User talk:Kimchi.sg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ozzaroni (talk | contribs) at 14:40, 6 March 2008 (→‎overbrook entertainment: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Click here to leave a new message
Old messages
If your message is not on this page, try looking into these archives, starting from the most recent.
Most recent: 01 Oct 10 0228 UTC


camp ramah in canada

please reinsate the camp ramah in canada page. PLEASE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.158.4.236 (talk) 01:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Pegasus «C¦T» 02:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daft Punk

Would you mind keeping an eye on the Daft Punk article? The subject was recently in the news, which may prompt vandalism. Thank you. Just64helpin (talk) 07:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Pegasus «C¦T» 07:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "Wendy Phua" article

Dear Pegasus,

I previously messaged you about above the article I was writing. You indicated that I needed to include references to justify putting up the article and so I inserted references and external links within the article. However it is being deleted once more.

I am very confused here as to the exact requirements needed to put up article because I have come across various other articles like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.P.I.C and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potential_Problem where the persons involved have far less media publicity and zero references.

Please enlighten me on what information could my article be possibly missing and how articles like the ones mentioned above could remain in wikipedia when they have no references at all.


Thank you for your time and consideration. Mohd.mnor (talk) 07:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pegasus, it seems the article is up again. This is getting rather confusing but I guess in this case, I will not bother you or take up more of your time unnecessarily. Thank You. Mohd.mnor (talk) 07:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of Dover restored

I hope you don't mind, but I restored History of Dover that you deleted as a copyvio earlier today. My reasons are on its Talk page, I hope you find them compelling. Best,  —SMALLJIM  10:52, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for enlightening me. Pegasus «C¦T» 13:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cat Le-Huy

Why was the Cat Le-Huy page deleted? I think it is very relevant information that belongs to the Wikipedia, a lot of other articles about other living persons are similar and not deleted. Probably some articles will link back to it because it is an interesting case.

He is the head of the internet department of Endemol and gets probably at least 4 years jail for nothing. So there is web campaign web for the release of German citizen and UK resident Cat Le-Huy.

More than 4000 friends and colleagues signed for his release.

Follow the links for more info: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7234786.stm http://freediz.com http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=512815&in_page_id=1811 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/07/endemol_big_brother_smuggling/ http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/newsfeed/2008/02/07/tv-chief-in-dubai-drug-hell-86908-20311283/ http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=5948 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0M8I8ydkq0g http://thetruthaboutdubai.com/ http://dubai.metblogs.com/archives/2008/02/dubais_drug_laws_cat_lehuy.phtml

Cat Le-Huy (aka "Diz") is a German national who has been held without charge in Dubai since January 26th 2008 after being detained at immigration.

Cat was carrying Melatonin, which is legally sold over-the-counter in Dubai, and this is being tested for contraband along with a sample of his urine and 0.01g of what the Dubai authorities believe is hashish which was found in his bag. Cat maintains that the alleged hashish is simply dirt.

If charged and found guilty Cat will face a minimum sentence of 4 years. Friends of Cat have started an online campaign and petition for his release. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.249.118.72 (talk) 11:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I concede I overlooked the many reports about him. Pegasus «C¦T» 13:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images under I3

Hello Pegasus, remember to warn newcomers who upload images under i3 or they will re-upload it again as happened on Special:Undelete/Image:Szczesny-Portraitfr.jpg. Cheers. Carlosguitar (ready and willing) 17:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK... Pegasus «C¦T» 17:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ludovic Hubler's deletion

Hi Pegasus. What is wrong with the following article I started about Ludovic Hubler? You have many other biographical articles on wikipedia about hitchhikers and explorers like Ludovic Hubler is.

