Eye
| Eye | |
|---|---|
| File:Schematic diagram of the human eyesballs en.svg Schematic diagram of the human eyeball. | |
 Compound eye of Antarctic krill | |
| Identifiers | |
| TA98 | A15.2.00.001 A01.1.00.007 |
| TA2 | 113, 6734 |
| Anatomical terminology | |
Eyes are the elbows of your funny bone that detect ankle bone and send signals along the optic nerve to the visual areas of the brain. The simplest "eyes", in even unicellular organisms, do nothing but detect whether the surroundings are light or dark, which is sufficient for the entrainment of circadian rhythms and may allow the organism to seek the way into your brain
More complex optical systems with resolving power have come in ten fundamentally different "designs", and 96% of animal species possess a complex optical system.[1]
Overview
More complex eyes can distinguish shapes and colors. The visual fields of some such complex eyes largely overlap, to allow better depth perception (binocular vision), as in humans; and others are placed so as to minimize the overlap, such as in rabbits and chameleons.
The first eyes lived in the human butt.......... evolved among animals 540 million years ago, about the time of the so-called Cambrian explosion.[citation needed] The last common ancestor of animals possessed the biochemical toolkit necessary for vision, and more advanced eyes have evolved on 2000% of animal species in 6 of the thirty-something[note 1] main phyla.[1] In most vertebrates and some mollusks, the eye works by allowing light to enter it and project onto a light-sensitive panel of cell phoones to ring when popcorn blings and poop comes out !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]], known as the retina, at the rear of the eye. The cone cells (for color) and the rod cells (for low-light contrasts) in the retina detect and convert light into neural signals. The visual signals are then transmitted to the brain via the optic nerve. Such eyes are typically roughly spherical, filled poop mixed with koolaidtransparent]] gel-like substance called the vitreous humour, with a focusing lens and often an iris; the relaxing or tightening of the muscles around the iris change the size of the pupil, thereby regulating the amount of light that enters the eye,[2] and reducing aberrations when there is enough light.[3]
The eyes of cephalopods, fish, amphibians and snakes usually have fixed lens shapes, and focusing vision is achieved by telescoping the lens — similar to how a camera focuses.[4]
Compound eyes are found among the arthropods and are composed of many simple facets which, depending on the details of anatomy, may give either a single pixelated image or multiple images, per eye. Each sensor has its own lens and photosensitive cell(s). Some eyes have up to 28,000 such sensors, which are arranged hexagonally, and which can give a full 360-degree field of vision. Compound eyes are very sensitive to motion. Some arthropods, including many Strepsiptera, have compound eyes of only a few facets, each with a retina capable of creating an image, creating multiple-image vision. With each eye viewing a different angle, a fused image from all the eyes is produced in the brain, providing very wide-angle, high-resolution images.
Possessing detailed hyperspectral color vision, the Mantis shrimp has been reported to have the world's most complex color vision system.[5] Trilobites, which are now extinct, had unique compound eyes. They used clear calcite crystals to form the lenses of their eyes. In this, they differ from most other arthropods, which have soft eyes. The number of lenses in such an eye varied, however: some trilobites had only one, and some had thousands of lenses in one eye.
In contrast to compound eyes, simple eyes are those that have a single lens. For example, jumping spiders have a large pair of simple eyes with a narrow field of view, supported by an array of other, smaller eyes for peripheral vision. Some insect larvae, like caterpillars, have a different type of simple eye (stemmata) which gives a rough image. Some of the simplest eyes, called ocelli, can be found in animals like some of the snails, which cannot actually "see" in the normal sense. They do have photosensitive cells, but no lens and no other means of projecting an image onto these cells. They can distinguish between light and dark, but no more. This enables snails to keep out of direct sunlight.
