German submarine U-91 and Modular Integrated Communications Helmet: Difference between pages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:ACH_005.jpg|thumb|[[United States Army|United States]] soldier wearing the MICH TC-2000.]]
'''''Unterseeboot 91''''' or '''''U-91''''' has been the name of several [[Germany|German]] [[submarines]] or [[U-boats]] during the [[First World War]] and the [[Second World War]].
The '''Modular Integrated Communications Helmet (MICH)''', also known as the '''Advanced Combat Helmet (ACH)''', was developed by the [[United States Army Soldier Systems Center]] to be the next generation of protective [[combat helmet]]s for use by the [[United States Army]].<ref>{{cite web| title = Advanced Combat Helmet ( ACH ) | url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/ach.htm | accessdate=2007-03-22}}</ref>


==Service==
* [[Unterseeboot 91 (1917)]] was built in [[1917]] and operated in the [[First Battle of the Atlantic]] during the First World War before being surrendered in [[1918]].
The MICH was originally part of a series of combat helmets designed for the [[United States Army Special Operations Command]] as a replacement for the Personal Armor System for Ground Troops Helmet ([[PASGT]]) solely within those units. However, the Army later determined that the improvements presented by the MICH over the aging PASGT helmet warranted organization-wide distribution.
**During the First World War, Germany also operated two other U-boats with similar designations:
*** [[Unterseeboot B-91]] was built in [[1918]] and surrendered the same year.
*** [[Unterseeboot C-91]] was built in [[1918]] and sunk in [[1919]].


To date, the MICH has replaced the PASGT in active [[United States Army]] service. Some units of the [[Army National Guard]] and [[Army Reserve]] continue to use the PASGT, though its use will eventually expire.
* [[Unterseeboot 91 (1942)]] was built in [[1942]] and operated in the [[Second Battle of the Atlantic]] during the Second World War before being sunk in [[1944]].


The MICH is in use with all branches of the United States Armed Forces in at least some capacity. The MICH was officially adopted as the standard issue helmet of the [[Air Force Security Forces]]. The [[United States Marine Corps]] evaluated the MICH during its own search for a PASGT replacement, but chose to adopt a helmet that retains the profile of the PASGT, known as the [[Lightweight Helmet]]. However, a small number of units and individuals within the Marines are issued MICH helmets. Elite combat arms units of the [[United States Navy]] are also typically issued MICH helmets as warranted.
{{shipindex|name=Unterseeboot 0091}}

MICH helmets are available for purchase by law enforcement agencies and the public. They have become popular with various [[SWAT]] units and [[Private military company|private security companies]].

==Design==
The MICH ranges in weight from about 3 pounds (size medium) to just over 3.6 lb (extra large) (1.36 - 1.63 kg). It uses a new, more advanced type of [[Kevlar]] and provides increased protection against handgun rounds.

A pad system and four-point retention system, similar to the cushions and straps found on bicycle helmets, replaces the nylon cord suspension system, sweatband and chinstrap found on the PASGT helmet. The change provides greater impact protection and comfort for the wearer. It can be fitted with a mounting bracket for an [[AN/PVS-14]] [[monocular]] [[night vision device]] (MNVD) on the front, similar to that on the PASGT helmet, as seen in the above image. It can also be fitted with a pair of straps on the rear to keep protective eyewear in place, as well as cloth [[helmet cover]]s in varying camouflage patterns including US Woodland, three-color desert, [[Army Combat Uniform|ACU]], Crye MultiCam, and solid black for use with SWAT teams.

The MICH is also slightly smaller than the PASGT, providing 8% less coverage. This accounts for some of the reduced weight and allows for both greater situational awareness and less obstruction of the wearer's vision, particularly when combined with [[Interceptor body armor]]. Previously, soldiers had complained that the high collar of the Interceptor pushed the back of the helmet forward, in turn moving the helmet brim over their eyes when they attempted to fire from a prone position.

