New Threat Upgrade: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Clean-up/Corrections
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:USS Mahan SPG-55B radars.jpg|thumb|250px|In 1983, the [[USS Mahan (DDG-42)|USS ''Mahan'' (DDG-42)]] was underway to test and evaluate the Terrier New Threat Upgrade (NTU) Combat System.]]
[[Image:USS Mahan SPG-55B radars.jpg|thumb|300px|In 1983, the [[USS Mahan (DDG-42)|USS ''Mahan'' (DDG-42)]] was underway to test and evaluate the Terrier New Threat Upgrade (NTU) Combat System.]]

'''New Threat Upgrade''' (NTU) was a [[United States Navy]] program to improve and modernize the capability of existing cruisers and destroyers equipped with [[RIM-2 Terrier|Terrier]] and [[Tartar Guided Missile Fire Control System|Tartar]] anti-aircraft systems, keeping them in service longer. It was a key component of then-President [[Ronald Reagan]]'s [[600-ship Navy]] plan.
'''New Threat Upgrade''' ('''NTU''') was a [[United States Navy]] program to improve and modernize the capability of existing cruisers and destroyers equipped with [[RIM-2 Terrier|Terrier]] and [[Tartar Guided Missile Fire Control System|Tartar]] anti-aircraft systems, keeping them in service longer. It was a key component of then-President [[Ronald Reagan]]'s [[600-ship Navy]] plan.


==The Program==
==The Program==

Revision as of 22:37, 1 March 2016

In 1983, the USS Mahan (DDG-42) was underway to test and evaluate the Terrier New Threat Upgrade (NTU) Combat System.

New Threat Upgrade (NTU) was a United States Navy program to improve and modernize the capability of existing cruisers and destroyers equipped with Terrier and Tartar anti-aircraft systems, keeping them in service longer. It was a key component of then-President Ronald Reagan's 600-ship Navy plan.

The Program

USS Mahan (DDG-42) was selected to install and test the Terrier New Threat Upgrade (NTU) Combat System with the improved Standard Missile Two Block II (Extended Range). Testing lasted from October 1981- March 1985.

New Threat Upgrade allowed the full use of newer Standard missiles (SM-2) and improved the interoperability of the radar and computer systems aboard the ships. The system allows the ships to which it was fitted to time share illumination radars for multiple missile interceptions in a manner similar to the Aegis Combat System. Some sources claimed that NTU ships were superior in some respects to Aegis ships of the same era, particularly in the area of user interface. They were inferior in that they could not deal with a saturation missile attack as well as Aegis vessels. In addition, the upgrade was also expensive, and the US Navy opted instead to construct vessels designed with Aegis.

History

The New Threat Upgrade to the Leahy class included massive remodeling of the ship from food service space rehabilitation to a main propulsion system overhaul.[1] Entire systems were removed and replaced, for example the AN/SPS-40 air-search radar was replaced with the AN/SPS-49 air-search radar.

In 1988–90, the Kidd-class destroyers received the New Threat Upgrade, including a new superstructure and heavier mainmast cooperative engagement with Aegis Ticonderoga-class cruisers, which could control the Kidds’ surface-to-air missiles while they remained electronically silent. The Spruance class, the predecessor to and close relative of the Kidd-class, did not received the NTU. However, in response to criticisms that the as-designed weaponry was insufficient, 24 members of the Spruances were upgraded with a 61-cell Vertical Launch System for Tomahawk missiles which granted them much enhanced anti-surface capabilities beyond their original anti-submarine warfare mission.[2][3]

End of NTU

The Cold War ended shortly after the New Threat Upgrade was initiated. The lower levels of funding available to the United States Navy after the Cold War meant that that the NTU upgrade was never applied to all of the intended vessels. Many of these ships were retired in the 1990s whether they received the full NTU modification or not; most of these warships built in the 1960s-1970s had high operational costs and manpower requirements (especially those which were nuclear-powered), compared to newer Aegis warships. The USS Texas (CGN-39) was decommissioned during the upgrade, in the midst of her reactor refueling. USS Gridley (CG-21) received NTU in 1991 at a cost of $55 million but was decommissioned in early 1994.

The arrival of the Aegis-equipped Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, which were more effective and cost-efficient, led to the accelerated retirement of the Spruance and Kidd classes, despite their recent modifications. Overall, all US Navy ships that received the NTU upgrades were decommissioned within six years of their upgrade, as the Navy chose instead to keep newly constructed ships with the Aegis weapon system.

NTU systems

  • AN/SPS-49(V)5 - A 2D Air Search Radar (azimuth and range)
  • AN/SPS-48E - A 3D Air Search Radar (azimuth, range and altitude)
  • AN/SYS-2(V)1 Integrated Automatic Detection and Tracking System (IADTS)
  • (A)CDS - (Advanced) Combat Direction System
  • WDS Mk 14 - Weapons Direction System
  • Mk 74 Tartar[4] and Mk 76 Terrier Fire Control Systems (AN/SPG-55B radar for Terrier ships and AN/SPG-51 for Tartar)
  • AN/SYR-1 Communications Tracking Set,[5] used for SM-2 missile downlink
  • Mk 10 twin-arm manual launcher, Mk 13 single-arm automated launcher and Mk 26[6] twin-arm, automated missile launchers
  • RESS - Radar Environmental Simulator System

NTU ships

These classes had some of their units modified with the New Threat Upgrade.

KDX-II Class

The Navy of the Republic of Korea uses a NTU derived system for its Chungmugong Yi Sunshin class destroyers.

See also

References

  1. ^ "CG-16". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  2. ^ [1]
  3. ^ [2]
  4. ^ "MK-74". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  5. ^ "AN/SYR-1". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  6. ^ "MK-26 GMLS". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  7. ^ "CG-26". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  8. ^ "DDG-2". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  9. ^ "DDG-37". fas.org. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  10. ^ "DDG-993". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 11 September 2014.