Ludovic Hubler is a French hitchhiker, most famous for his 5 year long tour of the world. One of three sons of Mr. and Mrs. Jacques Hubler, Hubler was born in Bar-le-Duc, France on the 11th of September 1977. He started hitchhiking adventures in college where he hitchhiked 40,000 km in Europe, but his greatest contribution to Hitchhiking includes his 2003-2008 tour of the world by hitchhiking during which he traveled over 170,000 km through 59 countries on 1300 various vehicles - all this while spending 0 (zero) cents on transport to complete the world tour (apart from urban transport and two-way trips with a return to starting point) and an estimated daily budget of $10 USD.[1]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drazek (talk • contribs)

 Done Restored, sources added. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Review for Vkontakte.ru

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Vkontakte.ru. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deleting Grey thumb society

Hmm, didn't even give me a day to respond to your warning before speedy deleting Grey thumb society. Anyway, notability is established with the multiple interviews from biota.org on the grey thumb society. Do I need to rewrite the article or can you undelete it? --Numsgil (talk) 20:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be notable a group needs to be discussed multiple times in independent reliable sources. I would advise you not to re-create the article. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps I am unclear: it is discussed in the biota.org podcasts. Meaning interviews, which are a reliable source. Biota.org is an independent reliable source (run by Tom Barbalet). Second, the Grey Thumb Society is strongly linked with Breve (software), a screenshot of which is presently being used for the Artificial life page. It's all sort of intertwined with each other. Do you still want to contest notability? Perhaps I can just add a grey thumb section to another article, if that's what your concern is. --Numsgil (talk) 03:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Biota is but one source. Where's another?
Regarding the society's links with breve - am I supposed to take your word for it, without sources? Pegasus «C¦T» 12:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
this should do. Again, if notability is the concern here (only one notable source I can find. What's the minimum? Two? And we can't take a leap of good faith here?), perhaps I can do an article Artificial Life Organizations, with a grey thumb section. --Numsgil (talk) 17:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That is on a server run by the grey thumb folks themselves. I am still not convinced of this organisation's notability; please seek consensus at Wikipedia:Deletion review before writing anything on these people. Pegasus «C¦T» 23:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mariposa (Stores)

Mariposa is a culturally important store in 5 Canadian provinces and 5 western US states. Many women and girls have been sopping there since the early 80's and look to sources like wikipedia to find out more. Any deletion would be in error. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlmcnamara (talk • contribs) 20:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any creation of the article would also be in error, unless it contains references to two or more third-party sources that describe the company. Pegasus «C¦T» 02:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where did Image:Esata cable & connector.jpg come from? Give the URL of the web page

To the best of my knowledge this image come from C:\Users\Transisto\Desktop\Hardware\Esata.jpg and was created by C:\WINDOWS\System32\mspaint.exe on 2004-05-06. I hope this can satisfy your curiosity. --Transisto (talk) 08:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, doesn't look like it. Pegasus «C¦T» 09:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Everything was true, as for the claim "to the best of my knowledge" exept the date. I wish to thank you for your contribution to esata picture.

SATA-IO provides the industry with guidance and support for implementing the SATA specification. non-profit organization developed by and for leading industry companies.

THAT WAS STATED IN THE IMAGE DESCRIPTION


I have not integrated your notion of copywrong and hope never will. I will thus avoid uploading any picture to wikipedia. because it just don't work— Preceding unsigned comment added by Transisto (talk • contribs)

Un-delete Camp Ramah in Canada

This page does not meet the criteria for deletion under CSD A7. This page DID in fact indicate why its subject is important. The page discussed a popular summer camp and its culture, a topic that is of significance to thousands of campers, staff, and alumni. Please un-delete this page. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.210.3.187 (talk) 01:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done "This page DID in fact indicate why its subject is important." But without using reliable sources. So still no undeletion. You could try asking on Wikipedia:Deletion review, though. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check out Deletion review. Could you hit me with the page transcript? walkupwall@hotmail.com thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.210.3.187 (talk) 05:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the page using Google's cache. Search for <"Camp Ramah in Canada" Wikipedia>. And be forewarned: Please read WP:ORG before making deletion review request. If you say there exactly the same things you've told me on this page, do not expect your page to be restored. State reasons for undeletion according to WP:ORG criteria only. Pegasus «C¦T» 05:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Fine Art Registry page

Pegasus, I wrote you about the deletion of the page on Fine Art Registry but cannot now find any answer about what I need to do to revise the page. At the same time, I find a page on a lawyer named Shawn Khorrami that seems to be blatant advertising and am wondering how this slipped through the cracks. Or, if it is a valid page, can you tell me why this would be considered valid, but Fine Art Registry isn't? I am new to Wikipedia and need some help here. Thanks. Dan ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan koon (talk • contribs) 04:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Khorraimi has been the subject of multiple independent, third-party sources. Your organisation has not. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you cannot find your message on this page see the most recent link in the "Old messages" section. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello a question

Hi, two of my creations were deleted. I won't push them again in wikipedia but is it possible to have the creations back so then I can keep it on my computer as personal work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fashionmogul (talk • contribs) 16:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sent to you by email. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frivolous?

