User talk:Sarvagnya

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

???

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

s c

Tulu/Kannada

Hi there, a discussion has started here due to some recent edits by other editors at Shilpa Shetty that possibly seek to insert a POV as to her native language. After I looked into the article history and discovered that it was your contribution, I thought you may like to join the discussion. Regards, Ekantik ^talk 02:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Replied on article talk page Sarvagnya 04:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Konkani language

Pleas do not fight a script war on the Konkani Language page. Leaving the refference would not have hurt anyone, rather it would have served as proof to anyone who had doubts.

Neither was reordering necessary, it serves no purpose. The reason I had put the Romi Lipi name after Devanagiri was becasue they are widely used in the state where Konkani is the offical language, although Kannada is without doubt the most popularly used.

Let me gently remind you that writing comment like the one you did can only get you into trouble. --Deepak D'Souza 07:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

If you'd seen the refs that had been added, you'd have seen that Kannada is not only the most popularly used script, but its users outnumber others nearly 3 to 1. It is not fair that references be asked just of Kannada script. If you want, move those refs to the scripts section. Refs look ugly in the lead. And if refs can be asked of Kannada, one can ask for refs for each of those languages listed there. Sarvagnya 08:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Amazingly, while I was writing a message on your discussion board, you were writing one on mine. So I decided to come back after lunch and put this one. References do not weaken our case, rather bolsters them. I think that the 3:1 ratio is not correct, but anyway. W.r.t the post you have put, there is no section but I took the capital letter as deleniating a section. Search for the line "Konkani has had to painfully negotiate a controversy about the nature of its relationship with Marathi". It wasn't meant to be original resarch but it ended up that way because I had quoted it out of memory.Anyway now I have provided a link that puts it in detail. As far as User:Maharashtraexpress asking for a citation, I was surprised that he had asked for a citation rather than delete the line as I thought any Maharashtrian Wikipedian would. Nothing wrong with it , after all it was a controversial point, and he was well within his rights to as per Wikiepdias policies. Lets stay decent as long as the other party stays so. --Deepak D'Souza 08:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

No.. what I meant was... I know about this so called disagreement about Konkani's status vis a vis Marathi. But my point is(as your ref also confirms) that this whole controversy about Konkani's status is, but a making of Marathi nationalists. Scholarly opinion does not question Konkani's status as a language in its own right. So please reword the paragraph to mention that this theory that Konkani is only a dialect of Marathi is a figment of Marathi nationalists' imagination and nothing else. At the moment, the article seems to be giving a sort of legitimacy to what is basically BS. Sarvagnya 09:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

That was created as a NPOV text by some sysadmin. Lets leave it at that. I forgot about it but this article does not mention the Chatterjee commision and the significant dates in Konkani. I will do some R&D and put it --Deepak D'Souza 11:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Origin of Karnataka's name

Sarvagnya,

How about moving this to Etymology of Karnataka ? Do we need a discussion on that?

Thanks, - KNM ^Talk 21:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

That thought did cross my mind. But I felt that the article talks not just about the etymology but also a fair bit of history. So I moved it to "Origins...". But I am open for discussion. Sarvagnya 21:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

OK!I provided redirect from Etymology of Karnataka to Origin of Karnataka's name. Thanks. - KNM ^Talk 01:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Warning

With regards to your comments on Bharatanatyam: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Your mentioning of 'disco dance' (a derogatory term in south india for sexually vulgar dance) in Silapathikaram is not appreciated. I sincerely hope that you desist from such lowly, crass remarks in the future. Praveen 03:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Disco dance for me is an honorable art form in itself as honorable as BN. May not be to you, but is surely held in high regard by someone somewhere. It is a shame that you find it derogatory. Sarvagnya 03:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your BS here Praveen 14:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:fyi

Thanks for the link. That's a good news. Gnanapiti 17:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit summary

Please do not make personal attacks in edit summaries, as you did here. Thank you. --Ragib 08:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to contact Fowler and tell him about the PA. The advice above is not given as my capacity as an admin. Thanks. --Ragib 08:34, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I saw the Karnataka portal. You are doing a fine job here.Dineshkannambadi 01:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

{{Lingayat-stub}}

Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, new stub types should be proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any reason why this stub type should not be proposed for deletion at WP:SFD. And please, in future, propose new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 05:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello

