User talk:Alison: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 54: Line 54:
==You (don't) have email==
==You (don't) have email==
Hope you didn't have to work tommorrow or anything, and you're enjoying the long weekend! [[User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]] 00:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Hope you didn't have to work tommorrow or anything, and you're enjoying the long weekend! [[User:SirFozzie|SirFozzie]] 00:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
: Thanks, Foz! Enjoy the long weekend :) - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#558; font-family: comic sans ms; font-variant: small-caps">'''A<font color= "#7070a0">l<font color= "#9090c0">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] [[User talk:Alison|☺]] 06:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC) (no work till Tuesday)


== [[The Academy Is...]] ==
== [[The Academy Is...]] ==

Revision as of 06:12, 3 September 2007

Archives
2004 Entire year  
2005 Jan • Jun Jul • Dec
2006 Jan • Jun Jul • Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan • Jun Jul • Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Entire year  
2013 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2014 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep • Dec  
2015 Entire year  
2016 Entire year  
2017 Entire year  
2018 Entire year  
2019 Entire year  
2020 Entire year  
2021 Entire year  
2022 Entire year  
2023 Entire year  
2024 Entire year  


Note to self

  • Provide detail / images for Douglas Ousterhout
  • Fix up Kenmare article & add historical details (not Harry Potter stuff)
  • Add stuff to Malahide re. castle and resident family
  • Upload Easter egg painted eggs + pic of traditional German 'Easter Tree' to Commons
  • Sort out some of the Pharma stubs, esp. Category:Hormones of the hypothalamo-pituitary system
  • Add details of OECD report to List of literacy rates article ...
  • Set up new system/templates for dealing with Deletion Review/Content Review admin work
  • Completely rebuild and rehabillitate ga.wiktionary and gd.wiktionary. Learn Scots Gaelic somewhere along the way. Oh yes!
  • Upload pictures of holy wells + shrines, etc to Commons checkY

- Alison 21:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas Ousterhout article tags

I've removed the tags per WP:AfD - If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion. In this case I think notability is not the issue but reliable sources might be, in any case the answer is constructive editing to make the article better. I've left this message for the potential deleter but I suspect the only way to fend of advances will be some reconstructive surgery on the article itself! Benjiboi 10:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleteing comment on Sharon's talk page

Is it OK if I put it back on, only commented out? I think she would like to see it, but if you can't see it without editing the whole page I don't think anyone will edit it.

On a slightly different note the "Wikipedians' Day" on her page is screwed up; pulling days from last month onto it. :/ You probably saw that it says Phaedriel's Day on it—which was a month ago on her birthday… —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  21:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I'd say just pmail her the link with my delete diff in it. As for the Wikipedians page, well ... I'm delighted to say she's back on en.wp now, so she'll probably take it from here :) - Alison 20:55, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pharmacology is currently organizing a new Collaboration of the Week program, designed to bring drug and medication related articles up to featured status. We're currently soliciting nominations and/or voting on nominations for the first WP:RxCOTW, to begin on September 5, 2007. Please stop by the Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week page to participate! Thanks! Dr. Cash 17:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you get any messages asking for information about what's been going on on-wiki in regards to the meme, it's because I informed the relevant WikiProject about the protections and asked them to watchlist the articles for when the protection ends. Give them whatever information you can when asked. -Jéské (v^_^v Kacheek!) 19:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool - no problem. I was involved in the original Mudkip article prot, so I know the full history there - Alison 20:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have mail

... so you do. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 22:56, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

... as do you, so you do! - Alison 23:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't :( One Night In Hackney303
You do now, so stop giving out! :) And lose that dreadful sig - my retinas have just been permanently damaged. Ugh!! - Alison 00:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC) (and it looks decidedly familiar, too)[reply]
I couldn't actually get the HTML to work so it could be a permanent sig, so it's strictly a one off. Go bhóire Dia orainn, 'sé go hainnis ar fad! One Night In Hackney303 00:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bring back the Blink Tag, I say. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 00:25, 3 September 2007 (UTC) (PS, Yes, I know how to and no, I won't) FlowerpotmaN·(t) 00:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You (don't) have email

Hope you didn't have to work tommorrow or anything, and you're enjoying the long weekend! SirFozzie 00:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Foz! Enjoy the long weekend :) - Alison 06:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC) (no work till Tuesday)[reply]

Hey there. I think you may have hit the wrong button when you tried to protect this article just now - the log shows it was *un*protected, and an IP edited right after you did.. Could you take a peek at that? Thanks! Tony Fox (arf!) 05:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's done now :) It got vandalised in between placing the template and the prot & I then went after one of the anons and blocked them - Alison 05:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that - and the template, too, I was about to suggest that one. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Way ahead of ya :) Thanks for putting in all that effort tonight. BTW, almost all those vandal IPs are now blocked. Looks like a concerted campaign from somewhere off-wiki, using the article as a messageboard - Alison 05:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking of socks

Your action in blocking several socks on the Belinda Stronach article is appreciated. I think you missed one of this collection of socks, though: User:Chillin841. I'm not sure whether you know the history of this. The primary account of this user is Michaelm (note the reversal of the letters "ae" in the name of one of the socks). Michaelm is well known for his edits of the Belinda S. article, having kept several editors on the lookout for his stubborn insistence on certain issues (the principle one has been his insistence that she's a socialist). For some reason he has not used the main account much in the past few weeks. Several editors have warned him not to resort to socks. Despite the warnings, the socks have been flooding the article with nonsense. Perhaps we should keep an eye on the primary account. In any case, I thought you might like to know this (in case you weren't already aware). Sunray 06:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've no idea as to the history, but I know socks when I see them! Re. Michaelm; that editor has now been blocked for a week due to abuse of multiple accounts. If they do it again, let me know and they'll get another. Re. User:Chillin841, I didn't block that one as they'd created a (seemingly) unrelated article and only did one revert on the Belinda Stronach article. I'll keep watch on them! - Alison 06:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oops...

Sorry, messed up :( --DarkFalls talk 06:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You did? - Alison 06:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah... --DarkFalls talk 06:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
LOL!!! I never noticed. You should have said nothing :-) - Alison 06:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you Alison! You are great! Can you delete few more? RS1900 06:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I got all the personal stuff. I don't want to delete too much, as that's not appropriate - Alison 06:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK! Anyway, thank you! RS1900 06:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all - Alison 06:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]