HK 82-93
Army field railway HK 82–93 | |
---|---|
EKB 12g in Mülheim-Wichterich
|
|
Numbering: |
HK 82–93 EKB 11 g –13 g and others |
Number: | 12 |
Manufacturer: |
Krauss & Comp. Serial number 7553-7564 |
Year of construction (s): | 1919-1920 |
Retirement: | until 1958 |
Type : | D n2t |
Genre : | K 44.9 |
Gauge : | 1000 mm ( meter gauge ) |
Length over buffers: | 8,190 mm |
Length: | 8,100 mm |
Height: | 3,650 mm |
Width: | 2,450 mm |
Total wheelbase: | 3,200 mm |
Service mass: | 36.5 t |
Friction mass: | 36.5 t |
Wheel set mass : | 9 t |
Driving wheel diameter: | 930 mm |
Control type : | Heusinger |
Number of cylinders: | 2 |
Cylinder diameter: | 400 mm |
Piston stroke: | 450 mm |
Boiler overpressure: | 12 bar |
Grate area: | 1.22 m² |
Evaporation heating surface: | 57.4 m² |
Water supply: | 2.5 m³ |
Fuel supply: | 1 t |
Coupling type: | Balance lever coupling |
The Heeresfeldbahnlokomotiven HK 82-93 were four-axle tank locomotives that were built for the Heeresfeldbahn with a gauge of 1000 mm .
Three of them were based at the Euskirchener Kreisbahnen (EKB) and were numbered 11 g -13 g . These locomotives were retired by 1958. The majority of the other locomotives had been decommissioned before 1945.
history
The locomotives are considered Krauss type E VIII d . They were still ordered for the Prussian army field railways . After they were not completed until after the end of the First World War , they were delivered to the facilities of the Heeresfeldbahn and passed on to railway companies from there. In 1919 the Euskirchener Kreisbahnen took over HK 84–86 .
Other locomotives took over the Härtsfeldbahn (HK 91, there No. 5), the Ruhr-Lippe-Eisenbahnen (HK 93, there No. 24), and the Albtalbahn (HK 90, there No. 11 ''). A locomotive is said to have been used in Finland .
construction
The locomotives had a low driver's cab with an incline at the top, a joint covering for the sand and steam dome and lateral water boxes that were not on the circumference. There were two small round windows serving as portholes in the cab end walls . The slightly conical smoke chamber closure was not concentric to the boiler.
The steam engine worked with two cylinders using the wet steam process . The third axis was the driving axis. The running gear worked according to the Gölsdorf method , whereby the uneven center distances are noticeable: 950 mm between the first and second axles, 1200 mm between the second. and third axis and 1050 mm between third and fourth axis.
literature
- Henning Wall: The Euskirchener Kreisbahnen . Schweers + Wall, Hövelhof 1999, ISBN 3-89494-107-3 , p. 147-148 .
Web links
Individual evidence
- ^ A b c Henning Wall: The Euskirchener Kreisbahnen . Schweers + Wall, Hövelhof 1999, ISBN 3-89494-107-3 , p. 147-148 .