Talk:Politics of Abkhazia: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
tagged with talk page guidelines |
m added wikiproject WikiProject Abkhazia «Start/Top» |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProjectPolitics}} |
{{WikiProjectPolitics}} |
||
{{talkheader}} |
{{talkheader}} |
||
{{WikiProject Abkhazia|class=Start|importance=Top}} |
|||
==''de jure''== |
==''de jure''== |
||
Revision as of 08:56, 27 August 2008
 | Politics Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Politics of Abkhazia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Abkhazia Start‑class Top‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
de jure
"de jure" or "de facto" ? I say to have only the official one which is in this case only "de jure" version. 
Georgianis | (t) 17:10, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Both. —Khoikhoi 17:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- There is significant de facto side, with separatist wing. Its part of politics of Abkhazia, just like Armenian in Karabakh, Russians in Transmestiya, Chechens in Chechnya and so on. Ldingley 17:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
"de facto seperatist"
The combined use of these two terms is unneeded imho. Either will do, now it sounds as though de facto applies to 'seperatist' rather than whatever is following the terms.