Talk:Terry Pratchett

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TimVickers (talk | contribs) at 23:51, 18 August 2007 (→‎Beliefs: coment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Unsorted

How about a name change to: Terry Pratchett's Discworld for that / page? --maveric149

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I think this is a good idea, although there are other entries about Discworld.Would these conflict? Kabads

"parodies everything under the sun" - is this appropriate, given the fantasy discworld? How should we approach this? - atorpen

I think there's too much on Discworld and not enough on the writer - more of a chronological approach through his career would be more appropriate. Discworld is another entry in itself. Kabads

1% of all the non-fiction books sold in Britain are written by Pratchett.

Surely this should be all the fiction books, right? -- Evercat 13:46 Apr 30, 2003 (UTC)

Oops! :) Arwel 18:47 Apr 30, 2003 (UTC)
On an ounce-of-truth per pound-of-paper basis, Pratchett is non-fiction. :) Tannin

Do we really need a section about Discworld with a list of novels? The same information appears under the Discworld article...--IYY 20:14, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]


The rest is history...

There's no good reason to not including this history in the article ;-) --FvdP 18:22, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)


I don't like how one paragrph describes events in 1965, then says "The rest is history...", and then jumps to 1981. Could we perhaps get some of that history in the article?

Acegikmo1 16:48, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Actually it says "It was during his time as a journalist..." i.e. anytime between 1965 and 1980. Checking through the COPAC library catalogue shows that The Carpet People was actually first published in 1971. -- Arwel 19:04, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Ah, that makes a bit more sense now. Thanks. Acegikmo1 19:07, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I understand that Pratchett is marketed as a fantasy author but in my opinion he's no more of a fantasy author than is Jonathan Swift the author of Gulliver's Travels.--Kop 04:25, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Pratchett identifies his own books as comic fantasy himself. Ausir 10:41, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

disc-shaped world rotates on the backs of four giant elephants

It does not actually rotate though, does it - a rather small and cold star rotates around it, just as Ptolemaeus envisioned...

According to Equal Rites the Disc rotates. For each rotation of the Disc there are two summers (where the sun rises and where it sets), two winters, etc. Two of the directions on the disk (can't remember their names at the moment) are named relative to the spin of the Disc (i.e. spinwards and counter-spinwards)--Misfit138 17:42, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The directions are turnwise and widdershins I believe, but yes, the disc does indeed rotate.--RustedGod 13:20, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Are "turnwise and widdershins" not simply the Discworlds North, South ect, how can the disc rotate? Do the elephants pass it about between them?

The elephants have specifically-designed back muscles (this is just speculation, but it does say somewhere that the point of the rotation is to balance the load on the elephants). Why would the directions be named turnwise and widdershins (or, in other words, "the direction it turns" and "the direction opposite to the one it turns") if there was no rotation? In any case, remember you're talking about a fantasy world set on the very edge of reality, created by an all-powerful being so forgetful he left his instruction manual behind, where magic works and gods bicker. Arguments from common sense don't hold as much ground on the Disc. (Oh, and please sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes: ~~~~). Confusing Manifestation 02:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Minor point but North would be hubwards & south would be rimwards, turnwise & widdershins are equivelant of east and west. If you want to know more read the books, particularly The Discworld Mapp Nate1481 02:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And here's a reference: "But this is the Discworld, which has not only the turtle but also the four giant elephants on which the wide, slowly turning wheel of the world revoles.* (* People wonder how this works, since a terrestrial elephant would be unlikely to bear a revolving load for any length of time without some serious friction burns. But you may as well ask why the axle of a planet doesn't squeak, or where love goes, or what sound yellow makes.)" (Interesting Times, Corgi edition, p14) Confusing Manifestation 14:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Call me crazy, but I always imagined that the elephants just walked in a circle.--Sub Zenyth 02:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In an early foot note in "the colour of magic" it mentions that the disc turns in order to distribute the weight evenly upon the backs of the four elephants, and later goes on to describe turnwise widdershins, e.t.c. Please could somebody look this up and confirm it, as I do not have a copy to hand but I clearly remember it. Oh and Personally I think that if in doubt refer to the "Discworld companion". although I don't have a copy of that to hand right now either, (even if I do own two.) DM --Danmas1986 06:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rhianna

His daughter Rhianna Pratchett is also a fantasy author.

