing on constitutional rights protected by the United States Constitution's Second Amendment.[4][5] [6][7] On March 9, 2007, portions of the law were declared unconstitutional by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 ruling in the case District of Columbia v. Heller.[8] The District subsequently applied for a rehearing en banc, which was denied, and appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of the United States. The case is now pending before the Supreme Court.
See also
- Crime in Washington, D.C.
- District of Columbia home rule
- District of Columbia v. Heller
- Gun politics in the United States
References
- ^ "Government Reform to Review D.C. s Handgun Ban". Congressman Tom Davis.
- ^ "The Case For Reforming The District of Columbia's Gun Laws". National Rifle Association.
- ^
Senior Circuit Judge Silberman (2007-03-09). "Case No. 04-7041, Parker v. D.C." (pdf). United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. p. 58. Retrieved 2008-02-12.
Section 7-2507.02, like the bar on carrying a pistol within the home, amounts to a complete prohibition on the lawful use of handguns for self-defense.
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=(help) - ^ Kates, Jr. Don B. (1983). "Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment". Michigan Law Review. 204.
- ^ Reynolds, Glenn Harlan (1995). "A Critical Guide to the Second Amendment". Tennessee Law Review. 461.
- ^ Hirschman, Albert O. (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy.
- ^ Polsby, Daniel P. (March 1994). "The False Promise of Gun Control". Atlantic Monthly.
- ^ Miller, Bill and Robert Barnes (March 9, 2007). "Appeals Court Guts D.C. Gun Ban". The Washington Post.