In 2007 the Army developed and introduced an armored "nape pad" that attaches to the MICH's rear suspension system and coincided with the introduction of the [[Improved Outer Tactical Vest]] (IOTV). The goal of the armor insert is to reduce soldier deaths from shrapnel wounds to the neck and lower head. It is currently being issued to combat units in [[Iraq]] and [[Afghanistan]].<ref>[http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=43033&archive=true Stars and Stripes - Army Adding Neck Pad to Body Armor]</ref>

Beginning in 2008, the Army's [[Program Executive Office Soldier]] outfitted soldiers of the [[101st Airborne Division]] and [[4th Infantry Division]] bound for Iraq with helmet-mounted sensors designed to gather data on head injuries caused during [[Improvised Explosive Device]] (IED) detonations. The data collected will help with the design of improvements to the MICH's suspension and chin strap systems.<ref>[http://www.army.mil/-news/2008/06/03/9638-helmet-sensors-improved-armor-helping-soldier-survivability/ Army.mil - Helmet Sensors, Improved Armor Helping Soldier Survivability]</ref>

==Controversy==
Lieutenant Colonel Jeff Poffenbarger, an Army neurosurgeon and former member of the [[United States Army Special Forces]], has been an outspoken critic of the MICH. He claims that the decreased coverage around the ears and neck is inappropriate for modern combat. He came to his conclusion after examining a large number of traumatic head injuries during his tour of duty as the primary military head trauma specialist in Iraq.<ref>[http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040827/news_1n27helmet1.html San Diego Union-Tribune - Army's new combat helmet might have fatal flaw]</ref>

The team in charge of developing the Lightweight Helmet for the Marine Corps claim that the instability created by the PASGT helmet when used while prone with Interceptor Body Armor can be better addressed by suspension improvements rather than giving the helmet a higher cut. Project officials were also concerned that a smaller helmet would encourage inappropriate helmet wear. Additionally, some Marines who evaluated the MICH during the development of the Lightweight Helmet claimed that they felt less protected with the higher cut. <ref>[http://www.natick.army.mil/about/pao/pubs/warrior/03/julyaug/index.htm#a2 US Army Soldier Systems Center (Natick)- Lightweight Helmet]</ref>

Widespread incorrect wear of the MICH helmet by soldiers was confirmed in 2007 when Program Executive Office Soldier issued a Safety Of Use Message urging all personnel to address incorrect wear of the MICH. The message stated that extensive surveying had revealed that soldiers were often wearing their MICH helmets too high on the forehead, a problem often attributed soldiers being issued helmets which were too small and/or using internal padding that was too large. <ref>[http://peosoldier.army.mil/soldierscorner/achmam.asp Program Executive Office Soldier - Safety Of Use Message for the Advanced Combat Helmet]</ref>

==See also==
*[[Personnel Armor System for Ground Troops Helmet]]
*[[Army Combat Uniform]]
*[[SPECTRA helmet]]
*[[Interceptor body armor]]
*[[Lightweight Helmet]]
*[[Kevlar]]

==References==
{{reflist|2}}

==External links==
* [http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/ach.htm Globalsecurity.org - Advanced Combat Helmet]
* [http://www.olive-drab.com/od_soldiers_gear_ach_helmet.php Olivedrab.com - MICH and ACH]
* [http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2005/08/us-military-taking-delivery-of-advanced-combat-helmets/index.php Defense Industry Daily - US Military Taking Delivery of Advanced Combat Helmets]

[[Category:Combat helmets]]
[[Category:Military equipment of the United States]]

----

Revision as of 17:19, 10 October 2008

United States soldier wearing the MICH TC-2000.

The Modular Integrated Communications Helmet (MICH), also known as the Advanced Combat Helmet (ACH), was developed by the United States Army Soldier Systems Center to be the next generation of protective combat helmets for use by the United States Army.[1]

Service

The MICH was originally part of a series of combat helmets designed for the United States Army Special Operations Command as a replacement for the Personal Armor System for Ground Troops Helmet (PASGT) solely within those units. However, the Army later determined that the improvements presented by the MICH over the aging PASGT helmet warranted organization-wide distribution.

To date, the MICH has replaced the PASGT in active United States Army service. Some units of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve continue to use the PASGT, though its use will eventually expire.

