Argumentum ad lazarum: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Addbot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Migrating 11 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q2861099 (Report Errors)
New worl (talk | contribs)
edit, re-order info
Line 3: Line 3:


This is popularly exploited as the statement, "Poor, but honest."
This is popularly exploited as the statement, "Poor, but honest."

== Examples ==

''Family farms are struggling to get by so when they say we need to protect them, they must be on to something.''

''The homeless tell us it’s hard to find housing. Thus it must be.''

''The monks have forsworn all material possessions. They must have achieved enlightenment.''

''All you need to know about the civil war in that country is that the rebels live in mud huts, while the general who sends troops against them sits in a luxurious, air-conditioned office.''


The opposite is the ''[[argumentum ad crumenam]]''.
The opposite is the ''[[argumentum ad crumenam]]''.


== Examples ==
* Family farms are struggling to get by so when they say we need to protect them, they must be on to something.
* The homeless tell us it’s hard to find housing. Thus it must be.
* The monks have forsworn all material possessions. They must have achieved enlightenment.
* All you need to know about the civil war in that country is that the rebels live in mud huts, while the general who sends troops against them sits in a luxurious, air-conditioned office.
==References==
==References==
*[http://education.gsu.edu/spehar/FOCUS/EdPsy/misc/Fallacies.htm Georgia State University]
*[http://education.gsu.edu/spehar/FOCUS/EdPsy/misc/Fallacies.htm Georgia State University]

Revision as of 12:12, 27 April 2013

Argumentum ad lazarum or appeal to poverty is the informal fallacy of thinking a conclusion is correct because the speaker is poor, or it's incorrect because the speaker is rich. It is named after Lazarus, a beggar in a New Testament parable who receives his reward in the afterlife.

This is popularly exploited as the statement, "Poor, but honest."

The opposite is the argumentum ad crumenam.

Examples

  • Family farms are struggling to get by so when they say we need to protect them, they must be on to something.
  • The homeless tell us it’s hard to find housing. Thus it must be.
  • The monks have forsworn all material possessions. They must have achieved enlightenment.
  • All you need to know about the civil war in that country is that the rebels live in mud huts, while the general who sends troops against them sits in a luxurious, air-conditioned office.

References