Argumentum ad lazarum: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:11, 5 June 2017

Argumentum ad lazarum or appeal to poverty is the informal fallacy of thinking a conclusion is correct solely because the speaker is poor, or it is incorrect because the speaker is rich. It is named after Lazarus, a beggar in a New Testament parable who receives his reward in the afterlife.

This is popularly exploited as the statement, "Poor, but honest."

The opposite is the argumentum ad crumenam.

Examples

Family farms are struggling to get by so when they say we need to protect them, they must be on to something.
The homeless tell us it’s hard to find housing. Thus it must be.
The monks have forsworn all material possessions. They must have achieved enlightenment.
All you need to know about the civil war in that country is that the rebels live in mud huts, while the general who sends troops against them sits in a luxurious, air-conditioned office.

References

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Italic title}}
-'''''Argumentum ad lazarum''''' or '''appeal to poverty''' is the [[formal fallacy]] of thinking a conclusion is correct solely because the speaker is poor, or it is incorrect because the speaker is rich. It is named after [[Lazarus and Dives|Lazarus]], a beggar in a [[New Testament]] [[parable]] who receives his reward in the afterlife.
+'''''Argumentum ad lazarum''''' or '''appeal to poverty''' is the [[informal fallacy]] of thinking a conclusion is correct solely because the speaker is poor, or it is incorrect because the speaker is rich. It is named after [[Lazarus and Dives|Lazarus]], a beggar in a [[New Testament]] [[parable]] who receives his reward in the afterlife.
 This is popularly exploited as the statement, "Poor, but honest."
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ==References==
+*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/fallacy/ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Fallacies]
 *[http://www.philosophicalsociety.com/Logical%20Fallacies.htm Philosophical Society - logical fallacies]