Jump to content

Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Constitutionality: reversal was by three-judge panel, not the full court
→‎Constitutionality: added info about city's intentions for appeal
Line 7: Line 7:


==Constitutionality==
==Constitutionality==
[[Washington, D.C.]]'s gun laws are considered by many to be the strictest in the [[United States]], and have been challenged on grounds of [[constitutionality]]. Any benefits of the firearms law are weighed against the impact on [[personal liberty]] and rights under the [[United States Constitution]]'s [[Second Amendment]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=Kates, Jr. Don B. |title=Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment |journal=Michigan Law Review |volume=204 |year=1983}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Reynolds, Glenn Harlan |title=A Critical Guide to the Second Amendment |journal=Tennessee Law Review |volume=461 |year=1995}}</ref> Many find such restrictions and enforcement objectionable, as intrusive and invasive of [[privacy]], and put fundamental values in jeopardy.<ref>{{cite book |author=Hirschman, Albert O. |title=The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy |year=1991}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |author=Polsby, Daniel P. |title=The False Promise of Gun Control |publisher=Atlantic Monthly |date=March 1994}}</ref> On [[March 9]], [[2007]], the law was overturned by a three-judge panel of the [[United States Court of Appeals]], in a 2-1 ruling.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030901090.html |title=Appeals Court Guts D.C. Gun Ban |author=Miller, Bill and Robert Barnes |date=March 9, 2007 |publisher=The Washington Post}}</ref>
[[Washington, D.C.]]'s gun laws are considered by many to be the strictest in the [[United States]], and have been challenged on grounds of [[constitutionality]]. Any benefits of the firearms law are weighed against the impact on [[personal liberty]] and rights under the [[United States Constitution]]'s [[Second Amendment]].<ref>{{cite journal |author=Kates, Jr. Don B. |title=Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment |journal=Michigan Law Review |volume=204 |year=1983}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Reynolds, Glenn Harlan |title=A Critical Guide to the Second Amendment |journal=Tennessee Law Review |volume=461 |year=1995}}</ref> Many find such restrictions and enforcement objectionable, as intrusive and invasive of [[privacy]], and put fundamental values in jeopardy.<ref>{{cite book |author=Hirschman, Albert O. |title=The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy |year=1991}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |author=Polsby, Daniel P. |title=The False Promise of Gun Control |publisher=Atlantic Monthly |date=March 1994}}</ref> On [[March 9]], [[2007]], the law was overturned by a three-judge panel of the [[United States Court of Appeals]], in a 2-1 ruling.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030901090.html |title=Appeals Court Guts D.C. Gun Ban |author=Miller, Bill and Robert Barnes |date=March 9, 2007 |publisher=The Washington Post}}</ref> The city is expected to ask the full Court to decide the case, and appeal to the [[Supreme Court]] if necessary.


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 04:49, 10 March 2007

The Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 was passed by the District of Columbia city council on June 26, 1976.[1] The law banned residents from owning handguns, automatic firearms, and high-capacity semi-automatic firearms, as well as prohibited possession of unregistered firearms. Exceptions to the ban were allowed for police officers and guns registered before 1976. The law also required firearms kept in the home to be "unloaded, disassembled, or bound by a trigger lock or similar device."[2]

Evaluation

Two evaluations of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 were done a few years after the law was enacted, including one commissioned by the United States Conference of Mayors.[3][4] These evaluations found that during periods of rigorous enforcement of the law in three years after implementation, there was some reduction in rates of gun robbery, assault, and homicide.[5] The effect was greatest for homicides arising out of domestic violence involving family members and acquaitances.[5] Findings from another evalation was published in 1991 in the New England Journal of Medicine.[6] This evaluation found that homicides and suicides by firearm decreased by one quarter immediately after the law was enacted, with the effect remaining until 1988 when homicides by firearms increased with the prevalence of crack markets.[5]

These evaluations do not provide any conclusive findings and questions remain as to the effectiveness of the District of Columbia firearms law.[5] One reason that local laws, such as the D.C. laws, may be ineffective is that guns are often trafficked into cities from other parts of the United States, particularly the southern states.[7][8] Results from the ATF's Youth Crime Gun Interdiction Initiative indicate that the percentage of imported guns involved in crimes is tied to the stringency of local firearm laws.[9]

Constitutionality

Washington, D.C.'s gun laws are considered by many to be the strictest in the United States, and have been challenged on grounds of constitutionality. Any benefits of the firearms law are weighed against the impact on personal liberty and rights under the United States Constitution's Second Amendment.[10][11] Many find such restrictions and enforcement objectionable, as intrusive and invasive of privacy, and put fundamental values in jeopardy.[12][13] On March 9, 2007, the law was overturned by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 ruling.[14] The city is expected to ask the full Court to decide the case, and appeal to the Supreme Court if necessary.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Government Reform to Review D.C. s Handgun Ban". Congressman Tom Davis.
  2. ^ "The Case For Reforming The District of Columbia`s Gun Laws". National Rifle Association.
  3. ^ U.S. Conference of Mayors (1980). The Analysis of the Firearms Control Act of 1975: Handgun Control in the District of Columbia.
  4. ^ Jones, E.D., III (1981). "The District of Columbia's Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975: The toughest handgun control law in the United States—or is it?". Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 455: p. 138-149. {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ a b c d Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (1993). Understanding and Preventing Violence, Volume 1. National Academy of Sciences. pp. p. 278. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  6. ^ Loftin, C., d. McDowall, B. Wiersema, and T.J. Cottey (1991). "Effects of restrictive licensing of handguns on homicide and suicide in the District of Columbia". New England Journal of Medicine. 325: p. 1615-1620. {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ^ Butterfield, Fox (July 1, 1999). "Gun Flows to Criminals Laid to Tiny Fraction of Dealers". The New York Times.
  8. ^ Wintemute, Garen (2000). "Guns and Gun Violence". In Blumstein, Alfred, Joel Wallman (ed.). The Crime Drop in America. Cambridge University Press.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  9. ^ "Youth Crime Gun Interdiction Initiative (1998)". Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
  10. ^ Kates, Jr. Don B. (1983). "Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment". Michigan Law Review. 204.
  11. ^ Reynolds, Glenn Harlan (1995). "A Critical Guide to the Second Amendment". Tennessee Law Review. 461.
  12. ^ Hirschman, Albert O. (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy.
  13. ^ Polsby, Daniel P. (March 1994). "The False Promise of Gun Control". Atlantic Monthly.
  14. ^ Miller, Bill and Robert Barnes (March 9, 2007). "Appeals Court Guts D.C. Gun Ban". The Washington Post.