Though both of us are in Wikipedia for a considerably long time, and have somewhat similar interests (releted to India, that is) I doubt if we have ever communicated. So just dropped by to say Hello. Hello Sarvagnya, how are you? :) Happy editing. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

He he. Many old friends of mine (from school and college) still prefer Dwai! That's far easy to pronounce (and read, as you have discovered). Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

DYK

On 9 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Siribhoovalaya, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Carabinieri 17:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment at CFD

I have removed the comment. I have just explained the incident involving Gnan and you to wikiraja. I am hopeful that he will stop making these allegations now. - Aksi_great (talk) 08:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

DYK

On 10 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Origin of Karnataka's name, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Wikipedia:Barnstar revert

Hi, just wondering what the rationale behind your revert was. I posted the misnomer details purely as an interesting (and factual!) anecdote. Check out the Barnstar page for the source. Thanks.

--mikaul 00:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

It's always difficult to prove a negative. The only reference to the Wikipedia:barnstar being a barnstar is on the page on which it was created. This star has a practical use, where barnstars are solely decorative; following a thorough search, the consensus on the talk:Barnstar page is that the creator of this page was in error. The acid test will be to find manufacturer(s) of these tie-plates, I suppose. The first thing they would tell you is that they are designed to be used for brick structures, not wooden barns.

Thanks for sorting it out, anyway. --mikaul 19:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Personal Attack

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. As a warning to you. Further attacks like the one below will be reported. Wiki Raja 05:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

“ I see above that user RaveenS has given you some smart and sound advice. He advices you to plaster a note next to this 'Ganapati's' signature to warn people that he may be a sock of another user. My only advice to you as a fellow.. er.. 'Dravidian' is that before you stamp such a notice, make sure that the user(Ganapati or Raveena or whoever) is indeed a confirmed sockpuppet or at the very least that there indeed is valid reason for you to believe so. Otherwise, I am afraid that the user may haul you up for a violation of WP:NPA and you may getpacked off to the Himalayas by some admin, with nothing but user RaveenS' sublime philosophy to reflect and meditate upon. Cheers. Did you say What?. Sarvagnya 22:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC) ”

Tamilnet

A mediator, User:SebastianHelm, helped create a project on the Sri Lankan ethnic conflict. One of the things that was discussed there by Sinhalese, Tamil and outside editors was the categorisation of sources. The proposal which I think was ultimately accepted was that Tamilnet was a "Qualified source", so it can be cited but there should be a qualification "The pro-LTTE Tamilnet". Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation#Classification of sources. This has not been consistently done across all articles because many editors are not active at the moment, including myself. -- Ponnampalam 23:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Replied here Sarvagnya 20:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Sravagnya, see the similarity between the image you provided (virgal) and the one that I took at Doddagaddavalli, the same cow, crescent moon and lady offering prayers to linga. So both are virgals than.Dineshkannambadi 01:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

thanks for your hero stone!

Where do you keep your pictures? I looked through your gallery on Wiki Commons and here but it is confusing where you keep all your picturee? How to find them? Anyway, thanks! I had looked all over for one. Sincerely, Mattisse 03:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

The Gallery tag has not worked for two days now at Wiki Commons. It is very frustrating trying to find photos there. I run across them by luck usually! So thanks again for your link to the hero stone. Sincerely, Mattisse 14:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi. On the Portal:Karnataka page we need a "Timeline of Karnataka's History" included. Lots of important dates to be mentioned with cool links.Dineshkannambadi 02:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

wrt: my discussion with utcursch

Hi,

I don't see the need to discuss the issue of the Konkani name on Mangalore article anymore. You have shown that you are not interested in facts but would rather make up your own in order to justify your biases. And then you say that it is going round in circles.

Northest states: What is the problem with Hindi names? After all Hindi is the official language of India. I feel that representing English, Hindi and State official language(and secondary official languages if any) is a must. Take a look at this article: South Tyrol and you will know what I am talking about.

Reg the Shilpa Shetty article you have not opposed the Kannada name , but have linked it to the presence/removal of the Hindi version.

I agree that I am not always polite. MaharashtraExpress has seen that too. If I dont show good faith it is because I am tired of battling with jingoists who couch their biases in polite sentences. I have been writing thousands of words to justify the inclusion of ONE word to the Mangalore article while a few jingoists hover around and revert any changes that do not agree with their world-view.

