Wikipedia:Copyright problems

Purge server cache to refresh this page if recent edits are not visible.

"WP:CP" redirects here. For other uses, see WP:CP (disambiguation).

Skip to listings

This page is for listing and discussing possible copyright problems involving text on Wikipedia, including pages suspected to be copyright violations. Listings typically remain for at least five days before review and closure by a copyright problems clerk or administrator. During this time, interested contributors are invited to offer feedback, propose revisions, or request copyright permission.

Listed pages appear in the bottom section of the page. For additional guidance, see Instructions for dealing with text-based copyright concerns.

To add a new listing, go to today's section.

Copyright owners: If you believe Wikipedia is infringing your copyright, you may request immediate removal by following these instructions.

Handling previously published text on Wikipedia

Further information: Wikipedia:Copy-paste

Under the United States law that governs Wikipedia, copyright is automatically assumed as soon as any content (text or other media) is created in a physical form. An author does not need to apply for or claim copyright, for a copyright to exist.

Only one of the following allows works to be reused in Wikimedia projects:

A) Explicit Statement. An explicit statement (by the author, or by the holder of the rights to the work) that the material is either:

• in the public domain,
• licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA), or
• otherwise compatible with CC-BY-SA.

B) Public Domain. If the work is inherently in the public domain, due to its age, source or lack of originality; or

C) Fair Use. United States law allows for fair use of copyrighted content, and (within limits) Wikipedia does as well. Under guidelines for non-free content, brief selections of copyrighted text may be used, but only if clearly marked and with full attribution.

Even if a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, material should be properly attributed in accordance with Wikipedia:Plagiarism in respect of local customs and attribution requirements of compatible licenses. If the terms of the compatible license are not met, use of the content can constitute a violation of copyright even if the license is compatible.

Repeated copyright violations

Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted text or images may be subject to contributor copyright investigations, to ensure the removal from the project of all copyright infringement. Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted material after appropriate warnings will be blocked from editing, to protect the project; see 17 United States Code § 512.

Instructions for dealing with text-based copyright concerns

"WP:CPI" redirects here. For the page that protects extremely high-risk templates, see Wikipedia:Cascade protected items.

Blatant infringement

Pages exhibiting blatant copyright infringements may be speedily deleted if:

• Content was copied from a source which does not have a license compatible with Wikipedia, and was not copied from a mirror source.
• The page can neither be restored to a previous revision without infringing content, nor would the page be viable if the infringing content were removed.
• There is no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a free license.

To nominate an article for speedy deletion for copyright concerns, add one of these to the page:

• {{db-copyvio|url=insert URL of source here}}
• {{db-copyvio|describe non-web source here}}

Both of these templates will generate a notice that you should give the contributor of the content. This is important to help ensure that they do not continue to add copyrighted content to Wikipedia. An administrator will examine the article and decide whether to delete it or not. You should not blank the page in this instance.

Suspected or complicated infringement

If infringement is not blatant or the speedy deletion criteria do not apply:

• Remove or rewrite the infringing text avoiding copyright violations or revert the page to before the text was added.

  The infringing text will remain in the page history, and it may be tagged for {{copyvio-revdel}}. Administrators hold discretion on the appropriateness of revision deletion for each case. Please note the reason for removal in the edit summary and at the article's talk page (you may wish to use {{subst:cclean}}). Please identify and alert the contributor of the material to the problem, unless advised not to. The template {{Uw-copyright}} may be used for this purpose.

• However, if all revisions have copyright problems, the removal of the copyright problem is contested, reversion/removal is otherwise complicated, or the article is eligible for presumptive deletion:

• Place one of the following above the infringing text:
  • {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}
  • {{subst:copyvio|identify non-web source here}}
  • Optionally place {{subst:Copyvio/bottom}} below if only some of the article infringes.
• Go to today's section and add:
  • {{subst:article-cv|PageName}}from [insert URL or identify non-web source here] ~~~~

to the bottom of the list. Put the page's name in place of "PageName". If you do not have a URL, enter a description of the source. (This text can be copied from the top of the template after substituting it and the page name and url will be filled for you.) If there is not already a page for the day, as yours would be the first listing, please add a header to the top of the page using the page for another date as an example.