I'm having trouble verifying this. What's she written? Evercat 01:27, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Dunno. I can't find any entries for her on COPAC, but I know she has written reviews which have been published in some newspapers. -- Arwel 01:50, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
The Rhianna Pratchett article didn't say anything besides that she was a fantasy writer, like her dad. No bibliography or references. I've speedied it, but feel free to recreate it if you find evidence that she indeed wrote something. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 08:46, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)
A couple of references which might be useful: Beyond Divinity - Interview with the Mother of Chaos! ("Hallo, I have Rhianna Pratchett with me, the author of Child of the Chaos and one of the main writers in Larian Studios Beyond Divinity. [...] When/how did Larian ask you to help them out? It was about a year ago. I had just left my staff position on a UK PC games magazine...Where did you get the idea for the Child of Chaos Novella? Swen, Brothion and I decided on a very rough plot for the story that started with Damian entering the Academy. However, later on down the line the length of the novella was doubled, so I decided to start the story with Damian as a young child. The rest just popped into my head really, but I’ve always liked the way in which Greek mythology depicted the Gods and Goddesses as constant observers of mortals, so I decided to work that idea into the story."); The Daily Telefrag - Games News 21 April 2004 ('Beyond Divinity shipped - Beyond Divinity has been shipped by Larian Studios [...] Fans will also rejoice with 50-page novel Child of Chaos, included n the box, written by Rhianna Pratchett.') - it appears that this is the only writing Rhianna has done (apart from her PC Gaming journalism), and was only available with the 'Beyond Divinity' game Phantomsteve 19:11, 24 June 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps the line should be changed to His daughter Rhianna Pratchett has written a fantasy novella entitled Child of Chaos which was distributed with the PC game Beyond Divinity? Also the current line mentioned journalism... perhaps that should be amended to PC games journalist? Phantomsteve 19:17, 24 June 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Here [1] is an useful interview. nice lass, too. she is 27/28 now

Rhianna Pratchett has been working in the games industry for seven years because she’s had a long-standing love affair with videogames since she was tall enough to turn on a ZX81. After several years cutting her teeth on PC Zone magazine, Rhianna left the security of full-time employment to pursue a freelance writing career. She still writes for PC Zone magazine and can also be found from time to time in the pages of The Guardian, The Sunday Times and Hotdog, amongst others. For the last two year she has also been giving talks, consulting and working on scripts for computer games. Rhianna has worked as story editor and writer for the PC hardcore role-playing game Beyond Divinity, has recently been working on level dialogues for Pacman World 3 and is working on story and mission design for Firefly Studio’s next project. Rhianna lives in London where she accidentally collects cats and lives in fear that she will one day be crushed by her precarious mountains of books, DVDS and videogames.

See also [2], [3], [4], [5] 81.208.83.222 09:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that Rhianna should definitely get her own article, or at least a stub. Right now Rhianna Pratchett redirects to the article about her father, and in my opinion that hardly makes sense. Yes, she does get mentioned in this article but otherwise it completely fails to offer any information about Rhianna. Either the redirect ought to be removed, or, a new page should be created. I know that Rhianna is currently working on Overlord (2007 video game) and Heavenly_Sword, both tripple-A titles, so not a small feat. I'd write an article about her but I'm a very, very, very poor writer. --ShadowCode 10:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Beauty of British Satire

There is as much Sophistication in Pratchett's Discworld Series as P.G. Woodhouse's Jeeves and Wooster, with the much of the Irreverant comedy of Monty Python...What a great mix. --Cbickford

This is not really ready for prime time yet, but I thought wiki editors who are interested in Terry Pratchett might want to give it a go. It's a MediaWiki engine and contains a wiki devoted to Terry Pratchett. There's a bare-bones bibliography list, some very brief biographical information, and quite a few linkbacks to Wikipedia. It could probably benefit from the attention of keen editors. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 7 July 2005 02:19 (UTC)

"Harry Potter Criticism"

I don't think Pratchett's comments are a criticism of JK Rowling and her work, but merely a criticism at how the media (namely the Times article) treats other fantasy writers. See for example Neil Gaiman's comments on his blog regarding this: [6]210.50.112.175 04:40, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have rewritten the current sentence in the article: "In July 31 2005 Pratchett criticised the status of Harry Potter author JK Rowling, claiming she is being elevated "at the expense of other writers".[1]" My goal is to more accurately frame the context of Pratchett's comment. However, I'd like to go one step further and question whether this needs to be part of an encyclopedia article about Terry Pratchett in any case. It seems to lack any but the most ephemeral relevance. Justin Bacon 03:05, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

new added picture

The newly added picture is pretty pathetic for a man who is only 57. He looks 70.--Kim Nevelsteen 11:24, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not suprising really, it was taken after he recently had fairly major, if routine, heart surgery
chrisboote 09:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes

