User talk:Rjanag and Annual publication: Difference between pages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
added comment
 
FairuseBot (talk | contribs)
Removing image with inadequate rationale
 
Line 1: Line 1:
An '''annual publication''', more often called simply an '''annual''', is a book or a [[magazine]], [[comic book]] or [[comic strip]] published yearly. For example, a weekly or monthly publication may produce an ''Annual'' featuring similar materials to the regular publication.
<big><font color="red">I will be on an on-and-off Wikibreak over the weekend, so I may not be able to respond immediately to comments. Thank you for your understanding. -Politizer</font></big>


==American comic book annuals==
{| align="right" style="background:none;"
<!-- This section is linked from [[The Savage Dragon: Sex & Violence]] -->
|-
In the case of comic books, an annual is considered a separate series for purposes of numbering and collectibility; a particular periodical's ''Annual'' will thus have its own numbering series, or alternately be referred to by the year of its publication (such as ''The [[Amazing Spider-Man]] '99 Annual''). A [[comic book]] annual customarily has a larger page count than its monthly counterpart, leaving room for longer single stories, multiple stories in a single annual, and/or "extra" material that the monthly series lacks the space to publish. These "extras" may include biographical information on featured characters, full-page [[pin-up girl#Other kinds of pin-ups|pin-ups]] of characters, reprints of previously published material, or all-new short stories (often called "back-up" stories). An annual as a whole was once considered an "extra" in itself, providing story material in addition to the customary twelve issues per year of a monthly series.
| align="center"|{{click | link = User talk:Politizer/Archive | image = Replacement_filing_cabinet.svg | width = 50}}
|-
| align="center"|[[User talk:Politizer/Archive|'''Archive''']]
|-
| <small>09/02/08 - 10/01/08</small>
|-
|}


Comic book annuals originally were little more than reprint albums, representing stories that had first seen publication in its monthly counterpart, but eventually this changed to annuals featuring primarily all-new material. Later annuals often featured stories with greater import to the characters featured than in the monthly publication, reflecting the "special" status of their once-yearly publication. Annuals also on occasion featured the finale of a multi-issue storyline running in the monthly series; conversely, many annuals would showcase [[stand-alone#Other usages|stand-alone]] stories that did not fit in with the then-current thrust of the monthly series' storyline.
'''If you leave me a message here, my habit is to post a response at your talk page. If you would prefer that I respond here, just leave a note in your original message and I'll respond to you here. Thanks!'''


In the late 1980s and much of the 1990s, annuals published by [[Marvel Comics]] and [[DC Comics]] were usually released in the summer of the year, and often had a unifying theme, either a similar theme that individual stories were written around, or a [[fictional crossover|crossover]] storyline bringing many of the characters in the individual publishers' [[continuity (fiction)|continuities]] together for a single overall event. The best-known of the "similar theme, individual stories" annuals may be [[List of Elseworlds publications#DC 1994 Elseworlds Annuals|DC Comics' 1994 ''Elseworlds'' annuals]], in which stories of [[parallel universe (fiction)|alternate reality]] versions of DC characters appeared. In the case of the "crossover" annuals, the number of characters and annuals involved in a crossover story varied; some were company-wide, incorporating virtually every character in the publisher's [[shared universe]] whose series received an annual edition, but many used smaller groups of characters, often those whose series had some sort of in-story connection (such as series featuring members of teams or "extended families" of characters, such as Marvel's [[X-Men]] or [[Avengers (comics)|Avengers]], or DC's [[Justice League]] or [[Titans (comics)|Teen Titans]]).
'''Click <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Politizer&action=edit&section=new here]</span> to leave me a new message.'''