• Advise the contributor of the listing at their talk page. The template on the now blanked page supplies a notice you may use for that purpose.

Instructions for special cases

• Probable copyvios without a known source: If you suspect that a page contains a copyright violation, but you cannot find a source for the violation (so you can't be sure that it's a violation), do not list it here. Instead, place {{cv-unsure|~~~|2=FULL_URL}} on the page's talk page, but replace FULL_URL with the full URL of the page version that you believe contains a violation. (To determine the URL, click on "Permanent link" in the toolbox area, and copy the URL.)
• One contributor has verifiably introduced copyright problems into multiple pages or files and assistance is needed in further review: See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.

Instructions for handling image copyright concerns

Further information: Wikipedia:Guide to image deletion

Image copyright concerns are not handled on this board. For images that are clear copyright violations, follow the procedure for speedy deletion; otherwise list at Files for Discussion. To request assistance with contributors who have infringed copyright in multiple articles or files, see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.

Responding to articles listed for copyright investigation

Copyright owners and people editing on their behalf or with their permission, please see below.

Any contributor is welcome to help investigate articles listed for copyright concerns, although only administrators, copyright problems board clerks, and VRT (formerly OTRS) agents should remove {{copyvio}} tags and mark listings resolved.

Assistance might include supplying evidence of non-infringement (or, conversely, of infringement) or obtaining and verifying permission of license. You might also help by rewriting problematic articles or removing infringing text (without removing {{copyvio}}).

Supplying evidence of non-infringement

Articles listed here are suspect of copyright concern, but not every article contains infringement. The content may be on Wikipedia first, in the public domain, compatibly licensed, or falls below threshold of originality for copyright. Sometimes, the person who placed it here is the copyright owner of freely-licensed material and this simply needs to be verified.

Information can be provided to prove compatible licensing or public domain status under the listing of the article on the copyright problems board or on the talk page of the article. A link or a clear explanation can be very helpful when a clerk or administrator evaluates the matter. As listings are not immediately addressed on the board, it may take a few days after you make your note before a response is provided.

If the article is tagged for {{copyvio}}, you should allow an administrator or copyright problems clerk to remove the tag. If the article is tagged for {{copy-paste}} or {{close paraphrasing}}, you may remove the tag from the article when the problem is addressed (or disproven), but please do not close the listing on the copyright problems board itself.

Obtaining/verifying permission

Sometimes material was placed on Wikipedia with the permission of the copyright owner. Sometimes copyright owners are willing to give permission (and proper license!) even if it was not.

Any contributor can write to the owner of copyright and check whether they gave or will give permission (or maybe they in fact posted it here!). See Wikipedia:Example requests for permission. In either case, unless a statement authorizing the material under compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, permission will need to be confirmed through e-mail to the Wikimedia Foundation. See Wikipedia:Confirmation of permission. If a compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, please provide a link to that under the listing for the article on the copyright problems board or on the talk page of the article.

Please note that it may take a few days for letters to clear once they are sent. Do not worry if the content is deleted prematurely; it can be restored at any point usable permission is logged.

Rewriting content

Any contributor may rewrite articles that are or seem to be copyight problems to exclude duplicated or closely paraphrased text. When articles or sections of articles are blanked as copyright problems, rewriting is done on a temporary page at Talk:PAGENAME/Temp so that the new material can be copied over the old. (The template blanking the article will link to the specific temporary page.)

Please do not copy over the version of the article that is a copyright problem as your base. All copied content, or material derived from it, should be removed first. Other content from the article can be used, if there is no reason to believe that it may be a copyright issue as well. It is often a good idea – and essential when the content is copied from an inaccessible source such as a book – to locate the point where the material entered the article and eliminate all text added by that contributor. This will help avoid inadvertently continuing the copyright issues in your rewrite. If you use any text at all from the earlier version of the article, please leave a note on the listing to alert the administrator or clerk who review the rewrite. The history of the old article will then have to be retained. (If the original turns out to be non-infringing, the two versions of the article can be merged.)