As far as politeness is concerned your "Swahili" dialogue in reply to Yessrao is really mean. Think about that. --Deepak D'Souza 05:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:March 2007

Yo, Sarvagnya. You accuse me of personal attacks when it is you who attacked Fowler & Fowler with this "Some people here should stop nitpicking, soapboxing and splitting hairs at every opportunity which is only resulting in this and related discussions getting fouler and fouler." I tell you to stop and you accuse me of personal attacks. btw i am sure you must have violated some wiki policy when you edited Saare Jahan Se Achcha and say see talk, but dont mention anything on the talk page. IP198 03:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

PS: Happy Ugadi to you as well. IP198 03:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Images

Hi - yes, 2 of them are pre-1946, so they satisfy {{PD-India}}. Henry Irwin's pic can satisfy {{PD-Old}}. Rama's arrow 10:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually that may not be the case. 1. It has to be determined that the images were published in India before that date for qualification. =Nichalp «Talk»= 11:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

note

As a regular contributor to WP:DSI, I was hoping you could weigh in on the category discussions going on related to the page. There are in fact quite a few, and are somewhat stagnant at the moment.Bakaman 18:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

regarding phenom

hey,can we still delete this article,as it is largely started and edited by the manager of the band itself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenom

Thank you!

Sarvagnya,
Thank you for the vandalism! :) - KNM ^Talk 13:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar!

Thank you so much! (Don't know if I deserve it as Dinesh does all the hard work.) But I appreciate that you noticed. Sincerely, --Mattisse 15:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Western Chalukya-->That was quick. I expected it would sit for a few weeks like Vijayanagara Empire.Dineshkannambadi 17:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Indian cricket team

You suggested that the page be moved to Team India. However, it would seem you have forgotten the possibility of Team India being used to represent India's national teams in other sports. And I would much rather the page being "Indian cricket team" instead of "Team India (cricket)". 211.26.235.50 07:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Sarasvati River

Hi ! I hope that you would like to defend my edit war with Dab for his dictatorship & denigrating behaviours. Do post your views in talk pages. WIN 08:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Periyar

As you may have heard Wiki Raja (talk · contribs) was exposed as a sock of Indrancroos (talk · contribs). USers related to them seem to be vandalizing the Periyar article, and since you seem to be good at dealing with ethnonationalism, it would be up your alley to have a look at this article.Bakaman 01:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Devaneya Pavanar

Hi Brother,

Why did you removed some content from 'Devaneya Pavanar' article. Those contents are from the book "The Primary Classical Language of the World" and the research carried out by European Lingusitic Scholar 'Cald Well'. Please read this book and Cald Well's research to know about this. This book is nationalised by Government of India.

Why did you removed some External Links, those are Government Website Links.

Tamil Virtual University and The Centre of Excellence for Classical Tamil (CECT) are Indian and TN Government sites.

Tamil Nation is the site maintained by world Tamils, which is source of all Tamil related information.

Please don't remove those reliable informations from the article. Rajan 20:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Re:Your 3RR report

You can see the result at WP:AN3RR. I'm here to give you a warning. You, too, are edit warring. You haven't broken 3RR, but your edit warring is still harmful to Wikipedia. Please stop. Give reasons for your reverts; don't use automated rollbacks in content disputes. Discuss issues on talk pages. Thank you. Heimstern Läufer 05:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

re: dashes

Hi Sarvagnya. Thanks for your offer to help out. But, I see that Sandy has fixed the dashes. You could help out with other issues though. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 07:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Hi, my RfA has been successful. Thanks a lot for your support. :) --soum (0_o) 10:24, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I will write on Karnataka flora-fauna this weekend.Dineshkannambadi 15:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

userpage

Thanks for reverting the spammer.Bakaman 22:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Portal:Karnataka

We should add a "Temples" to the list on top along with Literature, architecture etc.Dineshkannambadi 00:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Organizations in Karnataka

I have seen that you had/have worked a lot on categorization / re-categorization on various Karnataka articles as well as sub-categories under Category:Karnataka. Do we have any category, for Organizations in Karnataka? Categories article like, Karnataka Rakshana Vedike would be easier, if we have one. By the way, I recently created Category:Beaches of Karnataka and Category:Dams in Karnataka. Please feel free to correct if sub-categorization has gone wrong any where. Thank you! - KNM ^Talk 00:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Filmography of Rajkumar