Annuals published by DC and particularly Marvel became fewer and far between in the late 1990s, mainly due to the near-collapse of the comic book industry in the wake of [[Comic book collecting#The Speculator Boom|the speculator boom]]; annuals were seen as an unnecessary risk in a climate where many monthly publications were in danger of cancellation for lack of sales (especially at Marvel, which filed for [[bankruptcy]] during this time). When the industry began to recover from the "bust", annuals began re-appearing on occasion, but by no means as regularly as before the "bust", when numbered series of annuals had reached the teens or twenties, indicating over a decade of regular publication.
== OR in FFXIIcharacters article ==


Currently, the comic book annual is still something of a rarity, its purpose in presenting "extra" material often served by ''Special'' editions that are released at random intervals (usually to fill a gap in a publisher's production schedule) rather than the set yearly schedule of an annual. In addition, Marvel Comics in particular has adopted a publishing schedule in which thirteen or fourteen issues of an ongoing series will be published within a year, rather than one issue for every month of the year; the material provided in the additional issues per year in effect replaces the material that would see print in an annual.
Please tag the OR statements specifically so that I could address them properly. Thank you. &mdash; [[User:Bluerfn|Bl]][[User talk:Bluerfn|ue]][[Special:Contributions/Bluerfn|。]] 14:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
:Thank you for pointing them out, though I'd like it better if you can list them out in the article's talk page, and I'll do my best to address these concerns post haste! &mdash; [[User:Bluerfn|Bl]][[User talk:Bluerfn|ue]][[Special:Contributions/Bluerfn|。]] 15:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


==Taejo Wang Geon==
==British annuals==
<!-- Image with inadequate rationale removed: [[Image:Rotr-annual.JPG|200px|thumb|right|The ''[[Roy of the Rovers]]'' annual 1980 (actually published in 1979)]] -->
I have backup information on origin of Taejo Wang Geon.
In [[United Kingdom|the UK]], a large number of annuals are published shortly before the end of each year by companies such as [[D. C. Thomson & Co. Ltd|D.C. Thomson]], [[Egmont (media group)|Egmont]] (formerly IPC/[[Fleetway]]), and [[Rebellion Developments|Rebellion]], aimed at the Christmas market. These annuals are generally large-sized hardcover books with over 100 pages and a high colour content. They are normally cover-dated with the following year's date, to ensure that stockists do not remove them from their shelves immediately after the new year.


For many years until the near-collapse of the British children's comics market, an annual would be published each year for each of the comic titles published by Thomson and IPC/Fleetway, featuring extra adventures of the comic's current and former characters plus additional material in the form of puzzles, text articles, etc. Annuals were often even published for comics which had themselves ceased publication or been absorbed into other titles, for example ''[[Scorcher (magazine)|Scorcher]]'' annuals were still being published ten years after the comic itself had been absorbed into ''[[Tiger (comic)|Tiger]]''. Today, this section of the market has been reduced to just a couple of surviving titles.
Here is the S Korea's published geneology on Kaesong Wang clan,it clearly identifies the family ancestors came from 中國 = CHINA ' .


In addition, annuals are often published centred on sports, toys, currently-popular celebrities, recently-released films, and popular TV series. British annuals are also published featuring American characters such as [[Spider-Man]], often with simplified content aimed at younger readers. As tastes in these areas change, so does the line-up of annuals released each year. The increasing emphasis in recent years on annuals of this type (as opposed to the "classic" line-up of annuals based on comics) means that sales remain strong, and in fact doubled between 1998 and 2005[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/11/nclaus11.xml].
http://www.surname.info/wang/gae_seong.html <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jigglypuffie|Jigglypuffie]] ([[User talk:Jigglypuffie|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jigglypuffie|contribs]]) 13:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Some annuals have become extremely collectible, especially:
:Ultra-nationalist S Koreans knowingly omitted Taejo Wang Geon was of ' Han-Chinese ' extraction.This fact is well-known among Korean circle who take interest in history.By the way,I got that website from a non-Sinophobic S Korean forumite. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jigglypuffie|Jigglypuffie]] ([[User talk:Jigglypuffie|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jigglypuffie|contribs]]) 15:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


*[[The Beano]]
== RE:Good job ==
*[[The Dandy]]
*[[Rupert Bear|Rupert]]
*[[Eagle (comic)|The Eagle]]


[[Category:Publications by format]]
Thanks! Just trying to keep Wikipedia clean and happy! <font color="990000">[[User:Darth_Panda|D<small>ARTH</small> P<small>ANDA</small>]]</font><sup><small><b>[[User_talk:Darth_Panda|talk]]</b></small></sup> 14:33, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
[[Category:Comics terminology]]


