Direct sum of Abelian groups

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The term direct sum of Abelian groups generalizes the concept of the direct sum of vector spaces . It is of great importance for the theory of Abelian groups . If a group can be broken down into a direct sum, the structure of the group is reduced to simpler groups. New groups can be formed from the direct summands. Most structure theorems make a statement about a direct decomposition of groups.

Definitions

  • The Abelian group is said to be a direct sum of two subgroups , if the following two conditions are met.
  1. .
  2. .
In this case it is written . Here referred to the subgroup that only the identity element contains.
  • A subgroup is a direct summand if there is a subgroup are with: . In this case the complement of .
  • means directly indecomposable if and are the only direct summands of .
  • Be a family of subgroups of . The group is called the direct sum of when the following conditions are met.
  1. . The family creates .
  2. For each applies: .
It is written: . Or if .

Explanations, simple sentences

  • They are subgroups of the Abelian group . Then the following statements are equivalent:
    • It is .
    • Each can be clearly written as with .
    • It is and follows from with .
  • If , then the two endomorphisms and have the following property: and . It is the identity .

Homomorphisms provide a way of identifying and recognizing direct summands:

  • Be homomorphisms. Then:
  1. is a monomorphism and is a monomorphism.
  2. If there is an epimorphism , then is .
  3. If there is an isomorphism , then is .
  • The following statements are equivalent for a subgroup :
  1. is a direct summand in .
  2. There is an endomorphism with: and .
  3. If the inclusion map is, there is a homomorphism with .

Examples

  • is a direct summand in every group.
  • Let it be the cyclic group with the associated addition. Be it . Then is . There are and subsets of . Their average is and their sum is . It is for example .
  • The groups of whole numbers and rational numbers are indecomposable. If a prime number , it is directly indecomposable.
  • If the Abelian group has a largest subgroup , then it is directly indivisible. If a prime number, then has the largest subgroup . So it cannot be decomposed directly.
  • Are coprime integers, then is .
  • The last example has a strong generalization: be a group and be with . In addition, be coprime with . Then is .
  • Is , so is , where is. The complement of is by no means clearly determined. For example, it is also for everyone .
  • The last example is more general. Be a natural number. the set of - tuples with components . Next is the tuple that has one here and in other places . Then is .
  • To determine whether a subgroup is a direct summand, there is a simple criterion:
Be . Then the following statements are equivalent.
  1. is a direct summand in .
  2. There is with .

Property 2. of the last sentence has a geometric meaning: The subgroup is a direct summand in if and only if there is a vector such that a parallelogram of area 1 spans.

  • The last statement can be generalized. If so the following applies: is a direct summand in if and only if the numbers have the greatest common factor .

Primary groups

The following theorem makes a statement about the decomposition of torsion groups. For this purpose it is defined: Let be a prime number. The group is called -primarily if and only if everyone has a with . The sum of all -primary subgroups of a group is -primary. It is the largest primary subgroup of . It is denoted by and is called the primary component of . The following applies:

If a torsion group is, then is . It is the direct sum of its primary components.

Universal property

  • Be for two subgroups and the canonical inclusions. They are equivalent:
  1. .
  2. For every two homomorphisms there is exactly one homomorphism with for .

The second statement of the theorem is the so-called universal property of the direct sum. It applies to any index set.

  • Be a family of subgroups with . And be the inclusions. Then are equivalent:
  1. It is .
  2. For each family of homomorphisms there is exactly one with . That means, the following diagram is commutative for all .
Koprodukt-Mehrer-Components.svg
  • Let and be two abelian groups with and . If there is exactly one with and exactly one with for every family , then and are isomorphic.

Some structure sentences

  1. Theorem: If there is a homomorphism, then with and .
  2. Theorem: Each subgroup of is the direct sum of at most cyclic subgroups.
  3. Theorem: If it is torsion-free and generated by elements, then there is a monomorphism .
  4. Conclusion: If there is a torsion-free group generated by elements, then there is a such that is isomorphic to .
  5. If finitely generated, the torsion subgroup is a direct summand of .

Individual evidence

  1. ^ László Fuchs: Abelian Groups. Springer, 2015, ISBN 978-3-319-19421-9 , p. 43.
  2. ^ Frank W. Anderson, Kent R. Fuller: Rings and Categories of Modules. Springer, 1992, ISBN 0-387-97845-3 , p. 66.

literature

Web links

  • Since it is quite tedious to look for the evidence to the facts in the given literature together, evidence is compiled here .