Jump to content

User talk:Tpbradbury: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Vithoba: new section
new section
Line 149: Line 149:


Hi. I observed you upgrading the class of the article. Thanks. I love to have your suggestions about organization of the imgs, text etc., you being a Wiki-gnome and fairy. Thanks.--[[User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] ([[User talk:Redtigerxyz|talk]]) 05:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I observed you upgrading the class of the article. Thanks. I love to have your suggestions about organization of the imgs, text etc., you being a Wiki-gnome and fairy. Thanks.--[[User:Redtigerxyz|Redtigerxyz]] ([[User talk:Redtigerxyz|talk]]) 05:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

==[[Margaret Thatcher]]==
{{WikiCookie}}
Sorry about that link! I must of been using the template and forgot to copy the correct web address. Silly mistake, thank you for spotting and correcting it. What would we wikidragons do without the wikignomes and wikifairys ;-). As far as the article gos I keep meaning to resume adding references as I only got to her early political career. I will make another go once I'm finished with Wellington. Happy editing and Best regards, [[User:LordHarris| <font color = "Blue">'''LordHarris'''</font>]] 18:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:12, 13 June 2008

Geske

Hi! I saw you assested the article Geske, and wanted some expansion of it? Iv'e expanded it today. The witch trials of the 1590s are badly documented. If headlines vere put in, perhaps it would be a B-article now? --85.226.235.206 (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i see, thank you for telling me. I cant promise i'll do that, but its good to know the criteria! --85.226.235.206 (talk) 18:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment on William Rawson

Hi. I was actually surprised to see the article classed Start initially - it's short (at the moment) so it's obviously Stub - correct call in the end. Thanks for your efforts. Best wishes. Ref (chew)(do) 01:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thanks for finding time to assess Atif Aslam. Appreciate it. Anshuk (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tpbradbury. I was just editing Barefoot to Jerusalem and noticed that you, being the original author, had edited it beforehand, and I wondered whether you could help add to the article. Do you have any citations or references as to where you got your info from?

Also, I've added "User:" to those 'IP' users (they weren't before; they were links to mainspace pages). I hope you don't mind. Qwerty (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see. I myself then went to the BtJ website for reference. As for the mentions of "IP" and "User:", see here, and you'll probably understand. ;) Qwerty (talk) 12:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of Serranilla Bank

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article History of Serranilla Bank, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of History of Serranilla Bank. Jeodesic (talk) 13:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that. Good work...

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
This barnstar is award for great work on a certain French commune article (Beaumont-de-Lomagne), which has turned out pretty very well. Basketball110 what famous people say 18:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You deserved it. Basketball110 what famous people say 19:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Bonchurch article

Tpbradbury, thank you for taking the time in organising the references on the article entitled 'Battle of Bonchurch'. I am now aware of how to group references together. Once again, thank you. EasyPeasy21 (talk) 14:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed you have made several errors. In some of my quotes I used [], e.g. We [the French]. That was deliberate. I was including information in a quote that had not been in the original quote. I have undone the changes. EasyPeasy21 (talk) 09:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guidance on assessing

Hi. I have been assessing articles for a little while now. I have always refrained from uprating very poorly sourced articles, as I believe it is a core issue. I have been discussing this with another editor, who believes that addition of information, sourced or otherwise, means he should rate upward from, say, stub to start. I won't budge an unreferenced article from stub, as I don't trust the integrity of the information without sources. What are your thoughts?

Also, is there a nailed-down guideline or decent essay related to assessment, particularly BLPs? I would be grateful for guidance to ensure I do the correct thing within the assessment department. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 19:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Tom. I have since had a good look at some Project talk page postings regarding this issue, and have to agree that my parameters are somewhat restrictive. I will happily loosen off up to Start, but I would expect to see some decent verification after that. Best wishes. Ref (chew)(do) 13:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paula Creamer

Thanks for the review and upgrade. I noticed you made a number a minor style changes to the page, which I appreciate, but I think you made an error in the lead. Her birth date was linked 1986 in sports, which I agree isn't proper (I never even noticed it before), but now there's no link at all. Shouldn't it be linked like this since the full year is given? I could be wrong on this, so let me know if I am, and thanks again. Giants2008 (talk) 15:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleon thanks you!