[[de:Annual]]
== Re: Removal of information from [[Athena Chu]] ==
[[sv:Annual]]

Hello, I'm not familiar with lovehkfilm.com either. I removed the text because in the article's (http://www.lovehkfilm.com/people/chu_athena.htm) "Biography" section, it states: "For her next album, due out in September of 2003, Chu will take over producer duties and even write some of the songs too. (Yinique 2003)". Based on that, I assumed the biography section hasn't been edited or updated since 2003; although, if the lovehkfilm.com article was last modified in March (based on the page info), perhaps it was to edit/update the "selected filmography" section. So I assumed the text was copied from lovehkfilm.com, since the Wikipedia article wasn't created until [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Athena_Chu&diff=next&oldid=21102995 August 2005]. --[[User:Silver Edge|Silver Edge]] ([[User talk:Silver Edge|talk]]) 23:40, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

==[[Final Fantasy VIII]]==
Excellent edits to this article. I'm glad people are still around to nurse that article. &mdash; '''[[User:Deckiller|Deckill]][[User talk:Deckiller|er]]''' 00:29, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
:Every article on Wikipedia &mdash; from Featured Article to stub &mdash; has opportunities for improvement, so whatever you can do would be greatly appreciated. &mdash; '''[[User:Deckiller|Deckill]][[User talk:Deckiller|er]]''' 00:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

== [[List of characters in Megatokyo]] ==

Hey,

I'm working on changing the links in pages that link to [[Main characters of Megatokyo]], to avoid double redirects now that it's been moved. Just out of curiosity...is it bad practice to redirect to subsections? I mean, for example, for the Tohya Miho redirect page, should it be <nowiki>#REDIRECT [[List of characters in Megatokyo]] or #REDIRECT [[List of characters in Megatokyo#Tohya Miho|List of characters in Megatokyo]]</nowiki>? Thanks, &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]<sup><small>(&nbsp;'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''&nbsp;)</small></sup> 05:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
::[[Wikipedia:Redirect#Redirects_to_page_sections]] would seem to suggest that redirecting to a section is fine. - [[User:Jc37|jc37]] 05:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

==[[God of War (video game)]]==
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=God_of_War_(video_game)&action=history] Thanks, Pol! &mdash; [[User:Ivan Pozdeev|Vano]] 17:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

== ok with you ==

If it's ok with you, I am going to blank out the section about Jessica Alba's herpes. I prefer not to even leave the discussion in place. If it were cheek implants or even liposuction, ok. But herpes and just one reference isn't enough, in my opinion. If not ok, let me know and I'll restore it. [[User:Spevw|Spevw]] ([[User talk:Spevw|talk]]) 02:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

==you are an idiot==
I see your user page said that you have received one personal attack. Make that two!

Sorry, just kidding! I'm not really attacking you, just want to increase your count! :p Some people have a lot of friends in Wikipedia. If you want to discuss things, I would be happy to do so, even for an article that I normally don't read or edit. [[User:Spevw|Spevw]] ([[User talk:Spevw|talk]]) 02:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

== Notice ==


{{notice|header=Please accept this notice to join the [[WP:Wikiproject Good Article Collaboration Center|Good Article Collaboration Center]], a project aimed at improving five articles to GA status every month. We hope to see you there!--[[User:LAAFan|<font color="orange" face="Times New Roman">LAA</font>]][[User talk:LAAFan|<font color="black" face="Times New Roman">Fan</font>]]''<sup>[[User:LAAFan/Guestbook|sign]]</sup> <sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/LAAFan 2|review]]''</sub> 02:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)}}

== Re. ==

{{talkback|Blooded Edge}}


== Please do not blank facts mentioning individual gymnasts ==
Please discuss before rm important facts added per [[BLP]], thanks! [[User:Bobby fletcher|Bobby fletcher]] ([[User talk:Bobby fletcher|talk]]) 23:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
:No facts were removed, as explained at [[Talk:Age requirements in gymnastics#Exonerated Section]], and you are the one who has been reverting edits without consensus. &mdash;[[User:Politizer|Politizer]]<sup><small>(&nbsp;'''[[User talk:Politizer|talk]]'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;'''[[Special:Contributions/Politizer|contribs]]'''&nbsp;)</small></sup> 23:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

== I recently got a messege... ==

About posting incorrect information on the IGN page. I'm correcting you fools, because everything I posted was accurate.