The footnote numbering is thrown off by the presence of an external link, it appears, quite spoiling the joke. Anyone more skilled than I know how to fix that? --Darksasami 21:51, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

fixed. --None-of-the-Above 20:28, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What earthly reason is there for a humorous footnote about a translation? Let Pterry write the jokes - this is an encyclopedia, last time I checked. I'm moving it to Good Omens. ::Didactylos 00:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Done. ::Didactylos 02:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

books

Have I missed something? I dont see his three books: Truckers, Diggers, and, Wings, here. (Books about gnomes, my favorite terry prattchetts.) Again, why arent they here or have I missed them out somewhere? Banes 18:20, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • They're under "Other non-Discworld books by Pratchett". I tried making "adaptations" a sub-section of the "Discworld" section, but I now see it contains non-discworld works, so I reverted it back. The structure of the article seems really messy, perhaps an editor familar with it could straighten it out. Shouldn't all his books be listed together, followed by an adaptations section? -- DrBob 18:34, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Intro

I found the 'Pterry' reference in the first sentence a little odd, and distracting, so I've removed it for now..... Petesmiles 04:34, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This nickname is often used on alt.fan.pratchett. Would it be a good idea to explain it here? I believe it refers to Pyramids, where Teppic is also called Pteppic. (mcv)

What's with the 'Now containing over forty books' line referring to number of books in the Discworld series? There's only 35 published listed on the discworld page, and 37 total. I don't think its proper to include books not yet even completed or published, and even then, it is still off by 4+ 199.181.134.212 00:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

37 novels, but not books, if you include (for instance) the diaries, the Mapps, the cookbooks and so on. Stephenb (Talk) 07:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misquote

"I started work one morning and saw my first body three hours later, 'on-the-job training' meaning something in those days" - this is given as an unattributed quote, from context directly from Pterry. Unless anyone can provide a reference, it is actually a hacked version of a line from "about the author". From TCoM: "He started work as a journalist one day in 1965 and saw his first corpse three hours later, work experience meaning something in those days." If it can't be sourced, it can't stay. Anyone? ::Didactylos 00:51, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Done. ::Didactylos 02:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He certainly used that line at a book signing and talk in Berlin, September 2000 at the Passionskirche, but he may of course have just quoted his dust jacket... chrisboote 09:28, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dust jacket bios like this are, most often, written by the author themselves...so it's a safe bet, but sadly, still unsourced. I think if it was refactored as not being a direct quote, we'd be alright. InkSplotch(talk) 14:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rm second picture

The two pictures are fairly similar, and thus redundant. Please leave a note on my talk page if you decide to revert.  Cdcon  16:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Reverted changes

I reverted a change by Bbsrock which had removed Terry Pratchett's birthdate and birthplace information. Verifying through Google was pretty easy, not to mention I think I've some books around which would confirm it, so I've reverted and put the information back in.

Anyone who feels otherwise, I'm happy to discuss it here. InkSplotch(talk) 01:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Big Bang Theory

I think it would be both humourous and educational to include Pratchett's version of the Big Bang theory in this article.

If you don't know what that is, it was explained in some extra features on a cartoon production of either Wyrd Sisters or Soul Music... Can't remember which one at moment.

The story goes that there are many other world turtles like Great A'Tuin all swimming through space. Every once in a while, they'll all come together somewhere and mate (hence, the Big Bang), making new 'planets'.

Now wouldn't that just be fun?

Not really. It's basically a joke that came from Colour of Magic/Light Fantastic, and as such it doesn't really belong in an article that's about PTerry himself. If, on the other hand, he had gone on record as officially saying he was a believer in the Turtle Procreation Theory of Universe Creation (and not in a joking way), that would definitely be good article fodder. Confusing Manifestation 03:51, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apropo of nothing, other than this section heading, in one of his works Mr. Pratchett pithily sums up the actual big bang theory by stating that the sum total of scientific knowlege concering the origin of the universe is contained in the following sentence: In the begining there was nothing, which blew up. --Casement 03:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good omens

The book Good omens apears twice, once under 'non-diskword' books, and once under books 'contributed to'.

I would place it in the non-diskworld group myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.147.166 (talkcontribs)

Good point - it's more than just a book with "Contributions" by Pratchett, so I have removed the double reference. Stephenb (Talk) 14:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Side issue - signed copy with quote 'Burn this book!'

