Inauthenticity (literary studies)
Inauthenticity is a way of speaking in which a linguistic object means something other than what the wording says.
The term comes from rhetoric (improprietas). It is to be distinguished from indirectness and the counter-concept to authenticity / literality .
In the area of literary inauthenticity, Rüdiger Zymner distinguishes between three sub-areas: the textual micro-area of the tropics, e.g. metaphor , irony , metonymy , synecdoche , etc., the textual middle area of partial inauthenticity (e.g. in metaphor complexes with the same or different images or also in allegorical ones Text passages) and the textual macro area of the inauthenticity of full texts (such as the parabola and some forms of the fable ).
literature
- Zymner, Rüdiger (1991): Ineigenlichkeit: Studies on the semantics and history of the parable: Zugl .: Freiburg / Switzerland, Univ., Diss., 1990. Paderborn et al: Schöningh (= Explicatio).
- Zymner, Rüdiger (1994): Two Sides of Improprietas. In: Michel, Paul (ed.): The biological and cultural roots of the use of symbols by humans. Bern et al .: Lang (= writings on symbol research), pp. 91–122.
- Zymner, Rüdiger (2003): improper meaning. In: Jannidis, Fotis / Lauer, Gerhard / Martínez, Matías / Winko, Simone (eds.): Rules of meaning. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter (= Revisionen, Vol. 1), pp. 128–168.
Individual evidence
- ↑ Zymner, Rüdiger (2007): Ineigent. In: Braungart, Georg / Fricke, Harald / Grubmüller, Klaus / Müller, Jan-Dirk / Vollhardt, Friedrich / Weimar, Klaus (eds.): Reallexikon der deutschen Literaturwissenschaft. Revision of the real dictionary of German literary history. Vol. II: P-Z. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 726-728.