Since when is trying to help clean up nonsense being described as "frivolous?" If anyone is wasting administrative time, it's idiots who post hoax articles, not me. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*****s who don't follow the CSD criteria when tagging waste a not small amount of time as well. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. Have a nice day. Clean up your "*****" yourself. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

misshapes article?

Hi, I recently saw that you deleted the article I wrote on The Misshapes. I'm not very wikipedia-savvy but would like to know why you deleted it and how I can get it back. Thanks. 02:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Misshapes article (talk) 02:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted as a substantially similar copy of already-deleted material, but on second look, it isn't, so I've restored it. Pegasus «C¦T» 04:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misshapes article (talk • contribs) 12:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
edit- do you have a copy of the first article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misshapes article (talk • contribs) 20:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heartland Article Deletion

I have seen that you deleted the article about Heartland Community Church. I understand the need to delete the article due to speedy deletion criterion A7, but I posted my request on the page's talk page that I was unsure of how to satisfy this Wikipedia standard. It appears that you may have deleted the original page, and then the talk page, without first looking at the talk page for my request. I would appreciate any help in satisfying Wikipedia standards while still being able to put my article in the encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazy951842367 (talk • contribs) 04:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was no assertion of why this church is especially famous or notable. Has it been featured in multiple third-party reports, for instance? Please also see extra guidance here and here. Pegasus «C¦T» 05:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that

I was struggling to fix the formatting there, cheers very much. Joshuarooney2006 (talk) 11:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Five Ten Footwear, Innovations removed

How was that advertising?

This is not a case of proprietary technologies, these are things things Five Ten invented or contributed to the Outdoor community that are widely used today or are considered 'normal' by today's standards but were revolutionary when introduced.

Certainly not the blatant as found on Nike's page.. if the list i posted was advertising, Nike's page including 'recently introduced' products is surely over the top.

For now, that is the approach I have taken. I have replaced the list, omitting specific product references.

This is a big issue to me, because I do understand the perception, but unless you are very knowledgeable about the outdoor industry you would have no way of knowing how ground breaking these innovations have been.

Todrick (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where did the info come from? It should not be from their official website. Pegasus «C¦T» 22:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guywithdress

Ahh, OK. I didn't notice that categorization, I was just trying to make sure people didn't think Guywithdress was some other pupeteer, however since it's already categorized that way, my change was pointless.

Anyway, yea, I manage to survive. That reminds me, though, where did we see each other before? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 19:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When you asked me to upload a picture for the autovon article. Pegasus «C¦T» 22:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ahhhhh! Yes, I remember that!!!! Problem is, its a replaceable image... Anyway, the page is rarely edited anyway that a {{db}} is enough. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 01:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's the Bell System... what other one is there? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 21:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki:Newarticletext

Both you and the previous editor of MediaWiki:Newarticletext introduced an error. You corrected your mistake very quickly but a good way to avoid the error in the first place is to use Special:ExpandTemplates. I enter a context title like "image:My test" to see what the message looks like in a particular namespace. Sbowers3 (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't used it for a long time so I didn't remember to test it there until I messed up. :( Pegasus «C¦T» 22:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Ramah, Round 3,234,213

the camp ramah page should be reinstated because it truly is significant. Camp Ramah in Canada is a camp that has existed since the 1960's to the present. Thousands of people have gone through that camp and so to see it on Wikipedia, an internet site of such prestige illustrates just how meaningful the camp is.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.158.16.236 (talk • contribs)

Stop asking on this page. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rurouni Kenshin: Meiji Kenyaku Romantan

The article has been deleted before. Look at the user page of the creator. It was deleted once yesterday I think. Dengero (talk) 11:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can tell from the deletion log of the page. It has enough context and should not have been deleted as CSD A1 in the first place. Also CSD G4 is not to be used unless the article was previously deleted using WP:AFD. Pegasus «C¦T» 11:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

Dear Pegasus,

I hope you are doing well.