I will continue to correct the mis information on that page. Go ahead and block me, we'll see how far that gets you. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/208.107.139.80|208.107.139.80]] ([[User talk:208.107.139.80|talk]]) 00:59, 7 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== TS ==

Absolutely no problem. I wrote it in a hurry and further rewording would be most helpful. [[User:Eubulides|Eubulides]] ([[User talk:Eubulides|talk]]) 06:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

== Mount Huang ==

Thanks for the work on that article. I tried to get English language references and just couldn't find too many.[[User:LedRush|LedRush]] ([[User talk:LedRush|talk]]) 15:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

:Actually, I also have a book on home about it. It goes to show you how lazy (or dependent on the internet) I've become in the digital age...I didn't even think to use something as archaic as a book![[User:LedRush|LedRush]] ([[User talk:LedRush|talk]]) 15:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

::I'm not sure how much more I can contribute to the article without getting my new source. I am not a great editor on a big scale as I usually just look to one or two facts and try to get them right. But I will try and do a little better, and getting this article up to snuff is a good goal. My wife and I have our names intertwined on that beautiful mountain, and it would be good to get an article worthy of the place.[[User:LedRush|LedRush]] ([[User talk:LedRush|talk]]) 22:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

== I apologize ==

Hi Politizer. I apologize with my aggressiveness at that. That editor really bothers me sometimes with his edits. He will remove categories and information unless it's African American which bothers me because that's sending a message it's ok to leave the African American categories but everything else has to be proven. I'm sorry.[[User:Mcelite|Mcelite]] ([[User talk:Mcelite|talk]]) 18:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

== Lists of laojiaos ==
I've noticed that you marked these articles for deletion, but in the process, removed all of the Wikiproject Correction and Detention Facilities assessments. Please restore the assessments. I also notice that you plan on erasing the entire list because [[Talk:List of "Re-education Through Labor" camps in China|you think such a list is "frivolous"]] since you say it was copied from one source. I disagree that the lists are frivolous, and I disagree that they should be deleted. For one thing, it appears that many of the lists are incomplete, (see [http://www.laogai.org/news2/book/handbook05-06.pdf here]) so merging them all into one master list may create a very long article. For another, there are comparable articles to lists of prisons in each state of the United States. In any case, please restore the assessments. Thanks.--[[User:Cdogsimmons|Cdogsimmons]] ([[User talk:Cdogsimmons|talk]]) 01:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
:Since you aren't planning on doing it for awhile I'll do it for you. Also, the speedy deletion tags should go on the article's page, not the talk page. I'll move them for you.--[[User:Cdogsimmons|Cdogsimmons]] ([[User talk:Cdogsimmons|talk]]) 01:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
::Actually, for some reason I don't see these articles coming up at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.--[[User:Cdogsimmons|Cdogsimmons]] ([[User talk:Cdogsimmons|talk]]) 02:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
:::Hey thanks. It's a shame these lists aren't better. I'll start working toward improving them.--[[User:Cdogsimmons|Cdogsimmons]] ([[User talk:Cdogsimmons|talk]]) 16:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