The Editor's Barnstar
In recognition of your diligent efforts to improve the Napoleon I of France article, I hereby gratefully bestow upon you this Editor's Barnstar. Russ (talk) 18:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you already have one! Great work on Napoleon! Charles Edward 18:15, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token b05a8e540a322c012e5b4fec0729ab76

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! t

You've been doing a great job on this article. Much of it is still unreferenced, though, which will hold it up from passing a GA review. Thanks for your hard work, GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed your large amount of work on the article and thought I would let you now I'm going to be doing some major editing to the article, most importantly adding references! I would welcome your edits and opinions on any of my additions in the coming weeks. Thank you. LordHarris 20:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
James St Clair-Erskine, 2nd Earl of Rosslyn
Metropolitan Police Authority
Robert Dundas, 2nd Viscount Melville
Charles Léon
Tatiana Soskin
Democratic Party of Illinois
Keynote
Panharmonicon
Jean Baptiste Marie Franceschi-Delonne
Mehmet Akif Ersoy
Tupton
Jack Aubrey
Napoleon complex
Zénaïde Laetitia Julie Bonaparte
ITV plc
Napoleon Louis Bonaparte
Lucien-Louis-Joseph-Napoleon Cardinal Bonaparte
Peter Oppenheimer
Navy Board
Cleanup
USS America (CV-66)
Henry Clinton (Napoleonic Wars)
Epistle to the Ephesians
Merge
Neapolitan War
Alexis de Boyer
Switzerland in the Napoleonic era
Add Sources
Religion in Belgium
Armed Islamic Group
Jérôme Napoleon Bonaparte
Wikify
Fraternal Order of Police
Claude François de Malet
Joe Trippi
Expand
Richard Lindzen
Russian presidential election, 2008
Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Impalement arts

Thanks for taking a look at the Impalement arts article and rating it as at least a B. It's been difficult to get much input from other editors (due perhaps to it being a slightly esoteric subject, although still significant in the circus arts field). Having put in a lot of effort it is good to see some recognition.Circusandmagicfan (talk) 16:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Circusandmagicfan[reply]

Europe, list of countries

What do you think about this approach? Did you have something completely different in mind, then you might want to exemplify this there. Tomeasytalk 07:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned earlier, I appreciated the bulk part of your edits. Everyone tries to lift the Europe article to GA. So, it's good that we are pulling in the same direction. You might want to open a new section on the talk page with a bullet list of priority tasks for GA status.
I do not know how to enforce table columns to be of the same width. My problem with the current version in my sandbox is that the regional grouping info takes up a lot of additional space. It is also information that is much better conveyed through a map. So, my first preference would be to get a color map for the CIA groupings and simply remove the columns.
In retrospect, I am quite happy with new ordering mechanism of the list, which is now purely alphabetical. Readers can find a country much more easily now than with the regional-alphabetical order used before.
"My own personal preferences are also for having statistics to 2 or 3 significant figures." I do not get what you mean here. Do you want two or three more columns with additional statistics? What statistics do you have in mind? Tomeasytalk 16:07, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I observed you upgrading the class of the article. Thanks. I love to have your suggestions about organization of the imgs, text etc., you being a Wiki-gnome and fairy. Thanks.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that link! I must of been using the template and forgot to copy the correct web address. Silly mistake, thank you for spotting and correcting it. What would we wikidragons do without the wikignomes and wikifairys ;-). As far as the article gos I keep meaning to resume adding references as I only got to her early political career. I will make another go once I'm finished with Wellington. Happy editing and Best regards, LordHarris 18:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]