I am writing to you about your deletion of Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Cumulus_Clouds. I believe that deletion was a well-intentioned mistake. Per the proceedures at Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Principal_purpose_.E2.80.94_challenging_deletion_debates, I am coming here to discuss the matter with you as the deleting admin.

The RFP actually was certified. I certified it myself.

Lawrence acted improperly when he tagged it a speedy deletion.[1] He knows very well that I certified this RFC. He also knows that if he wishes to contest that certification that it is not a matter for speedy deletion.

Your edit summary is in error. You stated, "Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup: Uncertified RFC nearly a week old." It is certainly not an "non-controversial" cleanup matter. In fact, the RFC contains statements from numerous people saying that it should go forward.

Please revert your deletion so that we do not have to go through the time and tedium of a deletion review.

Thanks very much, Johntex\talk 19:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. RFCs must be certified within two days by TWO additional people per the RFC procedures, rules, and templates themselves, not one. Case closed. Lawrence § t/e 21:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The specific language, copied now from the Archtransit RFC:
"In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this sysop and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with Lawrence § t/e 21:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC). If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 20:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)}), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 21:13, 15 February 2008 (UTC)."[reply]
The RFC in question was only certified by Johntex. The filer is not a certifier. Lawrence § t/e 21:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI to clarify the certification (no offense, Johntex, but as possible partisans in this both your and my opinions are to be immediately devalued here for the community to decide). Neither of us will be making this decision. Period. Lawrence § t/e 21:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your message, Lawrence, but you are mistaken. "Two people" includes the person who files the RFC. That is clearly the interpretation that was being used during the discussion on the RFC. That discussion centered around whether or not I had certified it. If I, as the second person, was still insufficient to certify, then the conversation would have been completely different. It would have centered around whether a third person was stepping forward.
Also Lawrence, it is ironic that you say that "as possible partisans in this both your and my opinions are to be immediately devalued here for the community to decide". I am happy that you agree because it proves my point. You, as an involved party, should not have tagged the page for Speedy Deletion.
Also, this proves my point that it was NOT an uncontroversial matter. It should be allowed to remain and Lawrence should have taken this to MfD so that there could be a discussion if Lawrence wanted this deleted. Johntex\talk 21:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If Pegasus were to undelete it, I would be happy to MFD this. DRV is a preferable option, however, to spare CC more harassment by restoring a hit/attack page on him that BQZip had drafted. Lawrence § t/e 21:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am already following the DRV process. The first step of the process is to give the deleting admin a chance to correct their error. If Pegasus does not agree to undelete, or if Pegasus is not reachable within 24 hours, then I will take the next step in righting this problem. Also, you are way out of line by accusing BQ of harassing CC. That is a personal attack against BQ. Johntex\talk 23:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here are recent sample RfCs that were certified by a total of 2 people, including the original filer.
  1. Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Angie_Y._2
  2. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Threeafterthree
  3. Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Kmweber_2
  4. Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/COGDEN
  5. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Tony Sidaway 4

This mistaken deletion of an in-process RFC is a grave error and this improper deletion should be un-done forthwith. Johntex\talk 23:44, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done RfC undeleted; further comments in the ANI thread, please. Pegasus «C¦T» 23:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glory Glory Leeds - why deleted?

Hi..we are setting up a new wikki page at [2] And I just spent an age typing info on a link from it to give detailed info about one of the topics and you zapped it? Do I need to register a new Wikki subject, just for ten lines of additional info?

Twiggster (talk) 00:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was no indication why or how this website is well-known or notable. Pegasus «C¦T» 00:32, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glory Glory Leeds

The article Glory Glory Leeds appears to be a message addressed to you from user:Twiggster. (I found it while on New page patrol.) Sbowers3 (talk) 02:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted message content (admin view)

Hi Pegasus. I hope I have posted this in the correct place?

I am a broadcaster on Champions Soccer Radio Network - possibly the biggest USA based online soccer radio network. [3], who are associated with the Sports Byline Group and the David Beckham Academy and are sponsored by Setanta amongst other backers.

