Consider knowledge ethics

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Consider knowledge ethics

Deliberation Knowledge Ethics

description International, interdisciplinary scientific discussion journal
language German, (individual, English-speaking, articles, unknown language, reviews)
publishing company Lucius & Lucius (Stuttgart)
First edition 1990
Frequency of publication Quarterly, volume about 150 A4 pages
Editor Edition group: Frank Benseler , Bettina Blanck, Reinhard Keil , Werner Loh
Web link iug.uni-paderborn.de/ewe
ISSN (print)

Erwägen Wissen Ethik (EWE) was an international and interdisciplinary scientific discussion journal that was published from 1990 to 2015 (initially until 2001 under the title Ethics and Social Sciences - Dispute Forum for Consideration Culture ). In the course of the takeover of the publishing house Lucius & Lucius by De Gruyter Oldenbourg, the magazine was discontinued. It saw itself as a forum for disputes between different schools and directions as well as a forum for inventing, testing and improving rules for a clarification-oriented, contemplative handling of different positions.

Program and design

“The magazine Erwiegen Wissen Ethik (EWE) aims to promote the consideration of diversity.” EWE booklets can contain one or more discussion units. They should take into account the variety of orientations, concepts and arguments represented in the scientific field as comprehensively as possible on the selected topics. A professionally qualified person (or team) writes a main article on the respective topic. Other experts who have dealt with the topic from different disciplines are asked and write reviews of the main article, to which the authors respond in a reply. Examples of discussions are: Evolution - Fundamental Questions and Misunderstandings , Culture and Power - A Comparative Civilizational Analysis , " About the Difficulties of Learning from Mistakes ". Instead of main articles acquired from living authors, a relevant historical text (reprotext) can also be the starting point for a discussion. Second rounds of reviews and replicas follow if there is enough space and time for this.

For the discussion units consisting of the main article, criticism and replica, there were partially synopsis of consideration in which the content and form of the written arguments were reflected. The synopsis should "try to arrange the range of diversity represented and, if necessary, discuss the difficulties that arise". In coordination with the research editorial team, reports on seminars that have worked with discussion units from EWE in a consideration-oriented manner have been published in EWE. EWE wanted to promote the clarification of diversity in education, too, and thereby help bring research and teaching together. "In order to promote clarification processes, research continuities are sought between the disputes."

What is special compared to other scientific journals is, in addition to the special form of written discussion across disciplines, that EWE was designed as a research instrument. Articles in the journal were not selected by means of a peer review process; instead, comprehensive rounds of criticism were intended to promote research processes. According to the EWE statute, the edition group did not have any influence on the content of the contributions, provided that the legal limits were maintained.

EWE

history

The journal Reconciliation Knowledge Ethics was part of the recital culture project , in which - based on a deficit in the sciences in dealing with diversity - a considerative approach to diversity is researched and promoted. The research group considering culture Paderborn were at the beginning of the project in the 1980s, Frank BENSELER to, Bettina Blanck, Rainer Werner Greshoff and Loh. "Its members made the idea of ​​the consideration the programmatic basis for the foundation of the discussion journal" Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften "(EuS), which has been published since 1990." Reinhard Keil has also been co-editor since 1995 . In the 1990s, an expanded interdisciplinary group was formed in which the concept of a consideration orientation in research, teaching and practice was discussed and further developed.

literature

  • Frank Benseler , Bettina Blanck, Rainer Greshoff, Werner Loh: Alternative handling of alternatives. Essays on philosophy and social sciences. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen 1994, ISBN 3-53112-647-4 .
  • Werner Loh (ed.): Consideration orientation in philosophy and social sciences. Vol. 1 of the series: culture of consideration in research, teaching and practice. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart 2001, ISBN 3-82820-151-2 .

Web links

Individual evidence

  1. Lucius & Lucius. Retrieved October 4, 2016 .
  2. a b c d EWE program. Archive link ( Memento of the original from November 10, 2011 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was automatically inserted and not yet checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / iug.uni-paderborn.de
  3. Benseler, Frank; Blanck, Bettina; Greshoff, Rainer; Loh, Werner (1990): Editorial. In: Ethics and Social Sciences (EuS). Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 5–6, p. 5. Archive link ( Memento of the original dated June 10, 2007 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / iug.uni-paderborn.de
  4. Evolution - basic questions and misunderstandings, main article and replica by Ernst Mayr with 29 reviews, EuS 5 (1994) issue 2: pp. 203-279. Archive link ( Memento of the original from March 4, 2011 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / iug.uni-paderborn.de
  5. ^ Culture and Power - A Comparative Civilizational Analysis, main article and replica by Shmuel Noah Eisenstadt with 31 reviews, EWE 17 (2006) issue 1: pp. 3–91. Archive link ( Memento of the original from April 21, 2008 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / iug.uni-paderborn.de
  6. Special issue: Fehler, with 4 main articles and 4 replicas by Klaus Mehl / Theo Wehner, Maria B. Spychiger, Martin Weingart and Christine von Weizsäcker / Ernst Ulrich von Weizsäcker and 18 reviews, EWE 19 (2008) Issue 3: p. 265– 394. http://iug.uni-paderborn.de/ewe/Inhaltsverzeichnis/jahrgang19.htm  ( page no longer available , search in web archivesInfo: The link was automatically marked as defective. Please check the link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.@1@ 2Template: Toter Link / iug.uni-paderborn.de  
  7. EWE statute. Archive link ( Memento of the original from June 10, 2007 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / iug.uni-paderborn.de
  8. Blanck, Bettina (2002): Consideration orientation, decision and didactics. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart, p. 333