SOEVK model

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Behavior analysis
SR model
SOR model
SORKC model
SOEVK model
Dynamic self-regulation model
plan analysis

The SOEVK model, also known as the SEOVK model, is a model for behavior and condition analysis and a further development of the SORKC model by Frederick Kanfer . The model was expanded to include component E (expectations). In addition, R (reaction) has been replaced by V (behavior). K (contingency) is omitted in the model. Instead, instead of C for the English word "consequence" with a K for the German word Konsequenz. In contrast to the SORKC model, a distinction is also made here between short-term and long-term, internal and external consequences. Accordingly:

  • S - situation or stimulus : physical characteristics such as the presence or behavior of people or the previous behavior of the patient himself.
  • O - organism: genetic disposition or biological dysfunction, learned psychophysiological reaction patterns, effects of medication or drugs, current conditions or acquired deficits.
  • E - Expectations: This includes expectations regarding the situation and of one's own behavior and the consequences, but also the assumed expectations of other people, as well as one's own standards and about one's own behavior in the form of plans and general plans.
  • V - Behavior: This includes motor behavior, but also emotional, cognitive and physiological behavior.
  • K - Consequence: Here, as in the SORKC model, a distinction is not only made between positive and negative consequences. In addition, a distinction is made between short-term and long-term consequences (K k , K l ), but also between internal and external consequences (K i , K e ).

In an extension of the model, the following components are added instead of E (Gisela Bartling, Liz Echelmeyer, Margarita Engberding; 2007):

  • WP - Perception process: This includes orienting, absorbing and coding information
  • IV - internal processing: This includes the interpretation of the situation (attribution, meaning, expectations, conclusions), the evaluation in relation to goals (comparison between actual and target) as well as preparation for action.

At least in this extended model, a distinction is made between internal and external situations (S i , S e ).

The differentiation of the components makes it possible to design interventions for change in relation to each component. For example, one can effect a reality test on the internal processing (IV) through behavioral experiments or an attribution or reassessment through cognitive restructuring .

Individual evidence

  1. a b c d e Anil Batra, Reinhard Wassmann, Gerhard Buchkremer: Behavioral therapy: Basics - methods - areas of application . Georg Thieme Verlag, 2012, ISBN 978-3-13-154974-7 , p. 54–55 ( limited preview in Google Book Search).
  2. ^ A b Hans Henning Studt, Ernst Richard Petzold: Psychotherapeutic medicine: Psychoanalysis - Psychosomatics - Psychotherapy; a guide for clinic and practice . Walter de Gruyter, 1999, ISBN 978-3-11-014498-7 , p. 50–51 ( limited preview in Google Book search).
  3. a b Gisela Bartling, Liz Echelmeyer, Margarita Engberding: Problem analysis in the psychotherapeutic process: guidelines for practice . W. Kohlhammer Verlag, 2007, ISBN 978-3-17-018753-5 , pp. 40–46 ( limited preview in Google Book Search).
  4. Gisela Bartling, Liz Echelmeyer, Margarita Engberding: Problem analysis in the psychotherapeutic process: guidelines for practice . W. Kohlhammer Verlag, 2007, ISBN 978-3-17-018753-5 , pp. 99–100 ( limited preview in Google Book Search).