User talk:DerHexer/archive02

archives
archive1
barnstars

Check your facts please

Please check the edit history of a page before you accuse me or anyone else of vandalism. I removed several entries referring to "Dragon Private Parts" from Chinese Dragon and did not add any content. Fighting vandalism is not a crusade; get your facts straight before you hurl abuse in other people's faces.07:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

You did not revert to the correct version, but I removed the entire vandalism. That you didn't make vandalism is correct, I made the mistake to revert just your edit and not the edits by other IPs, but I cut out the mistake. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't call me a vandal kthx

Hi, before accusing me of vandalism, please check the page I supposedly 'vandalised'. I brought it from from: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sushi&oldid=127989056 ..to: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sushi&oldid=127989444 ..which I think we can all agree does not constitute vandalism. Perhaps there was something I missed, but I certainly didn't vandalize. Spend more time actually checking, and less time trying to get your revert-count up. Thanks! --85.227.145.166 14:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, sry. I should clean my glasses. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~john doe~ same here. you shouldn't be accusing me of vandalization either — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.178.172.98 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 18:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't reverted there, but your edits here. And these are vandalism. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 18:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You sent me a message telling me that edits I had done to the Berlin Wall article appeared to be vandalism... honestly, I don't remember ever even editing that article. Dx Any editing I've ever done I do to fix errors in spelling or punctuation. Your little message about my apparent vandalism shocked me so much I just had to reply. I'd never vandalize my beloved Wikipedia. 70.143.50.176 20:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you didn't vandalize the article another one who used your IP adress made these edits: [1] [2] Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 08:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello, I'm a member of the Counter Vandalism Unit, (CVU) and need to know something: How is it someone can get rollback privelages? Brain40 22:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm using WP:VF and WP:TWINKLE. And I'm used to fight vandalism. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, okay. Could you look over my contributions log and rate my performance with fighting vandalism? I'm just curious, since you would know whether someone is doing well or not. Brain40 22:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The performance doesn't matter. Every correctly reverted edit is important for our project—the quantity doesn't coin. And you're doing a good job. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe - I remember the de:WP-CVU... *ggg* Marcus Cyron 16:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please not! Please! —DerHexer (Talk) 16:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the "gay" comment from Burke Catholic. That is what I was attempting to do befor eyou told me I was vandalizing the page.

Bostonirish220 19:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You almost blanked the whole article without mentioning anything in the edit summary. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man

That one guy was obsessed with that page on that place in Texas. Whstchy 16:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 16:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

company

To Whom It May Concern:

I am just looking for some help. I am the web director for a company called Xyience. I have a wiki username Tk421lj and had recent updated an article on Wikipedia about my company.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xyience

I tried to create a non-biased article that was based on fact. That article has recently been modified by someone who is trying to slander the company. Rather than stating the facts, this person is using Wikipedia for personal gain and self promotion. He has written sensational, tabloid style articles about the company and is posting them on the internet. He is attempting to use Wikipedia to promote his tabloid internet blogs. I have since removed his slander from the Wiki article, but he continues to modify and update the article with content that is not acceptable for a Wiki article.

What can I do about this? Is there anything that can be done, further than me checking the Wiki article and editing the inappropriate content?

Thanks for your help.

Tk421lj — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tk421lj (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 16:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the revert on the 'vandalism' done on my user page, but it was me who did it :P --Chokelius 17:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so—that's why I didn't warn you—, but If you weren't it, it would be strong vandalism. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edit conflict

Whoops, you beat me to it. Apologies. CA387 18:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How can happen this? —DerHexer (Talk) 18:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon? I'm not quite sure what you mean. CA387 18:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is this possible with twinkle? You should get an edit conflict. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chances are it was just neglect on my part. CA387 18:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, okay. No problem. ;) If I'm allowed to remove the warning I would do it now. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 18:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go right ahead. Unless you want to keep it as some sort of souvenir. :P --CA387 18:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

;) Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke

... fürs reverten --Caltas 19:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gern geschehen. Deutscher Muttersprachler hier, kennt man dich von der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia? —DerHexer (Talk) 19:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

nein, da treibe ich mich nur lesend herum... ;-) --Caltas 20:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dort gibt es auch genug zu revertieren. ;) Dort schaffen wir es wenigstens noch, so gut wie alle IP-Edits durchzusehen. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I am proud to award you this barnstar DerHexer as you've been out reverting vandalism and warning senseless users all day. Well done. Retiono Virginian 21:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like you need more of those ;). I'm a little envious of you... --24.136.230.38 21:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give you one, too. ;) Every IP which is hard working for our project is a good IP. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 21:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to give you one too. Thank you for the multiple reverts of my user page today. 00:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Multajn dankojn pro la malmolestado de mia uzantpaĝo!

Ach, die Schießkopfen, sie liebe mich! Ho, la fekmensuloj, kiel ili min amas! --Orange Mike 22:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another...

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For beating me out a lot, and help with a page a few days ago. Whs tchy 21:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) Where did I help you? Sry that I forgot it. :( —DerHexer (Talk) 21:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Count to 10 and pray... ;). 10 Barnstars or other awards in - how much time? 2 Weeks? Marcus Cyron 21:37, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And yet another...

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For fighting vandalism here and on de-WP. --Complex (de) 21:37, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eleven... *ggg* Marcus Cyron 21:37, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Du zählst die auch noch? … Mehr als sie auf einer Unterseite zu verstecken, konnte ich noch nicht. Im Übrigen, FritzG und ich sind schon ganz sauer, dass du uns noch nicht wegen des Schiedsgerichtes gefragt hast. :P —DerHexer (Talk) 21:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Das hat seine Gründe. Ich persönlich würde euch beide sofort wählen. Aber ich weiß auch, daß ihr beide zu Konfliktbelastet seid (weil ihr eben viel macht, eckt ihr auch an). Ich will euch da nicht verheizen. Marcus Cyron 05:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the reverts of vandalism to my User page :O) Flowerpotman talk|contribs 22:07, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, thanks for the revert :) – Riana _ऋ 10:11, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, too. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of Sonia O'Sullivan

Excuse me, I did NOT vandalise the Sonia O'Sullivan page of wikipedia, nor did I even look at it, and please do not send me messages accusing me of such, thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.125.57.239 (talk) 01:30, 29 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

SemiProtect?

Would you mind if your userpage is semi-protected? --Kzrulzuall ^{Talk• Contribs} 06:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer it unprotected. The reason therefor you can find here. If it will be too much vandalism on my userpage I'll call for you. ;) But I'm used to it. So thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 08:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edit conflict #2

Sorry to put this in a different place. Feel free to delete but... It wasn't meant to be vandalism I was simply undoing other peoples blanking and I didn't pay attention that you had undone it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.128.22.8 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 10:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It looked like vandalism. ;) Could you sign your postings? Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Newspaper

Not such a vandalism, just deleting mis-information put up by another user. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.95.124.248 (talk) 17:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

You should use the edit summary to seperate your edit from vandalism. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spongecola Vandalism

I don't know if I should say this to you but I am not the one who vandalized it, maybe somebody else. Sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Barrera marquez (talk • contribs) 23:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I reverted the IP who removed a section. —DerHexer (Talk) 08:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. Moorematthews 18:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but, I think I'll stay! >:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.84.236.148 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sry, what do you mean? —DerHexer (Talk) 22:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you !

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Linnell 22:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Iluvcumonnotebook 23:08, 30 April 2007 (UTC)I didn't mean to delete all that on Titus. All I was trying to do was add osme info. Thank you for reverting the vandalism i did on that page. Thank You![reply]

Okay. I don't mind. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 23:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Iluvcumonnotebook 23:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC) You are so nice!!!! I dont know what I would do without you!!!!!![reply]

You're awesome.