Rewrites can be done directly in articles that have been tagged for {{close paraphrasing}} and {{copy-paste}}, with those tags removed after the rewrite is complete.

Please review Wikipedia:Copy-paste and the linked guidelines and policies within it if necessary to review Wikipedia's practices for handling non-free text. Reviewing Wikipedia:Plagiarism is also helpful, particularly where content is compatibly licensed or public domain. Repairing these issues can sometimes be as simple as supplying proper attribution.

Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia (or people editing on their behalf)

If you submitted work to Wikipedia which you had previously published and your submission was marked as a potential infringement of copyright, then stating on the article's talk page that you are the copyright holder of the work (or acting as his or her agent), while not likely to prevent deletion, helps. To completely resolve copyright concerns, it is sufficient to either:

• Link to a note permitting reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation, ideally using the email template at WP:CONSENT.

See also Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.

Please note that it may take a bit of time for letters and e-mails to clear once they are sent. Do not worry if the content is deleted prematurely; it can be restored at any point usable permission is logged. Your e-mail will receive a response whether the permission is usable or not. If you have not received a response to your letter within two weeks, it is a good idea to follow up.

One other factor you should consider, however, is that content that has been previously published elsewhere may not meet Wikipedia's specific guidelines and policies. If you are not familiar with these policies and guidelines, please review especially the core policies that govern the project. This may help prepare you to deal with any other issues with the text that may arise.

Should you choose to rewrite the content rather than release it under the requisite license, please see above.

Clerks and patrolling administrators

Copyright clerks

For a more complete description of clerks and their duties, as well as a list of active clerks, please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Clerks.

Copyright clerks are experienced editors on Wikipedia who are familiar with copyright and non-free content policies and its enforcement. They are trusted to evaluate and close listings and request administrative actions when necessary. Clerks are periodically reviewed by other clerks and patrolling administrators.

Copyright problems board administrators

For a more complete description of administrators on Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Administrators.

Any administrator may work the copyright problems board. Working the copyright problems board may involve evaluating listings personally or using tools as necessary to complete closures by clerks. Clerks have been evaluated in their work, and their recommendations may be implemented without double-checking, although any administrator is welcome to review recommendations and discuss them with the clerks in question.

Closing listings

Pages can be processed at any time by anyone, but are not formally closed until a clerk or administrator verifies that all problems are resolved. Pages listed for presumptive deletion stay open for a minimum of 7 days before being processed. VRT agents may close listings at any times.

For advice for resolving listings, see:

• Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Advice for admins (VRT agents, see section there)
• Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Advice for clerks

{{CPC}} may be used to denote resolutions of listings by administrators, clerks and VRT agents.

Listings of possible copyright problems

Older than 7 days

Below are articles and images that have been listed here for longer than a week, but have not yet been dealt with for specific reasons.

Poster claims to be the author or to have permission

This section is specifically intended for pages which contain apparently non-GFDL copyright material for which a User has claimed copyright or permission(s). Initial listings of pages with suspected copyright problems should not be listed in this section. When placing items here, please post under the relevant month (eg. if the copyvio listing was first made in October 2005, please post it there). If you are a Wikipedia editor or administrator following up on a copyright problem, please place a note under the relevant listing, stating what you have done or plan to do; this will help prevent duplicated efforts at resolving the problem. Once the uploader has been notified of how to prove ownership or permission, pages should be deleted after 2-3 weeks if no proof has been forthcoming.

If there is a claim, follow up by placing the Maintenance text found at the bottom of the tagged article on the article talk page and/or the user's talk page.

Fair use claims needing a second opinion

For fair use/non-free content review, please go to Wikipedia:Files for discussion.

This page is intentionally left blank.

Others

This page is intentionally left blank.