A few of us who are involved with the network are in the process of creating a Wiki page about CSRN. We decided it was better to link info about the various individual network shows to seperate pages rather than have ALL the info on our main wiki page (we currently have 16 shows broadcasting on a regular basis), as the page would be too cluttered. My Glory Glory Leeds Show is one of them.

You deleted my page for "blatant advertising", yet my show is a successful and integral part of the above mentioned network. It is NOT a "web site, blog, online forum, webcomic, or an online game" - although ALL the network's shows are available as podcasts, with it being an online media network. Therefore, I feel my Glory Glory Leeds info was within the rules and ask for it to be reinstated.

I refer you to the Fox Soccer Wikki page, [4] for a relevant comparison with what we are trying to create with our CSRN page,here on Wiki.

This is the first time any of us who are creating this Wiki site have attempted to do so and we apologise for having transgressed your rules. You have so many rules and regulations and none of us have had the time to read all of them - I seem to remember reading somewhere in your list, that administrators may be appointed, to decide the content that is posted on a Wiki page? Please let me know how this is possible, preferably by email: glorygloryleeds@csrnusa.com or else on this page?

Thank you for your time sincerely Twiggster representing the Champions Soccer Radio Network

The article was first created as an advertisement. If there are third-party reliable sources about the show itself, then by all means create the page again - just make sure it is written in a neutral, non-advertising manner. I will not be undeleting the initial version. Pegasus «C¦T» 13:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

reversal of another admin

Probably you didn't notice, but when you speedy deleted the redirect Designer headbands, I had previously declined to speedy delete on the same rationale. Since you didn't ask me about it, This might seem like wheel warring. The person placing the speedy I declined in fact admitted his speedy was not actually correct, and took it to RfD at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 February 16 where you --in effect--short-circuited the discussion. DGG (talk) 03:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was a wrong, but I doubt it is one that is necessary to be righted. Pegasus «C¦T» 13:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
agreed, thanks for the acknowledgment. DGG (talk) 01:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a notable article was deleted, no reliable reason

hi there, I need some help about an article that you deleted for reason CSD G4, the article KORD (band), but you didn't noticed that there was a little mistake with that CSD G4 which Accounting4Taste noticed in his talk page talk. I mean the article has many notable reasons for being on wikipedia and has many references. So, please reconsider you deletion of this article KORD (band), read carefully all the details from the page and re-back the article. Drokstef (talk) 15:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article had no references when it was deleted. References to third-party reliable sources are absolutely required per guidelines on band articles. Since the article had no references, no restoration will be done. You can just start a new version with the required references already added. Pegasus «C¦T» 04:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ojai Music Festival

Saw you just got this, thanks! I was going through Special:Contributions/Ojai Music Festival trying to get the rest of their CoI/spam/copyvio pages. I might suggest seasoning with this one, it's been deleted 3x now Travellingcari (talk) 03:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lansing-Dreiden

Sorry-I was a bit hasty with the speedy delete on that one. I scanned it and saw that their albums were self-released, but didn't noticed that they were re-released on a label. Cheers. freshacconcispeaktome 14:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Pegasus «C¦T» 14:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Clemson fan's attack article

Thank you SO much for your prompt attention to the silly stub thrown up by that Clemson fan in order to disparage USC football. I'm really wondering how much longer that guy is going to continue his smear campaign here. Hopefully, with the good work of admins like yourself and the community of editors, he'll get bored soon and move on. Thanks again! ViperNerd (talk) 15:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of dweeb (band)

Notability: I mentioned the fact that they took part in BBC3's singing with the enemy, which was a 30 minute episode. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBra-2O4U4k&feature=related . I read the notability thing, and it said that this meant they were notable. Tractakid (talk) 15:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Coaching Re-confirmation

Hello, previously you expressed interest in participating in the Wikipedia:Admin coaching project. We are currently conducting a reconfirmation drive to give coaches the opportunity to update their information and capacity to participate in the project. Please visit Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Status to update your status. Also, please remember to update your capacity (5th table variable) in the form of a fraction (eg. 2/3 means you are currently coaching 2 students, and could accept 1 more student). Thank you. MBisanz talk 09:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Organic chef - your opinion please.