Hello Sarvagnya,
Great job on compiling the filmography of aNNaavru! The table looks awesome. I see that, Blnguyen has moved it from Rajkumar(filmography) to Filmography of Rajkumar, which actually sounds perfect.
By the way, the list is a bit incomplete. There are only 199 movies mentioned, while the total should have been 207. For example, if you see Devatha Manushya, it is not coming as 200th movie, but it is. I have the complete list, and more details on each of the movie. Will work on it soon.
Also, I am thinking, is there any possibility of nominating this as a DYK. Thanks for creating the article! - KNM ^Talk 16:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Yes. The list is incomplete. But then the article was sitting in my sandbox for so long, I thought its better to first put it out there and then finish it. I was actually counting on you to complete the list. :) Sarvagnya 16:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

For your info, Rajkumar article in Kannada wikipedia has loads of information, including a detailed filmography. Not to mention, it is a featured article there. We can get the missing information from there and translate it. See: here. - KNM ^Talk 16:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Wikithanks

Thank you for your valuable and constructive contributions, Sarvagnya. The tripadi on your userpage catches the spirit excellently. dab (𒁳) 07:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. :) Also, good to know that you liked even my amateurish translation. Sarvagnya 09:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Tamil

The influence of Tamil on Skt is not trivial or small. Read Hart's book. About finding a feature on an inscription which is identified as Kannada is not an influence on Tamil language.--Aadal 23:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

society

I have replied here in Talk:Society of Rashtrakuta empire of ManyakhetaDineshkannambadi 23:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Ngo Dinh Diem

I have requested an arbitration between Blnguyen and myself regarding the Buddhist matter. Since you agree with Blnguyen, I have included you as well. --VnTruth 01:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Society in xxx Empire-->One option is to rename it "Social life and customs". How does that sound? Though is could become lenghty. I guess Society was intended to include both.Dineshkannambadi 03:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Here is the full text of the citation from KAN Sastri if it helps the discussion.

Literature in all Dravidian languages owes a great deal to Sanskrit, the magic wand whose touch raised each of the languages from a level of patois to that of a literary idiom and the influence they excercised on one another was also not inconsiderable . Basically, thay have all influenced each other, no language is exclusive.Dineshkannambadi 03:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Please comment on the subheadings in Political history of medieval Karnataka.

Are they suitable?Dineshkannambadi 14:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Political histroy of karnataka-->we need a map of Karnataka showing the locations of various regal capitals.Any ideas?Dineshkannambadi 14:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration

I am seeking to resolve our differences regarding the Ngo Dinh Diem article by arbitration. I left a message on your talk page earlier, but it's since been pointed out to me that I should have done a better job of highlighting it. So here it is again.--VnTruth 15:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

A gentlemen user:Scheibenzahl wants to learn Kannada. He left a message on Kannada talk page. He is looking for source material. Can you guys help him.Dineshkannambadi 18:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

{{Karnataka-stub}}

I have included image to {{Karnataka-stub}}. This stub was without any image, after the previous fair-use image was removed. Since you uploaded this into commons, would it be possible to append a rectangular border of Yellow, followed by Red? The Kannada/Karnataka flag colors.

Also, FYI, all the Templates are now listed under Templates section in Karnataka WikiProject page. Thanks, - KNM ^Talk 21:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

sure. will do. and btw, i've several derivatives of dk's pics. most of which I've touched up for contrast, brightness etc.. will be uploading them soon. i've already uploaded some though some of them(this one particularly) havent come off very well and need some repairing. Sarvagnya 21:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I see. I hope you have taken written approval from Dinesh, because he was the owner of the original versions. If not, please do take now. Also, please provide the extn as .jpg instead of .jpeg. By the way, I remember seeing .png format as a recommended format over .jpg. Not sure. You might need to check with experts on this item or post a message in village pump. Just a suggestion. Thanks, - KNM ^Talk 03:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

ohh is it? I thought once you release it on gfdl, its like you're giving permission to anybody and everybody to do what they want with the pics. I'll check again, though. Sarvagnya 04:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Kannad

Hi! As User:Dineshkannambadi has already mentioned, I want to learn Kannad. Do you know of any sites where I can get the material? Thanks in advance.--Scheibenzahl 14:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Also, please reply on my talk page.--Scheibenzahl 14:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your reply! No :( I don't know any south Indian languages, but I know Hindi.