== [[Sinhala alphabet]] ==

Thanks for your offer to review the article [[Sinhala alphabet]]. I have replied to your questions on the talk page. For convenience, I copy the reply here as well.
<blockquote>
I guess I am the main editor of this article, so here my reply. The font support for Sinhala is clearly suboptimal, and I guess most people will not have the necessary fonts installed, let alone rendering support. This is why all the tables have a *png-version, for which you do not need the fonts. You can click on the link on the bottom of the tables to see them. The content is thus accessible to anyone, whether they have the fonts installed or not. All tables combined give you a complete overview over the independent glyphs. Making the image version the default would make the article visually more pleasing to most of the public, but might annoy people who do have the fonts installed. Any opinions on whether to prefer unicode, png, or a combination of both?
<br />
The archaic Sinhala numeral system mentioned above is so incredibly archaic that it is not mentioned in any Sinhala grammar or article I am aware of. The referenced webpage is the only source, so I am not sure if this would even pass [[WP:V]] and should be included. Any more material on the numerals would probably be OR.
<br />
There is an external link to the entire Sinhala alphabet (600+ glyphs). Given the size of the alphabet, I am not sure whether the full text should be included inline, but I could make a similar table to store on WP itself. Not sure though whether this would make any difference to the reader, they might just as well click the external link. [[User:Jasy jatere|Jasy jatere]] ([[User talk:Jasy jatere|talk]]) 08:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
</blockquote>

== [[Reeducation through labor]] ==
I notice that you marked this page with a NPOV tag but did not start a discussion on the talk page. I think the page could be better sourced and seems critical of a system where detainees are forced to work before they are proven guilty of their crimes (It seems like common sense to be critical of such a system to me). In any case, I await your reasoning.--[[User:Cdogsimmons|Cdogsimmons]] ([[User talk:Cdogsimmons|talk]]) 17:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
:Unfortunately, I don't speak Chinese. They do seem to be on the same topic, but I've only given them a cursory look. Usually people like to have a discussion about whether pages should be merged and as I said, I'm unsure if they are exactly the same concept. If they are merged, I think we should use the surviving name for the lists. Have a good weekend.--[[User:Cdogsimmons|Cdogsimmons]] ([[User talk:Cdogsimmons|talk]]) 23:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
::Actually, [[Laogai]] says "It is often confused with, but completely different from, reeducation through labor, which is a system of administrative detentions." It's not cited but it does make me think they are distinct.--[[User:Cdogsimmons|Cdogsimmons]] ([[User talk:Cdogsimmons|talk]]) 01:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
I found an article at Human Rights watch [http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/china-98/laojiao.htm here] that explains the distinction. I don't think we will have to change the articles because they specifically list only reeducation through labor camps while the Laogai Handbook lists all types of detention facilities, including prisons.--[[User:Cdogsimmons|Cdogsimmons]] ([[User talk:Cdogsimmons|talk]]) 02:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
:It appears there's some overlap between Laogai and Reeducation through labor camps. [http://www.laogai.org/news/doc/Laogai-D&B-Report.pdf see here]

== [[Infinite Canvas]] ==
With regards to referencing WebCanvas on the [[Infinite Canvas]] article. This page only elaborates on one aspect of such a concept. This aspect is restricted to webcomics, whilst there are many other applications for such a boundless digital canvas. WebCanvas is a relatively new undertaking which employs such an [[Infinite Canvas]] and where users can paint/draw/write anything thing from webcomics to architectural footprints. Also it is innovative because it allows instant collaboration from artists around the world. This project employs leading edge Web 2.0 technologies and for this reason it has won 2nd prize at Sun Microsystem's sponsored London Start-up Camp <ref name="wcs">{{cite web | url=http://wiki.startupcamp.org/wiki/SpeedGeeking4 | title=London Startup Camp | work = London Starup Camp}}</ref>. In fact it works much like wikipedia with a number of administrators moderating and reverting back certain damaged sections... However this is another matter. What matters here is that on an article about a concept, it seems very limiting to be only mentioning one aspect of it (webcomics) and not even mentioning one leading edge implementation that is general!! Especially when such an implementation directly contradicts some of the facts mentioned (e.g. scrolling problem, wii-browser incompatability, image loading times...). To demonstrate that these issues have been solved or mitigated only a simple perusal of the site is necessary! Best wishes. [[Special:Contributions/82.69.178.229|82.69.178.229]] ([[User talk:82.69.178.229|talk]]) 01:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:42, 10 October 2008

An annual publication, more often called simply an annual, is a book or a magazine, comic book or comic strip published yearly. For example, a weekly or monthly publication may produce an Annual featuring similar materials to the regular publication.