Somedays, I don't know what Wiki would do without folks like you. Which anti-vandal program are you using? AgentFade2Black 23:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

I blush from embarrassment. Thanks! I use WP:VF and WP:TWINKLE. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi. You did a really bad job here[3], because you reverted the work of an anon user who tried to clean up some clown's vandalism. That article is under heavy attack and it seems nobody cares.Page Up 01:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looked like vandalism and it still looks like, too. If the IP had used the edit summary I wouldn't revert it. But sorry that I reverted this. It's easy to make a mistake in hundreds of reverts. Please don't mind, I was not about to do this. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 08:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You hate me, don't you?Kylejp93 17:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Veterans of The First World War who died in 2002

If you actually review the edits made you will see that they are not vandalism but individual references to meet the Wikipedia criteria that all articles have adequate and reliable sources. Accordingly I have reverted the edits back. This approach was agreed after a lengthy discussion on Talk:Surviving_veterans_of_World_War_I. 86.141.58.25 21:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Bruce[reply]

You're right, sorry. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Palestinian Nationalism page

You recently reversed my changes to the "Palestinian Nationalism" page on the basis that my erasure was vandalism. The section I erased (maps and facts) was added about a month ago. It was a disorganized and biased section in an otherwise quality article. The section does not cite its sources and is rife with factual inaccuracies and agenda-filled historical revisionism. Furthermore, I erased, rather than edited this section, because it did not relate to the rest of the article. With considerable cleanup, this section belongs in the "History of Palestine" or "Palestinian History" article, but it has no place in "Palestinian Nationalism." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.184.224 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 16:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but please mention this in the edit summary. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page protection

Thanks for spotting and reverting the vandalism on my page - you had removed it before I even saw it!! Kim dent brown 16:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I see edits in the second they are made with WP:VF. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent Vandalism

Please do not accuse me of vandalism as you seem to do rather a lot. I was removing a selection of what was clearly advertising speak, if you do understand wikipedia you will know that it did not fit in with the prose guidelines, amongst other things. Why not actually study the text before you reinstate it? As such, I feel you are doing the vandalism. I actually know something about the subject matter at hand, rather than just patrolling looking for thinks that you think are wrong.--195.82.104.122 21:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage so quickly. It is the first time I have been deliberately vandlaised, as opposed to it happening out of ignorance. I appreciate your vigilance. BrainyBabe 16:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks #2

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Seems to be happening more and more to me these days, hehe. MrMacMan^Talk 17:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:05, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a short Note

Nice going! - Fradlin 22:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:08, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(copied from userpage)

Hey derhexer. Im really sorry about that. Ill try my best not to do it again. Lets not let this come between us though. So hows it going? xxx 82.35.208.12 22:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, okay. Please don't do it again. But I don't mind if you've changed your mind. :) Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Monobook

Hallo Hexer,

ich bin ebenfalls Legionär aus der deutschen Wikipedia. Ich habe dein Monobook.js übernommen, aber irgendwie haut es nicht hin. Könntest du einmal schauen, was ich falsch mache? Gruß Julius1990 20:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bei dir fehlt die entscheidende Zeile: importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkle.js'); Einfach einbinden und es sollt gehen. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Diese technischen Spielereien sind nicht so meins. Gruß Julius1990 20:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Douglasr007 22:56, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:57, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Just dropping by to say "great job" with the anti-vandalism work lately. I'm using my copy of VandalProof right now, and a good portion of the rollbacks are already done by you by the time I get to them. Vielen dank, and viel glueck mit dem Deutsche-Wikipedia. Und tut mir leid, abe mein Deutsch ist nicht so gut. Tschuess! Jmlk17 10:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I understand English, too. And your German is okay. I understood it and that coins. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 10:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woah, double revert

Recently, you and I have been doing some double reverts on Articles, I think just two or three, maybe. ou might know what's going on, right? It seems something is wrong here that we should be both reverting the same article and neither of us getting notice. Or, are you getting notices of edit conflicts? Still, that's good that you work so hard for Wikipedia. SBKT 16:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I didn't get edit conflicts. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I as just saying I found it quite odd. Why did we not get any messages? Still, it's kind of cool that we're on the same page, no? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SBKT (talk • contribs) 17:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

That's why we are using a slower revert. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Persistant vandalism

