User talk:Mrmoocow: Difference between revisions
→4chan: new section |
→4chan: ++ reply |
||
Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
Hi there. I removed your external link addition on [[4chan]] as I do not feel that it complies with our [[WP:LINKS|external links guideline]] (despite it being cool) :P. Anyway, cheers =) --[[User:Slakr|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\ [[User talk:Slakr|talk]] /</sup></small> 08:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
Hi there. I removed your external link addition on [[4chan]] as I do not feel that it complies with our [[WP:LINKS|external links guideline]] (despite it being cool) :P. Anyway, cheers =) --[[User:Slakr|<span style="color:teal;font-weight:bold;">slakr</span>]]<small><sup>\ [[User talk:Slakr|talk]] /</sup></small> 08:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Oh, whoops, my bad. I totally didn't see those there. I need sleep :P Anyway, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=4chan&diff=186559541&oldid=186555051 fixed]. Cheers. =) |
Revision as of 09:42, 24 January 2008
IF I HAVE SAID SOMETHING ON YOUR TALK PAGE, RESPOND THERE; YOU ARE ON MY WATCHLIST. Welcome!
On Horseradish
I made an edit on the page for Horseradish: Bitter Truths, about a month ago. You reverted it and I asked why on the discussion page for that article. You haven't responded and I'd still like an answer. I know it seemed like advertising as I linked to a fan forum, but the information I linked is something I thought was really useful and I can't find anything like it anywhere else on the internet. Please get back to me on this. 667er 15:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
I realise that it looks like advertising, and it's true that I have an account on that site, but they have loads of lists and information that isn't being represented here on Wikipedia. How can I tell if what I'm posting is going to be seen as advertising or not?667er 15:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
An article you have contributed to, A Series of Unfortunate Events has been nominated for Good Article review. Although the article was only given GA status a few days ago, I found some issues within the article that might keep the article from GA status. So, I have asked for a Good Article review. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion there. Drewcifer 02:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mc-fig-serge.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mc-fig-serge.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:33, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Heroes
Your changes have been reverted; please do not continue to damage the article. I had already left you an extensive explanation as to why your changes are not appropriate, in response to your initial comment on my talk page. Please read through it. --Ckatzchatspy 05:07, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding the "season" information as it is useful. Unfortunately, the reorganization of the list wasn't, for the reasons I outlined previously. I've restored the alphabetical order as there is no purpose or benefit to making the list harder to read. Thanks. --Ckatzchatspy 08:33, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lemonygame.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lemonygame.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:14, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bluewarhawkship.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Bluewarhawkship.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Lemony Snicket Roll Call
Hi there. I removed your external link addition on 4chan as I do not feel that it complies with our external links guideline (despite it being cool) :P. Anyway, cheers =) --slakr\ talk / 08:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, whoops, my bad. I totally didn't see those there. I need sleep :P Anyway, fixed. Cheers. =)