Talk:I Love Money season 1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 94: Line 94:


:The article is not locked.--[[User:Andrewcrawford|Andrewcrawford]] ([[User talk:Andrewcrawford|talk]]) 21:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
:The article is not locked.--[[User:Andrewcrawford|Andrewcrawford]] ([[User talk:Andrewcrawford|talk]]) 21:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


I used to write coherent summaries that weren't biased and actually maked sense when it comes to the English language. How long does it take for one to be able to edit again on a semi-protected article?

Revision as of 02:40, 6 August 2008

WikiProject iconTelevision C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Tvimage

Episode 2 eliminations

There are already eliminations listed for episode 2. I don't know how this is possible, but please fix them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chastayo (talkcontribs) 19:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which table to use?

I personally haven't seen the episode yet, but if it is like previous Flavor of Love shows and spinoffs, it is done with a callout order. If not, it is fine the way it is. Just wanted to point this out to anyone who has seen it yet. <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 03:58, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turn on the TV and it was already on. It appears that the first episode was in callout format, but it might be a special episode. With the consensus of others, I think we should wait til the second episode before deciding which episode. <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 04:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And after thinking about it a little more, I remember seeing in the previews that they choose a B0ottom 3. The current table is best. :)<3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 05:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Change the table

I feel that the table that should be used should be similar to the one's used for Top Chef or Shear Genius. Have the team captains for the episode in a mini-header on top and then use a WIN for teams that one, SAFE, for players on team that lost but not in bottom, LOW and OUT for bottom 3 and loser. Any other opinions?<3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 01:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did do that but with a twist. I put "BTM 3" In pink for the first person chosen to be safe in the Bottom 3. And I put "BTM 2" for the person safe in the Bottom 2. Sean9500 (talk) 20:27, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think the table should remain the way it was, there is nothing wrong with it and the new one you want is sloppy.

(talk) —Preceding comment was added at 21:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The current table is really dumb. I don't know who's idea it is to include every single detail but seriously make your own fan page or something and take your shitty table with you. There really only needs to be a chart detailing who was safe, who was at risk, and who was OUT. Take the current Charm School chart for example. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.125.199.74 (talk) 23:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The show has a lot of information to give, unlike charm school, so quit being a little baby and deal with it.--Ydnar12 (talk) 23:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The table should be changed to the one that is mentioned before. It has all the contestants listed on the left, and then a high/low format. I might go ahead and try to make one. <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 04:00, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I currently hid both tables until a dispute can be resolved. There really is no sense having either if an agreement can be reached, so this should be settled soon. IRK!Leave me a note or two 06:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, here is mine. I feel we should use the table which lists all contestants on left hand side and then episode data on right. It is used for Top Chef, Project Runway, Shear Genius, and I think Flavor of Love Girls: Charm School (I know that will be redlinked augh). There is no call out order in the show except for episode 1. <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 08:15, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Charm School one is best for this, but with more colors.--Ydnar12 (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's another thing, is it doesn't have to have that many colors. One for a team win, one for a team lose but safe, one for bottom 3, and one for out. That is basically all that is needed. Team captains can be mentioned in the Episode Summary or can just be on top similar to Quickfire Wins in Top Chef. <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 20:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But I feel as though it would be easier to list it the original way it was. It's more organized, and the newer one is better suited for shows in which people compete individually instead of on a team. IRK!Leave me a note or two 23:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have an idea, this table should be formatted the way it is for Flavor of Love Girls: Charm School because we could list the teams on episode 1 and for Team Captains, we put a asterisk (*), so we know who the Team Captains are, and we put "WIN" in   for whoever was on the winning team in the challenge, "SAFE" in   for the contestants who did not win the challenge, "BTM 2" or "BTM 3" in   to show who was in the Bottom 2/3, and   (GOLD) and   (GREEN) to indicate who was on the Gold and Green Teams; and do not worry about the color for winning I Love Money yet, we have plenty of weeks before we have to put that on the chart. This would look organized, simplified, and easy to understand. That is my opinion on what to do with the chart; this debate should end due to Wikipedia's Bandwith. We should keep room for whatever other questions, and/or suggestions for this article in the future, thank you. Sean9500 (talk) 00:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. ~ Tell me what you think!!! Sean9500 (talk) 00:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sean9500, um thanks for telling us how already it was, but anyway, i agree with IRK because it is a team show and not an individual show.--Ydnar12 (talk) 00:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I never said anything about the contestants not being a team in the note above. Sean9500 (talk) 00:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Never said you did?--Ydnar12 (talk) 01:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The original way is the callout order way. And there is no callout order except for Episode 1. <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 01:23, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How about a table like the one in The Surreal Life: Fame Games? It's much more organized, and this version is rather sloppy, seeing as how people win as a team, and not individually. IRK!Leave me a note or two 04:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection

This article needs to be semi-protected simply because of all of the vandalism happening to the article. Can someone please change this? Sean9500 (talk) 20:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any vandalism going on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ydnar12 (talkcontribs) 20:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true. You are the one that keeps reverting the better chart (My chart). Stop, you're table isn't needed. Thank you. Sean9500 (talk) 21:19, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, my chart is the better one yours is sloppy, your chart is not needed, so stop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ydnar12 (talkcontribs) 21:22, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't Kindergarten anymore. Well, maybe for you, but, In the chart section, One person wanted the chart I'm making, and besides, my chart looks well oganized and gives a great idea of what happened. Yours, on the other hand, looks like there is a certain call-out order possibly confusing fans. And I'm not discussing this any longer because this is wasting Wikipedia's bandwidth. Thank you for your suggestion though. Sean9500 (talk) 21:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If the fan reads the key than the wont have that problem, and no yours just tell who was eliminated and not, mine tells there contributation in the episode. So stop with your un-helpful chart. Thanks.
Nice job not signing!! Sean9500 (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Ydnar12 21:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever the case, just somebody please make this page semi-protected. It would help a lot. Thank you. Sean9500 (talk) 21:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sean9500, I have combined are tables, my colors your format. If you do not like, then I will gladly restore it to my table. Ydnar12 (talk) 23:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

???

What is it with people putting up episode summaries and eliminations before they air? Isn't there something against Wikipedia standards involving this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.22.210.217 (talk) 17:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The episode airs at 11:00 AM the day of the advertised premiere episode. So if you don't want to find out who is eliminated early, don't visit this page bewtween 12:00 PM-10:00 PM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.213.16 (talk) 22:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. People assumed Megan was to be eliminated in Ep. 3 when instead Heat was. 72.22.210.217 (talk) 22:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the time i saw Ep. 3 it said Heat and Megan in the bottom 2. --Ydnar12 (talk) 22:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They show the power-outings in the trailers, so we know what team wins and loses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chastayo (talkcontribs) 12:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But it's not necessary to spoil fans like that, isn't it? We do not add it until we have complete proof of which team wins and loses until the complete Episode has aired completely on VH1. Sean9500 (talk) 00:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But it does show proof on the trailers.--Ydnar12 (talk) 00:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like most Flavor of Love shows and spinoffs, there are 2 showings. One in the morning and the more popular in the evening. I have always been for showing the information when first available. <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 01:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Needs major editing

Whoever originally wrote the episode summaries, either didn't spend any time editing or can't speak english. I was going to fix the grammar but the article is locked. Someone who can, needs to fix this page.


Bmatalka (talk) 21:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not locked.--Andrewcrawford (talk) 21:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I used to write coherent summaries that weren't biased and actually maked sense when it comes to the English language. How long does it take for one to be able to edit again on a semi-protected article?