I saw you have once or twice recently deleted this article (no problems there). But is is back The Organic chef. Would you maybe have a look at it and asses it once more? I have not Csd or Adf it because I think it may qualify for notability, but other than that, it is a mess. I have placed tags and alerted the COI noticeboard here WP:COIN#The Organic chef. Worst of all is the Wiki logo on the external sites home page [5], looks like it is claiming some sort of validation from WP! Triwbe (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted it and will be creating a stub based only on neutral third-party sources at Al Rosas (his real name). It will be up shortly after I type this. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Pegasus «C¦T» 01:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Lochhead [speedy deletion]

You deleted the subject David Lochhead after I had time only to enter a brief biography. I had not entered his Bibliograpy, his connection with founding the Ecunet computer network, his contribution to Buddhist-Christian dialogue or his work with Native peoples in northern Canada.

By deleting the article it left me no place, other than my own user talk, to add any arguments.

For example, I will put here David's bibliography: Works by David Lochhead

Books:


1977 - The Liberation of the Bible (The Student Christian Movement of Canada, 1977, World Student Christian Federation of North America - 1977) 1978 - The Lordship of Jesus, report of the Committee on Christian Faith to the 27th General Council of the United Church (Toronto: The United Church General Council, 1978) 1981 - Living Between Memory and Hope - a Bible Study for Today, with B. J. Klassen (Toronto: Division of Communication, United Church of Canada, 1981)

1983 - Faith of the Church, ten essays on some fundamentals of the faith (Toronto: United Church Observer, 1983)

1988 - The Dialogical Imperative - A Christian Reflection on Interfaith Encounter (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis, 1988)


1988 - Theology in a Digital World (Toronto: United Church Publishing House, 1988) - a collection of six essays: Theology in a Digital World; Theology about a Machine; Does God Love Computers? The New Electronic Church; The Tower of Babel Revisited; Toward a Theology of Information

1988 - General Council Online, David Lochhead, Editor (Vancouver: Small Computers in the Church Committee, 1988

1997 - Ecunet ’97 Conference Proceedings May 28-31, 1997 (Vancouver: Chalmers Institute, 1998) - David chaired this conference - his introduction of J. T. Roberson is included, David delivered his Theme Presentation: "Modem Dreams" (included) at the closing Banquet.


1997 - Shifting Realities (Geneva: WCC (World Council of Churches) Publishing, 1997)

1997 - On-line Distance Education and the Digital Revolution (Vancouver: Chalmers Institute, 1997) I can make the case for how "notable" David Lochhead is. But the problem is that when you delete the article itself, there is no place to make the case.

I have challenged the speedy deletion, but I see no place where that deletion is discussed.

Gordon Laird— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gordon Laird (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia:Deletion review. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Primelocation redirect

Hi, you keep redirecting a page I created (Primelocation) to the Daily Mail and General Trust. You've cited the reason as "persistently reposted spam for a non-notable company". The company is actually a part of the DMGT group and is a major property portal in the UK, similar to Rightmove - which has its own page. If you can tell me what you find non-notable about it, I'd appreciate it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmtownsend (talk • contribs)

The page was of the nature of an advertisement for the company and the magazine of the same name. If you can write the article differently so that it is neutral and non-advertising in nature, you can write a copy here and then make a request at deletion review, where the copy can be checked by administrators and moved back to the article, if the aforementioned criteria are satisfied. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Can you please help me out by identifying the points in the article that you would consider to be too like an advertisement. I actually think that it is sufficiently neutral and completely factual, but if you can point out to me the offending passages I'll be happy to change them and resubmit. Thanks. ----Jmtownsend (talk) 14:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 14:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your comments. Pegasus «C¦T» 14:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I look forward to your comments re: the article. Thanks.--Jmtownsend (talk) 14:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, it is the entire article. Every line reeks of spam. Just throw away whatever you had and write everything from scratch. Pegasus «C¦T» 14:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudospectral optimal control deletion

A message was sent to unblock-en-l from User:PS optimal asking why this article was deleted. I have been unable to reconcile your delete message with the most recent revision prior to deletion. What about the article met CSD G3? --Chris (talk) 12:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS Optimal and some other accounts were created to impersonate user User:Anilvrao. See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/PS optimal.
On the other hand, I undeleted the pages because G3/G5 arguably doesn't come into play. Pegasus «C¦T» 15:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. I will inform them of this. --Chris (talk) 15:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biosearch Technologies