DerHexer,

Thank you for removing the vandalism on the "Camp Ozark" page. The section in question has been reposted by the same user and I am unsure how to proceed. Thanks for any help you might offer. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.176.164.227 (talk) 19:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

See Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am unclear as to whether the paragraph in question is vandalism, or if you think the removal of the paragraph is vandalism. Could you please clarify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.176.164.227 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The removal of the paragraph is possibly vandalism. Please sign your postings. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

Was'n los? Keine Auszeichnungen mehr? Ich kenne doch noch mehr Zahlen, weiter gehts! ;) Marcus Cyron 15:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sag das nicht mir. :P Momentan komm ich gegen 19:30 Uhr nach Hause, esse dann etwas und mache danach meine Hausaufgaben, schlafe dann und stehe um sechs Uhr auf, den Tag wiederholend. Zeit für en.wp und de.wp bleibt da nicht mehr so viel übrig. ;) Wobei sich die Schmeichelseite auf de.wp momentan recht flott füllt. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Die wissen nicht so wie ich, daß man dir nicht trauen kann *g* Marcus Cyron 09:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Psst, nicht so laut. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting posts on talk pages.

Well, the post deleted contained curse words (!) which doesn't seem to be in a line with Wikipedia's policy and moreover abused a certain social group (it was political correctness talk page). Is it still that bad? Though, I guess, there were less harsh ways to handle the situation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.110.16.218 (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

If you mention this in the edit summary it will not be reverted. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

why have you accused me of vandalism, i wasn't even on wikipedia when i supposedly vandalised the page on jon brogger or whoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.73.5 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 18:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is vandalism. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Respond to me!

Why did you revert me? I archived it...look at this page...[4]...they did it why NOT ME? (Angelina - talk)

Did you see that I reverted myself? —DerHexer (Talk) 20:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned about the removal of these warnings from the main talk page of that IP address. There is an ongoing case involving a banned editor who continues to edit using that IP address and some of the messages were part of ongoing instances of inappropriate behavior. What is the precedent for archiving the talk pages of anonymous IP addresses? (Especially when there are that many postings on the page to begin with?) Nposs 20:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, on de.wp we delete talkpages of dynamic IPs after 24 hours. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke #2

Ich hab's jetz erst gesehen... danke fürs Reverten meiner user page :-) --Caltas 21:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gern geschehen. (Gerade erst gesehen.) —DerHexer (Talk) 22:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.

Personally, I believe I had enhanced the article by deleting the unreliable information. - M — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.88.12.214 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 21:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then please use the edit summary to seperate it from vandalism. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explain please. - M— Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.88.12.214 (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 21:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look at Help:Edit summary. Please sign your postings. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. 134.88.12.214 21:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC) - M[reply]

User_talk:209.114.143.5

Hello, as a recent changes patroller, I have to tell you this; after someone gave him a last level warning due to vandalism, you started back from level 2. Based on the information given here, he is liable to be reported here as "the user has been warned thoroughly". Viewing his contributions, he has been vandalizing various articles within a continuous time frame, and is therefore subject for blocking. Right now it is a bit too late to block him(as the warning level was reset), but next time, do not hestitate to report such people to the AIV. Optakeover 12:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know this. I visited here the AIV for some hundred times (and on de.wp some thousand times). But on I User_talk:209.114.143.5 saw another date by MER-C (and another time 'cause here is 14:46 o'clock). … Because there is so much vandalism which I revert, it might happen that a warning is not correct. More important is that the vandalism is reverted. —DerHexer (Talk) 12:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Test

For you own safety I have to seriously advice you to take this test.----Cometstyles 13:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm addicted to Wikipedia, yes. —DerHexer (Talk) 13:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Ape (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 13:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What??