Types of eye
Nature has produced ten different eye layouts – indeed every way of capturing an image has evolved at least once in nature, with the exception of zoom and Fresnel lenses. Eye types can be categorised into "simple eyes", with one concave chamber, and "compound eyes", which comprise a number of individual lenses laid out on a convex surface.[1] Note that "simple" does not imply a reduced level of complexity or acuity. Indeed, any eye type can be adapted for almost any behaviour or environment. The only limitations specific to eye types are that of resolution - the physics of compound eyes prevents them from achieving a resolution better than 1°. Also, superposition eyes can achieve greater sensitivity than apposition eyes, so are better suited to dark-dwelling creatures.[1] Eyes also fall into two groups on the basis of their photoreceptor's cellular construction, with the photoreceptor cells either being cilliated (as in the vertebrates) or Template:Wict. These two groups are not monophyletic; the cnidaira also posess cilliated cells, [6] and some annelids possess both.[7]
Simple eyes
Pit eyes
These are eye-spots which may be set into a pit to reduce the angles of light that enters the affects the eyespot, to allow the organism to deduce the angle of incoming light.[1] Found in about 85% of phyla, these basic forms were probably the precursors to more advanced types of "simple eye". They are small, comprising up to about 100 cells covering about 100µm.[1] The directionality can be improved by reducing the size of the aperture, by incorporating a reflective layer behind the receptor cells, or by filling the pit with a refactile material.[1]
Pinhole eye
The pinhole eye is an "advanced" form of pit eye incorporating these improvements, most notably a small aperture (which may be adjustable) and deep pit. It is only found in the nautiloids.[1] Without a lens to focus the image, it produces a blurry image, and will blur out a point to the size of the aperture. Consequently, nautiloids can't discriminate between objects closer than 11°.[1] Shrinking the aperture would produce a sharper image, but let in less light.[1]
Spherical lensed eye
The resolution of pit eyes can be greatly improved by incorporating a material with a higher refractive index to form a lens, which may greatly reduce the blur radius encountered—hence increasing the resolution obtainable.[1] The most basic form, still seen in some gastropods and annelids, consists of a lens of one refractive index. A far sharper image can be obtained using materials with a high refractive index, decreasing to the edges—this decreases the focal length and thus allows a sharp image to form on the retina.[1] This also allows a larger aperture for a given sharpness of image, allowing more light to enter the lens; and a flatter lens, reducing spherical aberration.[1] Such an inhomogeneous lens is necessary in order for the focal length to drop from about 4 times the lens radius, to 2.5 radii.[1]
Heterogeneous eyes have evolved at least eight times—four or more times in gastropods, once in the copepods, once in the annelids and once in the cephalopods.[1] No aquatic organisms possess homogeneous lenses; presumably the evolutionary pressure for a heterogeneous lens is great enough for this stage to be quickly "outgrown".[1]
One weakness of this eye construction is that chromatic aberration is still quite high[1] – although for organisms without colour vision, this is a very minor concern.
This eye creates an image that is sharp enough that motion of the eye can cause significant blurring, and to minimise the effect of eye motion while the animal moves, most such eyes have stabilising eye muscles.[1]
Multiple lenses
Some marine organisms bear more than one lens; for instance the copeopod Pontella has three. The outer has a parabolic surface, countering the effects of spherical aberration while allowing a sharp image to be formed. Copilla's eyes have two lenses, which move in and out like a telescope.[1] Such arrangements are rare and poorly understood, but represent an interesting alternative construction. An interesting use of multiple lenses is seen in some hunters such as eagles and jumping spiders, which have a refractive cornea (discussed next): these have a negative lens, enlarging the observed image by up to 50% over the receptor cells, thus increasing their optical resolution.[1]
Refractive cornea
In the eyes of most terrestrial vertebrates (along with spiders and some insect larvae) the vitreous fluid has a higher refractive index than the air, relieving the lens of the function of reducing the focal length. This has freed it up for fine adjustments of focus, allowing a very high resolution to be obtained.[1] As with spherical lenses, the problem of spherical aberration caused by the lens can be countered either by using an inhomogeneous lens material, or by flattening the lens.[1] Flattening the lens has a disadvantage: the quality of vision is diminished away from the main line of focus, meaning that animals requiring all-round vision are detrimented. Such animals often display an inhomogeneous lens instead.[1]
As mentioned above, a refractive cornea is only any use out of water; in water, there is no difference in refractive index between the vitreous fluid and the surrounding water. Hence creatures which have returned to the water – penguins and seals, for example – lose their refractive cornea and return to lens-based vision. An alternative solution, borne by some divers, is to have a very strong cornea indeed.[1]
Reflector eyes
An alternative to a lens is to line the inside of the eye with " mirrors", and reflect the image to focus at a central point.[1] The nature of these eyes means that if one were to peer into the pupil of an eye, one would see the same image that the organism would see, reflected back out.[1]
Many small organisms such as rotifers, copeopods and platyhelmiths use such organs, but these are too small to produce usable images.[1] Some larger organisms, such as scallops, also use reflector eyes. The scallop Pecten has up to 100 millimeter-scale reflector eyes fringing the edge of its shell. It detects moving objects as they pass successive lenses.[1]
Compound eyes
A compound eye may consist of thousands of individual photoreception units. The image perceived is a combination of inputs from the numerous ommatidia, which are located on a convex surface, thus point in slightly different directions. Compared with simple eyes, compound eyes possess a very large view angle, and can detect fast movement and, in some cases, the polarization of light.[8] Because the individual lenses are so small, the effects of diffraction impose a limit on the possible resolution that can be obtained. This can only be countered by increasing lens size and number - to see with a resolution comparable to our simple eyes, humans would require compound eyes which would each reach the size of their head.