Hello, I have been notified that our article on Biosearch Technologies has been speedily deleted by you. I am confused on to why our article was deleted. This has happened twice and we have rewritten it several times to meet wikipedia's standards. If you would please indicate to us why this has happened and what we can do to keep our page, I would appreciate it. This company invented the Black Hole Quencher, a dark quencher used in genetic research, qPCR and many other applications by major research companies. The Black Hole Quencher is actually linked to a blank page on the dark quencher article. If this is not notable, what is?? We are at a loss to why this page is being deleted, when other companies have had pages for years, basically advertising their products (ie Invitrogen, Affymetrix, BioMarin, Idaho Technology, ABI, etc.). Can you give us any suggestions on how to keep our page alive? Thank You. KaileyMcLaughlin (talk) 17:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article lacks sources to demonstrate notability. Actually it still does, to a lesser extent than the deleted versions, but still badly enough to possibly merit a discussion at Articles for deletion. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. We have made some changes to add more references and make the article more notable. Are there any suggestions you can give me to improve it even more? We are new at this and are trying to meet all the requirements, there is just a lot of criteria and its sometimes hard to understand.KaileyMcLaughlin (talk) 17:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fulham 07-08 season

The guy copy and pasted Chelsea's 07-08 team page and has only changed a small amount of the stuff. He should do more work on it first. michfan2123 (talk) 02:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I blanked the only incorrect info I could find; deleting it now would remove the skeleton of info that can be used to build a accurate article later on. If there is still incorrect or irrelevant info, just change it or trim away. Not everything was incorrect AFAIK (but then I'm only a EPL noob). Pegasus «C¦T» 02:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

not a blatant hoax for you - Image:NemanjicCrnojevic.jpg

But it is - this image is based on that image. It is a clear agenda of such people like Paxequilibrium.

Both of those images were created on the basis of fabricization of history using a portion of this map. They said to themselves, wouldn't it be nice to create something that has never been created. A Serbian Empire Flag from 1200ies. Nikola Smolenski supplied that small and unrecognisable portion from God knows where and they started firstly with that yellow flag.

Now they have set their minds to a new adventure - creating exactly the same (design wise) flag for Montenegro. Because they do not want to contribute encyclopeadical content, they want to stirr up troubles and fabricize history to meet their agenda.

Clearly you can see that their agenda is showing that Montenegrin people and Serbian people are one of the same. And to colaborate that (by their account even for this day and age - fact) they go to the deepest history where anything could exist or couldn't exist.

Please take this matter under more consideration than just stating that this is not a blatant hoax.

Imbris (talk) 02:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, this is hardly polite and very close to a personal attack. It is true that I based the flag on another one (hey - most maps and flags I created are amended versions of already existing ones, is there anything wrong with that?).
There is absolutely no "fabricization" of history - the first map was claimed to be used by the Serbian Kingdom in its capital of Skopje during the 13th century (and not the Empire, which existed in the 14th) by Angelino Dulcert, a Mallorcan mapmaker, based on some of the old symbols used by the Nemanyiden realm. That is the 'from God knows where' bit. The latter represents the excessively used and since the proclamation of the Serbian Empire the solely used symbol, which was kept by the local Serbian fiefs, like Despot Oliver in Macedonia and the Montenegrin Crnojevics. During the early 16th century, it was preserved by the Ottoman Empire and recorded in the autonomous Sanjak of Montenegro. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 22:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bunchedup.tv

hi, i'd like to ask why this page was deleted. i understand that it was related to blog/website/etc. but i was in the process of editing it as to explaining why it was not simply an "ad" to gather more footprints. can you please explain to me why it was deleted without me having a chance to edit?
Hotmihomia (talk) 05:04, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It satisfies none of the websites notability criteria. Pegasus «C¦T» 05:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hotmihomia go to ANI. He should know how to use the speedy button properly. Otherwise, he should not be admin. --- A. L. M. 15:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of article on Trigent Software

Could you please reinstate my article? I was still editing it, and was adding references to the article before it was deleted.

Thank you.

