Quails' Gate Winery

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

---

Why you delete David Lazzaroni... per A1

Why do you delete my article about David Lazzaroni. It was three lines written and he has been on top 15 in world cup at least 10 times and is because of that notable. So why you deleted it? AlwaysOnion (talk) 19:46, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! AlwaysOnion (talk) 19:54, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Why you deleted The Judas Syndrome??

the band member Phil Vibes of Irate has an international fanbase having played all the major festivals in the european summer tour circuit. Additionally the other members of the group were in bands that lapped around the USA a number of times with dedicated fanbases nation-wide as is evident by the combined almost quater million hits to their myspace pages.

in short, people are interested in what happened to these people.

so can you give the page back and let me finish it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fred Edmund (talk • contribs) 00:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Why you delete The iphone unlock history ??

Codegear (talk) 19:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

ok i read that. but you can remove the ads like text from it instead of removing the entire page! Not all edits on this page are done by me! Codegear (talk) 19:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

GroupSwim Deletion

Greetings - I saw that you deleted the GroupSwim entry I submitted/created because it was advertising. My company, a publicly traded investment firm, is piloting GroupSwim and it shows a lot of promise. GroupSwim has a unique and effective approach to helping us gauge client sentiment. Note that GroupSwim was my second Wikipedia post. My first post, Balsamiq, was also deleted because it lacked "significance" (Balsamiq is a groundbreaking tool for allowing non-technical users easily create mockups). How do you evaluate advertising versus significance? I also see posts on other software applications (e.g. Apple Mail) so is significance based on widespread adoption or something genuinely unique? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkingbking (talk • contribs) 02:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Hagger articles landing on my watchlist

NawlinWiki, a while ago I asked you how various Hagger vandalism articles could have ended up on my watchlist, and as you remember, you didn't know how, but asked me to tell you if I found out. Well, a little while ago I figured out how the articles got there, and the explanation is actually rather simple: those articles got there because articles already on my watchlist were being moved by Grawp and then those new article titles remained on my watchlist after it happened, because when an article that's on your watchlist gets moved, the new title is added to the list, and remains even if it's deleted. Far simpler then I had suspected at the time.--LWF (talk) 04:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Pederasty

I think it is uncalled for to block the article for a month. No one is warring over it, and we may have to do some work on it in the near future. Haiduc (talk) 03:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Liquidity crisis of September 2008

Why did you delete the above article? I see you have restored it now. But why did you delete in the first place?↔NMajdan•talk 19:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

WP:Selective deletion. –xeno (talk) 19:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Another Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For protecting LGBT pages from vandalism and defamation by anonymous users and single-purpose-account vandals. Bearian (talk) 21:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Talk: Prince (musician)

I noticed you'd deleted this page citing vandalism, and restored it soon after. I checked the page and could see no sign of recent vandalism, though an IP had posted an extensive list of Prince's songs which another editor removed. I'm keeping an eye on this page and the article associated with it and I'm curious what you saw that flagged the vandalism deletion. I am assuming that the complete deletion was an error. Thanks 23skidoo (talk) 22:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

• Please disregard the above. I didn't realize you were dealing with a vandalism page move. Good work on fixing that. Cheers! 23skidoo (talk)

The Offspring

Why was the Offspring page protected? There wasn't much vandalism lately before you protected it, so I assume it's probably safe to unprotect it now. Alex (talk) 03:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

A legitimate request to rename an article (H.R. 1424) that you protected has been made on its talk page. The bill was signed into law as Public Law 110-343. (source)   — C M B J   10:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Chess

Thanks for restoring this! -- Philcha (talk) 23:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Move protection

Why did you move protect Power Rangers: Mystic Force?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm wondering what the heck is going on, I noticed you had done the same for Sonic the Hedgehog (character). You've move-protected quite a lot of pages in the last few minutes. What's up? NeoChaosX (talk, edits) 21:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

And now orkut... I see your point, but I'd also like to note the incongruity between preventive move-protection and the available move-protection templates, which give only two reasons for the protection: naming disputes or vandalism. If this practice of preventive move-protection is acceptable (and the community may indeed be shifting towards this direction), perhaps this ought to be brought up, and adjustments made.

You may reply here; I am watching the page. Waltham, The Duke of 16:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Same response -- for pages where there's no real possibility that the title will legitimately need to be changed, and which have a high edit count such that they are highly visible/viewed pages, and where vandal edit summaries can't easily be removed, it seems prudent to me to protect the page. Note that "high visibility page" is now one of the check-box reasons that can be used for page protection. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

This is all very well. Having established that protection of this type is indeed an acceptable practice, I am asking whether you agree that the protection-template system should be updated to cover this option. If you do, I could proceed to initiating discussion on the matter in an appropriate venue. Waltham, The Duke of 20:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Please unprotect Kid Koala for anon editing. Thanks. :) -- Quiddity (talk) 18:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Done. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Dwayne Johnson protection

Hey there! I believe you only meant to add move protection, right? :) Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 21:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Thought so. Keep up the good work :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Bopped Kia

Is Bopped Kia going to be banned? --Joshua Issac (talk) 15:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)