I removed two pointless articles and made them into redirects- that's not vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Impervius XAD (talk • contribs) —DerHexer (Talk) 13:44, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't replace articles. If you want to add deletion templates you are allowed to do so. But please don't remove articles by yourself. The best is to expand an article. —DerHexer (Talk) 13:44, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks #3

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. --Nlu (talk) 13:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 13:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ernst Mach

The changes haven't been reverted.Xx236 14:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...wow

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		That is some serious vandal reverting there. Kudos Will ^{(is it can be time for messages now plz?)} 19:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Latin language

Wie kann man sich nur so für eine tote Sprache einsetzen? *g*. Marcus Cyron 10:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haue? ;) Kann mich mich doch nicht zum Admin wählen lassen ohne vernünftigen Beitrag. :P —DerHexer (Talk) 16:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you #2

For reverting vandalism on my userpage. — mholland (talk) 18:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check history on articles that are vandalized

You probably already know this, but it is a good idea to check the history of any article that has been vandalized. Often, a vandal will make several successive edits, sometimes using a different IP / username.

You recently reverted a version of Visual Basic, where the editor made two bad edits. Your reversion restored an earlier, but still vandalized, article. Actually, in this case, there were three different editors (or one using three IP/username) that did a bunch of vandalizing.

I use pop-ups, which allow me to hover over the (diff) link and see what changes were made. You might have a similar ability with the tools you use. It makes spotting the beginning of vandalism a lot easier. ;^)

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia a better place! wrp103 (Bill Pringle) ^(Talk) 19:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same sort of problem here with your edit [5] to Cansei de Ser Sexy. Please check the edit history, especially as people will tend to revert future vandalism to the last logged in user edit. All the best. Mmoneypenny 19:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Revert it and don't mind: I do hundreds of reverts fighting vandalism and because Wikipedia is a community project we should divide the work: I revert blatant vandalism, blankings and so on and you can control me, if I'm just doing a normal revert 'cause I had not the time to watch all histories of the articles I reverted. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert problem

Hi, please take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cascading_Style_Sheets&action=history -- your revert did not revert half of the article. Bug in the system? --Yurik 15:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It might happen that in the same second I reverted and the user deleted another section. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 15:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I, The Random Editor, award you, DerHexer, this barnstar for courage in the battle against vandalism. Random ^{Say it here!} 19:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

my user page

Thanks for the revert of the vandalism. That wrestler is really not what I'm going for in terms of a userpage look. Cornell Rockey 20:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Hey buddy. I just wanted to give you a heads up that I accidentally reported you to WP:AIV, while using Vandalproof. It was entirely by accident, and I truly apologize. I removed it seconds later. I was attempting to report an anonymous IP, and clicked the wrong button. I believe all is well, but I wanted to add prove of my mistake on your talk page. Tut mir leid. Jmlk17 20:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look at your talk page. ;) It's no problem for me. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you caught the mistake at the same time. :). Thanks for the understanding. Jmlk17 20:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to thank you. I've made mistakes in the past, and for far too many people around the site, being human in that regard is a mortal sin. You seem to take it all in stride, are very relaxed about the project while still contributing quite well, and that is very refreshing. Vielen dank! Jmlk17 20:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now I'm blushing. :) Nichts zu danken, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:51, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HEY!

You keep beating me to the punch on reverts. STOP IT!- Just kidding, keep up the good work -Optomal7

Thanks. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 20:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

You have reverted LOTS of vandalism and beated me alot of times. Good work! For that you get a barnstar. By the way, I think you should create a special section on your userpage for your adwards.

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For fighting vandals and trolls. Nice job. Runewiki777 20:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't want to show off with barnstars. My edits should say more than the barnstars, nevertheless I'm glad to get one. :) So I want to say thanks you. … I'm collecting them here when I archieve my talk page. A link you can find on the top. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you are leaving comments on your OWN talk page. You're suppose to leave comments on the talk page of the sender. Otherwise, it would seem like you are talking to yourself. Runewiki777 21:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar #2

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I am proud to award you this anti vandal barnstar as you have done a fantastic job reverting all kinds of defacement to articles, well done, and keep up the good work. Telcourbanio Care for a talk? 21:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Omg. The third today. Thank you very much. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you are leaving comments on your OWN talk page. You're suppose to leave comments on the talk page of the sender. Otherwise, it would seem like you are talking to yourself.Runewiki777 21:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting vandalism