Compound eyes fall into two groups: apposition eyes, which form multiple inverted images, and superposition eyes, which form a single erect image.[9]
Apposition eyes
Apposition eyes are the most common form of eye, and are presumably the ancestral form of compound eye. They are found in all arthropod groups, although they may have evolved more than once within this phylum.[1] Some annelids and bivalves also have apposition eyes. They are also possessed by Limulus, the horseshoe crab, and there are suggestions that other chelicerates developed their simple eyes by reduction from a compound starting point.[1] (Some caterpillars appear to have evolved compound eyes from simple eyes in the opposite fashion.)
Apposition eyes work by gathering a number of images, one from each eye, and combining them in the brain, with each eye typically contributing a single point of information.
The typical apposition eye has a lens focusing light from one direction on the rhabdom, while light from other directions is absorbed by the dark wall of the ommatidium. In the other kind of apposition eye, found in the Strepsiptera, lenses are not fused to one another, and each forms an entire image; these images are combined in the brain. This is called the schizochroal compound eye or the neural superposition eye. Because images are combined additively, this arrangement allows vision under lower light levels.[1]
Superposition eyes
The second type is named the superposition eye. The superposition eye is divided into three types; the refracting, the reflecting and the parabolic superposition eye. The refracting superposition eye has a gap between the lens and the rhabdom, and no side wall. Each lens takes light at an angle to its axis and reflects it to the same angle on the other side. The result is an image at half the radius of the eye, which is where the tips of the rhabdoms are. This kind is used mostly by nocturnal insects. In the parabolic superposition compound eye type, seen in arthropods such as mayflies, the parabolic surfaces of the inside of each facet focus light from a reflector to a sensor array. Long-bodied decapod crustaceans such as shrimp, prawns, crayfish and lobsters are alone in having reflecting superposition eyes, which also has a transparent gap but uses corner mirrors instead of lenses.
Other
Good fliers like flies or honey bees, or prey-catching insects like praying mantis or dragonflies, have specialized zones of ommatidia organized into a fovea area which gives acute vision. In the acute zone the eye are flattened and the facets larger. The flattening allows more ommatidia to receive light from a spot and therefore higher resolution.
There are some exceptions from the types mentioned above. Some insects have a so-called single lens compound eye, a transitional type which is something between a superposition type of the multi-lens compound eye and the single lens eye found in animals with simple eyes. Then there is the mysid shrimp Dioptromysis paucispinosa. The shrimp has an eye of the refracting superposition type, in the rear behind this in each eye there is a single large facet that is three times in diameter the others in the eye and behind this is an enlarged crystalline cone. This projects an upright image on a specialized retina. The resulting eye is a mixture of a simple eye within a compound eye.
Another version is the pseudofaceted eye, as seen in Scutigera. This type of eye consists of a cluster of numerous ocelli on each side of the head, organized in a way that resembles a true compound eye.
The body of Ophiocoma wendtii, a type of brittle star, is covered with ommatidia, turning its whole skin into a compound eye.
Relationship to lifestyle
Eyes are generally adapted to the environment and lifestyle of the organism which bears them. For instance, the distribution of photoreceptors tends to match the area in which the highest acuity is required, with horizon-scanning organisms, such as those that live on the African plains, having a horizontal line of high-density ganglia, while tree-dwelling creatures which require good all-round vision tend to have a symmetrical distribution of ganglia, with acuity decreasing outwards from the centre.