The MICH is in use with all branches of the United States Armed Forces in at least some capacity. The MICH was officially adopted as the standard issue helmet of the Air Force Security Forces. The United States Marine Corps evaluated the MICH during its own search for a PASGT replacement, but chose to adopt a helmet that retains the profile of the PASGT, known as the Lightweight Helmet. However, a small number of units and individuals within the Marines are issued MICH helmets. Elite combat arms units of the United States Navy are also typically issued MICH helmets as warranted.

MICH helmets are available for purchase by law enforcement agencies and the public. They have become popular with various SWAT units and private security companies.

Design

The MICH ranges in weight from about 3 pounds (size medium) to just over 3.6 lb (extra large) (1.36 - 1.63 kg). It uses a new, more advanced type of Kevlar and provides increased protection against handgun rounds.

A pad system and four-point retention system, similar to the cushions and straps found on bicycle helmets, replaces the nylon cord suspension system, sweatband and chinstrap found on the PASGT helmet. The change provides greater impact protection and comfort for the wearer. It can be fitted with a mounting bracket for an AN/PVS-14 monocular night vision device (MNVD) on the front, similar to that on the PASGT helmet, as seen in the above image. It can also be fitted with a pair of straps on the rear to keep protective eyewear in place, as well as cloth helmet covers in varying camouflage patterns including US Woodland, three-color desert, ACU, Crye MultiCam, and solid black for use with SWAT teams.

The MICH is also slightly smaller than the PASGT, providing 8% less coverage. This accounts for some of the reduced weight and allows for both greater situational awareness and less obstruction of the wearer's vision, particularly when combined with Interceptor body armor. Previously, soldiers had complained that the high collar of the Interceptor pushed the back of the helmet forward, in turn moving the helmet brim over their eyes when they attempted to fire from a prone position.

In 2007 the Army developed and introduced an armored "nape pad" that attaches to the MICH's rear suspension system and coincided with the introduction of the Improved Outer Tactical Vest (IOTV). The goal of the armor insert is to reduce soldier deaths from shrapnel wounds to the neck and lower head. It is currently being issued to combat units in Iraq and Afghanistan.[2]

Beginning in 2008, the Army's Program Executive Office Soldier outfitted soldiers of the 101st Airborne Division and 4th Infantry Division bound for Iraq with helmet-mounted sensors designed to gather data on head injuries caused during Improvised Explosive Device (IED) detonations. The data collected will help with the design of improvements to the MICH's suspension and chin strap systems.[3]

Controversy

Lieutenant Colonel Jeff Poffenbarger, an Army neurosurgeon and former member of the United States Army Special Forces, has been an outspoken critic of the MICH. He claims that the decreased coverage around the ears and neck is inappropriate for modern combat. He came to his conclusion after examining a large number of traumatic head injuries during his tour of duty as the primary military head trauma specialist in Iraq.[4]

The team in charge of developing the Lightweight Helmet for the Marine Corps claim that the instability created by the PASGT helmet when used while prone with Interceptor Body Armor can be better addressed by suspension improvements rather than giving the helmet a higher cut. Project officials were also concerned that a smaller helmet would encourage inappropriate helmet wear. Additionally, some Marines who evaluated the MICH during the development of the Lightweight Helmet claimed that they felt less protected with the higher cut. [5]

Widespread incorrect wear of the MICH helmet by soldiers was confirmed in 2007 when Program Executive Office Soldier issued a Safety Of Use Message urging all personnel to address incorrect wear of the MICH. The message stated that extensive surveying had revealed that soldiers were often wearing their MICH helmets too high on the forehead, a problem often attributed soldiers being issued helmets which were too small and/or using internal padding that was too large. [6]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Advanced Combat Helmet ( ACH )". Retrieved 2007-03-22.
  2. ^ Stars and Stripes - Army Adding Neck Pad to Body Armor
  3. ^ Army.mil - Helmet Sensors, Improved Armor Helping Soldier Survivability
  4. ^ San Diego Union-Tribune - Army's new combat helmet might have fatal flaw
  5. ^ US Army Soldier Systems Center (Natick)- Lightweight Helmet
  6. ^ Program Executive Office Soldier - Safety Of Use Message for the Advanced Combat Helmet

External links