Fangface6040 (talk) 14:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can tell me right on this page what these references would have been; please reply and I will consider them before deciding. Pegasus «C¦T» 14:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I added my article on Trigent Software, because it is a notable and reputed software company based out of Bangalore. I thought it would be a suitable addition to the following categories:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Software_companies_of_India
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Outsourcing_companies

Similar companies which have wikis under the same categories:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virinchi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aditi_Technologies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zensar_Technologies

External References / Links -
http://www.businesswireindia.com/PressRelease.asp?b2mid=11852 - Press release on Trigent Software being recognized as a Microsoft Gold Partner
http://www.nasscom.in/Nasscom/templates/NormalPage.aspx?id=52318 - NASSCOM interview with the CEO of Trigent Software
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2004_Sept_30/ai_n6218198 - Press release on Trigent Software being awarded CMM Level 4 certification

I would be very happy to accept any suggestions you would make to make this article suitable for publishing.

Thank you, Fangface6040 (talk) 06:24, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may not realise it, but articles that contain mostly material published or written by the company itself - i.e, press releases - are not suitable as reliable sources. As such Trigent Software appears to fail the notability guidelines for companies. A company should have substantial mentions in two or more third-party sources before an article on it is written. Pegasus «C¦T» 11:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of The International Research Institute for Climate and Society page

Hello, May you please give me some advice on measures to take in order to reinstate the entry for The International Research Institute for Climate and Society? In writing the entry, I tried to model it after other, similar institutions (Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Yale School of Forestry, the Earth Institute, Columbia University, etc.) While I realize that some of the text could be toned down, why did it necessitate a complete deletion?

In an effort to salvage as much of the text as possible, are there sections you recommend to remove in order for the entry to be undeleted? Perhaps the list of publications?

Thank you Fionda (talk) 20:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Preferably the article should be re-written using nothing but discussion of this organisation in third-party reliable sources. In its last version the article was no more than a carbon copy of what could have gone on the organisation's website - not at all in keeping with our notability guidelines. Pegasus «C¦T» 10:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response. I don't quite understand how strongly this should apply to an academic research institution (and how, with the exception of Columbia University's entry, it has applied to the others I listed above). Again, I think some areas could have been toned down. But my intention was to capture what the institution is, where it works, what topics it is concerned with and what it has produced thus far (using the institution's web site, which is the most reliable source of this kind of information). I had hoped that others, seeing the entry, would then add/edit this as they deemed appropriate and in the tradition of Wikipedia. Nevertheless, I am willing to start a new entry and proceed more slowly with its development, but I hope that you can suggest areas of the original that were, in your opinion, salvageable in an effort to save time and energy. Thanks Fionda (talk) 17:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Csymeonides

Hi. Thanks for taking care of this user's request for page protection, et al. I had deleted the userpage, and was trying to see if there was another way to meet their needs - looks like it got taken care of anyway. Thanks again, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 14:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you blank pages in my userspace?

Why did you blank a page in my userspace? And why didn't you leave a comment on my talk page or at least an edit comment explaining why? You know, the edit comment functionality and the talk pages are there for a reason...

I am referring to this edit by you.

It was very confusing for me to not find my test code anywhere when I was looking for it.

--David Göthberg (talk) 14:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protection of FA

The FA is being hit heavily and repeatedly. After you unblocked, the previous vandal registered a sock and started vandalizing again.

Since we're still in the middle of this episode, I think it's prudent to keep it protected for a while.

-- ran (talk) 02:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Can you delete User:Save Us 229/monobook.js for me, I was just had my username changed and I don't want this anymore. — Κaiba 15:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Pegasus «C¦T» 15:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but apparently someone made a mistake and deleted User:Kaiba/monobook.js, so I need that restored. — Κaiba 15:20, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also  Done Pegasus «C¦T» 15:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On March 6, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lalit Goel, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

IS this dude your prof?? Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 02:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No... although we're in the same uni. :P Pegasus «C¦T» 03:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Courtney

Hi, you have undone the speedy on Jon Courtney. Could you please tell me why this is not a candidate for speedy? If it requires nomination for 'normal' deletion then I will propose that instead and discuss it. ThanksJustpassinby (talk) 14:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very simple - we speedy delete only if the article matches the criteria on this page. No matching criteria, no speedy deletion. Pegasus «C¦T» 14:38, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

overbrook entertainment

i was not done with that article what is the matter with you ?

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kimchi.sg&oldid=196288561"