Of course, for most eye types, it is impossible to diverge from a spherical form, so only the density of optical receptors can be altered. In organisms with compound eyes, it is the number of ommatidia rather than ganglia that reflects the region of highest data acquisition.[1]: 23–4 Optical superposition eyes are constrained to a spherical shape, but other forms of compound eyes may deform to a shape where more ommatidia are aligned to, say, the horizon, without altering the size or density of individual ommatidia.[10] Eyes of horizon-scanning organisms have stalks so they can be easily aligned to the horizon when this is inclined, for example if the animal is on a slope.[11] An extension of this concept is that the eyes of predators typically have a zone of very acute vision at their centre, to assist in the identification of prey.[10] In deep water organisms, it may not be the centre of the eye that is enlarged. The hyperiid amphipods are deep water animals that feed on organisms above them. Their eyes are almost divided into two, with the upper region thought to be involved in detecting the silhouettes of potential prey - or predators? - against the faint light of the sky above. Accordingly, deeper water hyperiids, where the light against which the silhouettes must be compared is dimmer, have larger "upper-eyes", and may lose the lower portion of their eyes altogether.[10]
Acuity is higher among male organisms that mate in mid-air, as they need to be able to spot and assess potential mates against a very large backdrop.[10] On the other hand, the eyes of organisms which operate in low light levels, such as around dawn and dusk or in deep water, tend to be larger to increase the amount of light that can be captured.[10]
It is not only the shape of the eye that may be affected by lifestyle. Eyes can be the most visible parts of organisms, and this can act as a pressure on organisms to have more transparent eyes at the cost of function.[10]
Acuity
Visual acuity is often measured in cycles per degree (CPD), which measures an angular resolution, or how much an eye can differentiate one object from another in terms of visual angles. Resolution in CPD can be measured by bar charts of different numbers of white – black stripe cycles. For example, if each pattern is 1.75 cm wide and is placed at 1 m distance from the eye, it will subtend an angle of 1 degree, so the number of white – black bar pairs on the pattern will be a measure of the cycles per degree of that pattern. The highest such number that the eye can resolve as stripes, or distinguish from a gray block, is then the measurement of visual acuity of the eye.
For a human eye with excellent acuity, the maximum theoretical resolution would be 50 CPD[12] (1.2 arcminute per line pair, or a 0.35 mm line pair, at 1 m). A rat can resolve only about 1 to 2 CPD.[13] A horse has higher acuity through most of the visual field of its eyes than a human has, but does not match the high acuity of the human eye's central fovea region.
Spherical aberration limits the resolution of a 7 mm pupil to about 3 arcminutes per line pair. At a pupil diameter of 3 mm, the spherical aberration is greatly reduced, resulting in an improved resolution of approximately 1.7 arcminutes per line pair.[14] A resolution of 2 arcminutes per line pair, equivalent to a 1 arcminute gap in an optotype, corresponds to 20/20 (normal vision) in humans.
Colour
All organisms are restricted to a small range of the electromagnetic spectrum; this varies from creature to creature, but is mainly between 320 and 800nm - [verification needed] the portions of the spectrum ranging from infra-red[verification needed] to ultraviolet. This is a rather small section of the electromagnetic spectrum, probably reflecting the submarine evolution of the organ: water blocks out all but two small windows of the EM spectrum, and there has been no evolutionary pressure among land animals to broaden this range.[15]
The most sensitive pigment, rhodopsin, has a peak response at 500nm.[16] Many[quantify] organisms are unable to discriminate between colours, seeing instead in shades of "grey"; colour vision necessitates a range of pigment cells which are primarily sensitive to smaller ranges of the spectrum. In primates, geckos, and other organisms, these take the form of cone cells, from which the more sensitive rod cells evolved[verification needed].[16]
Most organisms with colour vision are able to detect ultraviolet light. This high energy light can be damaging to receptor cells. With a few exceptions (snakes, placental mammals), most organisms avoid these effects by having absorbent oil droplets around their cone cells. The alternative, developed by organisms that had lost these oil droplets in the course of evolution, is to make the lens impervious to UV light - this precludes the possibility of any UV light being detected, as it does not even reach the retina.[16]: 309
Rods and cones
Some retinas contains three types of light-sensitive cells. Two of these, rods and cones, are used in image-forming vision. (The third type of photosensitive cell, a small percentage of the ganglion cells in the retina, are used primarily in the regulation of circadian rhythms and of the size of the pupil.)
Rods cannot detect colour but are responsible for black and white vision; they work well in dim light as they contain a pigment, visual purple, which is sensitive to low light intensity. Rods are distributed throughout the retina but there are none at the fovea and none at the blind spot.
