Rational illustration

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If and are two irreducible algebraic varieties or schemes , then a rational mapping is a function of an open subset of to . Similar to how mappings of varieties correspond to homomorphisms of the coordinate rings, rational mappings correspond to body homomorphisms of the functional fields of the varieties.

Rational maps are needed to define birational equivalence , an important term for classifying varieties.

Definitions

Regular functions of algebraic varieties

In the following we assume an irreducible affine variety with a coordinate ring . The co-ordinate ring is a domain of integrity, designate its quotient field . The elements from are referred to as rational functions on .

Is and so is regular in called when exist with:

Is , then the set of elements in which is regular is called the domain of , as .

Rational mappings of varieties

denote the n- dimensional affine space over a body k.

Be and varieties over one body . A rational mapping from to is a tuple

with and for everyone

The mapping is called in regular if all in are regular. The domain of is

A rational mapping from to is therefore not entirely defined, but only on an open subset .

Therefore they are also noted with a dashed arrow:

Dominant rational illustrations

Rational maps cannot always be chained together, as the following example shows:

so

because

Concatenation, however, is always possible with dominant rational mappings:

A rational figure

means dominant when there is one in dense crowd.

Birational illustrations

A birational figure

is a rational mapping to which there is a rational mapping

gives with

and

The varieties are then called birational equivalent .

Relation to body homomorphisms

Be

a rational figure. be defined by the ideal . Because of

applies to everyone

Is so

so

so is well defined. A rational mapping therefore induces a mapping

Is

so that's equivalent to

If dominant, then in this case it must be because no function can vanish on a dense set. It therefore applies:

is injective is dominant.

In this case induces a linear body homomorphism

Conversely, a linear body homomorphism can be applied to each

a (thereby uniquely determined) dominant rational mapping

find with

It can even be shown that the star mapping is a contravariant functor that establishes an equivalence between certain categories.

Generalizations

The above definition can be generalized to quasi-affine, quasi-projective and projective varieties through equivalence classes. Now be and affine, quasi-affine, quasi-projective or projective varieties.

Are open sets and and morphisms from and to .

The equivalence relation is defined as follows: is equivalent to if and on match.

A rational figure

is now an equivalence class with respect to this equivalence relation.

A rational mapping is said to be dominant if a (and therefore every) representative has a dense picture.

Examples

Neil's parable

Let be the Neil parabola , which is replaced by the polynomial

is defined. The morphism

is bijective , but not an isomorphism, since the inverse mapping is not a morphism. On lets through

define a rational mapping with

for which applies:

and .

The two varieties are therefore birationally equivalent.

Projection in projective space

The projection

is a rational figure. For n> 1 it is only in the point

not regular.

If n = 1, the figure appears in the point

not to be regular because by definition is

and

But the illustration can be continued at this point, namely the illustration can also be written as

In general, every rational mapping from a smooth curve into projective space is a morphism.

literature