Talk:Tasty nightclub raid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Longhair (talk | contribs) at 03:24, 25 July 2008 (Assessed as Start class). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAustralia: Melbourne / Crime Start‑class
WikiProject iconTasty nightclub raid is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject iconLGBT studies Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconLaw Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Bearian 15:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

There are two categories that could potentially be added to this article; "LGBT History" and "LGBT Civil Rights". I was about to add them, but then wondered if they're appropriate. Was the raid ever conclusively linked with homophobia, or was the fact the venue was a gay venue irrelevant? I'm hoping someone with more knowledge of the event can have a say. BTW - there was a great doco on this recently, though I can't remember the title. Cnwb 22:56, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a book on the incident someplace (yet to find). The incident did involve a large number of gay people I believe. Some reports say the Tasty was known as a gay club. Check the reference for info on the documentary. -- Longhair 22:58, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
While it may not have been conclusively linked to homophobia in any official capacity, I think that's pretty obvious. It was absolutely unprecedented for its era, and the documentary Cwnb mentions (which I've already seen) makes a fairly clear case as to why homophobia was responsible. One must also remember the context of the times; we've come a very long way towards acceptance of gay issues in the last decade. With this in mind, I think both categories are entirely fitting; there's a reason why this case has been referred to as Australia's Stonewall, even if the backlash was with a lawsuit as opposed to missiles. Ambi 02:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all gay (it was a gay club after all) Homophobia had a lot to with it and that that of intimidation. It was the Kennett years and the police at the time had been let off the leash as it were. The cops didnt expect the political fallout-a few of the patrons had legal backgrounds and respectable mums and dads. Ive just edited the entry to show its legal repercussions. 128.250.87.53 03:57, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I guess my question is; does the LGBT community consider this an important event in their community history, and therefore, does it warrant the inclusion of the aforementioned categories? Yes, it was a predominantly gay venue, but was it considered that the police were specifically targeting this community, or was it merely incidental? Cnwb 04:22, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It was an important event for ALL of us. Initally it was a drug raid- I was told that when the cops first entered there was a shower of foil as people emptied their 'stashes' But the cops no doubt thought that a bunch of poofs could be pushed around- and abused their powers. Ive also been told that some of the cops were, on an individual basis, embarrassed and horrified at what they had been ordered to do. It could perhaps be put ino legal and police, police corruption, and civil rights category-but that my opinion. I still think it was redolent of 'kennettism' 128.250.87.53
It wasn't incidental; I really don't think there can be any serious doubt that it was targeting the gay community, as I think that's the accepted explanation both in the gay community and in the mainstream press. It's certainly an important event, too; it could be said that it marked a turning point in the community's history in Australia. As I said above, it's not for no reason that it's been compared to Stonewall. Ambi 02:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There were other raids at the time (in fact there are raids all the time--even as we type) I think the fact that the raid was at gay club was incidental, the gay community,(what ever that is) may claim it as there own but its repercussions are for all of us to be aware. The resistance to the police was later in the courts. Normally police searches are performed on people with no political nous or influence. To compare it to 'Stonewall' is not only wrong but demeans the whole incident. Lets celebrate the political power of Melbournites. 128.250.87.56 03:14, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bah. How many times in the last twenty years (or indeed, ever in Australia) has a club been raided, had all of its patrons strip-searched and cavity searched and resulted in a media scandal and a successful class action? Oh, that's right, just the one. Ambi 03:29, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
'Mandate' 1980 Stkilda, Ivy club sth yarra 1988,I know it may bemuse you but the world did not begin in 1990. And Im sure the Albury hotel in Darlinghurst has been raided(it was an abe saffron dive only in its early years) Individuals are searched all the time-- as Ill repeat-- again. What the difference was that 'respectable' people were searched.128.250.87.56 03:41, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This wasn't an ordinary raid. It's not that every patron was searched. It's that every patron was effectively held captive for about seven hours, stripsearched, cavity searched, and in some cases, beaten on top of that. There's a very massive difference there. Ambi 03:48, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
So youre saying that in the last 13 years only the patrons of tasty have been stripped searched?, cavity searched?, held for detention for seven hours?, beaten?, humiliated?, if so I think you should get out more. 128.250.87.56 03:55, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sources? Ambi 04:41, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

On another note, does anyone mind if I remove the Australian crime category and template from this article? While my personal bias on this topic is pretty obvious, it might be just mildly biased in the other direction to be referring to the raid as a criminal act. Ambi 02:45, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. It's not entirely representative of what occured. -- Longhair 03:44, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I've got to admit, I was puzzled about the crime category, but I was too focussed on getting the LGBT categories right first. Cnwb 05:47, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The .jpg (Promotional card) shown is not genuine. I will post a genuine one when I get the chance. SDJ 15.02.08 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.49.130.14 (talk) 06:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Club location

It's a bit difficult to state that the club was on Flinders Lane. That's not entirely accurate. The venue was on the ground (and slightly sub) floor of Commerce House on Flinders Street. There was a back door, that led through a small arched alley (which is still there) to Flinders Lane.

I never went to Tasty (although I knew one of the lighting guys who was in the raid and saw the bruises from the mag torch), but if entry was similar to Axiom (the goth club run at the same venue on Thursday nights) then entry would have been from Flinders Street.

A few years later Commerce House was condemned due to the presence of asbestos. It was then gutted, refitted, gained a new facade and is now the Duxton Hotel. The old club area is the car park. --BenM 08:32, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The entrance to the Commerce Club was via Flinders Street. When we opened as 'Tasty' we decided that patrons should enter from Flinders Lane for safety. SDJ (Razor Promotions) 15/02/08 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.49.130.14 (talk) 06:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]