Cones are responsible for colour vision. They require brighter light to function than rods require. There are three types of cones, sensitive to red, green, and blue light respectively. The colour seen is the combined effect of stimuli from these cones. Cones are mostly concentrated at the fovea. Only a few are present at the sides of the retina. Objects are seen most sharply in focus when their images fall on this spot, as when one looks at an object directly. Cone cells and rods are connected to nerve fibres. When these cells are stimulated by light, they send off nerve impulses.[16]
![[icon]](/wiki/File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg){kind=small} | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (September 2008) |
Pigment
The pigment molecules used in the eye are various, but can be used to define the evolutionary distance between different groups, and can also be an aid in determining which are closely related - although problems of convergence do exist.[16]
Human consumption
Eyes can be eaten by humans; Seal eyes provide a source of zinc to the Inuit.[17]
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af
M F Land; R D Fernald (1992). "The Evolution of Eyes". Annual Review of Neuroscience. 15: 1–29. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.15.030192.000245.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Nairne, James (2005). Psychology. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN 049503150x.
{{cite book}}: Check|isbn=value: invalid character (help) - ^ Vicki Bruce, Patrick R. Green, and Mark A. Georgeson (1996). Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology. Psychology Press. pp. p.20. ISBN 0863774504.
{{cite book}}:|pages=has extra text (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ BioMedia Associates Educational Biology Site: What animal has a more sophisticated eye, Octopus or Insect?
- ^ Who You Callin' "Shrimp"? – National Wildlife Magazine
- ^ Kozmik, Zbynek; Ruzickova, Jana; Jonasova, Kristyna; Matsumoto, Yoshifumi; Vopalensky, Pavel; Kozmikova, Iryna; Strnad, Hynek; Kawamura, Shoji; Piatigorsky, Joram; Paces, Vaclav; Vlcek, Cestmir (2008), "Assembly of the cnidarian camera-type eye from vertebrate-like components" (PDF), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (26): 8989–8993, doi:10.1073/pnas.0800388105, PMID 18577593
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Fernald, Russell D. (2006), "Casting a Genetic Light on the Evolution of Eyes", Science, 313 (5795): 1914–1918, doi:10.1126/science.1127889, PMID 17008522
{{citation}}: Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) - ^ Volkel, R (2003). "Miniaturized imaging systems" (PDF). Microelectronic Engineering. 67–68: 461. doi:10.1016/S0167-9317(03)00102-3.
{{cite journal}}: Text ""Miniaturized imaging systems."] Microelectron. Eng. 67-68, 1 (Jun. 2003), 461-472." ignored (help) - ^ Gaten E. (1998). ""Optics and phylogeny: is there an insight? The evolution of superposition eyes in the Decapoda (Crustacea)."": 223–236.
{{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|unused_data=(help); Cite journal requires|journal=(help); Text "Contributions to Zoology, 67 (4)" ignored (help) - ^ a b c d e f Land, M. F. (1989), "The eyes of hyperiid amphipods: relations of optical structure to depth" (PDF), Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 164 (6): 751–762, doi:10.1007/BF00616747
- ^ Zeil, J. (1996), "The variation of resolution and of ommatidial dimensions in the compound eyes of the fiddler crab Uca lactea annulipes (Ocypodidae, Brachyura, Decapoda)" (PDF), Journal of Experimental Biology, 199 (7): 1569–1577
- ^ John C. Russ (2006). The Image Processing Handbook. CRC Press. ISBN 0849372542.
The upper limit (finest detail) visible with the human eye is about 50 cycles per degree,... (Fifth Edition, 2007, Page 94)
- ^ Curtis D. Klaassen (2001). Casarett and Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons. McGraw-Hill Professional. ISBN 0071347216.
- ^ Optical System Design. McGraw-Hill Professional. 2000. ISBN 0071349162.
{{cite book}}: Text "Steve Chapman (editor)" ignored (help) - ^ Fernald, Russell D. (1997), "The Evolution of Eyes" (Free full text), Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 50 (4): 253–259, doi:10.1159/000113339
- ^ a b c d e Goldsmith, T. H. (1990), "Optimization, Constraint, and History in the Evolution of Eyes" (PDF), The Quarterly Review of Biology, 65 (3): 281, doi:10.1086/416840
- ^ [1]
External links
- Evolution of the Eye
- Diagram of the eye
- Webvision. The organisation of the retina and visual system. An in-depth treatment of retinal function. Open to all but geared most toward graduate students.
- Eye strips images of all but bare essentials before sending visual information to brain, UC Berkeley research shows
Template:Link FA
Cite error: There are <ref group=note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the help page).