User:Cmmmm

I think that if the Watchtower goes down, they should not behave orwellian and I call for all journalists and reporters and everybody in the media to respect my Internet anonymity. I did this not for faim but for faith and it is my right to do it so. If they want someone who is responsible, I acted according to my faith. They can blame my faith. But they can blame it also on the Watchtower because they were not able to create a portal themselves and they can also blame it on the intimidation of editors by the Watchtower . But they should not behave orwellian. I want to stay anonymus.

P.S Does everybody think that the LDS faith is only a racism vehicle? I think it has other things to offer!

P.S The LDS church, like many other sects, is also a social organisation.

P.S The Mormons are the only ones who count me as a human.

Mormons, come

2 Nephi 9:31–38

And wo unto the deaf that will not hear; for they shall perish.

Wo unto the blind that will not see; for they shall perish also.

Wo unto the uncircumcised of heart, for a knowledge of their iniquities shall smite them at the last day.

Wo unto the liar, for he shall be thrust down to hell.

Wo unto the murderer who deliberately killeth, for he shall die.

Wo unto them who commit whoredoms, for they shall be thrust down to hell.

Yea, wo unto those that worship idols, for the devil of all devils delighteth in them.

And, in fine, wo unto all those who die in their sins; for they shall return to God, and behold his face, and remain in their sins.

Category:Muslim Wikipedians

THE ONLY People who value my knowledge and work:

• Jimmy Wales
• Larry Sanger
• Larry Page
• Sergey Brin

• Jimmy Wales - Two Views of the "Wiki" Concept (YouTube)
• Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales on internet censorship (YouTube)

P.S. Wikipedia:No personal attacks

All decisions about wikipedia are made within Wikipedia and everybody is allowed to participate. If someone disagrees, he/she is allowed to add information or create portals themselves. Wikipedia has standarts for neutrality and behavour and is the most respected encyclopedia in the world.

If one can abolish the anonymity of one editor and intimitate him, one can abolish the anonymity of ALL editors and intimitate them all. Freedom is then lost and we live in a orweilian dictatorian society. Is our society so bad to allow this?

I´m so angry that there are people who are sad for the Watchtower that their intimitation of me was so a disaster for them, but were at the same time not at all sad for me when I was intimitated. I have also civil rights!

I´m more sad when a person who really matters for me is angry at me than when a mob wants to kill me because of an disagrement. I had to win against the mob.

I had to fight for my life and the liberty of all other wikipedians.

I had to win the war against islamic terrorists.

The feeling to be under surveillance is so terrible. I can´t resist the temptation to hit orwell. I hope I can edit anonymosly in the future.

1.Why intimitation on Islam

I added this to wikipedia.

from Islamic terrorism

Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar, an Iranian-born American citizen awaiting trial for nine counts of attempted murder, cited a number of verses from the Qur'an in justifying his attempt to kill civilians, including:

Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not. ^{[Quran 2:216]}

The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter; ^{[Quran 5:33]}

But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. ^[Quran 9:5]

Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! ^{[Quran 9:29-30]}

This is about a muslim terrorist who cited a number of verses from the Qur'an in justifying his attempt to kill civilians. This is a muslim who linkes the quran to violence. The entire war between Jehovas witnesses and wikipedia is because of this muslim who linkes Islam to violence. This is the official version of wikipedia and if someone attacks an editor because of this, there will be consequences.

The violent attempt to ban criticism of islamic terrorism on wikipedia is a very serious issue. Criticism of islamic terrorism has to be allowed on wikipedia and the net. The abolishment of internet anonymity is a very dangerous weapon.If the intimitation had succeded, it would have been a victory for the terrorist. I would prefer to close the entire Watchtower than to loose the possibility to criticise islamic terrorism on the net and I think that if the Watchtower looses, it is a victory for internet anonymity. This will protect other users who criticise islamic terrorism.

Articles for the "Islam is peace" thugs

• Muhammad as a general
• Muslim conquests

2.Why intimitation on Mormonism

the only reason is that the jehovas witnesses are to sily to create a portal themselves. The difference between Mormonism and Jehovas witnesses is, that the Mormons do not hide their controversial history on race while the jehovas witnesses try to deceive.

• Jehovah's Witnesses, Blacks and Discrimination - paper about Blacks and the Watchtower
• How Race Affects Your Position In The Kingdom Hall - a personal testimony
• Favoritism and the "Jim Crow" Laws Among Jehovah's Witnesses - The Story of Greg and Penny Peterson

Is it right to support Mormonism? Mormonism and Jehovas witnesses have both racist teachings but the jehovas witnesses know how they can abolish the anonymity of editors and this is an danger to the entire encyclopedia. It is the positon of wikipedia to take sides when an editor is intimitated. Furthermore nobody knows how the jehovas witnesses abolish the anonymity and this adds to the insecurity of editors. The Mormons do not want to abolish civil rights.

Some people say "why have death threats, the abolishment of internet anonymity and attempted murder by the racist Jehovas witnesses only advantages for the Mormons?" I say to them "because the Mormons don´t do this three things and are their direct competitor."

Some people say "I would have done exactly the same if I would not have been intimitated." I say to them "it is easy to criticise someone who is intimated by a sect and to leave him alone with this problem or to support the intimitation of the sect. But I have done this to protect internet anonymity and nobody in the real world except the police helped me." "If the internet anonymity were secured, they could not say this."

Some people say "to make a portal for the Mormons is a promotion of racism". I say to them "look at the portal Portal:Fascism, is this a promotion of racism? Look at the portal Portal:Communism, is this a promotion of communism? Look at the portal Portal:Anarchism, is this promotion of anarchism?" "Look at the portal Portal:War, is this promotion of war?""Look at the portal Portal:Beer, is this promotion of alcoholism?""Look at the portal Portal:Discrimination, is this promotion of Discrimination?" Is the portal Portal:Heathenism also a promotion of racism?

If I had been enslaved by the Watchtower, there would be many Watchtower portals and no criticism of Islam. Wikipedia would be under Watchtower control.

Does everybody think that the rules concerning Wikipedia:No personal attacks were made for fun?

Some peoples say "but the punishment was done by yourself". I say to them "does it really matter who did the punishment according to the wikipedia rules and with the help of other wikipedians?" "and with the help of the Arbitration Committe."

P.S. The racist jehovas witnesses can still build a portal themselves

P.S. If nobody is concerned about the abolishment of civil rights outside of wikipedia, everyone inside of wikipedia is concerned.

Wikipedia does not cave in to intimitation and thuggery but edits the thugs out! This is the way to defend wikipedia, civil rights and liberty! Nobody inside wikipedia cares about the friends of dictatorship and tyrany outside of wikipedia. Everyone has the freedom to edit. Liberty and the law are more worth than a sect which wants to abolish it.

As some thugs are against me only because I´m a ruler of the information age, the question needs to be asked: Why are you not a ruler of the information age? The answer: YOU ARE TO SILLY.

• Blacklds.org
• Videos

Moses with the Ten Commandments by Rembrandt (1659)

According to Biblical text, the commandments represent the utterances of God on Mount Sinai

Some people say that the Bible is only "written" and that the Bill of Rights is only "written". They are the friends of dictators and tyrants.

The Jehovas witnesses will never again abolish the internet anonymity of someone.

Some thugs say that criticism of Islam is "dangerous" but that islamic terrorism is not dangerous at all.

Some thugs say that they must help the racist, islamist friendly, orweilian, phaedophile Jehovas Witnesses because their intimitation brought them so bad results.

Wikipedia has no place for this thugs.