Thank you for reverting some of the vandalism done this day to "James Douglas (Governor)". When reverting vandalism, though, please take care not to miss part of the damage done, as you did in this case. Because vandals often work piece-meal, it is needful to look through a vandalised page's history so as to find the last "clean" editing. Missing part of the vandalism can result in "buried" vandalism, which can linger in an article for a long time. In this case, two different vandals (or two different IPs, at least ) were at it, making matters less straightforward than usual, and thus calling for more than ordinary care. Please take this advice in the friendly spirit in which it is given, but please do heed it. Thank you.
-- Lonewolf BC 21:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See this. Greetings. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... I'm not quite sure what you're saying there, but it seems to be that you won't be bothered to check the page histories when reverting vandalism. If so, I'm sorry to find that out, and I think it is a mistake on your part that, for the reasons which I and others have set out, takes away from the worth of your otherwise admirable vandal-fighting work. I hope that you will reconsider. You are quite right, though, that the choice is wholly yours, and I'm sure no one was seeking to "control" you, but only to offer a collegial suggestion. At any rate, I know that that is all I meant by raising the matter with you, and I hope you have not taken offence. Again, please think about the matter. Beyond that, I now leave it with you. -- Lonewolf BC 04:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I know your first language is not English, I think I might have misunderstood you a little. Anyhow, as I said before, I hope you'll think about looking at the page histories when reverting vandalism, but I recognise that the choice is all yours (so don't think I'm trying to give you orders). Peace and well met. -- Lonewolf BC 18:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I'll try to improve it. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fishing revisions

First of all, I would like to thank you for actively guarding our Fishing Project. I've seen all your efforts of protecting the Fishing article from those harmful vandals. I've made a major revision from all those revisions/reverts that were made previously by bots and other wikipedians because some of the important information there were lost despite the effort of each and everyone to guard the said article. Thanks and more power! Bu b0y2007 01:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pirates 1

I was the one who reverted it because it was a mistake of mine. UGH!!!
Hpfan1 (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got an edit conflict with you. Sry, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint by Torosa

Who is this guy DerHexer? Is he an expert on all subjects? How does he decides that a new info is vandalism? I have lost all my respect to Wikipedia.... I did not know that Wikipedia has employed such children to play with...
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Torosa (talk • contribs) 16:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See ElinorD's page. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks #4

I know this is late, but thanks for the reverts on my talk page. I've been without internet access for the past few days, so I didn't see your revert until today. Thanks again and take care! --Ann Stouter 20:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sami

You marked the page on Sami Brady Roberts for speedy with a tag of "copyright infringement of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sami_Brady" That's undoubtedly a slip--you probably mean of some other page, since that's the WP page itself. I removed the tag to avoid confusion--just redo it with the correct link to the copied material.DGG 20:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting an article inside the wikipedia without mentioning the (five) main editors and copying the history of the old article into the new one('s talk page) is a copyright violation. Articles should be moved. Please restore the speedy deletion tag. Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hadn't realized all that--It sounds like straight-forward vandalism --But is there a version that should be restored? I don't think the intention is to remove the article all together. I'll look here.DGG 22:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The new article has to be deleted completely and no version should be restored. Of course, the original article has to be reverted to the old version and the author of the new article should be given a hint. Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All done.DGG 00:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Campbell

Hi, I removed a bunch of unsourced information from Stuart Campbell's page. It's been sitting for ages with that content, all of which is unsourced. Fans of the man insist that the content should not be removed, but refuse to do the required rewrites and fact-finding work themselves, preferring instead to leave a page with content that may as well be fiction and hundreds of ^{[citation needed]} tags. Under the rule of "verifiability" I removed it. Is that vandalism?

I found this under vandalism: "An example of blanking edits that could be legitimate would be edits that blank all or part of a biography of a living person. Wikipedia is especially concerned about providing accurate and non-biased information on the living, and this may be an effort to remove inaccurate or biased material."

--87.194.95.18 12:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weil du uns gut aussehen läßt...

...und schon so lange keinen mehr bekommen hast ;)

Marcus Cyron 12:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]