Your AIV report

Do you have proof that these are all sockpuppets, before we block them indefinitely? Simply holding the same opinion on the same page is not irrefutable evidence. Besides which, sockpuppets are allowed, as long as they are not used to violate 3RR, avoid blocks, or vote. Straw man arguments on talk pages aren't such a big deal. Kafziel ^Talk 17:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry is obvious. Please take a look at their contribs. They are all busy blanking particular content and have all taken birth in the last few hours. One of them was warned for 3RR and immediately a new account appeared. And every new account reverts once or twice and then another account appears. After a couple of accounts they even tried claiming a consensus on the talk page. They have even blanked content on the talk page. Its obvious socking. Sarvagnya 17:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

More even as we speak - Dharmatma (talk · contribs), 131.193.8.208 (talk · contribs) Sarvagnya 18:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Peer review

An article that you had shown interest in the past has been tagged to be peer reviewed. Your input will be appreciated. Really :-) I've seen your edits and I can take constructive criticism. Thanks RaveenS 13:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Sure. The article's been on my watchlist and I've followed its progress :). You really seem to have done a good job. Will take a closer look and comment soon. Thanks for dropping by. Sarvagnya 10:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Churumuri

Interesting article on Churumuri.com. Would appreciate if you can add some references. Thanks - KNM ^Talk 00:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Yaa,Actually I am bit confused with the wiki conventions and other things. I will surely contac you if in case i need any help from your side.Thanks. Nrupatunga 06:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

New article on Kayyara Kinyanna Rai

This is a new article created by me and I have opened up a topic for discussion here in the article's talk page regarding his name. I have seen your edits to the Unification of Karnataka article and I felt that you may want to contribute to the discussion. Inviting you to provide your inputs, Thanks -- Amarrg 06:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Sure. I'll take a look. Thanks for dropping by. btw.. you're doing a great job! Keep it up. Sarvagnya 07:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

DYK

On April 20, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Churumuri (blog), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank You

i just was about close my laptop when i saw your message thank you for the Welcome i really appreciate you taking time to welcome me to the group oh by the way i have decided to stay.--Missionimpossible 03:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Lingayats/Veerashaivism

For your kind information, please do not delete articles related to Panchacharyas, and do not claim Basava has is the founder. We have sufficient information on Veerashaivism/Lingayatism existing long before.

Your welcom for Helthy discussion,

Veeresh Hiremath —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Veereshhiremath (talk • contribs) 06:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC).

Message from Veeresh

Dear Sarvgnya,

I have not spoilt anything, tried to correct the wrong things. In case of need we are ready to give you all the data, so say that. Origin of lingayatism, and also How old it was, It is not just found in 12th century. These are the seroius mistakes done on this site, for the history origin of the lingayatism/Veerashaivism. Just i am trying correct it.

Hope for a positive and constructive replies. Regards, Veeresh Hiremath —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Veereshhiremath (talk • contribs) 06:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC).

Note from Veeresh

Dear Sarvagnya, There is nothing like a vandalism, I am follower of both Panchacharyas and Basava. But most of the contents say that, basava is founder it is cent percent wrong and also it is bad as part of history, we refer articles written some third party, they even do not know about india/culture religion.

Thanks for your valuable effort, web site looks good. May be there are the things, those may be even true, needs proof and the things they have a proof but not th true.

I may need your valuable time for communication. As a religion/Dharma is a vast thing, as for proofs concerned, it seems that Hinduism again history of india is written by biased people. We will have a discussion, i need to add value to the information, at the same time, no one would be heart. We can have constructive ideas and hidden and suppressed truths come out early.

As i will be out of station for around 10-12 days, i will not be able to reach you frequently. Will talk to you, later. As i am new user to the site, please ignore previous mails and we will discuss it.

But I am 100% sure i have solid proofs to disprove the some of the things contributed to this site.

Thnks in advance, sparing time for me, Veeresh Hiremath

DYK nom on Bidriware

Hello,

Thanks for creating the article on Bidriware. Just for your information, I have nominated a DYK on this article, by having the following hook.

• ...that a special kind of soil from Bidar fort is an essential ingredient in making Bidriware, a metal handicraft of Karnataka, India?

Thanks, - KNM ^Talk 21:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Let's wait and see. Sarvagnya 21:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Recent edits in Tamil related articles

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Your edit such as this where you removed cited sources is vandalism.

{{Karnataka}}

There is a discussion on Template_talk:Karnataka. Please provide your inputs. - KNM ^Talk 15:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)