User talk:Piotrus
You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today. |
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you. |
---|
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
---|
Talk archives: Archive 1 (moved Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (moved Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (moved May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (moved July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (moved September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (moved November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (moved January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (moved 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (moved 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (moved 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (moved 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (moved 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (moved 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (moved 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (moved 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 (moved 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (moved 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (moved 30 July, 2007)
If you have come here to place a request for a re-confirmation of my adminship, please note that I will either:
at my discretion
DYK (24 August)Open Source DirectoryPreTender submitted eve-wiki to the CCP fansite list months ago and I've tried again and also on the Open Directory project. Can you help? Wikipedia weekly interviewHi there, I noticed that you are an extremly high contributor to FA and was wondering if you would like to be interviewed for an upcoming episode of Wikipedia Weekly? I would be interested in talking about why you are involved in WP, what areas are you specifically involved in, the Polish wikipedia community and their specific issues. Does this sound interesting? I hope to hear from you soon. Witty Lama 12:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Has it happened yet? The lama should have paired you with Ghirla.....well, we need take #2. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC) The Ep is now up and going. Enjoy. Witty Lama 06:19, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Jan CzyńskiHello Piotrus. My Polish being effectively non-existent, can you tell me if pl:Jan Czyński was in Paris in the 1830s. I assume so - "great emigration" I did understand. I'm trying to figure out if he is the person who co-authored a book called Le Roi des Paysans (published in Paris in 1838). My Belgian source calls this person Jean Czynski. Many thanks in advance! Angus McLellan (Talk) 08:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
DYKGACWhat a refreshing thought.[1] --Poeticbent talk 02:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC) Lack of respect for WP:UEThat where real disruptions lies. M0RD00R 18:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC) KievJust renominate it - and I think you might title the nomination Kiev 2 - there should be details on the page.--danielfolsom 01:57, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Enlightenment TemplateHi! Terribly sorry to spam you, but, remembering your interest in the Template:Enlightenment, I thought you might be interested to know that I have started a discussion on the inclusion criteria; it would be great if you came over to Template talk:Enlightenment to take part. --AVIosad(talk) 13:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Something for you I guesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Democracy#Why_no_mention_of_Poland.3F --HanzoHattori 19:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC) fair useHi Piotrus, is still fair use in apply ? I have an article without image where is not possible to obtain public domain image. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 10:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Question for youPlease see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodryg Dunin 2. Is it possible to obtain a text and or translation of the article referring to him? If you will check the history of this and related articles, you will see why there is a certain skepticism about both the accuracy of the facts related and the extent to which he encyclopedia article supports them. DGG (talk) 04:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Antoni Julian NowowiejskiA {{prod}} template has been added to the article Antoni Julian Nowowiejski, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the AfD nomination of Antoni Julian NowowiejskiDid you knowBarnstar
Well Estonians story is simple. Most of them came when the Russian media attack started against Estonia during the Bronze soldier of Tallinn incident. Some articles were really horrible at the time, Estonian flag under Estonia was replaced with nazi german one all the time, etc. Many editors came in. Some old editors were drawn into the spin, etc. The first sock/meatpuppetry accusations came from the fact that estonian editors were quite same minded. Estonian media gave detailed updates on situation and many people like myself were also in the center of the situation so saw the incidents with their own eyes. So there was not much room for debate if someone wrote that the soldier was dismantled sawn to pieces peed on or what ever as we knew it wasn't and thats why we all reverted that. So as people knew something for sure they ofcourse acted the same. When the so called Established Editors came into frame the things got more serious and they tried to eliminate some opposing editors. They succeeded on some cases. Mostly humble editors who were here before to edit encyclopedia not to battle. Others didn't give up so easily. Now as the things have cooled down a bit, the editors are quite hard working and Estonia related articles are better than they have ever been. Estonian (and now Latvian, Lithuanian, Polish, etc.) editors are also observing each others work to assist where necessary. It's sometimes happens that they also meet at AFD's and other votes for similar reason. Some editors are also available on #wikipedia channel so we have held discussions there. I can't speak for other editors because I don't know, but I don't have any sockpuppets and I don't think any other one has any either. The RFCU process makes me a bit sad. I shuffled over some old RFCU cases and the methodology they use seems like extremely unreliable. It seems they use some very mean statistics in style: 1) Assuming every 1000000th person in world is editing english wikipedia. 2) Assuming estonia has 1.4m people. 3) Estonia can have 14 wikipedians. 4) As the threshold is already exceeded, every new wikipedian must be a sockpuppet of the earlier editors. Suva Чего? 15:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I closed AFD as a non-admin due to the obvious keep consensus. Happy editing. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 22:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank your for awarding me a badge of honour for my contributions related to Poland. And also for an invitation to join the Poland/Poland-related WP noticeboard. I have a question related to the latter: DYKMonobook is in Category:Wikipedia toolsYour monobook is in Category:Wikipedia tools. This is most likely because when you were copying scripts into yout monobook you accidentaly copied their category. Since your monobook is not a tool itself, please remove this category from it (like this). If you intend for your monobook to be a tool, please consider creating a subpage with a more descriptive name, and moving the category there. Thank you, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 23:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
interviewDzien dobry! I just heard your interview on Wikipedia Weekly! :) I especially liked your statement that civility rules need to be enforced more effectively, somehow. I completely agree that incivility and general obnoxiousness is the biggest on-wiki problem we have to deal with... Also, it was just neat to hear your voice! :) K. Lásztocska 18:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC) SIP39I've gone through the article trying to get it back into shape. I didn't feel I could cut that large chunk of material that was added to the lead, because even though the information was all covered and reffed in the article already, it is properly reffed and the editor took care over it. So I've put it in a note for the time being. One problem I haven't solved is that someone added Soviet casualty figures to the lead. Nothing wrong with that in principle, but the figures were only from one source (which they took from our infobox). I have not yet been able to think of a way of summarising the varied figures for Russian casualties pithily (and good expression is essential; blocks of figures tramelled with ifs and buts are alienating to readers). For the time being, therefore, I've cut both Polish and Soviet figures from the lead; but this is unsatisfactory because the PoW figures are still there, sitting uncomfortably now. If you can think of a way to express both sets of figures briefly and accurately for the lead, please do so. In this, I think the article is a victim of its own success because, unlike books (which seem to choose the particular set of figures which suit their bent), it tries to inform the readers of the whole range of different possible figures. This is invaluable and unique but is not easy to summarise in the lead.qp10qp 04:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC) DYKQuestionHello, when you split up the articles on the Wołyń Voivodeship, one of them read Wołyń Voivodeship (1921–1919). I moved to Wołyń Voivodeship (1918-1939), which are the dates given in the article, but I hope I didn't mess anything up. Perhaps you go look over what I did and make sure. Thanks, Ostap 20:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC) |