American comic book annuals

In the case of comic books, an annual is considered a separate series for purposes of numbering and collectibility; a particular periodical's Annual will thus have its own numbering series, or alternately be referred to by the year of its publication (such as The Amazing Spider-Man '99 Annual). A comic book annual customarily has a larger page count than its monthly counterpart, leaving room for longer single stories, multiple stories in a single annual, and/or "extra" material that the monthly series lacks the space to publish. These "extras" may include biographical information on featured characters, full-page pin-ups of characters, reprints of previously published material, or all-new short stories (often called "back-up" stories). An annual as a whole was once considered an "extra" in itself, providing story material in addition to the customary twelve issues per year of a monthly series.

Comic book annuals originally were little more than reprint albums, representing stories that had first seen publication in its monthly counterpart, but eventually this changed to annuals featuring primarily all-new material. Later annuals often featured stories with greater import to the characters featured than in the monthly publication, reflecting the "special" status of their once-yearly publication. Annuals also on occasion featured the finale of a multi-issue storyline running in the monthly series; conversely, many annuals would showcase stand-alone stories that did not fit in with the then-current thrust of the monthly series' storyline.

In the late 1980s and much of the 1990s, annuals published by Marvel Comics and DC Comics were usually released in the summer of the year, and often had a unifying theme, either a similar theme that individual stories were written around, or a crossover storyline bringing many of the characters in the individual publishers' continuities together for a single overall event. The best-known of the "similar theme, individual stories" annuals may be DC Comics' 1994 Elseworlds annuals, in which stories of alternate reality versions of DC characters appeared. In the case of the "crossover" annuals, the number of characters and annuals involved in a crossover story varied; some were company-wide, incorporating virtually every character in the publisher's shared universe whose series received an annual edition, but many used smaller groups of characters, often those whose series had some sort of in-story connection (such as series featuring members of teams or "extended families" of characters, such as Marvel's X-Men or Avengers, or DC's Justice League or Teen Titans).

Annuals published by DC and particularly Marvel became fewer and far between in the late 1990s, mainly due to the near-collapse of the comic book industry in the wake of the speculator boom; annuals were seen as an unnecessary risk in a climate where many monthly publications were in danger of cancellation for lack of sales (especially at Marvel, which filed for bankruptcy during this time). When the industry began to recover from the "bust", annuals began re-appearing on occasion, but by no means as regularly as before the "bust", when numbered series of annuals had reached the teens or twenties, indicating over a decade of regular publication.

Currently, the comic book annual is still something of a rarity, its purpose in presenting "extra" material often served by Special editions that are released at random intervals (usually to fill a gap in a publisher's production schedule) rather than the set yearly schedule of an annual. In addition, Marvel Comics in particular has adopted a publishing schedule in which thirteen or fourteen issues of an ongoing series will be published within a year, rather than one issue for every month of the year; the material provided in the additional issues per year in effect replaces the material that would see print in an annual.

British annuals

In the UK, a large number of annuals are published shortly before the end of each year by companies such as D.C. Thomson, Egmont (formerly IPC/Fleetway), and Rebellion, aimed at the Christmas market. These annuals are generally large-sized hardcover books with over 100 pages and a high colour content. They are normally cover-dated with the following year's date, to ensure that stockists do not remove them from their shelves immediately after the new year.

For many years until the near-collapse of the British children's comics market, an annual would be published each year for each of the comic titles published by Thomson and IPC/Fleetway, featuring extra adventures of the comic's current and former characters plus additional material in the form of puzzles, text articles, etc. Annuals were often even published for comics which had themselves ceased publication or been absorbed into other titles, for example Scorcher annuals were still being published ten years after the comic itself had been absorbed into Tiger. Today, this section of the market has been reduced to just a couple of surviving titles.

In addition, annuals are often published centred on sports, toys, currently-popular celebrities, recently-released films, and popular TV series. British annuals are also published featuring American characters such as Spider-Man, often with simplified content aimed at younger readers. As tastes in these areas change, so does the line-up of annuals released each year. The increasing emphasis in recent years on annuals of this type (as opposed to the "classic" line-up of annuals based on comics) means that sales remain strong, and in fact doubled between 1998 and 2005[1].

Some annuals have become extremely collectible, especially: