This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Project Chanology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
I know I've been falling behind in adding some of these newer sources to the article, I've got a lot on my plate at the moment but I'll try to catch up with it all soon. Cirt (talk) 22:20, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlock Article
Enough time has passed. We should unlock the article and allow anonymous IP editors. If the vandalism becomes an issue again it can be relocked easliy enough, though I doubt that will happen. Z00r (talk) 21:43, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I highly doubt that the article would not be disrupted by frequent vandalism. Cirt (talk) 21:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are numerous grammatical errors, mostly punctuation outside of quotation marks that need to be corrected.198.199.154.250 (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That is generally the accepted style for quotation usage. Any specific examples? Btw, we are still getting vandalism even with the semi-protection. Cirt (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Page protection should only be used when absolutely necessary. Indefinite semi-protection may only be applied to pages with endemic vandalism problems, meaning excessive vandalism that persists even when attention on the subject is relatively low. This page has not been unprotected long enough to determine if such vandalism problems exist. It was only unprotected during a short period of time immediately following Chanology's creation when it was an internet hot topic. Z00r (talk) 15:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps, however the ongoing spots of vandalism even with the current protection level leads me to believe that only further disruption would be caused by its removal. Cirt (talk) 15:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Theres only one way to find out. I suggest unprotection for a short probation period, after which we may decide whether or not to protect it again. Z00r (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I put in an unprotect request at WP:RFPP. Hopefully there won't be much vandalism. :( Cirt (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
May the force be with us. Z00r (talk) 17:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
+1, Cirt, +1... Also, I do agree with the short probation idea. We'll never know if it will work unless we try.Lyoko is Cool (talk) 18:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sooo..... Z00r (talk) 15:38, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You added a request for the wrong page, Cirt >.> Readding. Lyoko is Cool (talk) 18:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]