Clutter

This page looks more than a bit cluttered. I understand the necessities of length for such and important author but a numbe rof the topics hardly fit the scope of an article on Terry Pratchet and give the article a fansite feel. In my opinion these include: Fans, Internet, Orangutans, and Trademarks. Similarly the influences, and possibly the small section Internet can and should be rolled into another general section. Finally the links list seems to be creeping towards relatively absurd proportions, that might be tamed by removing some of the links that cover similar material but in varying degrees (particularly the number of links that mainly just contain a bibliography)--68.231.174.183 11:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Can someone please help add citations to the article - requests are peppered throughout. I've added a few (someone ought to check them, as I'm no expert myself!) but I can't do them all. Stephenb (Talk) 12:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these requests are redundant: the fact that "2005 Booksellers' Pocket Yearbook" isn't online doesn't make it any less a citation. -- Arwel (talk) 14:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Best thing to do is list the ISBN of the book as part of the referance Nate1481 15:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first time trying to edit an article and I'm just learning so please be patient with me. I'm unsure why the reference to his 50 million books sold (first par) wasnt... referenced... I found a reference for it but I'm not sure how to put it in http://www.theage.com.au/news/books/meeting-mr-pratchett/2007/02/15/1171405371862.html?page=fullpage I will keep trying to teach myself how to do it but don't let me stop anyone else from doing this Douglike 22:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links

removed following links some may be better on the diskworld page

removed all unsourced parts per WP:BLP and also WP:CITE for non-person related ones.

I have been through the article and removed anything that was requesting a citation. Due to the nature of the article, we cannot accept this sort of request on articles about living people. If you wish to re-add any of it, please provide a reference for it. Thanks, Localzuk(talk) 13:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will get back to you but think alot comes from a back of book interview will see if I can find which when I have time. Nate1481 23:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Pratchett

I think that the Terry Pratchet article should have a list of all the books he's written not just the discworld books.82.12.132.195 21:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Fuzbuni[reply]

What seems to be missing? Notinasnaid 21:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Space Cadets

The following was in Pratchett's biography:

In 1997 Pratchett appeared on the science-fiction game show Space Cadets, hosted by Greg Proops:
When Proops asked the question: "Who is Britain's most shoplifted author?"
Pratchett immediately answered: "I am!"
"Correct!" confirmed Proops.

While amusing, this is hardly biographical information, and is definitly not a life-changing event on par with "He became an author" and "He became an Officer of the Order of the British Empire", the two entries between which it was located. This is amusing trivia at best. Not to mention that it is unsourced. I've removed it. -- Ritchy 05:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pterry

Could someone explain the origin and meaning of the nickname "Pterry" for Terry Pratchett? "Pterry" redirects to the Terry Pratchett page but isn't found in the article. joye 17:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the book Pyramids, a number of the characters (Pteppic, Ptracy etc), and other words (ptortoise) had names that began Pt (pronounced just as T). On the newsgroup alt.fan.pratchett, Terry was therefore referred to as Pterry. See also the alt.fan.pratchett FAQ. sjwk 00:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The names were actually spelled with the T (Teppic, Traci, tortoise), but due to the Djelybabian's accent, they pronounced it with a silent P. (Pteppic, Ptraci, ptortoise.) This was explained by both Pteppic's training as an assassin and Ptraci's training as a handmaiden, as one should always seem a little bit exotic. --StarChaser Tyger 09:51, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Science humour

I just wrote the page Science humour. The final section is "Humour in science fiction". I mentioned Adams, Asimov, etc. Could you please head over, and help develop the article? Discworld's astronomy/speed of light, etc., would certainly seem to fit into the page. Cheers, samwaltz 18:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I heard he dislikes Alice in Wonderland

I think this should be expected of an author so lame he uses wizards as a metaphor for the priesthood. How fucking clever, asshole. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.57.13.124 (talk) 13:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I thought he used the priests for that... --Nate 09:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Lel lame? Stfu mister literary critic. :') Krastain 10:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments beginning with "I heard..." are rarely useful, as the above clearly shows. Eldestone 10:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

libertarian

That category was added. Is there any supporting evidence?DGG 07:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Especially as "libertarianism" is primarily a US political term; see Libertarian Party. The closest in the UK is the Liberal Party. As such, if the claim were true, he would be a liberal. Please keep in mind that the twisting that has accompanied the term "liberal" in the United States only applies there. In the rest of the world, what is known as a libertarian in the US is recognised as liberal, and, as Wikipedia policy is to maintain appropriate dialect, one should not use American descriptors to characterise a Briton. samwaltz 09:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure at all that US libertarian=UK liberal. There are liberals and liberals. Isaiah Berlin and Popper and Shaw were all liberals, and not one of them was anything like the other ideologically. Hornplease 15:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism?

I'm new to all this so I'm not sure how it all works, but three pars of the introduction are taken word for word from answers.com. Is this allowed? or did answers take it from wiki? Douglike 12:00, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answers.com is a search engine, it's more likely it got them from here. In fact on a check it says so @ the top... --Nate 12:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for that. I've tried finding the most relevant sources for some of the quotes included. The only thing I can't get hold of is the hardback sales figures. Hope that helps you all. Douglike 13:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The refs are great, this should probably be put in for GA review soon. --Nate 13:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't disagree but those sales figures are a sticking point in my head.Douglike 13:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly sourced info

I removed an odd blockquote that was added by an anon IP with a webpage as a source. The webpage itself lists no sources so is not verifiable. here is what I removed:

When he took up his position with the Western Daily Press in 1970 he moved, with wife Lyn (whom he had married in 1968), to a cottage in Rowberrow in Somerset where their daughter Rhianna was born. When he found he could not enlarge the cottage further, the family moved in 1993 to what he has described as 'a Domesday manorette' south west of Salisbury, and alert fans will have seen pictures of this on the TV interview at the time Soul Music was published.

which had the following source: http://www.lspace.org/about-terry/biography.html --Chuck Sirloin 18:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chapters in Thud!?

The following can be found in the Trademarks section:

Another notable feature of Pratchett's style of writing is that the majority of his books are not subdivided into chapters. Pratchett himself has stated that he does this because life does not occur in chapters, nor do most movies, and that Homer did not write in chapters. He claims chapters to be unnecessary in books written for adults (WikiQuote). However, there have been exceptions; the books Going Postal and Thud! were divided into chapters.

My copy of Thud! is not divided into chapters; are there any versions of the book where this is so? Adzz 00:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mine isn't either. I suspect this is simply an error in the article. The Discworld article says "However, the first Discworld novel, The Colour of Magic, was divided into "books", as is Pyramids. Going Postal does have chapters" which I think is correct. Stephenb (Talk) 08:02, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anybody want to make this featured?

I've made some significant changes to the article: reorganized it, removed unnecessary sections and information (or moved it into Discworld), added 16 21 plenty of new references and expanded the lead section. This still needs some work to be a good article and later featured, so I hope I'll spark some interest in other editors.--Svetovid 21:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd just looked @ it & been thinking hmm is this a GA yet, peer review would be a good place to start to what needs doing. --Nate1481(talk/contribs) 16:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Someone (you?) should go through new text and fix grammar, wording, composition and such.--Svetovid 16:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately copy editing is not a strong point of mine , but ill give it a try. Will have to wait till home Inet is up again as not kind of thing i can do in 5 mins @ work. --Nate1481(t/c) 15:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Influences - only children statement Tiffany Aching

The Page stated that

"He was an only child and his characters are often with no siblings because "In fiction, only children are the interesting ones."[35] Examples include Susan Sto Helit and tiffany Aching.[27]"


Removed Tifany Aching as she has a younger brother

Thanks, I wasn't sure about that.--Svetovid 16:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
ref doesn't mention Susan so removedit. --Nate1481(t/c) 15:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nation?

The article says that Pratchett is writing a book for 2008 called Nation. Nation has no article, however, and Google doesn't provide any details. Can we have a confirmation on this? 69.19.14.19 21:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See this interview, for example.--Svetovid 22:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beliefs

I have removed him (temporarily) from "English atheists" because although he is a Humanist that could still make him an agnostic, and the citation reference after it states he is a Humanist does not make it clear which he is. CO.82.7.40.198 21:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing large chunks of The Science of Discworld 2 & most of SotD 3 would probably cover showing Pratchett as an atheist. --Nate1481( t/c) 08:35, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Or just type "Terry Pratchett" and "atheism" or "atheist" into Google.--Svetovid 09:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe one of his more famous quotes (was it from "Small Gods") was that he was angry at God for not existing. He might qualify for "weak atheist". That is an agnostic that's picked a camp :) 12.44.178.253 22:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a citation

Hi everybody. I'm reviewing this for GA a the moment. I've removed this sentence since it heeds a citation: Tim Vickers 23:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If Pratchett is attending, there is often an auction in which fans can bid money to have their name included in the next Discworld book, and all proceeds go to the Orangutan Foundation.[citation needed]