August 27

• Image:Pat_robertson.jpeg NOTE: I listed this two days ago, but an unregistered user removed it from this page (without removing the copyvio notice from the image or giving any reasons for claiming fair use) Cynical 15:00, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  • This seems like it's a good candidate for fair use---a photograph of Pat Robertson illustrating an article on him. It would be nice if we had one with the source better identified though (for example, a news photo would be an easier fair use claim than some sort of artistic photo). --Delirium 02:06, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Listed on PUI. RedWolf 05:25, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

August 30

• Taj trapezium is identical to [1]. This is an Indian government site, and I don't know what their copyright policy is. -- Reinyday, 00:51, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Couldn't quickly find the copyright status of this. -Splash 19:51, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

September 1

• David Gestetner - source unknown, but presumed copyvio since obvious Babelfish translation. --Jerzy•t 00:43, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Question. Where are you seeing this as a Babelfish translation?Gateman1997 00:48, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
    • I have not studied it in any detail, but in the absence of a specific contrary explanation, i think any English work of this length that uses "feather" where the context demands "pen" instead must be presumed a mechanical translation (and thus presumably Copyvio). (In German, French, Italian, and probably additional languages, words for "pen" and "feather" are identical.) --Jerzy•t 18:11, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
• Doom (band) (part) cites source as this is taken from the insert of the "doomed from the start" album released in '96 . RJFJR 04:31, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

September 3

• JamisonParker, I got caught in edit conflict, but earlier version was attributed to Christina Fuoco, All Music Guide Moriori 07:29, September 3, 2005 (UTC)

September 5

• Our Lady of the Rosary is a Google translation from the Spanish of this page [2]. Here is the Google translation version [3]. The two images in the same article are also copyright violation from the same article. This is yet another copyright violation that I've reported for User:Imdaking. BlankVerse ∅ 16:47, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Image:WBYeats1908.jpg not PD - author died in 1966 according to details on link. Justinc 22:19, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Not PD, but we might have a fair use claim on this. -Splash^talk 17:14, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

September 6

• Pages from Category:Possible copyright violations, (script run 06 Sep 03:14, 1012 pages currently tagged ) --Duk

• Image:Pope-pius-xii-in-berlin-1929.jpg

• Is it not possible to make a FU claim for this? -Splash^talk 22:39, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

• Image:Rabin at peace talks.jpg
• Image:Vladimir Upenski Sobor.jpeg From [4]

• Now Commons, but apparently not PD. -Splash^talk 22:39, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

• John5 from [5]
• Kayserispor from [6]. Ingoolemo ^talk 19:31, 2005 September 6 (UTC)

New Listings

September 14

This page is intentionally left blank.

September 16

Please add to the bottom of the list:

*{{subst:article-cv|PageName}} from [link]. ~~~~

September 17

• Hathigumpha (history · last edit) from [7] Melesse 04:05, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Sadiq al Mahdi (history · last edit) from [8] Sean (talk || edits) 04:15, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Captive bolt from [9] tregoweth 04:45, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Hershey Medical Center from [10], and it's named wrong anway, it should be Milton S. Hershey Medical Center--Boothy443 | comhrá 05:13, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• See Joseph Murphy credited to "Science of Mind Magazine, August 2005, written by Patricia Nolan." - Lucky 6.9 05:16, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Gillian Weir (history · last edit) from [11]. AKeen 05:35, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• The Intruder (Stargate Atlantis) from [12] - Lucky 6.9 05:49, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Highlands Study Center from [13]. User:Zoe|^(talk) 06:51, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Tania Zaetta from [14]. User:Zoe|^(talk) 07:21, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
• Image:2856.jpg (history · last edit) from [15] --bodnotbod 09:03, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
  • I'm concerned not because of the URL I've placed in the boiler as such, but primarily because a) the URL appears ON the image, b) user who uploaded is anonymous with no checkable contribs, c) no info appears on image page to say permission was sought or not required and d) unhelpful filename means this could have evaded detection previously. bodnotbod 09:01, 17 September 2005 (UTC)bodnotbod 09:03, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

Footer

Wikipedia's current date is June 12, 2024. Before appending new notices, please make sure that you are adding them under the right date header. If the header for today's date has not yet been created, please add it yourself.