User talk:61.88.131.148: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
m Reverted edits by 61.88.131.148 (talk) to last version by Horst.Burkhardt
m Protected User talk:61.88.131.148: 6 months [edit=autoconfirmed:move=sysop]
(No difference)

Revision as of 05:48, 6 September 2007

This IP is used by Sydney Boys' High School, if you are wondering. That's probably the reason why other institutions, such as Fort Street High School, was vandalised. --61.88.131.148 23:48, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Australia on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. דניאל - Danielrocks123 contribs 03:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Antandrus (talk) 03:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Australia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Merbabu 03:52, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishGuy talk 23:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -SCEhardT 02:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Mario. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. WODUP 04:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You are welcome to continue contributing, but please make sure all of your edits from here on are constructive and improve wikipedia. I c e d K o l a (Contributions) 22:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Conspiracy theory

Your recent edit to Conspiracy theory (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 03:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Jonathan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Dweller 22:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning for editing Barometer (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // AntiVandalBot 00:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of repeated vandalism to Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Nishkid64 00:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to McDonald's. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SkerHawx 23:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Indigenous Australians, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SkerHawx 23:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Indigenous Australians, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SkerHawx 23:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Stick Cricket

Your recent edit to Stick Cricket (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Doppler effect

Your recent edit to Doppler effect (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Jane Austen, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | Mr. Darcy talk 03:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Allies of World War II, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Wizardman 22:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Myopia

Your recent edit to Myopia (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism, January 2007

Thank you for experimenting with the page Austria on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Stemonitis 01:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Coat of arms of Italy page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Stemonitis 01:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Coat of arms of Italy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Stemonitis 01:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Coat of arms of Italy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Stemonitis 01:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Nishkid64 02:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Belgian Federal Parliament. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. worthawholebean talkcontribs 03:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61.88.131.148 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As the header template says, this IP is shared; I realise that my peers may vandalise, but I do not. Also Golgi apparatus has some vandalism that might need reverting.:)

Decline reason:

If you get an account, you'll be quite able to edit -- you won't be able to register from here (sorry!), but if you can register from home, a library, or somewhere else, that'll work. Last option, contact unblock-en-l, mention this page's URL if you can, and I or another member of the list should be more than happy to register an account on your behalf. Sorry to throw a roadblock in your path, but it's a pretty easy hurdle to jump. Hope that helps! – Luna Santin (talk) 00:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you please lift the block to something of less gravity? Please? --61.88.131.148 23:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Is it possible to set up a sort of veto system, i.e. have mods review edits submitted from the IP in question? It covers every public school in NSW, which is (from memory) about 200,000 computers - I'm sure you'll agree that that is a pretty large amount of computers to block for a few senseless acts of vandalism. -Horst, Rivendell School NSW Horst.Burkhardt 01:40, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]