Pseudo word

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The articles non-word and pseudo- word overlap thematically. Help me to better differentiate or merge the articles (→  instructions ) . To do this, take part in the relevant redundancy discussion . Please remove this module only after the redundancy has been completely processed and do not forget to include the relevant entry on the redundancy discussion page{{ Done | 1 = ~~~~}}to mark. Herr-Schlauschlau 1:47 p.m. , Aug. 18, 2011 (CEST)


A pseudo-word represents a sequence of letters or sounds that follow the graphotactic or phonotactic rules of a certain language (e.g. German), but without having a meaning in this language. Pseudo-words therefore obey the language-specific rules of word formation and can be pronounced without any problems, but have no entry in the lexicon of this language.

Differentiation from related terms

The difference to non-words is that non-words violate the grapho- or phonotactic rules of the respective language. Pseudo-words are therefore words that could theoretically exist, whereas this is excluded for non-words. Houses would thus be a word, Häsure a pseudo- word and Hrsäeu a non-word. Pseudo-words and non-words are mainly used to study language processing in the brain.

Neurophysiological Findings

Words, pseudo-words and non-words differ in how they are processed in the brain. When examining the temporal processing of linguistic stimuli in the brain by means of event-related potentials (EKP) , the activation processes of words, pseudo-words and non-words are the same in the first approx. 400 ms. Approx. 400 ms after the presentation of the linguistic stimulus, however, there is a negative effect on words in the waveform of the EKP, the N400 effect . The N400 amplitude is more pronounced in pseudo-words than in words. No N400 activity exists for non-words. The N400 effect can thus be interpreted as a search activity in the mental lexicon . The search is not carried out for non-words, but quickly leads to a result for words. In the case of pseudo-words, the search is intensive but inconclusive. This is reinforced by findings that show that the N400 amplitude is also more pronounced in rare or uncommon words.

Individual evidence

  1. Christian Stetter: On a theory of orthography. Niemeyer, Tübingen 1980, ISBN 3-484-31099-5 .
  2. ^ Gert Rickheit, Theo Herrmann, Werner Deutsch: Psycholinguistics: an international manual. de Gruyter, Berlin 2003, ISBN 3-11-916557-3 .
  3. C. Van Petten: Words and sentences: Event-related brain potential measures. In: Psychophysiology . 32, 1995, PMID 8524986 , pp. 511-525.